How far will the left go in trying to hold on to influence and power no matter what, and then attempting to gaslight the public in the face of indisputable evidence that the leftist BBC itself continues to report? The answer to that question is that the left will go as far as it possibly can without any limits whatsoever, as long as it can get away with falsifying the truth to suit its ideological agenda. The consequences to national security and the economy are secondary to its grab for power. The vote is prioritized, including the Muslim vote. As riots play out in France, the red-green axis is being exposed for what it is: a highly destructive force, allied with Islam, that is bent on ruining the West.
As the leftist media and BBC frantically try to cover up the truth, just as they did regarding the Muslim rape gang scandal, social media comes to the rescue:
Men draped in Palestinian flags loot stores across France.
What has France done to itself? https://t.co/XV5PyKSh9R
— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) October 18, 2026
Why is the media working so hard to avoid showing any Palestinian flags in the riots in France? https://t.co/YlT8ZzrOAK
— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) October 19, 2026
Terrible but sadly predictable. Was in Marseille earlier this week. Beautiful, vibrant but also in decay. You see more Palestinian flags than French ones. https://t.co/9XItIoJZS5
— Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) October 17, 2026
BBC News is now expected to eliminate over 100 jobs amid a major financial and operational crisis. Its real problem is its increasing irrelevance, as more people turn to social media for truth. Many others in the mainstream media are facing the same crisis.
“France riots: BBC doubles down on calling riots across France ‘mostly peaceful’ while showing masked looters torching cars and clashing with police,” by Dan MacDonald, GB News, October 20, 2026:
The BBC has doubled down on their decision to describe the riots in France as “mostly peaceful” while showing masked looters torching cars and clashing with police.
Since Saturday, more than 2,400 people have been arrested as disorder in several major French cities continues to spiral.
In its coverage of the disorder on Monday, the public broadcaster’s Paris correspondent, James Waterhouse, told viewers: “In Paris and beyond, half a million people had filled cities across France to protest over the future of their country
“They were mostly peaceful, but as we saw in the capital, in the wings were those who wanted to take advantage of the disorder.”
However, as Mr Waterhouse described the scenes as “peaceful”, the BBC used footage showing a car engulfed in flames with rioters heard yelling in the background.
It then proceeded to show a clip of balaclava-clad looters on the rampage through the streets, starting fires and clashing with police officers attempting to quell the unrest….
Taffy says
The left wing “news” sources have been caught lying so frequently, that they cannot be trusted to tell the truth for anything that they report. This is the case even with historically respected news sources such as The New York Times.
This reminds me of the Liar-Truth Teller set of logic problems, and one’s best strategy in dealing with these situations.
Westman says
The BBC is now calling on lawmakers for an “Internet Tax” after losing much of its TV audience. This is, of course, circular, because the government’s own desire to use the BBC for propaganda is the main reason the BBC exists, funded by a tax on anyone who owns a TV for watching any channel.
It is hilarious to see vans with directional antennas, like hunting Nazi spy transmitters, driving around the UK to determine who is watching TV and what channel. Do you suppose the government sells the data to pollsters and advertisers?
It seems so obvious that the internet has swamped all government propaganda with noise, rebuttals, and disinterest. Scammers are more prevalent than politicians, yet with effort, more truth can be found than ever existed in commercial broadcasting.
somehistory says
From al jazerra
“Why are French protesters chanting ‘Bismillah, c’est les ténèbres’?”
“As violent protests roil France, bringing together students demanding better educational conditions and groups rejecting the high cost of living, one chant has become an improbable rallying cry: “Bismillah, c’est les ténèbres”.
The unofficial slogan does not mean much taken literally, but students have channelled a whole array of grievances that lie at the heart of the protest movement into this nonsensical expression. It is meant to mock racial stereotyping by the police.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/why-are-french-protesters-chanting-bismillah-c-est-les-t%C3%A9n%C3%A8bres/ar-AA2fJiT5?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=1f6922f099694cc4b26840a2e0ac2617&ei=32
bob says
bet the Macrones are wearing Burkas now!
Rob R says
What do they think theyre achieving when we all can use the internet to see that its not peaceful?
Its completely pointless
somehistory says
And is the bbc reporting on this story:
“Landlords offered bumper rents to evict tenants and house small boat migrants”
“https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/landlords-offered-bumper-rents-to-evict-tenants-and-house-small-boat-migrants/ar-AA2fJqrt?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=6ad8ec569a1e446ab711e24f056f5950&ei=28
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I have figured it out – both CNN & BBC. “Mostly peaceful” means that almost nobody got killed
David M says
I wonder if they have to hold back from laughing to themselves when they call it “mostly peaceful’, or they are really so far gone they believe their own crap,
Jim Harmon says
“Mostly peaceful” means that only 49% of the demonstrators were violent.😉
Greg says
“FIERY BUT MOSTLY PEACEFUL PROTESTS”.
CNN correspondent Omar Jimenez reported live from Kenosha, Wisconsin, during civil unrest and riots.
gravenimage says
BBC calls French riots ‘mostly peaceful’ amid its own contradictory reports
………………………………………………….
How “peaceful” is looting, vandalizing Synagogues and Jewish shops, burning down schools and city halls, shooting teachers, and spraying them with gasoline and threatening to set them on fire?
Siddhi Nasranni says
The BBC is moving even further to the Left in it’s politics.
The BBC at one time only reported the News, now it gives us the Left leaning opinion.
It can not be Trusted.
gravenimage says
Yes–chilling. Decades ago I often sought out the BBC for reliable, in depth coverage. This has not been the case now at least since 9/11.
Beans🫘 says
It’s moving more towards crypto islamism and away from the left. The Muslims in the background there are the super stars who drive the narrative and control the whites working there with fear.
They have successfully pushed these western mainstream outlets not left, but Islamist. Not criticizing religion, is not Marxist or leftist. That is Islamist policy, the BBC protects Islam. The Muslims control because of their moral superiority, and the whites follow. They have gained massive power since this Gaza stuff, and Iran too. They’re the little “resistance”… we must listen to these brave Muslims, they’re the avant garde, they’re with justice.
CNN and most of the USA outlets are still a few steps behind. But we can all see the Muslims driving the narrative in general here, even changing our foreign policy and rallying our own people against US interests and for Islamist interests. Tucker turned down America and joined islamism. He wants them to benefit and be strong. Sharia is great.
gravenimage says
And it is not just CNN and the BBC. MSNOW (the former MSNBC, always leftist) is doubling down on their support of Abdul El-Sayed. Today they castigated Mike Rogers as “shameful” for daring to ask about his links to the Muslim Brotherhood.
Beans🫘 says
Well it does look like the Muslims finally are taking AIPAC down. They just said they won’t be endorsing or funding anybody for the rest of this cycle.
You know. I would just change the name to American Islamist organization instead of aipac, I’m sure everybody would be ok with that.
People have become parrots. They just heard 1 million times aipac bad aipac bad. It’s no different than your Muslim lobbies, but they get away with terror. AIPAC is American citizens doing exactly what the Muslims, Greeks and others do.
I’m not asking “how did we get here” at this point,
I’m now asking “what the hell is next”. I was thinking people like you were being rhetorical, but now I see it. It will get much more radical and Islamist, and it will not be livable for Jews.