Politicians and the media in the UK, and elsewhere in Europe, have insisted that Muslim migrants are no different from any others, and must be made welcome. But despite their efforts, according to a recent poll, almost three quarters of British adults are against admitting migrants who come from countries where rape, child abuse, and domestic violence are widespread. They have concluded this from experience, despite the constant effort from on high to convince them otherwise.
More on this latest poll can be found here: “Nearly three-quarters of Britons oppose entry for men from countries where women lack equal rights,” Brussels Signal, August 27, 2026:
Nearly three-quarters of British adults have said they would vote against allowing men from countries where rape, child abuse and domestic violence are widespread to enter the United Kingdom.
The finding comes from polling by Whitestone Insight, commissioned by the London think tank the Women’s Policy Centre and published on August 25.
Some 73 per cent said they would vote against admitting men from such countries, where women are also not regarded as equal to men. That compared with 13 per cent who would vote in favour, a margin of close to six to one.
Muslims make up 6.5% of the UK population. All of them would have voted in favor of admitting men from the Muslim countries where such mistreatment of women is allowed. That means fully half of those in favor of admitting people from those Muslim countries are Muslims. Only 6.5% of the non-Muslim population in the UK would allow them in.
Opposition was firm rather than tentative. A total of 58 per cent said they would “definitely” vote against, more than four times the number backing entry in any form, while 14 per cent did not know.
The same survey found 66 per cent of Britons think immigration from countries where women have fewer legal or social rights than in the UK has contributed to the rise in reported sexual offences.
Of those, 40 per cent said it had done so “a great deal”. Just 16 per cent said such migration had had little or no effect….
These are astounding figures. Almost three-quarters of Britons have declared their opposition to admitting migrants from countries where “rape, child abuse, and domestic violence” are common. Everyone understands that means Muslim countries. And 93 percent of people in the UK — that is, nearly every non-Muslim — would deport illegal migrants convicted of rape.
The opinion poll results show clearly that overwhelmingly Britons do not want more migrants from Muslim lands. Too bad, alas, they did not listen to the cassandras who, having studied Islam, warned the West against admitting Muslims into their midst. The question now is this: Will the next government after this one — forget about the hapless and hopeless Andy Burnham — do what the public wants, and call a halt to migration from lands carefully described as “places where women are not treated equally,” which means, though it does not directly state, “all the lands where Islam prevails”?
And the next question is how does the British government deal with the melancholy fact that there are already more than four million Muslim migrants in the UK, who have arrived from countries where women are not treated equally? They cannot be considered as different from the migrants whom nearly three-quarters of the British public now say they would not admit.
What is to become of these people? Could the British government now choose to deport those migrants who are convicted of serious crimes after they have served their sentences? Could those migrants who have been living continuously on the dole be deported? What about denying welfare benefits to migrants for the first five years of residence in the country? At least now we know from this poll just how unpopular Muslim migrants in the UK have become, and the nearly unanimous opposition, among the indigenous Britons, to admitting more people from countries where “rape, child abuse, and domestic violence are widespread.” That means the Muslim countries; that means the Muslim migrants.
Too bad it took this long for the British public to comprehend the full awfulness of Islam.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Let the Brits prove that by voting for any of these parties, but not the others:
1. Respond Britain
2. Britain First
3. UKIP
4. Reclaim
Sorry, if you vote for either Tories or Reform, you don’t count
Peter William Watson says
People need to do some research to see how this abomination took place – refer to Hansard Debate Volume 599 Monday 7 Septrember 2015 5:47 PM Yvette Cooper et al. EXCERPT
Yvette Cooper
(Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford) (Lab)
Sharethis specific contribution
In the light of the Prime Minister’s statement, I rise to propose that the House debate a specific and important matter that should have urgent consideration—namely the refugee crisis in Europe.
The number of people standing to ask questions has, I think, shown the strength of feeling and interest in the House. Most Members have welcomed the Government’s decision to take more refugees directly from the camps near Syria and the Government’s aid to the region, where they are ahead of every other country and are making an extremely important contribution. The Prime Minister is right, too, that the issues in the camps are serious, with a lack of schooling for thousands of people and a cut in rations meaning that the conditions are desperate and we should help.
The response in the Chamber today has raised two significant concerns about the Prime Minister’s response. The first is about the scale of the response— the 20,000 people he will help over five years—and the second is about the lack of help for refugees who have already fled into Europe. Interior Ministers are meeting on the 14th and the crisis is still escalating. This is not just about the tragic scenes we have seen of Alan Kurdi and others who have drowned or the families who are ready to walk from Hungary to Austria to find a safe home. This is also about our chance to discuss the number of people the Prime Minister has offered to help: 20,000 over five years could mean 4,000 a year, whereas the Kindertransport took 10,000 children in the space of nine months. I would urge the Prime Minister to reconsider and to see what more we can do with councils and communities across the country that have come forward asking to help and to do more. He has rightly changed his mind already in response to public concern. I ask for the House to have the opportunity to persuade him to do so again, given the urgent need to provide help.
I ask the Prime Minister to consider again helping those refugees who are already in Europe and who need help. He says that he does not want to encourage people to travel. I say to him that they are travelling already. They are not waiting for a response from the British Government. The refugees in Greece need particular help and humanitarian aid. Many are already being helped through Hungary and Austria, but in Greece there are thousands who are desperate for help. We could do more. We have a chance to work with other European countries, putting pressure on them to do more.
The Prime Minister has responded in part to what is now the greatest humanitarian crisis since the second world war. I urge him to do so again. I ask that we have the chance to debate this tomorrow and then again on Wednesday.
Mr Speaker
Sharethis specific contribution
I have listened carefully to the application from the right hon. Member and am satisfied that the matter she raises is proper to be discussed under Standing Order No. 24. Has the right hon. Member the leave of the House?