Se desata el caos en Suecia.
Un hombre se harta de los musulmanes rezando en público y lanza sangre de cerdo a un Corán en mitad de una plaza.
Los musulmanes saltan sobre él violentamente a pegarle.
Curiosa “religión de paz” https://t.co/5CvyK4YI6A
— Javier Negre (@javiernegre10) October 12, 2026
Translation: “Chaos erupts in Sweden. A man gets fed up with Muslims praying in public and throws pig’s blood on a Quran in the middle of a square. The Muslims jump on him violently to beat him. Curious ‘religion of peace.'”
Many people in the West will see this and side with the Muslims. They saw their holy book desecrated; how did the Swede expect them to react? And besides, treating books in this way is redolent of Nazi book-burnings, and manifests “racism,” “bigotry,” and “Islamophobia.”
That’s one point of view. But it fails to take into account several key bits of information. The pig’s blood on the Qur’an is indeed offensive. So is the blood of all those who have been killed or wounded because of the teachings contained within that book. Moreover, if this guy had poured blood on a Bible, the establishment media would be hailing him as an edgy warrior for freedom of thought and freedom of expression. Only when these performances take place in regard to Islam do they become “hate.” And the Muslims’ violent reaction demonstrates that they do not have any respect for the freedom of expression at all, at least when it comes to criticism of their own beliefs. How long will Sweden survive as a free society with such people living there?
Mo says
I do have to give them this: at least they stand up for their (demonic) religion. Christians would just stand there and not even complain. Maybe even defend him.
PRCS USN (ret) says
+1
somehistory says
Christians know that the physical book is not to be defended by violence
Too many make judgments about Christians, because they wrongly believe Christians are supposed to be more like muzzies in “defending” the Faith.
And too many Christians have been arrested when stating the evils about islime for them to stand up in a nation where other Christians have been arrested for proclaiming their Faith.
Walter Sieruk says
Not wanting to, in any way excuse the Muslims who beat up that man. Beating him up was wrong .
This incident should be a reminder that common sense that if a vicious dog infected with rabies is seen its best to keep away from that dog ,and not approach it and hit it with a stick.
Likewise, pouring pigs blood on the Qur ‘an in front of Muslims is like talking over to a dog with rabies and hitting it with a stick . For those Muslims who attacked him are a vicious dogs because they have been infected , not with the virus of rabies ,but the spiritual virus that is Islam.
somehistory says
Good for him. sorry he was beaten, but he probably expected it to happen. That other man in Sweden, murdered because he spoke the Truth about islime and burned their unholy book of demon filth, showed the evil violence of muzzies..
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I’d say that if one is going to do that, one had better be armed, and be seen to be armed. Then he could have smeared the qur’an w/ anything, while holding up his firearm, so that no jihadist would dare come near him. But this being Europe, they wouldn’t dream of having Second Amendment like laws, despite all the wars they have fought in history
Peter W Watson says
The entire media, luvvies, and progressive liberals thought nothing wrong with “Piss Christ”. Speaking of this with a Muslim friend in Istanbul he was horrified and said the Artist would have been killed had he done the same with an image of The Prophet or even worse immersed the Qu’ran in it. Double standards much?
Compare forgiveness faith and Fatherhood with vengeance, violence and the call for terror from an unknowable Force.
WPM says
If it was a Bible or some other Christian religious article nothing would happen we all know that .If anything the government might give “art grant money” for performing arts in public for that kind of display if the artist public proclaimed hate for Christianity or Christian symbols .
Dave says
I used to have 2 complete Qur’ans.
Got them in Saudi Arabia many years ago. Why? to better know the enemy.
Now, back to my first statement.
I used to have two Qur’an that were complete.
Remember the tolilet paper shortage a few short years ago?
I found a very good substitute.
Walter Sieruk says
Actually, pouring g pigs blood on the Qu’ ran is a very stupid thing to do. By contrast , an intelligent and sophisticated way to handle the problem of the Qu ‘ran is to study and examine it and expose and likewise reveal of the errors and contradictions that this “holy book” of Islam contains,
The Muslim terrorists use many verses from the Qur ‘an as the main source of justification for their violence, mayhem and murders. As found in For example, 4:89. 5:33. 9:5,111,123. The answer is clearly given on pages 145 through 157 in THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey in which he wrote a section on the Quran with its self-contradictions. Just two of the many he cited are the following “The Quran differs on whether a day is a thousand years or fifty thousand years in God’s sight’ and “Who was first to believe? Abraham or Moses [Sura 6:14 versus 7:143]? The above is inconsistent and illogical.
Further, Morey wrote about “The fact that Judaism and Christianity broke up into different sects was used in the Quran to prove that they are not of God [Suras 30:20-32. 42:13, 14]. Yet Islam has broken up into many warring sects and therefore cannot be true if the Quran is right.” Moreover, Morey in his book shows many more contradictions and absurdities in the Quran, there are and how Muhammad incorporated extra Biblical and Jewish folklore along with pre-Islamic Arabian myth and parts of Zoroastrian and Hindu stories into the Quran.
Furthermore, the Muslims claim that “the Quran is the direct, literal word of God unmodified in any way by the Prophet who uttered them at the bidding of God.”
In addition in the book UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet and Eethi Caner has shown that the Quran was modified in the following account on pages 45. “Muhammad felt the need to improve on the words of Allah, since he changed Allah’s wisdom for his own on several occasions. A hadith tells of the nonchalant emendations of Muhammad:’ On a number of occasions he [a scribe] had, with the Prophet’s consent changed the closing words of verses. For example, when the prophet had said ‘God is mighty and wise ‘ Adbollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down ‘Knowing and wise’ and the Prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Adbollah renounced Islam on the grounds that revelations, if from God could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.’
Other writers reveal that later Muhammad and his people did go war with the Qorayshites and he personally killed Abdollah. Obviously Abdollah knew too much and Muhammad wanted Abdollah’s knowledge to die with him.”
In conclusion, the Qur’ ‘an is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax and therefore entire foundation on a “house of cards.” That is total and complete falsehood.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Instead, he should have smeared that qur’an w/ 🐖💩
James Lincoln says
Decades back when I thought of Sweden I would think of Swedish meatballs, beautiful blonde Swedish women, and the Volvo 1800S.
Decades back…
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I daresay one would get a better experience of Swedish culture at an Ikea food court than at, say, Malmö
Islam is bad says
Just ban Islam.
Make being a Muslim a crime.
Raja says
islam is bad, why not expose the evils and lies/genocide thoroughly and make the islamists/Muslims ashamed? That would be true victory over the devil- icing in the cake!!!
Islam is bad says
Why not do both?