If the truth gets out in shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain, “we would have disorder on our hands.”
Indeed. In fact, everyone who has held any significant position of authority there over the last twenty years should be imprisoned for sacrificing the wellbeing of hundreds of thousands of British girls for fear of being called “Islamophobic,” and for initiating and hastening the nation’s suicide.
More on this story. “Chilling moment Afghan asylum seekers drag 15-year-old girl into the bushes before raping her: Pair jailed over ‘horrific’ attack,” by Jack Hardy, Daily Mail, December 8, 2025:
This is the moment two teenage Afghan asylum seekers dragged a screaming schoolgirl towards a dark park where they would rape her.
Small boat migrants Jan Jahanzeb and Israr Niazal, both 17, were on Monday jailed for sexually assaulting the 15-year-old in Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, on May 10.
They were both named following a legal victory by the Daily Mail.
Chilling CCTV released in the wake of their sentencing showed the boys leading their victim across a bridge to a park where they forced her to perform oral sex on them.
In the 20-second clip, the asylum seekers are seen standing menacingly on either side of the girl at around 9.21pm, after luring her away from her friends.
Separate footage captured by the victim on her phone was so appalling that one of the boy’s own barristers warned it would lead to rioting if the public were to see it.
The harrowing three-minute clip showed the girl saying ‘you’re going to rape me’, as she was forced away from the area where she had been happily socialising.
The phone clip, which was played at Warwick Crown Court today, also caught the girl weeping, repeatedly crying ‘help’ and begging not to be taken into the park.
At one point the victim screamed for help, but Jahanzeb placed his hand over her mouth.
She was forced to perform oral sex on the boys in a secluded area next to Newbold Comyn, before she escaped and filmed several further videos describing her ordeal.
The girl was eventually found by a quick-thinking passerby who took her to a nearby police station with him, where officers were able to obtain vital forensic evidence.
Ahead of sentencing the boys today, Judge Sylvia de Bertodano accepted a legal challenge mounted by the Daily Mail and agreed to lift a ban on naming them, which had been imposed due to their age.
Jahanzeb was jailed for 10 years and eight months, while Niazal was jailed for nine years and 10 months, with a deduction to reflect he was younger at the time of the offence.
The young victim, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, bravely attended court with her mother to watch her tormentors be imprisoned.
Passing sentence, the judge said: ‘No child should have to suffer the ordeal (the victim) has suffered. The fact is, you two have robbed her of her childhood and nothing that the sentence of this court and nothing I can do today can restore that.
‘I accept that you come from a place which has significant cultural differences from the UK, however I don’t accept that either of you does not understand the concept of consent.
‘This is a case where it was absolutely clear to both of you that you were talking a child away from her friends in the face of her vigorous protests to somewhere you couldn’t be observed, in order to commit this offence.
‘I’m satisfied you both knew perfectly well that what you were doing was criminal and wrong.
‘You have betrayed the interests of those, like you, who come here fleeing harm and seeking safety and for that you should feel a deep and lasting sense of shame.’…
Joshua Radcliffe, defending Niazal, had earlier sought to oppose the press’s application to lift restrictions on naming the boys by arguing the crime was so appalling it could lead to rioting.
‘It is horrific footage, genuinely horrific footage,’ he said. ‘I have no doubt that if the general public were exposed to that, we would have disorder on our hands.’
Robert Holt, defending Jahanzeb, went further by asking the judge to stop the press from even being able to say the boys were Afghan asylum seekers.
But Sam Rowe, representing the Daily Mail, told the court it was in the public interest for the boys to be named due to national concern about sex crimes being committed by asylum seekers….
Patricia Mott says
Of course he does! They don’t want any truth to be told!
somehistory says
Thes two are psychopaths. they like nothing better than to hear that their actions have done so much damage to the girl and her family. They have no remorse, and they get pleasure from reliving what they did to the child.
And the judge saying they have ‘betrayed the interests’ of others ‘seeking asylum’ by their actions ; even if true,…which it likely isn’t… they don’t give a hoot. Psychopaths care only for themselves.
The “culture” is always mentioned, but what that “culture” is, no one admits. These scum knew exactly what they were doing was against the Law; as the judge pointed to the fact that they lured her away to a dark area out of sight of her friends.
And when she screamed, the slug put his hand over her mouth. They knew full well it was all wrong.
But scummy muzzies get their kicks out of wrongdoing.
And good for the judge is allowing their names….and country of origin….to be published. Now on with naming their “culture” as the filth of islime.
somehistory says
If certain people here in the U.S. have their way, it may mean that the “culture” of these scum won’t be so out of order.
“EXCLUSIVE: Videos Show Bizarre Sexual Ceremony That Elite Amherst College Pushes All First Year Students To Attend
The event, ‘Voices of Amherst,’ is paid for by the administration and takes place in the school’s chapel
Washington Free Beacon”
I could post some of the information…a couple of paragraphs or more….but it is just too disgusting. So, read it if you dare, but know it is really, really, disgusting.
And if my son or daughter attended, I would sue to get my nearly $100 thousand (one year) back. I’d probably need it for therapy for him.
somehistory says
Two centuries ago, the school was started for Christians. Now: from the Beacon…
“The Center for Religious and Spiritual life—which has a Buddhist, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, and interfaith and humanist chaplain—declined to comment on the use of Johnson Chapel for the performance. Amherst does not have a Christian chaplain.”
Walter Sieruk says
There wouldn’t so many vile and heinous rapists and vicious death inflecting Afghan: refugees in the United States right now if Joe Biden hadn’t made that fool or treacherous order to suddenly and completely abandon the land of Afghanistan without gradual transitional period.
Therefore, that despicable President pretender Biden is just as guilty for the death of all those innocent people as those Afghan: refugees who directly murdered them.
KufarDawg says
Your indictment of Bideni all depends on whether or not he was competent to hold the position of POTUS in the 1st place and whether or not he was actually elected at all.
Walter Sieruk says
Those crimes for Muslim criminal acts of rapes have increased in the United States “thanks’ to awful policy that Joe Biden put into action which was his extremely incompetent or wicked treachery of too quickly fast and at the wrong time.
Alkflaeda says
Prayers for the safety of that judge, not only from any Islamic retribution, but also from the UK hierarchy. I’m pretty sure Mr. Lammy won’t approve.
England Invaded says
I mentioned this the other day. I’m actually surprised that their names were released given how bad it is here now. The authorities bend over backwards for these animals.
Usually, anyone under 18 does have their name withheld unless it’s deemed to be appropriate to have it made public.
Maybe the authorities feared a riot if names were withheld given everyone knows it was invading turds.
Just note, these two are older than 17 as well. There are countless of these invaders claiming to be kids in the UK when they are in their 20’s or older.
somehistory says
The eyes tell so much….not just the evil in the soul, but the *age* of the scum.
I have long noticed that even when the rest of the face may appear youngish, the eyes reveal an older person. Like Cher who is nearly 80 but with her surgery, may appear younger.
The eyes are not only the ‘window to the soul,” but hey indicate age, too.
England Invaded says
In the UK, the ‘Paki stare’ has long been noticed. Not limited to Paki ‘slims of course.
Always menacing.
somehistory says
Every photo of the muzzie scum posted to this site reveals so much about them. I have to wonder at the people so blind as to not see.
I was watching an old Dateline show yesterday. I nice young man went missing. He was murdered and left unrecognizable. When the LE found and arrested the perp, it was a Libyan ‘refugee,’ and his eyes were the eyes of a muzzie….even though that part was not mentioned.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
England Invaded
That is good to hear: I was wondering whether the judge in question complied w/ that request. I don’t blame the rapist’s lawyer for asking for that confidentiality: he does have to support the best interests of his client. But I do blame the judges who comply
England Invaded says
Many of our judges are partial to severely chastising any Brit who steps out of line for second. This on top of any sentence given when found to have simply spoken out against the invaders.
While often being so understanding and making excuses for the third world animals who commit the most terrible of crimes.
At least this one did the right thing in allowing the names to come out.
Although, the judge did nothing on the clear fact that these two are older than 17 years. Maybe they couldn’t act.
Walter Sieruk says
Those crimes for Muslim criminal acts of rapes have increased in the United States “thanks’ to awful policy that Joe Biden put into action which was his extremely incompetent or wicked treachery of taking the US armed forces out of Afghanistan too quickly fast and at the wrong time.
rick says
This nonsense is based on the fact that word is out that Britain is so Woke that it doesn’t
want to sentence Muslims for rape. SO maybe if language is amended these two 17 year old slime-balls will get off scott free.
Maybe his attorney will also want the press to remove the word “Rape”.
And use “Bother” instead.
Instead of using “Afghanistan” for them just call him “Slime-balls”. Would that be ok counselor?
And if playing the horrible tape of her rape would lead to citizens going out on a good old US style Lynching Party, that sounds like that is exactly what Britain needs to reverse their mousy reputation.
James Lincoln says
According to the feature article:
“Robert Holt, defending Jahanzeb, went further by asking the judge to stop the press from even being able to say the boys were Afghan asylum seekers.”
In other words, he wants mainstream media outlets to not tell the truth.
Since they rarely do, that shouldn’t be a heavy lift…
gravenimage says
UK: Attorney for Muslim migrant rapist asks judge to stop media from reporting his client is Afghan asylum seeker
………………………………………………
So the solution to rape and illegal immigration is not allowing anyone to report on it? So glad the judge shot this down.
Eddie says
The rape of British girls by immigrants continues and the cover ups continue.
Or as in this case, the restriction on information that the public may be further enraged by.
The Government’s promised Rape gang enquiry is likewise constantly stalled and inactive. Not even got off the ground.
The UK Government desparately needs that Islamophobia defintion enshrined in Law. Criticism of muslims will then not be allowed officially.
Removes not the problem – but the ability to even mention it.
Clever
OLD GUY says
These young muslim men are just doing what their mosque taught them to do. The rape of non-islamic girls and women is applauded by Islam. For Islam rape is a form of terrorism of your enemies daughters and wives. Islam is at war with the rest of mankind and they will do anything and everything to destroy non-islamic followers.