I told you this was going to happen. This note at the end of this weepy creepy USA Today piece is telling: “The reporters’ roles covering First Amendment issues at the USA TODAY Network is made possible by a collaboration among Freedom Forum, Journalism Funding Partners and the USA TODAY Network. Freedom Forum does not provide editorial input.” That is essentially an admission that those groups paid to have this piece featured in USA Today. Go to Freedom Forum’s website and you’ll see that it is a leftist organization focused on Trump’s alleged enormities; this alleged free-speech organization never said a word about the very real and thoroughgoing censorship of foes of jihad violence and Sharia oppression.

“25 years after 9/11, many Muslims fear a new backlash,” by BrieAnna J. Frank, Cate Charron, Angele Latham, Stephany Matat, and Taylor Seely, USA Today, September 6, 2026:
The morning of Sept. 11, 2001, began like any other day. Sabinah Mohyuddin was getting her kids ready for school in Clarksville, Tennessee, while her husband, a cancer physician, was still asleep….
Then Mohyuddin, a Muslim, learned the hijakers also followed Islam.
“It fell on me like a heavy weight,” she said. “What did this mean for the Muslim community? What did this mean for me?”
Not a word, you’ll notice, about the martial and violent passages in the Qur’an, or 1,400 years of jihad violence, or about the jihad attacks around the world today. USA Today leads us to believe that the Islamic identity of the attackers was entirely incidental to their attacks, and that Islam is completely harmless and non-threatening.
Now, 25 years after the attacks, Muslims across the country are asking the same question as they experience rising Islamophobia and concerns about their First Amendment right to religious freedom.
Over 40% of U.S. adults believe Muslims are less patriotic than other Americans and that Muslim Americans are having a negative impact on the country, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted in May.
The stigmatization, often amplified by politicians, has affected everything from immigration statuses to due process rights and everyday religious practices. Muslim leaders and community members, in turn, told the USA TODAY Network they’re left fighting to defend their faith and warning the nation that its founding principles are at stake….
Note the sleight of hand here. We have gotten not the slightest hint that Islam is political, and are told that our right to religious freedom is at stake. Yet the religious practices of Muslims are not what makes Islam controversial.
“I think there’s a lot of propaganda pushed against Muslims, which leads to an unsafe environment,” Khan said.
Abutaa fears that won’t change anytime soon.
“We’re going to see, at least unfortunately the way the waves are going, more anti-Muslim rhetoric than ever before,” Abutaa said. “It’ll probably be worse than post-9/11, especially with the demonization of Muslims in America being the new McCarthyism.”…
The ones who are really being demonized here, as always, are the critics of Islam and foes of jihad violence and Sharia oppression. They’re portrayed as irrational bigots, without the slightest hint that there might be any genuine problem to which they’re responding.
A fight for the right to wear a hijab in a booking photograph has also come to the forefront. There have been at least seven lawsuits over the matter since 2024, according to Religion News Service.
Among them is a complaint by four Muslim women in Arizona who sued multiple police departments and Arizona State University after male officers removed their hijabs while arresting them at pro-Palestinian campus protests in 2024.
The women alleged the officers violated their First Amendment rights by denying their request for religious accommodations, such as removing their hijabs only in front of female officers. An Arizona district court judge dismissed several of their claims, though one against the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office remains.
Jabaieh was one of those women, telling the USA TODAY Network she was in jail for 26 hours without the covering she’d worn since she was in high school.
“You wouldn’t want somebody to take off your shirt,” Jabaieh said. “I felt stripped, and I felt exposed. I felt scared. I felt humiliated. I felt small.”
She called wearing the hijab “something that was deeply personal between me and my religion that was taken out of my control.”
Why are all these pious Muslim women getting arrested? Why does USA Today pass over in silence the fact that women are getting imprisoned and killed for not wearing the hijab in Iran? Why is USA Today silent about how Muslim women are threatened and worse for not wearing it?
The incident echoed other interactions she’s had throughout her life related to her faith, including a man asking her as a teenager whether she was married.
“I was like, ‘Oh, no sir, I’m 15,'” Jabaieh recalled telling him. “He was like, ‘Yeah, but your people do that, right? Like Muslims, y’all get married at six, eight, nine?'”
No mention of Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha and how he is the “excellent example,” or of why child marriage is rampant in Afghanistan and elsewhere.
Despite the challenges for American Muslims, there are “silver linings in what’s been a pretty dark cloud for the last 25 years,” according to Arsalan Iftikhar, a human rights lawyer and author of books including “Fear of a Muslim Planet: Global Islamophobia in the New World Order.”…
Dark cloud? Muslims have been streaming into the U.S. in large numbers since 9/11. Why are they coming to this alleged “Islamophobic” hellhole?
Mohyuddin, too, has gotten involved.
She and other Muslim leaders in Tennessee organized protests and pushback to a 2011 state bill that initially sought to make it a felony to follow Sharia law. The bill was rewritten as a provision allowing the governor to determine that a group provided “material support” to terrorists – without providing evidence to the public – and passed.
Shortly after, she became a founding board member of the American Muslim Advisory Council and now serves as its executive director. The Nashville-based organization challenges Islamophobic legislation and works to combat Muslim stereotypes.
“In hard times, what gives me hope is seeing more of the community willing to exert their rights, and willing to organize and speak up,” she said. “Even despite all of the attempts to silence us.”
Who is attempting to silence the American Muslim Advisory Council, or Muslims in general? Absolutely no one. There are some people and groups calling attention to the fact that Sharia is political, supremacist, expansionist and violent, and not as benign as Mohyuddin and her comrades claim. She is free to deal with the substance of our arguments, but instead contents herself with calling us names and attempting to silence us. Freedom Forum remains uninterested in that.
somehistory says
It seems that most muzzies in the U.S. have money….more than the average American. so, they can pack up their things….and the pretend *troubles* and go to some place where they won’t have to deal with any “backlash,” which they always claim comes to them.
Knowing what islime is all about, I have no time, no sympathy for the whining muzzies who know full well they would gladly slit throats to make sure islime takes total control of every life.
Walter Sieruk says
One thing is for sure, which is that the surviving family members of the people who had been murdered by Muslim terrorists on September 11th 2001 are right and justified by having a petition to ban that Muslim mayor Zohan Mamdani from being present at the 25th anniversary memorial events.
For Mamdani is very fond of death –inflection jihad terrorism as observed by his favorable view those murderous affronts committed by the jihadists of Hamas of 10/7/.23 which is the opposite side of the 9/11 jihad terror /murder coin.
Wellington says
One way or another Buttlims end up making it all about them.
There are many completely legitimate criticisms one can make of the world’s worst religion. Many. And here’s just one of them: Islam is steeped in narcissistic victim status to an absolutely maudlin and self-parodying degree.
Islam sucks. Nothing sucks more.
somehistory says
One of my professors, Wellington, is also a psychologist. He says that psychopaths (with whom he spoke as a special agent with the FBI) think in terms of “It’s all about Me!”
Enter a world-wide mob of psychopaths….some wearing slave, “rape her/not me,” rags.
The mob says, “It’s all about Us!”
Walter Sieruk says
The movement of the relatives of those murdered by Muslim terrorists on 9/11/2001 have signed a petition calling on New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani not to attend the 25th anniversary ceremony, is very good idea.
For insidious un-American Islamic subversive stealth jihadist Mamdani is a two legged walking and talking affront of adding insult to injury to the surviving family members of the people who had been murdered on Islamic attacks of Islam’s jihad on September 11th. 2001 by the Muslim terrorists of al Qaeda.
Larry Estavan says
“Why are all these pious Muslim women getting arrested?”
Indeed –
CAIR And The UC Irvine Hijab Crisis –
https://youtu.be/hjV8hFDgkBU
tgusa says
It took five AWFL’s to come up with that bilge.
The First Amendment reads: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Notice how the AWFL’s ignore freedom of speech, the right of the people peaceably to assemble, to petition the Government for a redress of grievances? The AWFL’s use the free exercise of religion as their argument but that part of the First Amendment does not cover a cult posing as a religion. A cult that establishes their religion under threat of death. A cult that prohibits the free exercise of religion. A cult that prohibits every right listed in the First Amendment. Those AWFL’s are dumber than a box of rocks and a menace to American society. Please God rid us of the loathsome AWFL’s (and their islamic BFF’s).
tgusa says
The AWFL’s are a portrait of why men of the past restricted certain activities of women. The men of the past were wise. The US Constitution and the Bill of Rights are much to important to leave to the AWFL’s. On the Internet there is a growing chorus of people that calling for a reevaluation of women’s rights. I have to admit, regarding the AWFL’s, they have a point. If American women want to keep the rights they have marched for in the past I suggest that they start marching in large numbers in opposition to the AWFL’s before it is too late.