Suleman Lalani’s bill comes on the heels of news that Colorado Muslim Democrat Senator Iman Jodeh’s internship program made “Identifying as a Muslim” a qualification. No time is being wasted.
No one should be surprised that Suleman Lalani and Iman Jodeh have undertaken a rapid advance of Islamic interests. Warning after warning about the advancing Sharia has gone out, including disturbing news about elected officials such as Abdul El-Sayed, Zohran Mamdani, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and many more.
There is a legitimate reason why a California pastor recently warned evangelicals in America about the importance of getting out to vote because of an “Islamic takeover of America.”
Here’s the breakdown again of Muslims holding elected office nationwide:
-Local City & Town Councils: 98 members
-State Legislatures/Representatives/
-School Boards & Education Roles: 63 officials
-Judges: 18
-Mayors: 11
-U.S. Congress: 7
“Muslim Texas Democrat Files Bills Promoting Muslim Heritage, Halal School Meals,” by Emily Medeiros, Daily Signal, November 11, 2026:
Just a week after a blue wave hit the Lone Star State, a Muslim state representative has filed multiple bills ahead of the 90th legislative session that would implement Islamic practices and holidays.
Democrat state Rep. Suleman Lalani, an immigrant from Pakistan who represents Texas House District 76, which encompasses Fort Bend and Harris counties, filed several bills ranging from establishing a “Muslim Heritage Day” to ensuring halal food is provided in schools.
Bill filing opened for Texas legislators on Monday.
Lalani filed House Bill 236, which amends Chapter 662 of the Texas Government Code to recognize Feb. 4 as Muslim Heritage Day in the state. The bill states that the day would recognize the historical, cultural, and social contributions of Muslim Americans to Texas.
In addition to filing HB 236, he also filed House Resolution 16, which would formally recognize the Islamic holy month of Ramadan in 2027.
The ceremonial resolution would honor Muslims who observe Ramadan in the state and would “extend to Muslims across the Lone Star State sincere, best wishes for a joyous and meaningful observance.”
Lalani also filed two bills that relate to ensuring public schools provide halal food for students.
He filed HB 401, which would require Texas public school districts and open-enrollment charter schools to provide halal meal options when a parent or student requests one. The proposal would apply to both the school breakfast and lunch programs….
40 rounds says
The halal food in schools is a total crock.. are you telling me Muslim parents can’t feed their own kids? But alas, that’s not what that’s about is it?
England Invaded says
As you correctly say, just one of the early stages of their attempts to take over.
In the UK, this halhal muck is forced on everyone in schools. No choice to not have it in many areas. It is all that is offered now.
Anyone in the US who is thinking of pandering to the ‘slims, needs to visit Europe and see how it quickly escalates.
Beans🫘 says
Yes England that’s exactly what’s going on.
Republicans tried hard to take on Islamization and lost so big, they won’t dare touch it for a generation because Texans surprisingly took the side of the victim Muslims.
Now, the Muslims won and they’re doing exactly what we’ve been warning. Taking Islamization steps. Muslims are flooding into Texas to vote Democrat. The American people back them Palestine and Iran at the moment and are punishing us. It is a terrible time, the Muslims are bold in every state because democrats are moving to red states.
A mosque here would not even let Christians onto the sidewalks, it was all on camera. Not knowing sidewalks are public.the police (Muslims) told them to leave the public sidewalks anyway.
Greg Abbot was totally right. But the people of Texas did not want to hear any attempt to fight back at Islamization. Their Islamic only city of 10,000 is going to be built now.
England Invaded says
I had hopes for the US. Astonishing that some people never learn from history or even what is going on right now in other countries in plain sight.
The ‘slims always take advantage of the kindness and goodwill of others. I would call it gullibility though. Then later come the demands and enforcement.
I still think most Americans will try and resist more so than here in Europe. Of course, our lack of right to speak is a large factor in the capitulation here. Our laws have been totally usurped to suit the ‘slims. Despite the protections, I wonder how long before laws go the same way to a high level in the US?
Americans can protect themselves. And I think the best defence is a good offence.
Beans🫘 says
Here is an example of how draconian it is in America. The nelk boys did an interview with Netanyahu. The Muslims forced them to apologize and denounce.
https://youtube.com/shorts/rLrMCZtOiS4?si=gcoi4JqvogMw_-ba
The Muslim immediately came the next day, bassem yousef and shamed them. And the internet overwhelmingly came down on them and all others who dare show the Israel side of things. It’s simply not allowed here. Everyone is pro Palestine, or you’re shut down and isolated in a corner by Muslims, and their followers, their dhimmis who denounce everyone.
Billy says
By partnering with Democrats, Islam’s Muslims are quickly implementing Sharia, Islamic Law, throughout the society to ‘Islamize’ the country and gain more taxpayer money, more political. power, and more government control so that Islam reigns supreme(Qur’an 9:5, 29, 41, 111; 49:15, etc.). Genocidal Allah in Qur’an 8:39 commands, “And engage in war with them[Non-Muslims] until there will not be sedition and the religion will be completely to Allah…” We must STOP PUBLIC FUNDING of Islam and its Organizations!
Funding is a privilege that should NOT BE granted to organizations that are against the US Constitution or Western Constitutions. Totalitarian Islam and its Muslim Organizations including Muslim Schools and Mosques are against the US Constitution due to Muslim funding, teaching, and promoting Muslim discrimination, supremacist segregation, hatred, rape, violence, totalitarianism, and terrorism against Non-Muslims to make Islamic Law supreme WITH NO EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW. Islam’s Muslims, citizens of the global Ummah or global Islamic State, are treacherous, Totalitarian Terrorists of Allah operating as a Criminal-Terrorist-Gang Enterprise under Islamic Law using MUSLIM MONEY and MUSLIM LIVES to ultimately conquer the enemies of Allah, the Non-Muslims, with Islamic Law DBA Islam(Qur’an 5:33; 8:60; 9:5, 29, 111; 49:15, etc.).
Billy says
Islam and Islamic Law allow NO OPPOSITION and NO EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW under penalty of death. Allah in Qur’an 9:29 commands, “Engage in war with those who do not believe in Allah nor in the last day[Non-Muslims]. Nor forbid what Allah and his messenger forbid[via Islamic Law], nor believe in the religion of the truth[Islam] among those who have given the book[Jews and Christians] until they pay the jizyah[Extortion Payment] out of hand and they are subdued[disgraced].”
Troybeam says
Islam in America: the silent violent takeover thru elections and population growth.
Beginning to look like the pattern used in the UK and Europe to conquer a nation.
Let’s take a look at New York after Mandami was voted in, they now have 2 police units working in the city: A: New York Police, legit and second Muslim Sharia Police wearing official uniforms telling people they cannot walk their dogs…just the beginning.
When all of you who voted a Muslim into office you have given Islam a means to conquer and remove our sovereignty from WE THE PEOPLE”.
Remember Islam sound great when running for office however their intentions have nothing to do with what lies behind those election promises.
Also watch carefully when sworn into office: using the Quran to uphold the elected office, for Muslims this is swearing to conquer and instill sharia law, applies only to Muslims and everyone else to submit or pay a tax leading to death if one does not submit, per sharia law according to Reliance of the Traveller, Chapter o9.0 titled Jihad.
Marvin Schiller says
Muslim/islamis are satans religion. Objective, destroy America and Western Civilization
Art Kyger says
You want us to still believe that if we had voted things would be different? Thanks for the gaslight. So you’re going to have us believe we have fair and honest elections and that the elections weren’t rigged and stolen? Thanks for more gaslight.
England Invaded says
Give them an inch and this is how it will turn out –
More muslim filth in the UK on the run after being convicted of child rape.
Given bail and therefore route by which to disappear.
When genuinely British people are refused bail for the slightest of things now if they are speaking out against such as this.
It is not the first time this has happened. In fact it’s predictable at this point.
http://www.gbnews.com/news/rotherham-grooming-gang-members-run-raping-schoolgirl
somehistory says
“if a student or parent requests one.” so if **one** muzzie *demands* special food, the school **must** provide **one.** But the school cooks can’t prepare just **one** meal a certain way.
In olden days….and now when it involves a non-muzzie….if special food was required, the parent had to prepare, and the student would take ,the meal from home.
Before Texans can blink, the entire breakfast and lunch meals will all conform to the demands of muzzies.
40 rounds says
In my retirement I’m gonna raise hogs for fun, food, and an f.u. to the slimes. Pork will be a rare commodity by then
somehistory says
Hogs are more intelligent than any muzzie. They are fine with not being eaten.
Wellington says
There will be no end to this.
Sentinel says
And so we go according to England, What happened to America First???
Trump are you listening to America
PRCS USN (ret) says
“HB 401, which would require Texas public school districts and open-enrollment charter schools to provide halal meal options when a parent or student requests one. The proposal would apply to both the school breakfast and lunch programs.”
Seafood is not subjected to halal slaughter.
Salmon, rock cod, tuna, oysters, scallops, etc., for lunch—for every student—five days a week is fine and meets even Muslim ‘religious’ needs
And how would oatmeal, toast, a fruit cup, and a glass of milk for breakfast be Islamophobic?
Parents wanting red meat for their children can provide that during supper—at home.
Stop pandering and start using OUR laws to thwart Muslim thuggery.
Troybeam says
Coming soon to all states by Muslim elected, This is going thru New Jesery right now Bill number A 1146, state adopts definition of Islamophobia, see below.
This has worked in Europe and especially the UK
THE BILL:
Bill A1146
Session 2026 – 2027
ASSEMBLY, No. 1146
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
222nd LEGISLATURE/PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2026 SESSION
Sponsored by:
Assemblyman JOE DANIELSEN
District 17 (Middlesex and Somerset)
Co-Sponsored by:
Assemblywomen Reynolds-Jackson, Drulis and Assemblyman Freiman
SYNOPSIS
Adopts State definition of Islamophobia for certain civil and criminal purposes.
CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT
Introduced Pending Technical Review by Legislative Counsel.
An Act concerning the definition of Islamophobia in the State of New Jersey and supplementing Title 10 of the Revised Statues.
Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
1. The Legislature finds and declares that:
a. Islamophobia and harassment on the basis of actual or perceived national origin, shared ancestry, or ethnic characteristics with a religious group, remains a persistent, pervasive, and disturbing problem in contemporary American society.
b. Data shows that Muslims are among the most likely of all minority groups to be victimized by incidents of hate, and such incidents are increasing at an alarming rate.
c. Data also shows that the State of New Jersey ranked amongst the highest of states in the nation in Islamophobic incidents in 2020.
d. State officials and institutions, including educational institutions, have a responsibility to protect the public from hate and bigotry, and must be given the tools to stem both criminal conduct as well as discriminatory acts motivated by Islamophobia.
e. Valid monitoring, informed analysis and investigating, and effective policymaking all require uniform definitions.
f. Instituting a standard definition of Islamophobia will provide an essential definitional tool to determine manifestations of Islamophobia.
g. In addition to Islamophobia, the terms “intolerance against Muslims,” “anti-Muslim prejudice,” “anti-Muslim hate,” “hatred of
Muslims,” “anti-Islamism,” “Muslimophobia,” and “racism towards Muslims” may also be used to define the same characteristics of Islamophobia.
h. Awareness of this definition of Islamophobia will increase understanding of the parameters of anti-Muslim crime, harassment, and discrimination.
2. a. For the purposes of this act:
“Islamophobia” means a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness, which may be expressed as hatred toward Muslim persons, including, but not limited to, the following:
(1) hatred or severe disparagement towards Muslim persons or their culture;
(2) hostility and fear of Islam, and as a result, a fear of and aversion to all Muslims or the majority of Muslims;
(3) discrimination, harassment, prejudice, and unequal treatment of Muslim persons or Muslim-majority communities;
(4) exclusion of Muslim persons or Muslim-majority communities from major political and social spheres;
(5) making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Muslims, or of Muslims as a collective group, especially but not exclusively, conspiracies about Muslims entry into politics, government, or other societal institutions, the myth of Muslim identity having a unique propensity for terrorism, and claims of a demographic threat posed by Muslims or of a Muslim takeover;
(6) rhetorical, violent, or physical anti-Muslim manifestations directed against Muslim or non-Muslim individuals, or their property, or Muslim community institutions and religious facilities;
(7) shouting, verbal or physical abuse, pushing, spitting, pulling hijabs from Muslim women, and other forms of prejudicial abuses that target Muslims;
(8) calling for, aiding, encouraging, supporting, or justifying the killing, harming, or defaming of anyone, simply for practicing Islam or exhibiting a Muslim identity or heritage;
(9) expressing an outlook or worldview involving an unfounded dread and dislike of Muslims, which results in practices of exclusion and discrimination;
(10) accusing those practicing Islam, or exhibiting a Muslim identity or heritage, whether singularly or collectively, as being wholly responsible for any real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Muslim person or group;
(11) accusing Muslim citizens of being more loyal to a transnational Muslim community or to their countries of origin, or to the alleged priorities of Muslims worldwide, than to the interests of the people of New Jersey or the interests of the people of the United States;
(12) accusing those practicing Islam, or exhibiting a Muslim identity or heritage, whether singularly or collectively, as being wholly responsible for any real or imagined wrongdoing committed by any Muslim-majority country; and
(13) accusing those practicing Islam, or exhibiting a Muslim identity or heritage, whether singularly or collectively, as being more loyal to any foreign Muslim-majority country, or the alleged priorities of Muslim persons worldwide, than to the interests of the people of the State of New Jersey, or to the interests of the people of the United States.
The term “Islamopobia” shall not include any criticism of any Muslim-majority country similar to that leveled against any other country.
b. In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of any policy, law, or regulation prohibiting discriminatory acts under the civil or criminal laws of this State, a public official or law enforcement officer shall take into consideration the definition of Islamophobia contained in subsection a. of this section for the purposes of determining whether the alleged act was motivated by Islamophobia and discriminatory anti-Muslim intent.
c. Nothing contained in this act, P.L. , c. (C. ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill), shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, or paragraph 6 of Article I of the New Jersey State Constitution. Nothing in this act shall be construed to conflict with local, State, or federal anti-discrimination laws or regulations.
3. This act shall take effect immediately.
STATEMENT
This bill adopts the first-ever State definition of Islamophobia in New Jersey and in the nation. Attacks on persons who are Muslim or perceived to be Muslim have grown significantly since September 11, 2001. From 2014 to 2019, there were 10,015 anti-Muslim bias incidents, which included 1,164 anti-Muslim hate crimes. This rise in Islamophobic sentiment is widely acknowledged by the American people, as a 2019 study by Pew found that most American adults (82%) say that Muslims are subject to at least some discrimination in the United States today. According to the FBI, approximately 19% of religion-based incidents from 2015-2019 were against Muslims, who make up only about 1% of the United States population.
Furthermore, the United States Attorney General has commented that since September 11, 2001, the Justice Department has led more than 1,000 investigations into “anti-Muslim hatred” acts and bigoted behavior that have led to more than 45 prosecutions. According to a 2017 Pew Poll, while perceptions of religious groups improved overall in 2017, Muslims rated most negatively of all religious groups, scoring a 48 out of 100. New Jersey ranked among the top 10 states for anti-mosque incidents according to the ACLU, including multiple incidents against Muslim persons and Muslim institutions.
This bill provides a State definition of Islamophobia modeled in part after the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG), which is composed of British Parliament Members of both the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Awareness of this definition of Islamophobia will increase understanding of the parameters of contemporary Islamophobia crime and discrimination.
Under the bill, the definition of Islamophobia in the bill would not include any criticism of any Muslim-majority country similar to that leveled against any other country.
The bill provides that in reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of any policy, law, or regulation prohibiting discriminatory acts under the civil or criminal laws of this State, a public official or law enforcement officer is required to take into consideration the definition of Islamophobia contained in this bill for the purposes of determining whether the alleged act was motivated by Islamophobia and discriminatory anti-Muslim intent.
Nothing contained in this bill is to be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, or paragraph 6 of Article I of the New Jersey State Constitution, and nothing in this bill is to be construed to conflict with local, State, or federal anti-discrimination laws or regulations.
40 rounds says
That looks and smells totally unconstitutional, at least for now
somehistory says
When they change the First Amendment, then this will really matter. Until then, islime stinks. islime is evil. islime is a product and worship of satan the devil.
somehistory says
FOX News
“Incoming GOP congressman backs halting all immigration to US, warns about Sharia law in Texas”
“Rep.-elect Jace Yarbrough, a Republican from Texas, is set to enter Congress on Jan. 3 with an agenda to sharply restrict immigration and preserve what he describes as the “Christian heritage” of the United States, though he doubts the incoming Democratic majorities in both chambers will be willing to work with him.
In an interview with Fox News Digital, Yarbrough repeatedly denounced mass migration and said he’d be in favor of “stopping immigration altogether for a time because of how insane this has gotten.”
He argued the U.S. is admitting far too many immigrants, including individuals he described as “avowedly anti-American” or connected to international terrorist groups.
He also said he’d support repealing the 1965 Hart-Celler Act, which abolished the national-origins quota system that favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe while severely restricting immigration from Asia, Africa and other parts of the world.”
somehistory says
“”You have to justify why it is that you are going to make our country stronger,” Yarbrough said. “You have to prove that you want to be a part of this thing. You’re going to forswear allegiance to your old country.”
Yarbrough also expressed concerns about the spread of Sharia law, the Islamic religious legal system that he argued was “completely incompatible” with American values.
“We’re not thoughtful about whether or not certain cultures are compatible with ours,” he said. “My job as a member of Congress…is to fight for us and be unapologetic about the richness of our history.”
When asked to provide examples of what he has previously described as the “Islamification of Texas,” Yarbrough pointed to a lawsuit filed last year by the East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC), a North Texas mosque.
The EPIC mosque is located near Texas’ 32nd Congressional District, which Yarbrough will be representing in Congress.
“That mosque sued a group of Christian street preachers for preaching the gospel on public sidewalks near the mosque. And that’s an example of the kind of anti-American Sharia supremacist behavior, activity, and ideology that I’m talking about,” Yarbrough said.
In Oct. 2025, the mosque sued Testimonies of God, a Texas-based Baptist ministry, alleging that its members used microphones and bullhorns to disrupt Friday prayer services in violation of the city’s noise ordinance. Videos posted to the ministry’s social media accounts show its members preaching near the mosque over a period of several months.
Plano police records show officers responded to a criminal trespass complaint at the mosque in May, though the log does not identify those involved or indicate whether a citation was issued. A judge dismissed EPIC’s lawsuit in March under Texas’ anti-SLAPP law, but the mosque appealed, and the case remains pending.”