It is common today to compare the spiritual and political collapse of the West to the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Undoubtedly, both processes share several common features in terms of their scale and dramatic nature, yet the comparison is extremely far-fetched. In reality, the collapse of Western civilization is far more terrifying and grim than the fall of Rome.
If the fall of ancient Rome can be likened to the slow dying of an infirm, chronically ill, and jaded old man, then the demise of the modern West is more akin to the irrational suicide of a person in the prime of life, possessing every advantage.
For one thing, Rome was unfamiliar with the destructive pseudo-Marxist concepts — such as Identity Politics, Critical Race Theory, Institutional Racism, Intersectionality, “White Privilege/Male Privilege,” Cancel Culture, etc. — that have infected every sphere of intellectual and spiritual life in the modern West. The Roman elite were mired in debauchery, perversion, corruption, and cynicism, yet this pales in comparison to the self-hatred and self-flagellation that the West practices. Class-based and racial gradations that divided citizens into the “inferior” (white Christian men and Zionist Jews, viewed a priori as exploiters, racists, manipulators, and colonizers — modern “Untermenschen”) and the a priori “oppressed” (ethnic and sexual minorities, migrants, and peoples of the Third World — modern “Übermenschen”) were unthinkable to the Romans.
Romans in the twilight of the empire continued to respect ancient philosophers and their own culture. It would not have occurred even to a madman in Rome to call Plato, Aristotle, Epictetus, the founders of the Republic, Scipio, Caesar, or Cicero “dead white European males” (DWEM). Fashions, beliefs, and ideas changed, but the memory of their ancestors and admiration for them remained alive in the hearts of the Romans.
They took pride in Rome that conquered, ruled, enacted laws, and built bridges, amphitheaters, and roads, and they did not torment themselves with pangs of conscience. They were also aware of the evil nature of man and rightly considered that Rome — for all its vices — represented the highest manifestation of the human spirit when compared to the barbarians.

Secondly, Ancient Rome, even as it was dying, continued to maintain a rich spiritual life. The ideas of Stoicism and Epicureanism (Epicurus’s philosophy had nothing in common with unbridled hedonism) provided rich food for the intellectual and imaginative life of the educated Roman, laying the foundation for the Italian Renaissance. Followers of Pythagoras and Plotinus (Neoplatonists), as well as Gnostics, engaged in vigorous intellectual debates regarding the fundamental philosophical issues that have always occupied the human mind: divine providence, the origins of the cosmos, the causes of evil in the world, the paths to the salvation of the human soul, and the nature of virtue.
The mystical cults of Mithraism captivated Rome’s military elite. Among intellectual circles, a fascination with Judaism became a sign of the times: Caesar himself and Octavian August were famous for liking of Judaism, and Horace, Seneca and Cassius Dio wrote that the Jewish religion had spread across the whole of the empire.
This ferment of ideas ultimately contributed to the spread of Christianity and the formation of the modern Church, shaping the future of Western civilization. Judeo-Christianity is not an empty cliché. It is a complex of moral and ethical paradigms — such as the concepts of conscience, empathy, reflection, guilt, and remorse, as well as the striving for a spiritual ideal — that has elevated humanity above primal animal instincts.
No other culture has created anything like it. The West has committed many terrible crimes in the past. But ONLY the West was willing to accept repentance. Neither Japan, China, nor Turkey, nor the peoples of Africa and Asia — and certainly not the Muslim nations — feel the slightest pangs of conscience for the atrocities they have committed and continue to commit.
What ideas define the intellectual and spiritual state of the West today? Only one: endless Marxist mutations in their most repulsive and absurd forms.
Rome left behind the fertile seeds of countless ideas and concepts. The West leaves behind a spiritual wasteland that quasi-Marxism has scorched, a graveyard of ideas, and a cult of perversions — leaving nothing but a vacuum. But nature abhors a vacuum, and it is already easy to predict who will fill this void.
Václav Havel called the Soviet system “Absurdistan.” Today, the West itself resembles “Absurdistan,” even when compared to the Soviet empire.
Thirdly, the Romans invited barbarians into their midst, yet the barbarians quickly and willingly integrated into Roman society, adopting its way of life, worldview, and ideals. Even upon entering Rome, Alaric, the leader of the Visigoths, sought to minimize senseless bloodshed and the desecration of sacred sites.
Today’s Muslim barbarians are filled with an instinctive, irrational hatred of the West. They crave its humiliation and destruction. They bring their most vile habits and primitive traditions to the West, including a crude cult of force, cruelty, violence, contempt for women and minorities, pedophilia, female genital mutilation, incestuous marriages, polygamy, blood feuds, hatred of animals, and patriarchal mores.
Islam is reshaping Western culture, erasing it just as it has previously erased so many others.
The founder of modern liberal democracy, Alexis de Tocqueville, wrote: “I studied the Koran a great deal … I came away from that study with the conviction that by and large there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad.”
There is the following characteristic of the Church historian Philip Schaff: “Mohammedanism conquered the fairest portions of the earth by the sword and cursed them by polygamy, slavery, despotism and desolation. The moving power of Christian missions was love to God and man; the moving power of Islam was fanaticism and brute force.”
Ernest Renan called Islam “the heaviest chains which have ever shackled humanity.”
Yet it is precisely Islam that the Western elites welcome as a “good and peaceful religion” of the future.
The collective West threw its doors open to Islam, which the Muslim Brotherhood and its patrons represent, most notably Qatar and Turkey. This is not merely suicide — it is the most agonizing and merciless suicide imaginable. It would have been far less painful back then to let in Soviet tanks than to welcome the Muslim Brotherhood, with their mosques, seventh-century Sharia law, and cult of superiority.
No, the demise of the West is not the fall of Rome. The demise of the West is not a process of dying at all; it is suicide — and in its most horrific form.
Alexander Maistrovoy is the author of Agony of Hercules or a Farewell to Democracy (Notes of a Stranger), available at Amazon and Barnes & Noble.
Rick Gordon says
Frightening ………………. more importantly ……….. is it already too late to stop it.
Timmy says
Assuming the West wakes up at some point. The first effort would be to pay Muslims to leave, buy their property at fair value, help them resettle elsewhere. For those who refuse that, make life so difficult for them, they either leave Islam, or somehow just endure the situation, some would self-deport. After that, rounding them up, forcibly removing them, would the West ever have the stomach to do that? Maybe if it was finally acknowledged that would be necessary for our civilization to survive. Needless to say, we are so far from doing what is necessary, but we should begin thinking about possible alternatives for the future.
Focusing currently on Sharia is an idea. Deport anyone that promotes it, in any form, close any mosque that supports or teaches Sharia. Deport any Muslim family that does not allow a member of that family to leave Islam if they so choose. Chip away at the enforcement that allows Islam to survive in the first place.
Timmy says
An excellent article indeed.
The brainwashing by modern liberalism into multiculturalism has worked to such a degree that the average Western citizen no longer has that most basic instinct common to all living things, self-preservation.
Nothing short of an actual miracle from the God of the Bible, not Allah, can save the West at this point.
Wellington says
Yes, worse. Far worse.
somehistory says
Not just islime….but it has brought with it a loss of the view that there is a sacredness of life.
Just reading the various conversations after the one lone juror….whom the supporters of the murderous mom excoriated for reports that he hadn’t paid his rent and he shoved his nephew…caused the murderer to have to wiait for another trial, lets me know that we are living in evil times.
I knew it before, but this is evil on steroids.
clancy is not the only one who has murdered her children recently. There are so many. and the murderers are getting the sympathy for what they have done and claim to be “suffering.”
If I wasn’t sure of the final outcome, I’d despair.
somehistory says
And an example of those who are bringing the “demise and suicide”
“CNN anchor Dana Bash lamented on Thursday the findings in a new poll out of Michigan that 45% of the electorate would not vote for a Muslim candidate, calling it “just gross.”
She doesn’t see it acceptable. I recall conversations showing fear of the first Catholic becoming president. there was no reason for that fear…..but with the objections of muzzies, there are a gazillion *reasons*.
““And then the question, which kind of goes to the strategy here, perhaps, by some voters who are thinking about the balance of power in Washington: ‘What is your preference for party control in the US Senate?’ Democratic, 53. Republican, 45,” Bash said, adding:
Now let’s get to what you were just talking about, Nia. “Would not consider voting for a presidential candidate who is…” Atheist, 46%. Muslim, 45%. Jewish, 20%. Christian, 7%. These are Michigan voters, the people who are going to go to the polls to decide between Rogers and El-Sayed. 45%?
“Yeah, I mean, listen — Barack Obama had to deal with this, right? I mean, he had to deal with the reality that some people in 2008 were not comfortable voting for a Black man for president, a Black man that people thought was Muslim, and all that kind of stuff,” replied”
Bloomberg columnist Nia Malika-Henderson, who added:
So, you know, if you listen to Abdul El-Sayed, he says, “Oh, there are many Abduls in Michigan, and take my name out your mouth if you can’t say it correctly.” But the reality is there are biases out there, and he’s got to figure out a way to address them. It doesn’t help that he is essentially campaigning with Hasan Piker.
“Well, yeah, I mean, he did — he did one time. Now he’s trying to distance himself-ish. It’s one thing to sort of suggest that; it’s another thing to say — to have respondents from this poll, 45% say they would not consider voting for a Muslim. First of all, it’s just gross, right?” Bash added.”
:”distance himself-ish”?
These women are fools.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/just-gross-cnn-s-dana-bash-taken-aback-by-poll-on-how-many-people-would-not-vote-for-a-muslim/ar-AA2cssJu?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=6aac6ae8ee5147e8b7acf8da596b12f1&ei=7
somehistory says
Hungary is changing. Orban is out. Per Glenn Beck
https://glennbeck.com/watch/videos/what-hungary-just-did-to-conservatives-is-a-stark-warning-for-america-guests-salena-zito-marissa-streit-91726?utm_source=Recurring%20%7C%202026-09-17%20%7C%20PM_Newsletter_Recurring&utm_medium=