Muhammad, according to Islamic tradition, beheaded between 600 and 900 men of the Jewish Qurayzah tribe after the Battle of the Trench, because of their alleged betrayal. Muhammad had already exiled the other two tribes in Medina, and the Qurayzah had no reason to believe he would treat them differently. What is interesting here is that Naqdi assumes the truth of the incident. Just a few years ago, Islamic apologists in the West, recognizing that it made Muhammad look bad, routinely denied that it was historically accurate. Of course, Naqdi is speaking from a Muslim country, where such accounts are well known, but in general, Islamic apologists are more forthright now about the aspects of Islam that Westerners consider unpleasant than they were quite recently.
“‘Flee quickly’ – Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps threatens Israeli citizens,” Egypt Independent, September 2, 2026 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
The senior advisor to the commander-in-chief of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Mohammad Reza Naqdi urged Israelis to return to their countries and “flee quickly,” adding that those who remain will be treated “as Banu Qurayza were treated,” according to Iranian media.
Naqdi added, “They should know that the method the Islamic forces will use once they arrive there will be the same method used with Banu Qurayza.”
He continued, “Therefore, they must flee quickly, and those who remain will be treated according to the way the Banu Qurayza were treated, according to the rulings of the Torah, not according to Islamic mercy.”…
࿗Infidel࿘ says
So in the last few days, the islamic regime has been hitting targets in various Arab countries – Jordan, Emirates, Kuwait, Iraq,…. One country that they have been careful not to hit is Israel. B’cos they know fully well that if one bomb lasts West of the Jordan river, then Trump will be powerless to restrain Israel from rejoining the war. And unlike the US, Israel’s sole goal in the war is regime change from day 1. If they were to resume, every leader now – be it military, religious or political – would be targeted – Mojtaba, Rezaei, Ghalibaf, Pezeshkian, Vahidi, Araghchi, Ejei, et al. Which is why despite their bluster, Israel is the one country they are not hitting
So alluding to Muhammad’s battles w/ the Jooooooooos is not just bluster: it couldn’t be farther from the truth. If it was remotely close, then the IRGC would not be sending a single missile in the way of its Arab neighbors: it would be solely targeting Israel. But instead, it’s targeting everybody but Israel
The sooner this regime falls, the better, so that the economic chaos & doom that has descended on Iran can soon end
John Smith says
Good logic in what you are assuming here, it’s well thought out.
James Lincoln says
Infidel,
I’m secretly hoping that Iran sends a missile into Israel that results in no casualties.
Then Israel could could do what Israel is capable of doing…
John Smith says
I see where you are coming from with this one James and I’m with you all the way. This is a battle between good and evil which you and Infidel are both well aware of.
James Lincoln says
Thanks, John.
Westman says
When dogs growl it is usually a sign of fear, running up as close as it dares, repeatedly, and then falling back.
Khamenei is in the grave, well some parts, and Mohammad Reza Naqdi is quite aware that he could join the departed if the IRGC actually tried to invade Israel. For now, Israel has a nuclear deterrent, backed by a US nuclear deterrent capable of making the IRGC into men without a country.
Given the history of earthquakes and other disasters befalling Iran, one could surmise that Allah is not pleased with the reputation Iran and its proxies bring to Islam nor that any Iranian Imam actually speaks for the diety. Over a thousand years of hostility toward Sunnis does not describe any religion of peace. If Islam can’t create peace in its own house it is hardly fit to rule the world.
abu taleb says
Then, it should be ok if Israel use the same method used with Banu Qurayza to the Gazans, right?
But we all know that muslims are always practicing double standard, they can use any method they want but never eaccpet when the same method is used to them.
And the west always falls for that.
ceres says
islam is evil and the koran says they love death…may they get what they love. sura 113: say, i seek refuge with the lord of the daybreak (allah) from THE EVIL OF WHAT HE HAS CREATED. In hadith allah blows your evil into you as he makes you out of a 40 day old bloodclot in your mother’s womb. Allah makes the jinn, demons made of smokeless fire. ie allah is evil/satanic/or satan’s helper. Only evil allows men to rape children and others, mutilate girls genitals, kill everyone else, enslave, beat, behead, stone, amputate.. etc.
gravenimage says
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps advisor: ‘The Islamic forces will use the same method used with Banu Qurayza’
…………………………………………….
So–slavery, rape, and mass murder. Yes, this is what these thugs most admire.
Malibu Conservative says
I believe the material I’ve read on this event may have been more Islam friendly than I assumed. From my reading, at least how I remember it now, these Jewish allies of Muhammad were convicted of treason, and thus executed. It would be no different than if we decided to enact it against a traitor in today’s time. But I admit, I took it for granted that this was true. I’ve learned more about Islam since then, and I presume there is much more to this story.
I have also seen some material about this alliance when I was researching the Abraham pact between Israel and the Muslims. Their Islamic scholars used this alliance of Muhammad and these Jewish tribes as a reference model based in Islamic jurisprudence…. But then…. Who would make an alliance with such a group if they were in fact traitors?
They are definitely hiding something. It is a pattern of the historic crimes of Muhammad which has been manipulated by western Muslims. I also have some Islamic material which I was given by a Malaysian man about seven years ago. The point being, once you touch material that was written for knowledge Muslims, you will absolutely notice the difference between this and material me and you may find at a library here.
gravenimage says
MC, the the Banu Qurayza were accused of breaking the peace treaty and conspiring with the attacking Quraysh forces against the Muslims. I have never seen any further details.
But even if true in some way, your claim that “it would be no different than if we decided to enact it against a traitor in today’s time” is *completely* mistaken. Where have we–I presume you mean the West–punished allies who didn’t come through by beheading all of their men and pubescent boys, and enslaving all women and children?
Note that “Prophet” Muhammad also expelled the other two Jewish tribes in Medina after he took over there–the Banu Qaynuqa and the Banu Nadir. The first was over a prank played on a Muslim woman (a merchant pinned up her dress so that when she got up part of her leg was exposed. A stupid prank–but surly not worthy of theft and expulsion of the entire tribe in retaliation?). The second is even vaguer. But in both cases Muhammad stole all of their assets before expelling them.