In old Londinium, hard by the Inns of Court, a certain Forz Khan who took silk and became that envied thing, a barrister, has now been revealed as a homicidal hater of Jews, who believes the world would be better off if all the Jews were eradicated from the earth. More on this addlepated wretch can be found here: “UK barrister Forz Khan suspended over LinkedIn posts calling for ‘global cleansing’ of Zionism,” by Gokul Ankari, Times of India, November 14, 2026:
A UK barrister has been suspended from practising for four months after a disciplinary panel found that several posts he published on LinkedIn contained anti-Semitic and seriously offensive remarks about Israel and Zionism.
Forz Khan, who has worked as a self-employed barrister in London since being called to the Bar in 1988, was found guilty of professional misconduct following a hearing before the Bar Standards Board (BSB). He was also ordered to pay £2,880 in costs, The Telegraph reported.
The panel examined a series of statements Khan published on his LinkedIn account, including calls for the global eradication of Zionists and references to a “final solution” to what he described as the problem of Israel.
“Zios” is now the antisemites’ word for “Zionists” or rather, for Jews.
In March last year, Khan wrote that Zionism could only be addressed through a “complete global cleansing”, claiming the ideology would otherwise continue to spread hatred and violence.
Another post described Israel as an “apartheid war criminal entity” and accused its government and military of committing genocide and violating international law.
He also wrote: “The world needs to eradicate Zios globally.”…
Khan forget to include “genocidal” in that particular post. He ordinarily makes sure to include it. He must be slipping. As to the charge of “apartheid” he affixes as an epithet to the “war criminal entity” Israel, he is pretending not to know that Arabs serve in the Knesset and sit on Israel’s Supreme Court. Until recently, an Arab was the president of Israel’s largest bank, Bank Leumi. Jews and Arabs work in the same offices and factories, play in the same orchestras and on the same sports teams. Jews and Arabs own businesses together, everything from restaurants to high-tech start-ups. None of that will change in the slightest the tiny mind of Forz Khan, K.C. He just knows.
Khan is a barrister who specializes in crime, immigration and family law. These areas of practice are unsurprising, given his likely clientele — “crime” and “immigration” and “family law” are particular problem areas for the Muslims seeking the solace of his pettifoggery. They commit crimes in much higher numbers than the indigenes, they fiddle with their legal/illegal immigration status and defy orders to self-deport, they want to practice their own misogynistic family law, where husbands rule over wives, are told they may beat them, albeit “lightly,” if they so much as suspect those wives of disobeying them, and in Muslim law husbands can divorce those wives merely by uttering the triple-talaq.
In a separate statement, Khan referred to Israel as a recruitment tool for Hamas and said there was “only 1 final solution” to the country.
He continued posting similar remarks the following month, writing that the region would remain affected by what he called evil until Israel was completely dismantled.One of his other posts stated: “Scum like this should be in a gas chamber.
After posting about the “final solution” to the “problem of Israel,” just the way the Nazis proposed their “final solution” to the “problem of Jews” — “Die Endlösung der Judenfrage” — which took place at death camps that have entered history as Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec, and a dozen other terrifying names, Mr. Khan was finally charged with misconduct by the Bar Standards Board. And he was suspended from the practice of law for four months.
For all this, Khan was suspended for four months. That result is sickening. Let the welkin ring not with revelry, but with outraged cries against this injustice. Four months, only four months, for endlessly calling, every which way Khan could think of, for the murder of every Jew on the planet?
This is not right. In British law, “expressing hatred or using threatening, abusive, or insulting words/behavior with the intent or likelihood of stirring up hatred is a criminal offense. This applies to characteristics such as race, religion, and sexual orientation under laws like the Public Order Act 1986.” With his long history of homicidal antisemitic invective, Khan ought to have been charged with violating that Public Order Act, and instead of being suspended from the practice of law for four months — a ludicrous tap on the wrist — he should have been struck off forever.
Leave a Reply