The left’s flawed sense of reality, its shoddy reasoning, and its routine false equivalences are evident here. The leftist media’s coverage of the Gaza war focused on the numbers of the dead in Gaza, which were compared to the numbers of the dead in Israel. Scant, if any, mention was made of the use of human shields, nor of Hamas’ intent (along with that of the entire Palestinian resistance). There was also immediate amnesia about who the aggressor was on October 7.
The left is characterized by a thoroughgoing absence of reasoning and clarity, even to the point of blurring the lines of defining a man and a woman.
How can one possibly compare the freedom of expression overall to someone visiting the Oval Office or being welcomed on Air Force One? One is a constitutional right; the other is a privilege.
Also, did the leftist media forget that in August, while Joe Biden was president, at least 442 reporters “lost their credentials since the White House press office” suddenly “changed its rules for journalists to be eligible for permanent passes”?
But now the leftist media is screaming foul over the AP ban, while applauding the actual crackdowns on the freedom of speech that are taking place in Germany.
“‘There’s a difference between…’: JD Vance slams journo Mehdi Hasan for likening White House ban to attack on free speech,” by Gulshan Parveen, WION, February 18, 2025:
US Vice President JD Vance and the American journalist Mehdi Hasan exchanged heated words on the internet over free speech. It all started when Hasan tagged Vance in a post on the social media platform X, which talked about the White House ban on the news agency Associated Press for not using the changed name of Gulf of Mexico.
Taking a dig at Vance’s latest remarks at the Munich Security Conference, Hasan wrote, “Hey JD Vance, I know you’re busy lecturing the Europeans on free speech, but have you seen this?”
Vance replied in the comments to Hasan, describing the difference between not giving a seat to a reporter and jailing people for their views.
“Yes dummy. I think there’s a difference between not giving a reporter a seat in the WH press briefing room and jailing people for dissenting views. The latter is a threat to free speech, the former is not. Hope that helps!” Vance wrote in his response. ….
Eva says
The more I see of this man, the more I like him.
I think Trump chose his Veep wisely.
Billy says
Vance is terrific but Mehdi Hassan is another Muslim deceiver seeking to Islamize America and the West under Islamic Law, Sharia. Under Islamic Law, it is a Crime against Allah for Muslims to neglect performing Terrorism against Non-Muslims; Jihad means warfare against Non-Muslims to ESTABLISH THE RELIGION, ISLAM(Quran 9:29; Muslim Law Manual – “Reliance of the Traveller”, o9.0 and more).
OLD GUY says
He may make a good future President.
Hoi Polloi says
The opening alone was gold. I’m liking Vance more with every punch he throws.
Mehdi-evil also posted “Make American Planes Crash Again” on X, apparently thinking he’d get no blowback from that either. Of course he claimed it was just a joke.
somehistory says
Yes, HP, the “dummy” part is gold.
The mozlum goon claimed, after “backlash,” that it was ”a joke,” ‘a poor choice of words,’ and the backlash was due to the ‘phobia.’
The “dummy” hasn’t yet gotten to know his “limitations.” Perhaps Mr. Vance can assist him in learning.
soda says
Agreed, getting insulted by the 2nd most powerful man in the world should be a wake-up call for Medhi.
I bet Medhi thought he could take pot-shots and never expected Vance to repond, given his position.
So I’m glad he got put in his place. There’s millions of terrorist-loving idiots like Medhi out there, he speaks for. I have zero sympathy for him and he got someone fired for making a joke about the Hezbollah terrorists so Medhi to me is just another Osama bin Laden type…I think Vance sees him the same way.
This showdown btw the West and Islam is inevitable…I hope our elites figure out that Islam is an enemy ideology and has no place in our countries and we can start deporting them all.
Hoi Polloi says
Yes to both. The sooner this showdown begins, the better; I agree with everyone here. The UK’s and the EU’s surrender proves that it’s hardly too early. The arrogance of Mehdi-evil is proof that islam is confident that the US will fall just as easily and Vance is clearly telling him with this retort that we won’t.
Anthony Fernandes says
Why is this Islamic terrorist admitted to the US – you Americans are accepting Trojan Horses by the thousands
somehistory says
It’s not “Americans accepting”…it has been the foul, fetid, *leaders* such as bo and biden, who have invited them in.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I agree w/ all of you, but I’m not sure that the VP should have been the one to respond. Probably better an underling either in the Vice President’s office, or Karoline Leavitt, or even better, some Conservative media observer, like Joe Concha or Alex Marlow
Hoi Polloi says
Well, I can’t know what’s in Vance’s mind but I’d like to think he’s making clear that he’s speaking with full backing from his boss and taking personal pleasure in a) painting a solid contrast to his predecessor Ms. Word-Salad-Hyena-Laugh, and b) putting entities on notice that what went before will not be tolerated now.
Billy says
Islam is a totalitarian system of deceit and propaganda as taught by Allah in the Quran(Quran 3:54; 7:99; 8:30; and more).
Islam and its Muslims fund, promote, and practice ideological subversion, propaganda, bigotry, discrimination, deceit, supremacy, segregation, hatred, violence, and terrorism as taught in Islamic Law and in Islam’s Quran, and Muslim actions should be legally challenged with a multi-faceted force of Western Laws like Muslims wield against Americans and Westerners. Like a Foreign Terrorist Organization(FTO) designated by the USA Secretary of State, Islam is a MUSLIM TERRORIST ORGANIZATION(MTO) fighting against Non-Muslims and NOT A PEACEFUL religion under Western Law because Islam funds, teaches, and promotes a Terrorist, Criminal Organization with Muslims as Terrorists for Allah. Under Islamic Law, it is a Crime against Allah for Muslims to neglect performing Terrorism against Non-Muslims; Jihad means warfare against Non-Muslims to ESTABLISH THE RELIGION, ISLAM(Quran 9:29; Muslim Law Manual – “Reliance of the Traveller”, o9.0 and more). More specifically, Islam is a Muslim Terrorist Ideology and Murderous, Criminal Enterprise of intolerance, continuous war, discrimination, segregation, supremacy, genocide, polygamy, propaganda, deceit, hatred, incitement, sedition, rape, terrorism, and violence against all Non-Muslims as taught in the Quran(Quran 2:216; 4:65,89,95; 5:14; 8:12,39,74; 9:5,21,29,36, 41,49,88,111,123; 21:92; 49:15 and more).
Non-Muslims CANNOT have peace with Islam and its Muslims because Islam and its murderous god, Allah, demand a continuous Muslim war, a religious duty, against unbelievers where Non-Muslims are CRIMINALS for making WAR ON ALLAH due to UNBELIEF when Allah in Qur’an 8:39 says, “And engage in war with them[Non-Muslims] until there will not be sedition and the religion will be completely to Allah…” HENCE, NON-MUSLIMS MUST MAKE ISLAM, ITS MOSQUES, ITS SCHOOLS, ITS ORGANIZATIONS, ETC. ILLEGAL UNDER THE LAW. Similarly, Islam and its many Organizations must be identified and publicly declared to be MUSLIM TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS(MTO) for their funding, teaching, and support of terrorism, violence, and discrimination against Non-Muslims(eg. Quran 9:5,29,111 and more).
Isabella Hale says
J.D Vance does understand the difference: the extremely skewed left wing media along with the brainwashed Islamists who have lived under a theocracy has a ONE DIMENSIONAL view of what “American free speech means” does NOT UNDERSTAND what “free speech” means. I also noted the German “representative” at one of the conferences CRIED in response to J.D Vance’s comments. I thought to myself: (I am half German, my mother and I were born there.. father was Army).. post ww2.. the German people have totally lost their culture and Identity and apparently all the men are now BETA MALES.. Wow. As we say in AMERICA.. WE WON! suck it up. all outta kleenex.
somehistory says
“EMERGENCY PODCAST: Save ‘Baby Sparrow’ from the Taliban | The Glenn Beck Podcast | Ep 246”
https://www.glennbeck.com/glenn-beck-podcast/save-baby-sparrow?utm_source=glenn-dailyPM&utm_medium=
Blougeoisie says
Mehdi also needs to realize any Arab country outside the peninsula is colonialism and that Mecca not being open to non Muslims is apartheid
tgusa says
No one is denying the left their right to say what they want even though much of the country is sick of hearing from the lying bastards.
Naya says
Our thoughts are with Syria’s Grand Mufti, Dr. Ahmad Badr Al-Din Hassoun, a man of peace and humility, whose house was recently attacked in Aleppo, but who is now safe outside of Syria.
Hassoun is emblematic of an anti-sectarian, pluralist, unified Syria, explaining to investigative reporter Eva Bartlett in 2018 that
‘In Syria, there are 23 million Christians, and 23 million Muslims. My title is Grand Mufti of the Syrian Arab Republic, not the Mufti of a particular denomination.’” (1)
His statement reflects those of most Syrians who do not define themselves in terms of religious labels and associations, who reject sectarian hatred, extremism and terrorism — all products and instruments of Western Regime Change operations.
I remember meeting Syria’s Grand Mufti Hassoun years ago, in 2016, as Syria was being besieged by Western-supported sectarian terrorists, the same ones who now claim to govern Syria. He said then that profiting from arms manufacturing should be illegal.
He was right. War profiteering has been a significant driver behind the war on Syria, as it is with NATO expansionism.
What Dr. Hassoun may have overlooked at the time is the pernicious role of International Finance as leading war profiteers.
International Financial Institutions helped set the stage for the war on Syria in the first place. Prof. Michel Chossudovsky notes in “SYRIA: NATO’s Next “Humanitarian” War?” that IMF guidance in 2006 included austerity measures, a freeze on wages, the deregulation of the financial system, trade reform and privatization … leading to unemployment, “social unrest and mass protest.” (2)
Syrians were (by design) ripe for productive change, but not the fake “revolution” and Western-imposed sectarian carnage that would soon dismantle their country.
Now that the elected government has fallen, with al Qaeda posing as the new government, International Financial Institutions are again circling Syria like vultures, keen to profit from Syria’s Western-imposed misery.
According to SANA news, “a roadmap for the economic vision” was discussed at a recent conference in Saudi Arabia, where the conference addressed “reintegration of the Central Bank of Syria into the international system, and the representation of Syria in the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.”
Importantly, prior to the Western-imposed Regime Change War, Syria reportedly had NO EXTERNAL DEBT. (3)
International Financial Institutions, seemingly far-removed from the mass death and misery that they helped to orchestrate, are in fact some of the key (though largely hidden) villains that will profit from the demise of Syria as a sovereign, pluralist, anti-sectarian nation. Big Finance loans and conditionalities will dictate much of Syria’s political-economy, largely hidden from view.
Tolerance and pluralism are increasingly unwelcome in the “New Syria” fronted by al Qaeda/HTS’ Al-Sharaa.
Largely unseen bad actors have played an important role in this well-planned catastrophe.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
While on the subject of Mehdi Hassan, he did a tweet a few days ago about the bodies of the Bibas family which raised suspicions: how did he know that? This was before Hamas started announcing that they were dead, and that the bodies would be handed over. I think it’s time Mehdi gets arrested and investigated for terrorist ties, particularly to Hamas (which I’m guessing he has courtesy his employer al Jazeera)
And of course, Mehdi loves the pro-islamic censorship going on in Europe, particularly Germany, Sweden and Britain
somehistory says
I agree, Infidel. He needs to be investigated and arrested as a supporter of terror.
In the past few weeks, there have been several plane crashes…NY, AZ, one from the U.S. in Canada, a Navy jet in the Pacific and one other which I can’t recall the location.
The mozlum was calling for more American plane crashes. Are there molzums involved in these?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
He may simply have been gloating at the air crashes. In the absence of al Qaeda’s ability to penetrate our air traffic like they did on 9/11, these are the closest things that he can root for
Incidentally, that too is his First Amendment right. Just like Bill Maher, another scumbag, had the right to root for the US economy to crash so that Trump got voted out of office. This was even before Covid
somehistory says
It’s their ‘right’ but it just shows what evil is in their arrogant hearts.
There are still many mozlums working at airports and there are mozlums in the military.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Oh yeah, that’s a given. It’s only news to those people who have no idea of what either islam is, and therefore, what muslims are
Rarely says
Lack of Freedom of the Press or not it’s pretty childish and petty for punishing AP for not calling the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America. The obvious implication is …
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Every geographical entity is named after the country that it is in. Like Canada split the Northwest Territories and carved out Nunavut. Should others have refused to recognize it and kept calling Nunavut Northwest Territories anyway?
The Gulf of Mexico is surrounded by both US and Mexico. As it is, Latin Americans don’t like it when US citizens call ourselves Americans, since they think that name applies to all inhabitants of both North and South America. So while Trump may have used “America” in “Gulf of America” to mean the US, those countries, including Mexico, could have used America to mean the entire American super-continent – both North & South America
All that aside, AP thinks it’s okay to use terms like “gender assigned at birth”, “cisgendered” and push preferred pronouns in their style-guides, but they have a problem going w/ this demand from the US? How do they treat the Gulf – do they call it the “Persian Gulf” or the “Arabian Gulf”? The way Google does it w/ Google Maps is that if the phone/computer or whatever device w/ a GPS is in Iran, it’s called Persian Gulf. If in any Arab country, it’s called Arabian Gulf. Outside those two, it says “Persian Gulf (Arabian Gulf)”. For the body of water surrounded by Mexico, TX, LA, MS, AL & FL, it says “Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)” if outside both US & Mexico
As for the AP, nobody has a right to be on Air Force One, or invited to any Oval Office ceremonies. AP is still there in the White House briefing room, like everyone else. What these companies like AP, CNN, MSNBC resent is that a whole lot of other people and organizations are being recognized by the While House Press Office as journalists and being given the same importance as they are, and they are no longer treated as members of an exclusive club. Being banned from Air Force One or the Oval Office is just icing on that cake
Mehdi Hasan was bitching about AP not having that special status any more. Incidentally, why would foreign news agencies, even ones that employ American journalists, be entitled to entry in the White House Press Office? The first dibs on that ought to go exclusively to American news organizations, and after that, the Press Secretary can decide which, if any, foreign news organizations would be given the privilege of attending their press conferences
Rarely says
Rationalize it any way you wish…it’s still childish (and petty).
somehistory says
Ah, “childish”….used as an insult. But it isn’t really bad to be “childish”….My soon-to-be eight year old granddaughter doesn’t miss anything. She listens, she questions, she observes and notices things that adults around her completely miss.
Freedom of the press means they can print what they wish and the government can’t clamp down on them except under certain conditions.
It doesn’t mean that they can’t be restricted as to access.
Did you have like comments about biden’s press people not allowing some reporters, not calling on some, etc.?
As to whether it’s “petty”….the admin gets to decide what importance is put on the name used to designate a body. Mr. Trump sees an importance to the gulf being named something that, had it been so two-hundred years ago, none of the complainers would be complaining.
Rarely says
somehistory.
Gotta love your granddaughter. Maybe she’ll become a great journalist some day with her inquisitive mind.
Re: Biden. I’m not in favour of limiting press because one doesn’t like their political positions. For other reasons …yes.
Of course it’s a privilege, if you like, to be included in the press corps covering the POTUS — it can be revoked for no reason at all.
BUT to revoke it because they call the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of Mexico is just plain childish and petty.
“Follow my dictates, however minor or irrelevant, and I’ll punish you”.
Great way to decide who’s in the press corps.
Great way to make friends and influence people.
Great way to govern.
somehistory says
Thank you for the “granddaughter” comment. She already paints and writes stories. Has been doing those things since the age of about two. So, an artist, not a newsperson, most likely.
The thing is, every president does things that displease some people. Just as every human does things that others who know them, dislike. It’s just that the U.S. president has such a high profile.
If G. Washington had called the body ‘Gulf of America, who would care today?
At least, Mr. Trump is not insisting that everyone call it what he said, as biden and his cohorts did about the whole ‘pronoun’ thing.
The gulf does touch many miles of the U.S. of America.
Rarely says
somehistory.
Maybe your granddaughter will write and paint. Dr. Suess watch out.
The “pronoun thing” was ridiculous and I feel is totally idiotic.
Gotta laugh at the term “they” that’s somehow considered neutral and singular. With the wide variety of given names I have never heard before and which do not connotate a particular sex I find many news articles confusing.
I like Jordan Peterson’s approach to the multi-gender issue.
somehistory says
Yes, Rarely, “they” once meant more than one person. And I have thought often about “The House of They.”
When the name is not the usual American name, I too, get confused as to whether male or female. Some writers of ‘news articles,’ are written by people who are not very good at their chosen work. Misspellings, lack of proper punctuation, etc. make me wish for former times when writers actually had the ability to keep my mind focused on the article and not the pathetic writing.
One thing which has often caused gritted teeth is with the use of “myself” and “yourself” instead of me and you. Or I and you.
Instead of “I and a several others,” they’ll say, “Myself and several others.” and “One such as you,” it’s “One such as yourself,” Arrrggghh.
Rarely says
somehistory.
Continuing to call the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of Mexico in its articles is a very, very minor thing and yet it has been so infuriating as to cost THE top US news service a spot in the POTUS media troop. Now THAT is petty and childish. I suppose it’s intended to keep the press perfectly in line if such a minor thing could raise such anger.DO AS I SAY…OR ELSE. It’s a good thing AP didn’t suggest that Russia was the agressor and not the Ukraine or the big cheeses might be investigated by the new FBI.
Very childish and petty but also very telling.
Rarely says
BTW. AP appears to be an American news agency headquartered in NYC.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Okay, I stand corrected on that one
The Istanbulian says
I thought dead naming was a criminal offense these days…
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Good catch 👌