The mere allegation was enough for them to beat him mercilessly.
“Allegations of hurting religious sentiments: Man dies after being beaten twice by mob in Satkhira,” Daily Star, October 14, 2026:
A 30-year-old man died after being beaten by a mob in Debhata upazila of Satkhira on Tuesday night over allegations that he had hurt religious sentiments by making remarks considered disrespectful to the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), police said on Wednesday.
The deceased was identified as Wahiduzzaman Shamim, son of Shamsur Rahman of Chhota Shanta village in the upazila.
Debhata Police Station Officer-in-Charge HM Shaheen said an audio clip purportedly containing Shamim’s remarks went viral on social media on Tuesday morning.
That evening, a group of people began beating Shamim in the Sakhipur area of the upazila. On information, police rescued Shamim and took him to Debhata Upazila Health Complex.
Around 9:00pm, a group of people under the banner of “Tawhidi Janata” entered the hospital and beat Shamim again, the OC said. As his condition deteriorated, he was referred to Satkhira Medical College Hospital, where doctors declared him dead around 1:00am today….
Frank Anderson says
“THE RELIGION OF PEACE” LIE at work again. Thank you GWB for promoting it and never correcting your false proclamation.
Pray Hard says
There was no “mohammed”. “Mohammed” is/was nothing but a mythical construct of the sun-baked brains of desert savages. Don’t agree? OK, prove he existed. Whatever can be asserted without evidence, can also be dismissed without evidence.
Troybeam says
No proof just a whisper in the wind by some one stating he made a comment to insult Muhammed.
Islam never demands proof, they set up a supposed system to defend ones self however it fails at every turn, low mental IQ from inter family relations lead to this outcome.
gravenimage says
Bangladesh: Muslim mob beats man to death over claims that he insulted Muhammad
………………………………………………………..
Just sickening. God, I hate Islam.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
In the other thread, we were discussing whether the Saudis were barbaric in executing that Bangladeshi couple. This is one reason I believe that they weren’t: you have these barbarians here hunting down anybody they suspect of blasphemy, and then one of their ilk – a devout muslims couple, mind you (who else goes to Mecca on their honeymoon?) – is executed for kissing in a Meccan mosque
It ought to teach them how valued they are within the ummah, but I’m pretty sure it won’t
gravenimage says
Infidel, your idea that atrocities mean that other atrocities are not barbaric is, I believe, mistaken.
abu taleb says
Beating, robbing, killing for the sake of allah or muhammad certainly gets big reward and should be considered as jihad act.
andrew says
mohamad, may PISS be upon him, was nothing more than a evil murdering self righteous piece of pig shit that couldnt handle anybody telling him they disagreed with his notion of God and if you want to come after me then I must tell you Im locked and loaded, so bring it on Ali Baba you disgusting cowardly Son of Satan.
gravenimage says
Muhammad also sacralized lying to critics of himself so that assassins could get close enough to murder them.
“Narrated Jabir bin `Abdullah:
The Prophet said, “Who is ready to kill Ka`b bin Al-Ashraf who has really hurt Allah and His Apostle?” Muhammad bin Maslama said, “O Allah’s Messenger! Do you like me to kill him?” He replied in the affirmative. So, Muhammad bin Maslama went to him (i.e. Ka`b) and said, “This person (i.e. the Prophet) has put us to task and asked us for charity.” Ka`b replied, “By Allah, you will get tired of him.” Muhammad said to him, “We have followed him, so we dislike to leave him till we see the end of his affair.” Muhammad bin Maslama went on talking to him in this way till he got the chance to kill him.”
https://sunnah.com/bukhari:3031