There’s a lot that is worrisome about Ilhan Omar. I don’t mean her virulent anti-Israel views that descend into antisemitism. Nor am I here concerned with her activities in Congress, where she has spent more time representing Somalia than Minnesota. Nor is it the louche dealings she and her husband, “political consultant” Tim Mynett, have been engaged in.
No, what should be our focus right now is the government’s investigation to discover whether Ilhan Omar did, or did not, marry her brother. More on this investigation can be found here: “ICE refuses to disclose records on Ilhan Omar fraud probe, cites ongoing ‘enforcement proceedings,’” by Steven Richards, Just The News, August 12, 2026:
The federal government is refusing to turn over records related to an investigation conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement into allegations of immigration fraud by Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., citing a legal exemption for ongoing investigations.
Just the News filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the records in January, seeking the records pertaining to any investigations conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement into the allegations that Rep. Omar, who represents Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District, married a relative in order to help him remain in the country.
Omar has denied the allegations. No court records, DNA evidence, or other documentary proof has ever substantiated that Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, Omar’s legal husband from 2009–2017, was her biological brother….
Trump administration border czar Tom Homan first said in December last year that the Department of Homeland Security was investigating whether Omar committed immigration fraud by allegedly marrying her brother, Just the News reported. “We’re pulling the records, we’re pulling the files,” Homan said in an interview with Newsmax last year. “We’re looking at it […] I’m running that down this week….
Ilhan Omar is now under active investigation for immigration fraud. The charge is this: Ilhan Omar changed her last name from “Elmi” to “Omar” in order to hide from immigration authorities that she had “married” a man whose last name was “Elmi” and who, in fact, is her brother. Now the government of Somaliland has provided evidence to American authorities of this name change, and of the connection of her father to atrocities committed in the Horn of Africa when Siad Barre was the dictator of Somalia.
🧾 Receipts: Ilhan Omar’s original last name was Elmi before it was changed.
This evidence was available, but the Obama Justice Department refused to investigate.Her brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, and their father, Nur Said Elmi (also known as Nur Omar), used multiple names… https://t.co/9sz3ZXVN3X pic.twitter.com/d16tAMCKrn
— REPUBLIC OF SOMALILAND (@RepOfSomaliland) March 19, 2026
The charge that she married her brother so that he could remain in this country is still neither proven nor disproven. What is new is the information from the government of Somaliland, which appears to show, from a paper trail (receipts) that Ilhan Omar’s real name is Ilhan Nur Said Elmi, and the man she “married” is her brother, Nur Said Elmi.
We’ll wait right here until Ilhan Omar, the “smyler with the knyf under her cloke,” is either indicted or exonerated. The former, of course, would be preferable to the latter. Surely, if Nur Said Elmi isn’t her brother, both she and he would be glad to have samples of their DNA analyzed. Deoxyribonucleic acid, do your Watson-and-Crick stuff.
somehistory says
I read this in an email from Glenn Beck a couple of days ago. There are ways of getting DNA even if the perps don’t want to give it.
Get a couple of samples….one from the snake and one from her brother.
The snake filed irs tax returns with the other *husband* during the years she was “married” to elmi (her birth name). this is clearly a breaking of federal law and she , and he, should have already been charged for those crimes.
Those crimes do not require DNA evidence.
Submitted documents with their signatures. That’s proof.
OLD GUY says
Funny how this has never been investigated by any state or federal agencies. But then again she probably falls under political protection as an elected officials.
Walter Sieruk says
We may be sure that much of that money that Ilhan Omar has obtain, by hook or by crook,’ will go into that insidious subversive and dangerous stealth jihad. Likewise, we may also be sure that much of that money will go funding, through Islamic shall front groups, supporting and suppling murderous jihad terror entities, as Hamas.
Furthermore, Ilhan Omar, should be impeached and removed from the political office she now holds. Maybe she should even expelled from the United States as a security threat. For even an American Imam had described her as so dangerous that he referred to her as “ISIS with lipstick” [1]
Omar with her stealth jihadist schemes to promote Sharia over the US Constitution as the rule of law upon America is ,in essence, very un-American of her.
Related to this, are the wisdom of former US President, Theodore Roosevelt had, rightly, \in a speech declared “There can be no fifty -fifty Americanism in this country. There is room here for only one hundred percent Americanism, only for those who are Americans and nothing else.”
Furthermore, Omar with her Islamic anti-Jewish and anti- Israel politics and policies is also very un-American of her.
Therefore, That sign is reminder former US President, William Howard Taft had, wisely, declared in a speech “Antisemitism is a noxious weed that should be cur out. It has no place in America.” – Neither should Omar have a place in America.
[1] The video documentary titled TRUMP CARD by Dinesh D’ Souza,
Walter Sieruk says
Ilhan Omar should be removed from congress, then expelled from the United States. For Omar is the epitome and personification of the dangerous insidious subversive Islamic movement in America which is known as the “stealth jihad.”
Hugh Fitzgerald says
“Watson-and-Crick stuff”
To be fair, let’s also remember Rosalind Franklin, whose X-ray defraction photographs were so important to the two infiguring out the double helix. She died before she could have shared the Nobel Prize with the two of them. Wilkins, however, did. And the Nobel can be shared by, at most, three people. So had she lived, who would have been the third — Franklin or Maurice Wilkins? Another who died just before he would have shared in a Nobel Prize was Stephen Kuffler, a wonderful man whom I knew in my youth.
Hugh Fitzgerald says
Diffraction, not defraction. Sorry.
Voltaic says
Who would have been third?
How about the American Linus Pauling?
He seemed to be getting close to the answer when two younger dudes, Watson (American) and Crick (English) came running up and flashed past him and everyone else to the finish line.
Too bad. Just think -Pauling could have turned to James and said ‘Elementary, my dear Watson, and oh give my regards to your friend…um.. uh…Crook..no..Crick, yes Crick, how could I forget?
Momentous. The Double Helix. The actual primal structure of life itself. That would have been at Cambridge in about 1953, the same Cambridge where today….
[Yes, the same Cambridge where today a Muslim in a hijab denies (hence she is a liar) that she wrote that Muslims should study Engineering so they can build weapons to destroy the West.]
At one stage I wanted to see how it was announced to the world back in 1953. I looked it up in a University library. It was just a couple of short grey-printed paragraphs in a letter to Nature.
I don’t know if it was a Monday.
But my sense of it was that the main contenders were Pauling, Crick, and Watson.
Franklin and Wilkins could have stared at those Bragg diffraction images for a hundred years and seen not a thing.
I thought that it was just weeping feminists who were canonising Franklin for obvious reasons.
But I’ll read it all again.
I didn’t know that only three were allowed to receive the prize.
Thanks for that Sir Hugo.
That casts a strange yellowish light on the scene.
And so Miss Franklin conveniently dies and three men Watson, Crick and…um …Wilkins
walk up to collect the glittering prize.
But these days it’s just Watson and Crick.
Who talks about Wilkins?
Hugh Fitzgerald says
Very funny, Voltaic. But “dudes”? Un po’ di dignita, per favore.
It isn’t just feminists who believe that Rosalind Franklin deserved nore recognition fom Watson and Crick, and posterity. Her great champion was the brilliant Aaron Klug, a Nobel Prize winner himself in 1982. According to Wikipedia, he was given the award for “his development of crystallographic electron microscopy and his structural elucidation of biologically important nucleic acid-protein complexes.”
Aaron and his wife Liebe once put me and my wife up for a day or two. I remember that he seemed to know all about everything.. His library was full of books of literature and history. I remember his discussing George Sturt’s “The Wheelwright’s Shop.” — the life and times and art of a rural wheelwright in the period of 1880-1920, when the so-called modern world put paid to his profession.
Taffy says
No one cared that Obama was provably not a US born citizen and therefore not Constitutionally eligible for the presidency. Not the press, not the judiciary, not the Federal Election Commission nor anyone else that mattered. And no one cared that the document that he alleged was his birth certificate, published on the White House website was a provable forgery.
Similarly, no one seems to care if Omar committed immigration fraud by marrying her brother. It is simple enough to prove one way or the other. Clandestinely obtain a discarded drinking cup from Ilan Omar and one from Ahmed Nur Said Elmi. Send both to a lab with a check for $500 and order a DNA comparison test. If the test comes back a match for siblings, the U.S. attorney now has probable cause for an arrest of both of them, and can then have a judge order that they both submit to a DNA test with full chain of custody for admissibility in federal court.
This process takes days, not years. My guess is that someone already did the first step and knows the answer, but for reasons best know to the U.S. Attorney, the case is not going forward.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Actually, if someone is not constitutionally eligible for the presidency, that should apply to all elected office in the US. The best they should have is the right to vote, but not much more, after naturalization
somehistory says
If that had been the way of the Founder’s there wouldn’t be such a mess now….like in MI, NY, MN, and stinking up Congress. We wouldn’t have had to suffer through bo times.
Winston 101 says
Still. . .waiting. . .
My hope is for the day I wait no longer! But until that day. . .it’s just more talk. Agreeable talk. . .
but only talk none the less. . .