Thursday at the Reagan Ranch Center in Santa Barbara, California.
Comments
David Grisezsays
When it comes to peace with Iran I suspect that peace with Iran will only occur if all the Shia Islamic leadership is completely removed from the government of Iran and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp is completely destroyed. As long as any of this Shite Islamic leadership and IRGC remain in power this leadership will lie and deceive and do anything possible to regain full power and continue fighting and attacking other nations and continue the nuclear bomb program.
it’s not possible to have a genuine peace agreement deal that is real and lasting peace with those aggressive tyrants of that Islamic regime of Iran.The reason why this is so is because those disingenuous deceitful dishonest despots who chronic liars and will have no intention of keeping any of promises in any ‘peace document” that they might happen to sign . At it’s very best , they will keep some of the promises that they would peace agreement only as long as it fits in their their jihad agenda and no longer . They will use the time after the agreement was signed to restore the weapons manufacturing centers.
To put this in another way, the sigernes by those tyrants on any “peace agreement document ” that they might sign wouldn’t be worth the price of the paper of the document was printed on.
Furthermore, those despots of that brutal and cruel Islamic regime would then “hunt down” and capture ,through those vicious thugs in uniform , the IRGC , the Iranian patriots who were bravely and courageously striving to have established a legitimate government that would ensure a natural basic human rights. Those Iranian patriots after being captured and chained in prisons and severely tortured without mercy and then ruthlessly murdered.
No good thing ,at all , would come out of that so -called ‘peace agreement deal” It would be bogus .
It is not possible to have peace with someone dedicated to following violent instructions in the Qur’an and Hadiths and the example of a violent, sociopathic, paedophilic warlord named Muhammed.
There is an old wise Bible based saying which is “Have no dialogue with the Devil.” That saying has come from Genesis chapter three, in which Eve talked with Satan through the serpent. the result of her discussion with the Devil was severe calamity for her and her husband , Adam and all future humankind.
The wisdom of that saying may very much be applied in this year of 2026, Being that President Trump might be willing to have US government officials meet with and have “peace discussions” with representatives of the belligerent and hostile Islamic regime of Iran .
The point being that those tyrants of that Islamic regime may be as seen as symbolic of the Devil . Likewise, those despotic Islamic regime’s representatives may be viewed as “the serpent.” If the outcome of such a fool dialogue with those Islamic characters will result in some kind of a “peace agreement deal;” it would be a disaster for America, a disaster for Israel , a disaster for the Iranian people ,and a disaster for the world
The war that Iran started in 1979 when it invaded US sovereign territory by attacking the US Embassy in Tehran and taking US citizens hostage?
Then calling for death to America every day since, while supporting proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Gaza, Iraq and Yemen, to continue to wage their war against the US and the West via deniable means?
Muhammed, Allah’s Prophet, declared war on all Infidels 1400 years ago. Muhammed was following Allah’s command that Islam was to Rule Over the Entire World until
All Religion is for Allah and thus Sharia is over all.
Islam is a Government Religion.
You can’t take the Rule over All out of Islam or it’s not Islam. Without Islam Ruling over believers and nonbeliever alike, Allah is not in charge.
Islam has been waring specifically against the United States since 1801 with the Barbary Wars, when Islam attacked American ships and demanded tribute.
How dare you be such a weak Muslim and not acknowledge Allahs Right to Rule Over All!
How dare you not defend Allah’s right to be aggressive in his Rule!
How dare you deny Allah’s right to start wars against the Infidel!
Take off your Western mask and stand up for Allah!
I do wish close captioning was enabled for this video
9:00 The claim that 15% of the world’s muslims are shi’ite depands on that 99% of Iranians being shi’ite. But as Robert notes, most Iranians have stopped being muslim at all in the first place. So that not only reduces the number of shi’ites worldwide, but also their percentages
15:00 Talking about the rule of the cleric, or velayati faqih, one titbit I heard in the last few days on Armin Navabi’s show was that the official head of the islamic republic is not even the Supreme Leader, but the Mahdi. That twelfth imam who disappeared into a well in Samarra at the age of 5, Muhammad al-Mahdi – that person is under the islamic republic’s constitution, the official head of state of the islamic republic. The Ayatollahs – Khomenei and then the Khameneis – were just his representatives: they weren’t the actual supreme leaders in their own rights. Which begs the question – how many degrees of representation can the islamic regime have before someone has to show himself? 😈
21:00 Talking about competing in the economic realm, not only does Iran not compete w/ Israel anywhere there, but Iran goes head to head w/ Russia when it comes to competing. These 2 countries have the same imports and exports, making their current alliance absolutely ridiculous. And Russia ain’t even islamic – shi’a or sunni
25:00 Talking about Spain, maybe mohammedans won’t have to do a jihad against Spain, given how easily Madrid is folding on Cueta
30:00 Saddam Hussein wasn’t quite “secular”. As Hugh used to explain about the Ba’athists, Saddam, being a sunni, which was the minority in Iraq, made alliances w/ other non-shi’a minorities and imposed a socialist regime there (just like Hafez al-Assad did next door in Syria, but in the other direction) In Iraq, becoming an islamic republic implied Iraq becoming officially shi’a, given that they were the majority. Saddam stood in the way of that happening. But other than that, he was the one who added to the stars in Iraq’s flag w/ “allahu akbar” written in Arabic, and no subsequent regime thought it worth changing, the way Syria reverted its flag once Assad got overthrown
34:00 Using the Kurds to try & topple the islamic regime is a stupid idea, even if Erdogan wasn’t for it. Iranians Kurds, like the other minorities, want to see an end to the islamic regime, but they don’t want to secede from Iran. If anything, they too support Pahlavi. If the US had gone ahead w/ arming the Kurds, it might have rallied some nationalistic Iranians behind the IRGC, just like in the 80s, Iranians, regardless of what they thought about Khomenei, rallied behind him against Saddam Hussein. This is one of those rare instances where Erdogan drove us to making the right call
35:00 Iran is a poster child against gun control. I wonder whether Reza Pahlavi, in his reforms, plans to introduce gun ownership rights in Iran if he comes to power? That’s one thing that the Iranians should have so that no future ayatollah can take over that country again. Having said that, even though the regime has all the guns, if there are enough people rising, even that won’t keep them in power. Only thing – it won’t be as bloodless as most of us hope for, but few revolutions ever are
37:00 Talking about Qatar, it’s the reason that I hope that the IRGC manages to cause more damage to their LNG production infrastructure, so that they no longer have money to splurge on global islamic causes
42:00 Talking about them pouring into Spain, it’s worth noting that Spain is separated from Morocco from the Strait of Gibraltar. What happened here was Moroccans pouring into an exclave of Spain on the Moroccan side of the Strait of Gibralter. As we discussed, it’s worth asking whether that territory is worth Madrid holding on to, if they are going to do nothing about their border
47:00 On the reference to the Crusades, it’s not just History of jihad, even if that’s the latest: the Politically Incorrect Guide to islam (and the Crusades) was a better book if one is just interested in the Crusades
50:00 Congratulations to the gentleman who pushed back on the very existence of the term “islamophobia”. I get Robert’s explanations for what it covers, but that very term should be rejected to start w/
58:00 On Mateen’s question on why there isn’t more coverage about the Pahlavi plans, there are 2 things. One – since we Americans have only been a republic and rejected the idea of kings, the conclusion is that that is a solution for nobody, no matter what their history or culture demand, or their situation. The assumption is that a solution for the US is the same that should be applied to countries like, say, Iran or Nepal or Thailand. No cultural context whatsoever. Two – things like reintroducing prosperity to a country are more nerdy & boring topics for Western media outlets, who only believe in highlighting bad news. It’s a big reason that Western news should not be taken seriously
dear Mr SPENCER , in your opinion , and based on your knowledge , who is primarily organizing the masses of muslims who are invading european Countries ? thank you . GCM
Peace with Iran is missing the point completely. The question is, “Can there be peace with moslems”?
The answer is “no”.
I don’t say it.
They do.
It’s also proven by 1,400 years of history.
David Grisez says
When it comes to peace with Iran I suspect that peace with Iran will only occur if all the Shia Islamic leadership is completely removed from the government of Iran and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp is completely destroyed. As long as any of this Shite Islamic leadership and IRGC remain in power this leadership will lie and deceive and do anything possible to regain full power and continue fighting and attacking other nations and continue the nuclear bomb program.
Walter Sieruk says
it’s not possible to have a genuine peace agreement deal that is real and lasting peace with those aggressive tyrants of that Islamic regime of Iran.The reason why this is so is because those disingenuous deceitful dishonest despots who chronic liars and will have no intention of keeping any of promises in any ‘peace document” that they might happen to sign . At it’s very best , they will keep some of the promises that they would peace agreement only as long as it fits in their their jihad agenda and no longer . They will use the time after the agreement was signed to restore the weapons manufacturing centers.
To put this in another way, the sigernes by those tyrants on any “peace agreement document ” that they might sign wouldn’t be worth the price of the paper of the document was printed on.
Furthermore, those despots of that brutal and cruel Islamic regime would then “hunt down” and capture ,through those vicious thugs in uniform , the IRGC , the Iranian patriots who were bravely and courageously striving to have established a legitimate government that would ensure a natural basic human rights. Those Iranian patriots after being captured and chained in prisons and severely tortured without mercy and then ruthlessly murdered.
No good thing ,at all , would come out of that so -called ‘peace agreement deal” It would be bogus .
gravenimage says
+1
Islam is bad says
It is not possible to have peace with someone dedicated to following violent instructions in the Qur’an and Hadiths and the example of a violent, sociopathic, paedophilic warlord named Muhammed.
Walter Sieruk says
There is an old wise Bible based saying which is “Have no dialogue with the Devil.” That saying has come from Genesis chapter three, in which Eve talked with Satan through the serpent. the result of her discussion with the Devil was severe calamity for her and her husband , Adam and all future humankind.
The wisdom of that saying may very much be applied in this year of 2026, Being that President Trump might be willing to have US government officials meet with and have “peace discussions” with representatives of the belligerent and hostile Islamic regime of Iran .
The point being that those tyrants of that Islamic regime may be as seen as symbolic of the Devil . Likewise, those despotic Islamic regime’s representatives may be viewed as “the serpent.” If the outcome of such a fool dialogue with those Islamic characters will result in some kind of a “peace agreement deal;” it would be a disaster for America, a disaster for Israel , a disaster for the Iranian people ,and a disaster for the world
Marie Ruiz says
Is it because you think the USA is not belligerent? They are the ones who started the war.
Islam is bad says
Started what war?
The war that Iran started in 1979 when it invaded US sovereign territory by attacking the US Embassy in Tehran and taking US citizens hostage?
Then calling for death to America every day since, while supporting proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Gaza, Iraq and Yemen, to continue to wage their war against the US and the West via deniable means?
Or did you have some other war in mind?
Winston 101 says
Muhammed, Allah’s Prophet, declared war on all Infidels 1400 years ago. Muhammed was following Allah’s command that Islam was to Rule Over the Entire World until
All Religion is for Allah and thus Sharia is over all.
Islam is a Government Religion.
You can’t take the Rule over All out of Islam or it’s not Islam. Without Islam Ruling over believers and nonbeliever alike, Allah is not in charge.
Islam has been waring specifically against the United States since 1801 with the Barbary Wars, when Islam attacked American ships and demanded tribute.
How dare you be such a weak Muslim and not acknowledge Allahs Right to Rule Over All!
How dare you not defend Allah’s right to be aggressive in his Rule!
How dare you deny Allah’s right to start wars against the Infidel!
Take off your Western mask and stand up for Allah!
gravenimage says
Note that Marie Ruiz here has never said *anything* critical of Jihad terror. Very telling.
And Iran has been attacking Israel for years through its proxies Hamas, Hezb’allah, and the Houthies–as well as directly. She seems good with this.
Cynthia says
It is time for complete victory over the evil regime. If it remains in any form, the danger starts all over again.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I do wish close captioning was enabled for this video
9:00 The claim that 15% of the world’s muslims are shi’ite depands on that 99% of Iranians being shi’ite. But as Robert notes, most Iranians have stopped being muslim at all in the first place. So that not only reduces the number of shi’ites worldwide, but also their percentages
15:00 Talking about the rule of the cleric, or velayati faqih, one titbit I heard in the last few days on Armin Navabi’s show was that the official head of the islamic republic is not even the Supreme Leader, but the Mahdi. That twelfth imam who disappeared into a well in Samarra at the age of 5, Muhammad al-Mahdi – that person is under the islamic republic’s constitution, the official head of state of the islamic republic. The Ayatollahs – Khomenei and then the Khameneis – were just his representatives: they weren’t the actual supreme leaders in their own rights. Which begs the question – how many degrees of representation can the islamic regime have before someone has to show himself? 😈
21:00 Talking about competing in the economic realm, not only does Iran not compete w/ Israel anywhere there, but Iran goes head to head w/ Russia when it comes to competing. These 2 countries have the same imports and exports, making their current alliance absolutely ridiculous. And Russia ain’t even islamic – shi’a or sunni
25:00 Talking about Spain, maybe mohammedans won’t have to do a jihad against Spain, given how easily Madrid is folding on Cueta
30:00 Saddam Hussein wasn’t quite “secular”. As Hugh used to explain about the Ba’athists, Saddam, being a sunni, which was the minority in Iraq, made alliances w/ other non-shi’a minorities and imposed a socialist regime there (just like Hafez al-Assad did next door in Syria, but in the other direction) In Iraq, becoming an islamic republic implied Iraq becoming officially shi’a, given that they were the majority. Saddam stood in the way of that happening. But other than that, he was the one who added to the stars in Iraq’s flag w/ “allahu akbar” written in Arabic, and no subsequent regime thought it worth changing, the way Syria reverted its flag once Assad got overthrown
34:00 Using the Kurds to try & topple the islamic regime is a stupid idea, even if Erdogan wasn’t for it. Iranians Kurds, like the other minorities, want to see an end to the islamic regime, but they don’t want to secede from Iran. If anything, they too support Pahlavi. If the US had gone ahead w/ arming the Kurds, it might have rallied some nationalistic Iranians behind the IRGC, just like in the 80s, Iranians, regardless of what they thought about Khomenei, rallied behind him against Saddam Hussein. This is one of those rare instances where Erdogan drove us to making the right call
35:00 Iran is a poster child against gun control. I wonder whether Reza Pahlavi, in his reforms, plans to introduce gun ownership rights in Iran if he comes to power? That’s one thing that the Iranians should have so that no future ayatollah can take over that country again. Having said that, even though the regime has all the guns, if there are enough people rising, even that won’t keep them in power. Only thing – it won’t be as bloodless as most of us hope for, but few revolutions ever are
37:00 Talking about Qatar, it’s the reason that I hope that the IRGC manages to cause more damage to their LNG production infrastructure, so that they no longer have money to splurge on global islamic causes
42:00 Talking about them pouring into Spain, it’s worth noting that Spain is separated from Morocco from the Strait of Gibraltar. What happened here was Moroccans pouring into an exclave of Spain on the Moroccan side of the Strait of Gibralter. As we discussed, it’s worth asking whether that territory is worth Madrid holding on to, if they are going to do nothing about their border
47:00 On the reference to the Crusades, it’s not just History of jihad, even if that’s the latest: the Politically Incorrect Guide to islam (and the Crusades) was a better book if one is just interested in the Crusades
50:00 Congratulations to the gentleman who pushed back on the very existence of the term “islamophobia”. I get Robert’s explanations for what it covers, but that very term should be rejected to start w/
58:00 On Mateen’s question on why there isn’t more coverage about the Pahlavi plans, there are 2 things. One – since we Americans have only been a republic and rejected the idea of kings, the conclusion is that that is a solution for nobody, no matter what their history or culture demand, or their situation. The assumption is that a solution for the US is the same that should be applied to countries like, say, Iran or Nepal or Thailand. No cultural context whatsoever. Two – things like reintroducing prosperity to a country are more nerdy & boring topics for Western media outlets, who only believe in highlighting bad news. It’s a big reason that Western news should not be taken seriously
All in all, a good speech and Q&A session
Giancarlo MATTA says
dear Mr SPENCER , in your opinion , and based on your knowledge , who is primarily organizing the masses of muslims who are invading european Countries ? thank you . GCM
Pray Hard says
Peace with Iran is missing the point completely. The question is, “Can there be peace with moslems”?
The answer is “no”.
I don’t say it.
They do.
It’s also proven by 1,400 years of history.
James Lincoln says
An excellent speech by Robert Spencer at YAF on Iran – worth watching the whole thing.
He should be an advisor to Secretary of State Rubio.