The denials are crumbling.
Two options.
1. Rep. Ilhan Omar/Elmi married a gay man (who may also be her brother) in a bigamous wedding presided over by a pastor, while being married to her pre-existing husband, who gave her children, and with whom she filed joint tax returns.
2. She committed immigration fraud.
There’s really only so many options here for liberals looking for an off-ramp which is why the New York Times laid out the bad news for them.
The best possible interpretation of events, the one that she wants you to believe, is that Rep. Omar was married to one man in an Islamic wedding, left him for another man (without actually getting a divorce), who later turned out to be gay, pursued legal status for him, which he dropped when the government became suspicious that the marriage was fake, and then went back to her first husband.
And there’s nothing suspicious about any of it.
The Obama era DOJ justice department thought she committed immigration fraud. Potentially with her brother. They chose not pursue it because of the statute of limitations. The only real argument from the media at this point is that it’s a ‘political investigation’ that serves no purpose because charges can no longer be brought. That’s really as good as an admission.
And that brings us to the second point.
If Rep. Ilhan Omar is the sort of person to engage in a fake marriage with her own brother for immigration fraud (not to mention cheat on her first/third husband with her campaign strategist), isn’t it just a little bit possible that…
1. She also committed immigration fraud and lied about her age and last name
2. And has committed a roster of other offenses once in office dealing with her 3rd/4th husband’s weird winery/investment fund that seems to fluctuate from billions in capital to millions of net worth to a loss due to an, according to Omar’s office, “accounting error”.
If you’ve already conceded that the woman you think is Rep. Ilhan Omar may very well be Rep. Ilhan Elmi and may have committed immigration fraud by marrying her brother, I have to ask, in the words of a certain fictional lawman, do you feel lucky?
What do you think your chances are that a racist adulterous grifter in a bigamous incestuous gay immigration fraud marriage didn’t commit any offenses she can be currently prosecuted for?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
She is muslim, her brother presumably is muslim as well, but they got married by a pastor – an arrangement they obviously didn’t/don’t believe in, and we are expected to think that they thought of it as a legitimate marriage? All she did was immigration fraud by reporting bro as the husband. Her real husband was the guy who knocked her up twice
Of course, neither of them are her current husband
somehistory says
Another ‘option,’ she committed all of the above crimes. Lying about her name, lying about here dob, lying about marrying her brother, lying about why she married her brother, claiming on a tax filing….more than one time….when she was ‘married’ to her brother while filing tax forms with her first husband….lying about her bank balance,
And as one knowledgeable attorney has made clear, she is still liable as she is still engaging in the fraud.
If a person robs a bank, and there are statutes of limitations on bank robbery, if they are not caught and don’t spend the money before that ‘limit’ runs out, they can still be in trouble when they do spend the money.
ilhan, the snake, elmi alias omar, can still be prosecuted for all of her crimes of fraud and lying to Congress….because she has not changed anything (except her name, dob and money amts).
The snake is hiding out in a ‘muzzie mall’ which is owned by a muzzie already found guilty of fraud.
Wellington says
Oh yeah, she’s a snake and a liar and no good for America but the much bigger problem is that loads and loads of people on the Left will defend her without reservation.
Omar is a symptom of something deeply troubling and that is what has happened to the Democratic Party, which has become the cause of such rot in America that it would be foolish not to consider the “transformation” of this party into something ever increasingly a mortal enemy of what the Founding Fathers established.
It’s the enemy within scenario. And a very bad scenario it is, not only for America but for all of mankind at its best.
Namer says
It would talk a willing suspension of disbelief to believe she didnt commit all of the crimes stated.
Taffy says
When playing chess against a not so good player, one often gets the opportunity to “fork” the opponent’s pieces with a knight, giving the forkee the option of losing either piece 1 or piece 2. Sometimes a fork involves three chess pieces. Here, Ilhan Elmi has her king, queen and rook triple forked. Game Over!
Despite all this, Barack HusseinObama is still supporting her, claiming that this is a political purge.
John Smith says
Today November 1st marks the first day of “Islamophobia Awareness Month,” so let’s have no more Islamophobia for the next month. I’m sure you will all comply.
somehistory says
ilhan was speaking and said that she ‘don’t think people should be able to say what they want to’
Maybe not her exact words, but close. She also said everyone who disagrees with her “are stupid.”
She uses the freedom of speech, but it’s her goal to prevent the rest of us from speaking or writing.
muzzies and those with a mindset like them, want to control speech and read into speech whatever meanings they wish.
Have I failed to “comply”, John?
Taffy says
You can lead the Islamophobia cheering section!
But as the motto of Bare Naked Islam (another fine blog) says: “it’s not Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you.”
John Smith says
Come on Taffy do you really believe I’m being serious. I’m well aware of what this death cult is all about.
John Smith says
In other words it’ s just sarcasm Taffy.
John Smith says
I’m afraid you have Somehistory, but I knew you would.
somehistory says
In that case, John, I hold my head up.