And the danger these Muslims pose to Jews, but also to Christians in America, is insufficiently understood. An enlightening essay on the growing threat can be found here; Tal Fortgang is writing about the threat to Jews, but in the end, Christians will suffer as well, for as Muslims have been known to say, “After the Saturday people, the Sunday people”: “Jews Must Start Thinking Clearly about Islam in America,” by Tal Fortgang, Tikvah Ideas, November 2026:
In 2025, many American Jews were shocked by the victory in the New York City mayoral race of Zohran Mamdani, who has made hatred of Israel the cornerstone of his political career, and who has since commemorated the anniversary of September 11 with a condemnation of America. Even more unsettling is the rise of Abdul El-Sayed, arguably an even more radical candidate, surrounded on all sides by connections to the Muslim Brotherhood and anti-Israel obsessives. But here an important fact comes into play: according to most estimates, Michigan, where El-Sayed is running for a Senate seat, has nearly twice as many Muslims as Jews. If current trends continue, similar ratios will become increasingly common throughout the country.
To many Americans, and especially to American Jews, the very expression of concern about the growth of the Muslim population smacks of the worst kind of bigotry. Perhaps the only thing more uncomfortable than voicing such concerns is seeing political figures with the views of Mamdani or El-Sayed rising to power. Our own Jewish identity has so often been deployed against us that we now cringe at the thought of trading in a kind of discrimination that disadvantaged our fathers. How should American Jews deal with this predicament? Should our views of immigration shift accordingly? And are such worries really a concession to the selfsame prejudice once turned against Jews?
Let’s begin with some facts. Less than a month after October 7, 2023, a college professor in California approached a pro-Israel rallygoer named Paul Kessler, hit him in the head with a megaphone, and killed him. In October 2024, a twenty-two-year-old shot a Jewish man walking to synagogue in Chicago. In June 2025, a man yelling “free Palestine!” firebombed a gathering in Boulder, Colorado in support of Israeli hostages, killing an eighty-two-year-old Jewish woman. And in March 2026, a man drove his explosive-laden vehicle into a synagogue preschool in suburban Detroit, where he was stopped by security before he could kill dozens of Jewish children….
There are approximately 5.5 million Muslims in the United States, a number that has more than doubled in the last two decades. As of 2020, there were 2,800 mosques in the country, the number more than doubling since 2000 and likely higher now several years later. Rapid immigration, overwhelmingly legal, has fueled this growth, with more than half of American Muslim adults reporting that they were born abroad. High fertility rates among a young population have also played a role. Absent drastic changes to immigration policy, fertility rates, or conversion-attrition trends, Islam will pass Judaism as the largest non-Christian religion in the United States within the next fifteen years….

The rise in Muslim numbers, and thus in Muslim voters, has had a worrisome effect on politicians in both Europe and North America. They are now increasingly determined to win, or retain, the support of Muslim voters.
To the extent that population comes to resemble that of Muslims elsewhere, this is obviously worrisome. There is no need to spend much time describing the fanatic anti-Semitism endemic to Arab and Muslim countries, whence immigrants would come under a liberal American immigration policy. Suffice it to say that the ADL has measured the prevalence of anti-Semitism worldwide and found that 74 percent of adults in Muslim-majority Middle Eastern countries agree with six or more anti-Semitic stereotypes. In the Palestinian territories, some nine out of ten individuals harbor anti-Semitic views; in Iraq, 92 percent. Even in Muslim countries far from Israel with negligible Jewish populations, the numbers are remarkably high: 61 percent in Malaysia, 53 percent in Senegal, and 48 percent in Indonesia. A 2010 poll asking about favorability of Jews found that 97 percent of Jordanians view Jews unfavorably; 95 percent of Egyptians said the same. About three-quarters of respondents from Pakistan, Indonesia, and Turkey view Jews unfavorably….
After years of soft-pedaling crimes committed by Muslims against Jews, France is now burning. As of this writing, the one constant from the scenes of buildings in flames, shattered glass, and assaults on police across France is the Palestinian flag. Unifying Islamists, migrants, and leftists, the organization of politics against the Jews appeals to all parts of the third-worldist coalition. Preliminary reports of ransacked synagogues and Jewish-owned stores only drive the point home: hatred of Israel, hatred of the West and its inheritance, and special opprobrium for Jews, wherever they may be found, make an extremely appealing political bundle. Unless a crackdown comes soon, France’s political future belongs to whoever picks the bundle up and presents it to voters. Nearly a decade ago, the French Jewish intellectual Alain Finkielkraut admitted to being “extremely worried—as much for French Jews as I’m worried for the future of France.” At risk of repeating the obvious, that’s because bringing in enormous numbers of people with alien views changes a nation’s culture, which eventually hardens into politics and law. France has changed: “it would be absurd to suggest all immigrants are anti-Semites,” Finkielkraut continued. “The majority perhaps are not. But most anti-Semites today in France come from Algeria, northwest Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, and the Middle East. That’s the reason anti-Semitism isn’t being fought very much.” Whether there is a French future depends on whether that tide can be turned.
Read that again: “Whether there is a French future depends on whether that tide can be turned.”
Does the same future await America? In its current composition, the American Muslim population is quite different from Europe’s. That could be because American Muslims come from more diverse national origins, because America lacks Europe’s colonial and post-colonial history, or because there is a large “native” stream of American Muslims within the black population. The U.S. has also taken in a very small share of migrants and refugees in recent years. Regardless of the exact causal inputs, most American Muslims are highly assimilated and generally express less-extreme views than their counterparts elsewhere.
A remarkable 92 percent of American Muslims say they are “proud to be an American.” Sixty percent say they have “a lot” in common with most Americans, indicating a much greater sense of belonging than their European coreligionists. Only 11 percent say that they have “nothing” or “not much” in common. Eighty-two percent express concern about extremism done in the name of Islam around the world—a higher number than that of Americans generally—and only 8 percent believe violence against civilians is at least sometimes acceptable “to defend Islam.” A 2022 study found that “although American Muslims are less positive toward Jews than non-Muslims, the difference is not great, and, on average, American Muslims have positive views of Jews.” (However, the same study found, “Muslims who immigrated to the U.S. may be importing their home-nation anti-Semitism with them.”)
Yet there are signs that a significant share of American Muslims do not share most Americans’ moral and political intuitions. These are easiest to perceive, unsurprisingly, when American Muslims are asked to opine on the Middle East. Despite all Hamas has done to bring poverty and destruction to Gaza, a May 2026 Pew survey found that 44 percent of American Muslims expressed favorable views of the terrorist group. According to the Atlantic Council senior fellow Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib, that high number is “neither shocking nor remotely reflective of the full picture.” Rather, “based on countless interactions, trends, and observations since October 7,” Alkhatib suggests that “this number is almost certainly an undercount” reflecting social-desirability bias. If it were more socially acceptable to proclaim support for Hamas, more American Muslims would. Perhaps that would explain why Muslim favorability towards Hamas increased from 37 percent in 2024: not because Hamas has done anything to improve its standing, but because supporting it has become more socially acceptable. The prevalence of once-unthinkable Hamas and Hizballah paraphernalia at anti-Israel demonstrations testifies to this trend as well….
If his presentation alarms you, you are not alone. The author tries to be sober and measured in his analysis, but the picture he paints of a future America with many more Muslims transforming our politics — he calls it “political capture” — and also posing a threat to the physical security of American Jews, is positively horripilent.
Rick Gordon says
‘Insufficiently understood’ is the biggest understatement I have heard in quite some time. America’s paying optics for Obama and Biden’s Islamic immigration policies – and it’s going to get much worse over the next two years for sure.
somehistory says
muzzie voters translate to muzzie politicians holding high offices. muzzies vote for other muzzies to do muzzie things. muzzies don’t need people going to Washington to lobby for what they want. The politician muzzie wants the same thing.
“Watch: El-Sayed supporters celebrate win with a chant that reveals their true priorities”
“Well, Gaza has its first member of the U.S. Senate.
Oh, sure, Abdul El-Sayed is nominally supposed to represent Michigan. That’s what voters elected him to do on Tuesday.
But for a man who should be focused on manufacturing and commerce, given his state’s industrial base, he seems to think his remit involves a contested piece of land in West Asia.
And so do his supporters, apparently.
On victory night, what were El-Sayed’s peeps chanting about? Not “affordability, affordability”! You know, that big issue he ran on.
Heck, they weren’t even chanting about the blue wave.
Instead, they made their first priority loud and clear: “Free, free Palestine!”
El-Sayed, who worked as a Wayne County health official before becoming a senator-elect, really has no experience in dealing with foreign relations and should stay out of it — if it weren’t for the fact that he’s abnormally interested in Israel and has been for years, and has ties with numerous terrorist organizations.
And that wasn’t all. Look who was at the victory party, as well: pro-Palestine activist and potential deportee Mahmoud Khalil!
Don’t worry, habibi. Gaza’s first senator has got your back. So does his pal Hasan Piker.
This still wouldn’t be so disconcerting if it weren’t for what El-Sayed has said about Israel — up until just days before the election, when we had this nugget from “60 Minutes” on CBS:
And that was the version for public consumption. Here he is praising terror sympathizers who love them some Hamas:
But Rep. Haley Stevens is the bad person here for pointing out the obvious: El-Sayed doesn’t care about using his power to help out Michiganders. He cares about using it to shield radicals.
If that’s your definition of “affordability,” congratulations, Michigan: You’ve got yourself a winner. Just ask his supporters.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/watch-el-sayed-supporters-celebrate-win-with-a-chant-that-reveals-their-true-priorities/ar-AA2gP06r?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=6aec999744414bf0b056d19d4477ec75&ei=19
Troybeam says
Like the UK America is on the same course as more and more Muslims are elected into political offices from Mayor to Senators.
Sworn in on the Quran because in Islam a Muslim can serve in a foreign government in order to conquer from within therefore it is on its way.
The American people are in for a huge surprise because they refused to see Islam for what it is: a threat to America’s sovereignty which is being taken bit by bit.
England Invaded says
Yep, they’re within your systems as well now in the US. That will accelerate exponentially.
Here in the UK and Europe already done for due to that across many years.
Only difference is that the US has the first, then backed by the second as the Americans always tell me.
Personally, you might want to just skip that first one.
Samer says
The majority of Jews in Europe and America have supported an “open-door” policy toward immigrants, including Muslims. This stems from their misguided belief that a larger number of immigrants and minority groups enhances their own security—reasoning that the focus of the majority would be dispersed among these various groups, rather than concentrated solely on them (as was the case in Germany, where they were the only prominent minority in society). What the Jews failed to consider is that a significant portion of those immigrating to America—particularly Muslims—harbor a deep-seated hatred and hostility toward them, one that is at least as intense as the animosity they faced from the Nazis, if not even greater.
ConcernedReader says
Many of the jewish academia, journalists, politicians and all manner of public oppinion formers have been pro-immigration and were on the side of muslims a decade or two ago or three ago.
They feared so greatly that a next national socialistic movement will emerge, that they forgot that the left has among itself its own jew hatred. And it also did heinous things to them and others.
So for years centrist-right, conservative and traditionalist right parties, and many right radical(not antisemite!) parties have been constantly been demonized by jewish public oppinion formers.
Constantly marked for everything as antisemites, racists and xenophobes.(Check out how ADF is still handled in Germany even among jews, especially in leadership position of their own congregation!)
Quite often in favour of muslims. The above attitude was quite noticeable among the european jews. And i would expect it existed among the american ones.
What happened is that the muslims learned the lesson from jews. Now xenophobia, racism and all other slogans are available to them. Whereas the previous consequences and marks that came with antisemitism is mostly without any concern, simply because muslims dont care for it, and they can mobilize any time to disrupt society. So their antisemitism gets left alone in order to prevent organized raids.
Before anyone misunderstands i am not here to blame them. They are also a heterogenous people in regards to their political beliefs. However what happened was, that they managed to cripple one of their allies to the point, that they are now voluntarily submitting. In academia, mass media and elsewhere brainwashing and indoctrination is openly happening. Research of truths, telling of historical facts can lead someone to become imprisoned or their lives ruined. And quite often these and similar laws were made in order to appease the jews when certain things were not to their liking. Many of the tools used against them and christians were deployed at their request.
Quite a number of the jewish populace was also openly in favour of mass immigration.(At least in the EU. Most of the jewish were progressive and liberal. And many still are. And quite often still pen articles in favour of muslims or to wash them out of anything.)
And even today after a decade or two facing open muslim hostility there are quite a few among them who will still stay behind this policy and idea. And the problem is that these jewish public oppinion formers have brainwashed many a people to do so as well. And even if they themselve perhaps would reconsider their previous action realizing where it lead, most of their students will not.
And herein lies the tragedy.