And she is now suing the owner of the hair salon for “discrimination.” More on this latest example of that special Muslim house blend of absurdity and aggression can be found here: “Allegations of discrimination against business owner for rejecting an applicant wearing a headscarf,” translated from “Diskriminierungsvorwurf gegen Unternehmer wegen Ablehnung einer Bewerberin mit Kopftuch,” Unzensuriert, November 9, 2026 (thanks to Medforth):
Vienna-based business owner Peter Schaider is facing preliminary proceedings before an administrative tribunal after rejecting an applicant for an apprenticeship in the hairdressing trade. The case stems from allegations of discrimination, as the rejection was based on the applicant’s decision to wear a headscarf. In an interview with the daily newspaper *Heute*, Schaider expressed bewilderment regarding the legal scrutiny of the matter. He emphasized that the hairdressing profession is defined, above all, by the presentation of hairstyles:
“I was told this constitutes discrimination. But our business is built on styling, beauty, and hair fashion. You can’t have people standing there wearing a headscarf. I’m sorry, but that just doesn’t work.”
Those who work in a hair salon should at the very least be expected not to cover their hair, which introduces a discordant note. The hairdressers are not just doing a customer’s hair, and selling hair products , but showing in their own hairstyles the rich profusion of possibilities from which a customer may choose. A hairdresser who covers her own hair does not show any of those hairstyles; nor does she demonstrate the efficacy of the hair products that are sold at the salon.
Schaider defended his approach to recruitment, drawing comparisons to other service sectors. In his view, personal appearance plays a crucial role in establishing credibility when selling hairdressing services:
“We sell hair accessories. You wouldn’t expect someone weighing 130 kilos to sell weight-loss products, would you? That simply doesn’t work.”
Nor would it be wise for a salon to hire as a hairdresser someone completely bald, which would also prevent that person from demonstrating either various hairstyles or the use of the hair products that are sold on site, and are a major part of a salon’s revenue. In refusing to hire as a hairdresser someone whose appearance — completely hiding her hair under a hijab — undermines the essence of his operation, Peter Schaider is only making a justified business decision.
Or imagine a niqab-wearing Muslima suing because she wasn’t hired at a woman’s dress shop — that, too, is not “discrimination” but a strictly business decision.
In a sane world, her lawsuit would be tossed out. In the world in which we live, the plaintiff — being a Muslim — may win, so fearful are judges in the Western world of being labelled as “racists” or “Islamophobes.” And that will no doubt result in the hapless Mr. Schaider having to pay her compensation. In fact, that outcome may have been intended all along. The litigious Muslima may have applied for a job at Schaider’s hair salon knowing it would not be given to her because of her hijab, and then she could sue for damages.
Beans🫘 says
SHARIA IN UK
“ UK universities have begun advertising “interest-free” student loans designed to comply with Islamic law. The government-backed scheme is drawing sharp criticism over fears it could create a “two-tier” system”
“ The planned scheme, known as Alternative Student Finance, is set to comply with sharia law, which prohibits the payment or receipt of interest. Based on the Islamic finance principle of Takaful, it would require students to pay an equivalent “contribution” instead of interest on top of their principal, with the funds ring-fenced to finance future participants.”
— in other words, interest is only for kufar to pay on their loans now, Muslims will get interest free student loans. Enjoy UK!
somehistory says
This kind of thing from the females….and a few males (the two who worked for a beer distributor but didn’t want to haul beer, eeoc took their side)…has happened a lot of times. The woman gets hired w/o, then shows up with head scarf, or she applies wearing one and like this, is not acceptable.
This man probably will lose and have to pay her for suing him for a job she probably couldn’t do even sans the ‘rape her, don’t rape me’ slave rag.
And other salon owners will worry about being sued.
Siddhi Nasranni says
Next you will have a woman turn up for a job as a Beautician wearing a ” Niqab ”.
Hiding underneath all that black material, is a most ugly woman covered in pimple’s.
Enough of this madness already.
This cult is always out to screw the Infidel, they are sick & evil
.
40 rounds says
Muslims discriminate all the time, so what’s the problem?
somehistory says
muzzies are entitled to discriminate but anyone not wanting them around for whatever good reasons, is unacceptable…because the muzzies are entitled.
My mind keeps returning to the claim that there are ‘many’ who aren’t terrorists, aren’t out to commit warfare, etc. make good neighbors, etc. The fact that there are muzzies who seem to be that way, are a large part of the problem.
They go to the barracks and hear….while agreeing….that the rest of us have to be eliminated by them and go home and eat and drink according to their rules, and maybe go to work and school and appear to be normal people. And some see this and believe that islime is benign.
Many normal people apply for jobs and for one reason or another, are not hired. How many of those people sue? If muzzies want to wear stuff which screams their superiority, that’s their choice. Why should others be forced to agree to the wearing when they *own* the place the muzzie wants to be while wearing?
40 rounds says
So true but bet you anything the powers that be in Austria will cave
somehistory says
Probably so. while bowing and scraping..
Jim says
Many years ago there was a hair salon in London called Wedge Hair. A muslim woman applied to be a stylist, and so the owner decided to give her a tryout. After the tryout, she told her that she would have to uncover her hair while working, because the stylists showed off different hair styles as a promotional for the business. The muslim woman refused, and sued for discrimination. The government ruled against Wedge Hair to the tune of around $34,000. I remember the owner thinking that that was the end of her dream of owning her own business.
John Smith says
She is suing for discrimination, I’ve never heard of anything so ridiculous in my life. I don’t believe she’s got a cat in hell’s chance of winning her case. Isn’t an employer allowed to pick and choose who they have working for them.
She might have some luck playing the islamophobic card in the UK, but I don’t the US has gone quite far done that road YET.