The Iranian regime is a scourge to its own people, Israel and to the West, so to see it fall would be an occasion of celebration. According to Trump:
Iran was “a few weeks away” from developing a nuclear weapon before Israel launched strikes last week…adding that he now seeks “total and complete victory,” not a ceasefire.
But the question of what comes after is another matter. While regime change is not the same thing as nation-building, it is understandable why so many want the current regime to fall. In reading the plethora of reports circulating about the Iranian Islamic regime’s downfall, there is no certainty about what might replace the regime should it fall. One needs also to keep in mind that a majority of Western media has long become activist media, and given their anti-Israel bias, they lack credibility in reporting and analysis.
French President Emmanuel Macron also weighed in, but he is a leftist globalist who has shown little good will to Israel given the historic truth about its deadly enemies. Macron is not so fond of his own country, either, given his open-door immigration policies. He has not protected Western interests; also, he has a habit of calling for “ceasefire” whenever Israel justifiably and prudently retaliates against its enemies and is winning. He did ask one reasonable question, however, that highlights the uncertainly of the fall of the Iranian regime: “Does anyone think Iraq in 2003 or Libya a decade later were good ideas?” Although a valid point for discussion, every situation is different. Iraq and Libya were not nuclear states, and Iran is perhaps the only country where many of its people were celebrating Israeli attacks on their own country.
As Iran continues to grapple with political unrest and calls for reform, Reza Pahlavi, the crown prince of Iran, is an important figure in discussions and debate about the future of Iran. His role could become increasingly central as he provides needed insight, direction and even a possible future role for himself in an Iran free of its current regime. Not only has Netanyahu stated that Israeli attacks “pave way for Iran regime change,” but Pahlavi is calling for regime collapse.
The Islamic Republic has come to its end and is collapsing. What has begun is irreversible. The future is bright, and together we will turn the page of history. Now is the time to stand up; the time to reclaim Iran. May I be with you soon. pic.twitter.com/qrbnDmf8SX
— Reza Pahlavi (@PahlaviReza) June 17, 2025
In 2013, Reza Pahlavi established the National Council of Iran in Paris, comprised of an exiled opposition group. He now lives in America, where he has long been an active voice for regime change in Iran for secularism, human rights and democracy. That vision is a solid one, which will certainly be backed by the dissidents of Iran, by Israel and the US, unlike in the cases of Libya and Iraq, where regime-change efforts lacked vision and a solid plan.
The well-known Iranian-Canadian human rights advocate Shabnam Assadollahi, who was arrested and imprisoned at age 16 for eighteen months in Iran’s most notorious prison, Evin, gave me a statement on Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi’s role in leading Iran’s transition:
Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi is a legitimate and unifying figure, widely recognized by Iranians—particularly those inside Iran—as the trusted leader to guide the country through the critical transition following the fall of the Islamic Republic’s occupying regime. For decades, millions of Iranians have upheld the memory and legacy of the Pahlavi era not only with nostalgia but with renewed calls for national revival, justice, and secular governance.
During nationwide uprisings, particularly in 2017, 2019, and 2022, powerful chants such as «رضاشاه، روحت شاد» (“Reza Shah, may your soul be blessed”) and «ولیعهد کجایی، به داد ما بیایی» (“Crown Prince, where are you? Come to our aid”) resounded across cities and villages alike—despite brutal repression. These are not empty slogans; they are a direct mandate from a people yearning for principled leadership and national sovereignty.
The Iranian people have called upon Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi to lead the transitional phase and prepare the country for a genuinely free, fair, and democratic election—one conducted without interference from the United Nations or any foreign entities whose historical involvement has either empowered theocratic tyranny or compromised Iran’s independence. The future of Iran must be decided by Iranians alone.
Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi has repeatedly emphasized his commitment to secular democracy, human rights, and unity across ethnic and religious lines, positioning him as a transitional figurehead—not for personal power, but for the restoration of a democratic republic or constitutional monarchy, as freely chosen by the Iranian people.
Now more than ever, as the occupying regime loses its grip, the people’s voice is clear: the path forward must be rooted in national dignity, historical continuity, and self-determination. Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi embodies these principles and stands ready to serve—not rule—the people of Iran in this historic transformation.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
At this point, regime change in Iran looks inevitable, and the US should absolutely avoid doing anything to salvage the Ayatollah. I watched a couple of interviews w/ Iranian expats in the US, and they pointed out that the only reason there wasn’t a revolt was that each time the regime was humiliated by Israel or anyone else, they’d take their wrath out on the Iranian people. As a result, people want to make sure that if they revolt, that this time they really will win, and not be at the receiving end of repercussions later. She also pointed out that when Mahsa Amini, a Kurdish woman, was killed, there were protests all over the country by Iranians of all ethnicities, so that it’s not like the country would come apart at the seams
https://youtube.com/watch?v=vFHhxKcCH3c
I was watching an interview of Martha McCallum of Reza Pahlavi, and was convinced by him that blowing up Fordow would be counterproductive. The presumptive Shah pointed out that bombing that reactor could result in a major nuclear contamination of the place, but that if the regime falls, it won’t even be necessary. He pointed out that parts of the military have told him that they are ready to defect, and that an increasing number of people are starting to revolt, and that once the regime collapses, that reactor can be decommissioned w/o needing to cause an environmental disaster
https://youtube.com/watch?v=BCjJdkOqhTg
Winston 101 says
Radioactive contamination is a very real consequence to consider. The blow back from the explosion could bring radioactive materials up to the surface and scatter them far and wide. This is a different situation from the radiation considerations of Hiroshima & Nagasaki. That radiation was the result of airbursts, where the radiation was dispersed into the atmosphere. This is why you can visit those sites today. Glad to hear Pahlavi bring this to the fore of discussions.
It’s good to see people thinking, literally, about what happens next.
GBU -57, penetrating bunker busters may not be usable but could the non penetrating M.O.A.B. be used? Like the ones used in Afghanistan. Could the shockwaves collapse the hollow cavities of the facilities under the mountain?
However it’s done, complete dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program must be completed. Nothing left in place, in case the winds change, yet again, like in Turkey.
somehistory says
Some might find this interesting:
“Iran’s supreme leader mocked mercilessly after bizarre social media posts resurface”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/iran-s-supreme-leader-mocked-mercilessly-after-bizarre-social-media-posts-resurface/ar-AA1H6Uo7?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=f360ecd314184ad786f1622dce8c1f5a&ei=78
somehistory says
“Desperate Iran ‘may activate sleeper agents in the US’ in last attempt to beat Israel”
“Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei may be attempting to activate terrorist “sleeper cells” across the West as he continues to make inflammatory statements rejecting Donald Trump’s calls for surrender, Middle Eastern experts have said.
According to Henry Jackson Society research fellow Barak Seener, Khamenei may be turning to terrorist Iranian sympathizers across the world as he runs out of traditional resources. While satellite images have uncovered Iran’s underground nuclear bases.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/desperate-iran-may-activate-sleeper-agents-in-the-us-in-last-attempt-to-beat-israel/ar-AA1H61pc?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=2494e96d5de4435e9116e78da35742c7&ei=47
Troybeam says
Question for thought: will the son follow in his fathers footsteps to give the people of Iran freedom?
President Carter did a disservice to Iran when he helped oust the Shah and put in Khamenei.
The old regime is falling yet how many inside of Iran want to continue with the current status of strict sharia law? Tick tock, time will tell.
Bret says
Hopefully a regime change will be implemented by the Iranian people. It needs to be secular, not because Christianity is bad but because the leading religion in the middle east is Islam. Unfortunately, Islam will again arise in time and again they will have to be defeated once more. That is what Muslims have done since Mohammed. America has beaten back the rise in socialism and socialist in the early 1900s, the 1940s the 1960,s and now as this is written. Look for the hammer and sickle flags at the LA riots. Socialism is their goal. Freedom is never permanent unless it is continually fought for
gravenimage says
Iran’s Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi says a transition plan is in place if Khamenei falls
………………………………..
Still not really sure what Iranians want. W’ve been hearing for the past 45 years that they are posed to oust the Mullahs. I *hope* this is true, but am no longer counting on it.