The imam of the New Orleans jihadi’s mosque, Eiad Soudan, according to the Jerusalem Post, “has accused Jews of using usury to exploit and take control of the economy wherever they went.” He also said that “Hitler hated the Banu Israil so bad, because of the economy thing, they were in control of the economy,” and added: “So those who say that only the Banu Israil paid the price — everybody paid the price, they say thousands of Muslims were killed.”
Eiad Soudan doesn’t want the world to limit its sympathies to the Jewish victims of the Holocaust, when there are so many others, including Muslims, who suffered during the war. And besides, he tells us, the Jews’ rule over the world’s economy means there was a valid reason for the Nazis wanting to eliminate them.
The mosque Jabbar attended is not about to help in the investigation of Jabbar; it has asked is members not to respond to questions from the media. And if the FBI tries to interview any members of the mosque, they should not answer, but refer the FBI to the Council on American Islamic Relations, or to the Islamic Society of Greater Houston, whose leaders will know how to best handle — that is, explain away or deny altogether — any attempt to link them to Jabbar.
“Imam at mosque connected to New Orleans terrorist says Jews exploit usury to dominate economies,” Jerusalem Post, January
In another statement posted to social media following the New Orleans attack, the ISGH said that it was “horrified” by the event and condemned the “act of terror” as “pure evil.”
But why should the ISGH be”horrified” when one of its members does what the Qur’an commands, and proceeds to strike at and kill Disbelievers? What was it about Jabbar’s act that made it so “horrifying”? Was it, perhaps, the way his act has aroused, quite rightly, more suspicions about Muslims and the ideology of Islam? And if it was so horrifying, why did the ISGH not express at once its desire to cooperate fully with the FBI? Indeed, why did CAIR and ISGH balk at their members providing information about Jabbar’s attendance at his neighborhood mosque, the Masjid Bilal, including any signs that he took to heart certain violent verses in the Qur’an, or about the contents of the khutbas delivered by the Imam Eiad Soudan, whose virulent antisemitism was on display in the sermon he gave about Jewish financial power and the desire, he claimed, of all countries to keep the Jews in “Palestine,” a videotape of which MEMRI managed to obtain?
The ISGH also sent its condolences to the families of those killed, stated it was praying for the quick recovery of those hurt, and encouraged anyone with relevant knowledge to be in contact with law enforcement authorities.
The ISGH’s ostentatious display of sympathy for the victims, and its reversal of policy, by now calling on its own members to contact law enforcement authorities directly if they have any relevant information, does not jibe with its earlier statement, that directly contradicts that advice. Following the attack, media reports cited a social media post by Masjid Bilal, urging members not to respond to inquiries from the media. If approached by the FBI, the statement read, community members should refer to CAIR or ISGH. Now it is telling them to “be in contact with law enforcement authorities.” Clearly, it must have realized that its first remark — trying to prevent cooperation of its members with the police — had aroused such fury and suspicion that it had to reverse course.
And it did.
One hopes the police will take a careful look at what the Masjid Bilal’s imam preached, not just about the perfidious Jews, their usury, their power, but about other Infidels as well. One of the exceptions to the First Amendment right of free speech is the Brandenburg test (Brandenburg v. Ohio), which says that speech can be prohibited if it is “directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action”; and if it is “likely to incite or produce such action.” Let’s see if the Imam Soudan’s sermons sound as if they could well have contributed to the “imminent lawless action” of Shamsud-din Jabbar. And if so, could Imam Soudan be arrested for influencing Jabbar to commit mass murder?
Questions for study and discussion.
somehistory says
They also denied that jabbar went to their barracks. The one goon said that he was not recorded as attending any of the barracks in Houston.
Referring the LE to the mozlum lawyers of cair, means that the mozlums have something to hide.
CaliphMj says
source?
gravenimage says
The Mosque told its congregants not to speak to the media or law enforecement, but to refere them to CAIR:
“A mosque near the Houston home of Shamsud-Din Jabbar, who police say carried out the New Year’s Day attack in New Orleans, has urged its congregation not to respond to media inquiries and to refer to other Islamic organizations if contacted by the FBI…”
https://www.newsweek.com/shamsud-din-jabbars-local-mosque-responds-new-orleans-terror-attack-2008437
Why pretend that this is not the case, when it is so easily proven? This is very poor Muslim trolling. You need to up your Taqiyya…
somehistory says
g,
thanks for the link to the Newsweek article.
I noticed down below this advice, and I agree:
“Mike Davis, a lawyer who supports President-elect Donald Trump, wrote on X: “The Trump 47 Justice Department must investigate @CAIRNational.”
Also, “The Islamic Society of Greater Houston said Jabbar was not a formal member at any of its 21 mosques in Houston.”
https://jihadwatch.org/2025/01/houston-muslims-say-new-orleans-jihad-massacre-has-no-place-in-islam-worry-about-islamophobia
Quoting , The Texas Newsroom,
CaliphMj says
taqiyya does not mean lying ignorant
you evidence contradict what you said and it did not says mosque it people not to speak to law enforecement just only media you didn’t even prove what somehistory saids and notice how you say a mosque not a mosque near his house
and
Speaking to Newsweek a spokesperson for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said they were aware of the post but hadn’t yet talked to the mosque about its authenticity.
James Lincoln says
CaliphMj,
Try using Google – or Bing.
CaliphMj says
try using google or bing to debunk that
somehistory says
Your lies will get no traction here. No one will be persuaded to believe anything you write.
Everyone to whom you have commented or replied, is fully aware that islam is evil from the inside out, having not one virtue, nor one thing to recommend it.
So, go try out your lies someplace else; better yet, flee the filth of islam by rejecting the book of demonic filth which comes from the lying demon, satan the devil. You’ll be the better person for doing that. Stop listening to the mozlum clerics and their evil threats, boasts, bragging and lies. Cleanse your mind and soul. Leave, denounce islam and its evil filth.
CaliphMj says
liar and coward
and
after the attack in New Orleans, several Houston Muslim organizations issued statements. The Islamic Society of Greater Houston said it was “horrified by the senseless crime targeting civilians” and extended its condolences to the families of those killed.
“ISGH has a longstanding absolute zero-tolerance policy against extremism and suspicious activities,” said the statement, which asked anyone with relevant information to contact law enforcement. “The attack on civilians, regardless of their nationality, ethnicity or religion, is an atrocity that no ideology or cause can justify.”
https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/religion/2025/01/04/509776/this-act-has-no-place-in-islam-houston-muslims-worry-about-islamophobia-after-new-orleans-attack/
https://isgh.org/press-release-new-orleans-terror-attack-2/
and you say something like “Also, “The Islamic Society of Greater Houston said Jabbar was not a formal member at any of its 21 mosques in Houston.””
like did you debunk yourself or something?
somehistory says
No reason to “debunk” myself. But you are doing a great job at showing your lying ignorance of all that is Truthful.
Now, begone with your islam garbage. No more replies from moi.
Wellington says
The long and the short of it is is that Islam, ALL OF IT, functions as a fifth column within the USA. It does not matter much at all that not all Muslims in America are not ready to implement all of Islam’s liberty destroying dictates before one is ready to condemn all of Islam. Thinking so is highly fallacious thinking.
Adherents of any malevolent and freedom-destroying ideology do not have to be “fully invested” in carrying out the dictates of that ideology before that ideology is properly described as inimical to freedom, equality under the law and many other good things. It is what the ideology states that is key and not the fact that some adherents of a particular ideology are not ready to implement all of its doctrines (this applies as well to positive ideologies like Christianity and democracy).
And what Islam states is rotten to the core respecting how inimical it is to the best that mankind has achieved, never in its “full glory” capable whatsoever of promoting, practicing and endorsing the finest principles of true liberty. Nothing could be clearer than this assuming one is very clear on what Islam is really all about. A huge assumption to be sure still lost on so many, Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
CaliphMj says
nope completely false
gravenimage says
How is this “completely false”? Do you suppose that Jihad terror and Shari’ah law are somehow in line with civilized American values? Try again.
CaliphMj says
shari law is just
James Lincoln says
CaliphMj,
Critique Wellington’s post line by line and include references.
Hint: if you are actually trying to outwit Wellington, you are in for a rude awakening.
somehistory says
James, this “caliph’ poster is trying to argue with Truth. His arguments are so weak, he adds no supporting remarks.
Perhaps he’s getting paid by how many replies he gets.
Tim gallagher says
One thing that all of us non Muslims can be absolutely certain of is that a muslim like this bullshit artist, caliph,is lying.to us. I prefer the Hungarian approach. They would simply tell the Muslims, don’t waste your lying to us you slimy Muslim bullshit artist, we know exactly what barbaric, evil, primitive islam is all about, now piss off back to your Muslim countries full of knuckle dragging barbarians because you Re not getting into Hungary. No discussion, no listening to Muslim lies just piss off. That is the sensible way to deal with Muslims.
James Lincoln says
Agree, somehistory and Tim.
Tim gallagher says
Thanks James. It is a waste of time pussy footing around debating with lying Muslims.
CaliphMj says
Wellington is just an ignorant
rubiconcrest says
The elimination of Islam as a threat to non-Muslims and Muslims alike in Democratic states is perhaps at first base. There is a long way to go. And you are right that although many Muslims don’t practice the faith they cannot be counted on to come forward such is the fear of their they have of their fellow Muslims.
The country would have set up a system of safe houses and free change of identities for freedom loving Muslims who wanted to leave the faith so dangerous is the Islamic culture.
The whole topic of de-Islamization of a society is something warranting discussion. Muslims better start speaking up. But to have that happen they need support. At the present time even non-Muslims cannot speak truthfully as a few brave people like Robert Spencer know all to well.
So that is where government intervention is needed. Legal protection from lawfare and from Islamic racketeering against those speaking the truth about Islam.
CaliphMj says
islam is good
CaliphMj says
baseless and easy to debunked
gravenimage says
If this was “easy to debunked” (sic) why would you not do so? Waiting…
Your very username shows that you want to impose the brutal Caliphate.
CaliphMj says
man this guy is incredible ignorant brutal caliphate? what no
islam is peaceful
and person who wrote this have no sources quran is peaceful “There is no compulsion in religion” [al-Baqarah 2:256] he doesnt even cite a quran verse
and Jerusalem post have no sources
Shalom says
I’m wetting myself, so funny 🤣
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Sorta like every one of the claims Karin Jean-Pierre used to make from the White House Press podium. When she used to say that every true assertion about this administration was thoroughly debunked
I believe that you are needed at Damascus or Kandahar
CaliphMj says
huh? what are you talking about
James Lincoln says
CaliphMj says,
“baseless and easy to debunked”
So, go ahead and attempt to “debunk it” with verifiable references.
CaliphMj says
ok
“There is no compulsion in religion” [al-Baqarah 2:256]
done
quran is peaceful
look the guy who make this have no sources other than jerusalem post which i been to many times which is baseless
A mosque near the Houston home of Shamsud-Din Jabbar,
In a statement the group said: “We stand in solidarity with the people of New Orleans in the wake of this senseless and horrific crime. Anyone with any potentially relevant information should come forward immediately, and our attorneys stand ready to help arrange and facilitate communication with relevant law enforcement agencies.”
Jesse Waggoner says
If this country is “the great satan”, then why are they here? If they hate us as much as they claim, DEPORT ALL OF THEM.
gravenimage says
The New Orleans Jihadi’s Mosque Has a Revealing Reaction to His Action
……………………………………………….
So this Jihad murderer was connected to an antisemitic Mosque? What a shock! sarc/off
Joe Kool says
Notice when muslims are angry (or just not OK) about something, they start attacking and destroying things very quickly, it appears they are OK with the attack in New Orleans!
somehistory says
Good point, Joe.