Dana Nessel Will Never Understand It, but She Is Antisemitic

Dana Nessel will never understand it, but she is antisemitic. She thinks Jews have a duty to sacrifice themselves — if need be to put their very survival at stake — for what she sees as the good of humanity. I repeat here that single sentence of Nessel that should be etched in all our memories: “We [Jews] have a moral imperative to place the needs of the world above even our own self-interest and, yes, even our own survival.”

Oh yes, El-Sayed “regrets” certain remarks he made after the attack on a Detroit synagogue in March, when he said that “hurt people hurt people” and “violence is a cycle.” Let’s not be idiotic, shall we? Of course he is now merely mouthing what he thinks he must in order to win over the terminally gullible.

Yet Nessel says she will not back Mike Rogers. What’s wrong with Mike Rogers? Why such a reluctance of some Jews to endorse him? After all, it is not Rogers, but his opponent, Abdul el-Sayed, who denies that Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state.

Another line by Nessel that should be etched in our brains: “It is perhaps up to us now to follow in her [Queen Esther’s] path and sacrifice the comfort, safety and security and even the very future of our own people in exchange for the opportunity to save the rest of humanity.” If you want to sacrifice your comfort and safety and security, Dana Nessel, in order to “save the rest of humanity,” go right ahead, we won’t stop you. But for god’s sake, kindly leave the rest of us, Jews and non-Jews alike, alone.

Nessel has also said: “What good is defending the historic homeland of our ancestors and demanding that candidates acknowledge its right to exist, if the planet upon which it rests is no longer inhabitable?” Hmm. Oh, I see. The most important thing is to slow down global warming. Because if we don’t, the world will “no longer be inhabitable.” And the only way to prevent that is to give the Democrats control of the Senate. And that means you, Jews of Michigan, must — to save the planet — vote for Abdulrahman El-Sayed, no matter what that may mean for the survival of the Jewish state and of the Jewish people.

Nessel asked Jews: “Come November, what do your Jewish values tell you to do?” Hmm. What are “Jewish values”? I don’t know, but I don’t think suicide “for the benefit of the world” is one of them. I would have thought, given the history of the 20th century, that Jewish values would now include the duty to multiply, to make up for all those murdered by the Nazis and so many other willing collaborators.

Nessel doesn’t grasp the full danger of El-Sayed. She’s willing to overlook his denial of Israel’s right to exist because she thinks that if he becomes a Senator, then — it doth follow as the day the night — Congress will pass legislation to halt global warming, and so will every other country, and then the whole wide world will be saved from extinction. And not a moment too soon. All because Jews in Michigan voted for El-Sayed.

A member of the Jewish caucus, Joan Lowenstein, said: “Many do not agree and don’t want to turn their backs on Jewish life in the U.S. or in Israel so that we can have a Democratic Senate. Even though many of us disagree with each other, we respect the validity of these views.” Well, I trust that Jews in Michigan will not “respect the validity” of Nessel’s call for Jews to sacrifice themselves in order to “save the world,” and will, by way of riposte, show up to cast their ballots this November, but not for Abdulrahman El-Sayed.

One last point: in the Middle East, Israel is holding the fort for Infidels everywhere. Its military strength, its economic achievements, its successes in all kinds of technology, its ability to keep Muslim enemies at bay, is a much greater achievement “for the good of the world” than Dana Nessel comprehends. Among other bad qualities, she’s an ingrate.