What is of interest in this story is not just that the three Afghan rapists filmed themselves raping the young German girl, or that they laughed hysterically while they raped and filmed her. No, the thing to note is that a German feminist made public the story of her rape. We are so used to Western feminists taking the side of the most misogynistic of faiths that when one of them does not follow that script, but denounces Muslim rapists, and further denounces those who in a spirit of political correctness protect such criminals, it is worth noting. More on this story can be found here: “Germany: 3 Afghan men gang filmed themselves laughing as they gang raped a young girl,” Remix News, August 27, 2026:
The three men – 20-year-old Quais W., 19-year-old Burhanulla N., and 25-year-old Kambiz H. – are currently on trial in Dortmund Regional Court involving a range of serious charges, including rape and the filming of a pornographic video of a minor.
The three men reportedly lured the girl to their apartment in September 2024 in the city of Dortmund under a false pretext. However, once in the apartment, the suspects got the girl so intoxicated with alcohol that she lost consciousness.
“During the night, the witness lost consciousness as a result of alcohol consumption. The accused then took advantage of this situation,” said prosecutor Fabian Weishaupt.
The three men then systematically raped the girl and filmed themselves laughing. One of them even opened the unconscious girl’s eyes with his finger.
According to Bild, the three suspects all have extensive criminal records, including robbery, attacks against law enforcement, drug trafficking, assault, and other offenses.
As for the Lukreta feminist group, one of their members stated that the case was “covered neither by public broadcasters nor by the political Left even though it can hardly be surpassed in terms of abnormality and misogyny.”
“The reason, of course, is that the three perpetrators are all of Afghan origin and known to the police,” she said.
She is right, of course, and how welcome that the charge comes from a member of Lukreta (Lucretia was the Roman wife whom Tarquin raped, and who then killed herself), a feminist group. Ordinarily organized feminist groups in the West have defended Muslims, choosing not to recognize the deep misogyny of Islam. In the same way, homosexuals in the West have defended Muslim causes and shown up as “Queers For Palestine” to denounce Israel, the only country in the Middle East where homosexuals are not discriminated against. Could it be that the number and type of Muslim attacks on women can no longer be denied? Can it be that Western feminists are beginning to realize all the ways that Islam is misogynistic? These include the Qur’anic license for husbands to “beat their wives” if they even suspect them of disobedience; the value of a woman’s testimony being half that of a man; the daughter who inherits half that of a son; the requirement that women be clothed as men demand, with everything from those Iranian girls punished by the religious police if they wear a hijab too loosely or still worse, not at all; those Saudi women wearing black niqabs with only their eyes visible through thin slits in the fabric, the Afghan women wearing burkas that cover them completely, save for a mesh that falls over their faces.
This looks like a break in the dam of resistance to blaming Muslims for their crimes. A German member of a feminist group forthrightly blames these three Muslim rapists and goes further, expressing her outrage at how Muslim crimes against women are so often not reported on, in an attempt by left-wing politicians to hide the reality of all the mayhem and misery that Muslims in Germany have caused. She’s not having it, and I allow myself to believe that other feminists, in other countries, have also come to the end of their tether, and now recognize that Islam is their enemy.
Ade Fegan says
You might have hope for brain dead feminists ………… but I don’t
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Me neither
tgusa says
Feminists got everything they wanted and now that they have it they are calling in an airstrike on their own positions.
John Pepple says
Nor do I. There have been so many times in the last twenty-five years that I thought this would be the event that turned things around, but it never happened, so I don’t have much hope here.
Anyway, while I used to support feminism and homosexuality, I no longer do. After 9/11 — in fact, after the Muslim takeover of Iran in 1979 — they should have been the loudest ones screaming against allowing any Muslims into the West. Instead, they supported it (aside from a few people like Phyllis Chesler and Bruce Bawer). They screamed at us for being Islamophobic, and yet I am supposed to support them? No way.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
On Homosexuality, I used to support Civil Unions, but stop there: I refused to grant such relationships the same status as marriage. Justice Anthony Kennedy arrogated that power to SCOTUS, but once that happened, it turned out that the “slippery slope argument” was not a logical fallacy, but rather a trend line. People who have been activists their whole lives aren’t gonna stop simply b’cos their goal has been attained: they’ll continue to try to push the envelope. Which is why I now see the point of those who were even opposed to civil unions (to this day, I still support that, but draw the red line right there)
Feminism came in waves, and what we have today is 4th wave feminism. I was fine w/ the first wave of feminism – women having the vote as well as the right to be things other than housewives and have to trot around home barefoot and pregnant, as well as the second wave – equal pay for equal work. It’s the third & fourth waves of feminism that I have always been against – misogyny in the third, and female supremacy in the fourth, coupled w/ the “T” in the LGBTQIA+ movement
somehistory says
The three slugs should hang.
Westman says
Too slow. Firing squad with birdshot, no blindfolds.
tgusa says
Too fast. We should take a cue from the leftists and embrace third world tribal practices. Tied to a branch and slow roasted over hot coals. Marinade is optional.
Alex Lund says
Or follow the example of Vlad Tepes. Impalement.
Or Stephuhn. (aka stepping chicken)
You have a round metal plate, that can be heated. in the middle is a small opening for a chain to pass through.
This chain is attached to a chastity device you put on the most male part of the offender.
And then you turn up the heat on the metal plate.
And then he will begin to dance.
And if you are merciful you give him a knife so he can cut off a certain part of his anatomy and save his life.
tgusa says
That sounds gruesome…but anyway,
Peter Watson says
They won’t laugh when they find themselves in Hell.
medaber_emet says
The merciful judge will consider the poor people who suffer from a gap in cultures and set them free. I hope the Muslims will rape the judge’s daughter too, and I’m not sure that even then he will learn that they should be executed.
Cynthia says
This is typical Muslim behavior. On October 7 Gazans filmed their own atrocities while laughing and calling home to parents to brag. These “people” are the lowest of the low.
tgusa says
Three Afghans rape a German Girl and film themselves laughing but their sponsors are the German government.
Lisa Tea says
I like to point out that it is their god Allah who gives Muslim men permission to have sexual relations with pre-pubescent little girls. This explains the British grooming gangs 250,000 estimated victims, and the tragic story of the little eight-year-old Yemeni girl who bled to death on her wedding night in 2013.
Her own government tried to cover it up, but a female member of their parliament confirmed it was true. And boy was she MAD. I saw the video. When Yemen tried to raise the legal age of marriage to 18, Muslim men rioted in the streets.
I learned most of these facts from my Jihad Watch daily newsletter. And I publish these facts wherever I can on related Muslim stories online. How can anyone think Allah is God?