A former politician’s preposterous proposal reveals the depth of the elites’ ignorance.
As Britain slides toward total self-destruction, the once-great nation’s political and media elites remain determinedly clueless about what is happening and why, and don’t even see any need to do anything about the problem that will, if left unchecked, certainly lead to the country’s demise. Edwina Currie has just given us a new indication of just how willfully ignorant those elites really are.
Edwina Currie is 79 years old, and she is a longtime pillar of the British establishment. She was a member of the British Parliament from the Conservative Party for nearly fourteen years, and from September 1986 to December 1988, she was Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health. She has recently returned to the headlines, and earned a good bit of ridicule, by suggesting that the British government should not only welcome in Muslim migrants, as it has been indefatigably doing for years now, and providing them with all manner of welfare benefits, but that it should also give them free access to prostitutes.
In making this suggestion, Currie demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of what Britain is dealing with in the Muslim migrants it has with foolish and suicidal short-sightedness welcomed into the country. She also betrays a number of false assumptions that are by no means limited to her alone, and that have led Britain to the sorry state it is in today.
Currie was asked if it was really right that the tiny town of Piddington, which has fewer than 500 people, should be forced to take in 1,200 migrants. In response, Currie first made surethat her interviewer was apprised of the current politically correct terminology: “I think you mean asylum seekers!”
The idea that the young, military-age Muslim men who have been flooding into Britain are seeking, or in need of, asylum from anything strains credulity well beyond the breaking point. The young men who have already come into Britain are responsible for massive spikes in criminality, particularly rape. They make up a hugely disproportionate percentage of the population of British prisons, having abundantly demonstrated that, as “the best of people” (Qur’an 3:110), they have nothing but contempt for the laws and customs of “the most vile of created beings” (Qur’an 98:6).
Currie showed no understanding of that, and she was just getting started. According to The Times, she responded: “The obvious thing that 1,200 young men are going to need in a village like little Piddington is a brothel. I don’t think they’re going to provide that. I have a feeling that is not going to be allowed.”
One would hope it wouldn’t be, but in Britain these days, madness reigns to the extent that one never knows. Whatever happens, however, Currie in saying this displays two other dangerously false assumptions. She appears to believe that the Muslim rape gang scandal, in which over 250,000 British girls were victimized while authorities did nothing for fear of being accused of “Islamophobia,” happened simply because the Muslim perpetrators lacked access to prostitutes. If the government will start supplying them, all will be well.
Currie has almost certainly never heard Muhammad’s famous dictum, “Islam must dominate, and not be dominated.” She is no doubt completely unaware that the Qur’an tells Muslims that they can take infidel women as sex slaves (4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, and 70:30). She doesn’t realize that the mass rapes of British girls are a way for the Muslims in Britain to assert their dominance, display the weakness and cowardice of British authorities, and pave the way for the destruction of the British state and the establishment of Sharia in Britain.
Even worse, Currie assumes that it is the British government’s responsibility not only to take in these migrants, but to provide for their every need at taxpayer expense. Why the British, as well as the Europeans, Canadians, and Americans have the responsibility to take in and care for all the oppressed of the world remains, as always, unexplained. Why the British taxpayer must pay even a farthing for the upkeep of these men coincides nicely with the Qur’an’s command to collect the jizya from conquered infidels (9:29), but the question of what the taxpayer gets in return is never set out. If Edwina Currie gets her way, those beleaguered taxpayers will only get more trouble.
J Allan says
You REALLY need to concern yourself with YOUR country, MISTER Spencer!
Let US concern ourselves with OURS!
Josh says
You post the same comment over and over again. I can tell just from the tenor of your copy & paste comment that you’re someone I would find despicable and intolerable.
But here’s the thing, you keep telling Spencer & co. to concern themselves and limit themselves to their country. Why don’t you tell Muslims that? Islam is a specifically expansionist internationalist totalitarian ideology that sees the entire world as its concern and focus. You’ve never shown the slightest concern about that.
By the way, the United Kingdom, the British Isles in total, are doomed. You’re partly to blame for that. You’re inanity is intolerable. So is your ignorance and inaction. An eternal curse upon you.
Bean🫘 says
I think he’s got some family members ready to sign up for jobs. Don’t interrupt their opportunities.
These are jobs for British girls after all. The migrants are all single, male and of course asylum seekers.
gravenimage says
Good post, Josh.
And clearly J Allan does *not* concern himself with Islam taking over Britain.
Jos Haynes says
If only our politicians WOULD concern themselves with the welfare and future of the British people rather than the invaders,
gravenimage says
+1
carpediadem says
Robert Spencer posts about JIHAD wherever it occurs, and that is not specific to one country.
if you don’t like it, go elsewhere.
gravenimage says
Exactly. carpediadem. The US, Britain–and France and Germany and Italy and all of Europe–and Africa and Asia and anywhere else Islam is a threat.
I am American–but I don’t mind if others care about the threat of Jihad here–in fact, I am glad to know we all have allies who *do care*. In the same way, I care about the threat of Islam all over the world.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Hey, we were thinking about you the other day – but there you weren’t!
jerry glenn says
Dhimmi Britain increases its lead in the European Islamopandering derby
Rob R says
She’s nothing but a mad old lady, who quite possibly needs to go to the doctor for something in her lady parts.
Ronald Dewhirst says
It will come, we don’t know when or exactly how.
Huh?!? says
Perhaps dementia is setting in.
gravenimage says
Could be–but how would that explain all the much younger dhimmis?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Maybe, but her views are pretty much in line w/ most Tories. There is a reason traditional British conservatives have moved either to Reform or even further to Respond Britain
Jos Haynes says
Restore Britain! Rupert Lowe’s party
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Yeah, Jos, my bad!
gravenimage says
What the British Still Don’t Get
……………………………..
What an idiot. I don’t suppose she’d want to volunteer for that free brothel servicing violent Muslim thugs?
Jos Haynes says
Currie is most famous for having a four year affair with John Major (he of the “family values” mantra) when they were both Conservative MPs. The affair ended because Major became prime minister and it was too risky to carry on. Currie revealed all this in her “memoirs” published after she retired.
She was also the most useless minister in a government of useless idiots.
Ray Adams says
Edwin C is just one more useless politician and we have our Parliament packed with these ignorant jobsworths . She promoted the toxic covid jab and criticised all those wise enough to avoid the poison . The Brltish elites are on a different planet and by their actions demonstrate their contempt for the UK and its History .We are in big trouble.