What do you think happened next?
The video, posted Sunday, bears this legend: “Chaos erupts in Sweden. A man gets fed up with Muslims praying in public and throws pig’s blood on a Quran in the middle of a square. The Muslims jump on him violently to beat him. Curious ‘religion of peace.’”
One of the many interesting aspects of this brief fourteen-second video is that numerous police officers are present, and at least one of them actually comes to the aid of the victim, pulling one of the Muslim attackers off him before the video ends. Another is that one of the first people to confront this man after he pours pig’s blood on the Qur’an is a hijab-wearing woman, her face contorted in pure hatred.
We often nowadays see Islamic apologists and their leftist allies likening hijab-wearing women to nuns, and claiming that those who object to the one but not to the other are simply “bigoted” “Islamophobes,” but it is quite rare to see a nun who still wears her habit, with her features distorted in rage, rushing to physically attack someone for criticizing her faith.
Nevertheless, many people in the West will see this and side with the Muslims. They saw their holy book desecrated; how did the Swede expect them to react? And besides, treating books in this way is redolent of Nazi book-burnings, and manifests “racism,” “bigotry,” and “Islamophobia.”
That’s one point of view. But it fails to take into account several key bits of information. The pig’s blood on the Qur’an is indeed offensive. So is the blood of all those who have been killed or wounded because of the teachings contained within that book. Moreover, if this guy had poured blood on a Bible, the establishment media would be hailing him as an edgy warrior for freedom of thought and freedom of expression.
Only when these performances take place in regard to Islam do they become “hate.” And the Muslims’ violent reaction demonstrates that they do not have any respect for the freedom of expression at all, at least when it comes to criticism of their own beliefs. How long will Sweden survive as a free society with such people living there?
The same question could be asked of many other continental European countries, as well as of Britain. Back in June 2025, a man named Hamit Coskun was found guilty of a “religiously aggravated public order offence.” His specific crime, however, was that he publicly burned a copy of the Qur’an, the Islamic holy book. His conviction was ultimately overturned, and in March 2026, a Crown Prosecution Service appeal of the overturning was denied; nevertheless, the fact that the British government hounded Coskun over this for so long set a disquieting precedent for the future.
It is not a crime to burn the Qur’an or any book in Britain. Coskun wasn’t convicted of burning the book as such, but of disturbing the public order by doing so. That meant that he posed a problem for British law not insofar as he burned a book, which was permitted, but because in doing so he supposedly opened the door to public disturbances, which was not permitted. In other words, Hamit Coskun was convicted of a crime because Muslims might have rioted or committed jihad terror attacks over his actions.
The Crown Prosecution Service was, in short, pandering to the nation’s restive Muslim community by prosecuting Coskun, and appealing the overturning of his conviction. In trying to keep the nation’s Muslims happy, however, it was essentially adopting Sharia blasphemy laws. Coskun himself explained: “This is no longer just about me. It is about whether the West still believes that no religion is beyond criticism, especially when it shapes public life and political power.”
Yes. In persecuting Coskun, the U.K. enshrined the heckler’s veto as part of British law. If he had burned a Bible, no one would have cared, and there would have been no possible disturbance to the “public order.” But now, every time anyone expresses a critical word regarding Islam, he or she can be hauled off to jail.
The threat of jihad violence is now guiding the course of British law and infringing upon the freedom of speech. The British government has now compounded the prospect of some Muslims reacting violently to the burning of the Qur’an by making it clear that whether they do or not, the culprit will have to face the wrath of the British state.
Can what was known not too long ago as “the free world” survive this?
Namer says
I have been to the middle east several times and watched muslims slice out hand writing pages and pictures from many centuries old Korans to sell to western Tourists and no muslims cared. This is just selective outrage. In many muslim countries the woman who confronted him would have been beaten or killed for talking to a man she was not related to.
gravenimage says
+1
Tony says
No Public Funding for Islam and its Muslim Organizations including Mosques and Schools because of Muslim discrimination, segregation, violence, and terrorism as taught in Islamic Law and in Islam’s Qur’an(Qur’an 5:51; 9:5, 29, 41, 111; 49:15; 98:6, etc.). Public Funding is a privilege that should NOT BE granted to organizations that are against the US Constitution or Western Constitutions. Totalitarian Islam and its Muslim Organizations including Muslim Schools and Mosques are against the US Constitution due to Muslim funding, teaching, and promoting discrimination, segregation, hatred, rape, violence, totalitarianism, and terrorism against Non-Muslims to make Islamic Law supreme WITH NO EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW. Islam’s Muslims are murderous, Totalitarian Terrorists of Allah operating as a Criminal-Terrorist-Gang Enterprise under Islamic Law using MUSLIM MONEY and MUSLIM LIVES to ultimately conquer the enemies of Allah, the Non-Muslims, with Islamic Law DBA Islam(Qur’an 8:60; 9:5, 29, 111; 49:15, etc.).
Islam is the deceitful, daily practice of Islamic Law by Muslims, and Allah rewards his Muslim believers, Criminal-Genocidal-Terrorists of Allah, with a Garden Paradise when they kill and are killed in Jihad for Allah as war against the enemies of Allah, the Non-Muslims, using MUSLIM MONEY and MUSLIM LIVES to make Islam, Islamic Law, supreme(Qur’an 2:191, 216; 4:89, 91, 95; 9:5, 29, 41, 111; 48:29; 49:15, etc.). Allah in Qur’an 49:15 teaches, “Surely the believers[Muslims] are only those who believed in Allah and his messenger. They do not doubt, and they performed JIHAD with their MONEY and their LIVES for the sake of Allah. Those are the truthful.” See also Qur’an 2:191; 4:89, 91; 8:60; 9:5, 29, 111; 47:4; 48:29, etc.
Troybeam says
The problem with society and Islam is this: Society rushed to defend Islam because they have been told that Islam is peaceful and non threating.
Society has turned a blind eye to the actual threats of Death to a nation, violent attacks on people that oppose Islam like the man in the article. Yet society does nothing when Islam attacks people in churches, destroys schools, art works, statues etc.
Even today as will use the UK as an example: Government has turned against the citizens in order to allow Islam to destroy a nation of its sovereignty so that it becomes an Islamic state forever more losing its freedom, customs and mainly its history because now that Islam rules that history of the nation will be destroyed. Big Ben will be destroyed, Parliament will become a huge mega mosque. That’s just for starters.
Walter Sieruk says
That man who poured pig’s blood on the Qur ‘an must understand that Islam is a dangerous the Western countries , Still, there is the need for common sense by realizing that there is such a thing as taking on a specific problem in the wrong way. . That’s what this man did,
This isn’t excusing the brutal violent reaction of those Muslims who “snapped ” when he poured swine blood on the Qur.an . Still their violence is further proof that Islam is based on aggressive emotions and strong feeling and not or logic.
To explain this in another way, ,this incident should be a reminder that common sense that if a vicious dog infected with rabies is seen its best to keep away from that dog ,and not approach it and hit it with a stick.
Likewise, pouring pigs blood on the Qur ‘an in front of Muslims is like talking over to a dog with rabies and hitting it with a stick . For those Muslims who attacked him are a vicious dogs because they have been infected , not with the virus of rabies ,but the spiritual virus that is Islam.
Walter Sieruk says
The reality is that pouring pigs blood on the Qu’ ran is a very stupid thing to do. By contrast , an intelligent and sophisticated way to handle the problem of the Qu ‘ran is to study and examine it and expose and likewise reveal of the errors and contradictions that this “holy book” of Islam contains,
The Muslim terrorists use many verses from the Qur ‘an as the main source of justification for their violence, mayhem and murders. As found in For example, 4:89. 5:33. 9:5,111,123. The answer is clearly given on pages 145 through 157 in THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey in which he wrote a section on the Quran with its self-contradictions. Just two of the many he cited are the following “The Quran differs on whether a day is a thousand years or fifty thousand years in God’s sight’ and “Who was first to believe? Abraham or Moses [Sura 6:14 versus 7:143]? The above is inconsistent and illogical.
Further, Morey wrote about “The fact that Judaism and Christianity broke up into different sects was used in the Quran to prove that they are not of God [Suras 30:20-32. 42:13, 14]. Yet Islam has broken up into many warring sects and therefore cannot be true if the Quran is right.” Moreover, Morey in his book shows many more contradictions and absurdities in the Quran, there are and how Muhammad incorporated extra Biblical and Jewish folklore along with pre-Islamic Arabian myth and parts of Zoroastrian and Hindu stories into the Quran.
Furthermore, the Muslims claim that “the Quran is the direct, literal word of God unmodified in any way by the Prophet who uttered them at the bidding of God.”
In addition in the book UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet and Eethi Caner has shown that the Quran was modified in the following account on pages 45. “Muhammad felt the need to improve on the words of Allah, since he changed Allah’s wisdom for his own on several occasions. A hadith tells of the nonchalant emendations of Muhammad:’ On a number of occasions he [a scribe] had, with the Prophet’s consent changed the closing words of verses. For example, when the prophet had said ‘God is mighty and wise ‘ Adbollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down ‘Knowing and wise’ and the Prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Adbollah renounced Islam on the grounds that revelations, if from God could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.’
Other writers reveal that later Muhammad and his people did go war with the Qorayshites and he personally killed Abdollah. Obviously Abdollah knew too much and Muhammad wanted Abdollah’s knowledge to die with him.”
In conclusion, the Qur’ ‘an is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax and therefore entire foundation on a “house of cards.” That is total and complete falsehood.
England Invaded says
Shame he didn’t make the ‘slim animals drink it.
gravenimage says
Sweden: Man Pours Pig’s Blood on Qur’an
……………………………………………
Yet how many tools will blame the victim here?
Pray Hard says
Seems like almost everyone who’s commented so far.
gravenimage says
Not here on Jihad Watch.
OLD GUY says
Well it could have been worse, he could have been pouring pig piss or S–t on the Quran. This problem is cured vary easily, don”t allow the Quran into your country. We should do what Saudi Arabia and Qatar do with the Bible, they ban it from coming into their countries. They see the Bible as a threat to them, just as we should see and know the threat of the Quran and the people that follow it.
Huh!?! says
+100%