The former defender of the faith is busy paving the way for the nation’s destruction.
Britain is still officially a Christian nation, but in practice, it is something quite different, and now King Charles is busy paving the way for what it is obviously becoming. According to GB News, Gavin Ashenden, who was once the chaplain to Queen Elizabeth II, has recently accused the king Charles of “violating the oath he swore at his Coronation to uphold the Christian Faith.”
Ashenden is quite right. That is exactly what Charles has done, and the fact that it has caused so little of a stir in Britain is an indication of how much the nation has already departed from the values and principles it once not only upheld, but spread throughout the world. Britain is now in a transition stage. Charles has made a sharp break with the past, but he has simply acknowledged a vacuum that has existed for some time. He has not made any move to fill that vacuum, but what’s to come is quite clear. It just isn’t there yet.
“The accusation,” GB News explains, “follows Buckingham Palace’s decision to alter the monarch’s traditional title in this year’s Sovereign Grant Annual Report, replacing “Defender of the Faith” with “Protector of the Space for Faith within the Multi-faith Nation.”
Yeah, no. That one clearly isn’t going to catch on, and it won’t have to, as soon Britain will not be as multi-faith as it is today. A hint of what’s in store for the Sceptered Isle, or Perfidious Albion, if you prefer, was clear in the circumstances of Ashenden’s leaving his post as the queen’s chaplain: “Ashenden departed his role after criticising a church service in which a Muslim student had been invited to recite from the Koran.”
Soon enough, there will be no need for a Protector of the Space for Faith within the Multi-faith Nation, but only for a Protector of the One True Faith of Allah within an Islamic Nation. A successor of Charles, however, may not bear such a title, for by then, there won’t be king, either.
Meanwhile, Ashenden noted correctly that Charles “has deserted Christian allegiance, turned his back on his Coronation oath [and] repudiated the support and promotion of a Christian culture.” That’s all true, but in Charles’ defense, the Anglican Church forsook Christianity for leftism quite some time ago, and so there wasn’t a whole lot of Christian allegiance to protect in Britain by the time Charles became king.
Ashenden added: “Some are asking whether his behaviour is sufficiently subversive as to raise questions about his capacity to fulfil the office of King.” Charles, however, represents the wave of the future. The next king, assuming there will be one, will be even less Christian than he is. And the situation is unlikely to improve from there.
A world-historical societal transformation is taking place before our very eyes, and yet few have taken notice. Britain, the erstwhile leader of the Western world and the foundation and source of English-speaking civilization, is in its last days as a free society, and will soon become an Islamic state. Yet despite the mountains of evidence that this transformation is taking place, many will still deny that it is happening at all. They may not even admit it when it overtakes them personally.
This kind of thing has happened before, but few are aware of that fact. Back in the days when our schools and universities concentrated on teaching actual facts rather than leftist propaganda, race hatred, and gender fantasy, every schoolchild learned about the Norman conquest of England in 1066. Nowadays one would be hard-pressed to find someone under twenty who knows what a “Norman” was (they were people from Normandy, in northern France, where a large number of Norsemen from Scandinavia had settled), but a few decades ago, any random student would have been able to tell you that this conquest was not just a military victory. It heralded the thorough transformation of English society.
The invading Normans were few in number compared to the English, but once they had defeated the defenders, they set about systematically to ensure that England would remain theirs in perpetuity. They removed the native English from positions of political and ecclesiastical power. Norman French mingled with the Old English language, ultimately creating the English language as we know it today. Historian Richard Southern observed that “no country in Europe, between the rise of the barbarian kingdoms and the 20th century, has undergone so radical a change in so short a time as England experienced after 1066.”
Until now. Charles’ change of title was just one small sign of the radical change that is underway, and much more is to come.
jerry glenn says
King Dhimmi I.
Hank says
King Dimwit the First of Woke
Siddhi Nasranni says
That is a good one, but I like to call him King Chuck the Turd (iii ), that is how we pronounce ( third ) in Ireland.
Huh?!? says
How sad. England is bending over for Islam to perform cultural sodomy. Why won’t the UK stand up for itself? The U.S. needs to take warning of this. Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition. Vote! Vote! Vote!
OLD GUY says
UK is the perfect example of the muslim/islamic migration invasion. And you are right when you say America is also in the sights of islamic leaders who know they can not defeat our military but know the migration invasion can. STOP the MIGRATION INVASION of ISLAM now.
Walter Sieruk says
About King Charlies with his being so very favorable to Islam , just maybe the King had been proselyted to Islam or not, he favors Islam ,with the politically correct climate in England he must have had conveniently forgotten about the deadly results of Islam in the United Kingdom. Such as the murderous Manchester jihad bombing that occurred on May, 22, 2017 that killed many young people, many of them girls. Before that, there was those deadly London which happened on July ,7, 2005.
Likewise, the King seems not to remember the deadly jihad train bombing Islamic vehicle and knife jihad attacks. London nor does the King appear recall the Muslim terrorist who, in London murdered a British police office with a hatchet attempting to cut off his head. Worst of all, that Such as the murderous Manchester jihad bombing that occurred on May, 22, 2017 that killed many young people, many of them girls. The deadly dangerous posed by Islam’s violent and murderous jihad hasn’t gone away in the UK. Therefore, it’s shameful that the King is “bending over backwards” to appease the Muslim mayor of London and the imams as well as the other Muslims in power in the government in the United Kingdom.
Walter Sieruk says
Could it actually be that King Charlies Britain belong the British and not to foreign Muslim migrants usurpers who want to destroy England common Law and replace it with Islam with its Sharia.?
Britain belong the British and not to foreign migrants usurpers who want to destroy England common Law and replace it with Islam with its Sharia. Likewise, the Union Jack is the flag of the United Kingdom. Not that fake and ugly “Palestinian flag.” Regardless of how the king of ?England happens to feel about it.
Walter Sieruk says
Regarding King Charlies with his being so very favorable to Islam , might actually view the Muslim infiltration and subversive influence in the United Kingdom because, had been proselyted to Islam or not, he greatly favors Islam ,with the politically correct climate in England he must have had conveniently forgotten about the deadly results of Islam in the United Kingdom. Such as the murderous Manchester jihad bombing that occurred on May, 22, 2017 that killed many young people, many of them girls. Before that, there was those deadly London which happened on July ,7, 2005.
Likewise, the King seems not to remember the deadly jihad train bombing Islamic vehicle and knife jihad attacks. London nor does the King appear recall the Muslim terrorist who, in London murdered a British police office with a hatchet attempting to cut off his head.
Walter Sieruk says
About the old” “news” last Easter that King Charlies largely disregarding the most important Bible doctrine of the resurrection of Jesus in favor of Islam’s Ramadan further reveals his being so very favorable to Islam , just maybe the King had been proselyted to Islam or not, he favors Islam ,with the politically correct climate in England he must have had conveniently forgotten about the deadly results of Islam in the United Kingdom. Such as the murderous Manchester jihad bombing that occurred on May, 22, 2017 that killed many young people, many of them girls. Before that, there was those deadly London which happened on July ,7, 2005.
Likewise, the King seems not to remember the deadly jihad train bombing Islamic vehicle and knife jihad attacks. London nor does the King appear recall the Muslim terrorist who, in London murdered a British police office with a hatchet attempting to cut off his head. Worst of all that murderous Manchester jihad bombing that occurred on May, 22, 2017 that killed many young people, many of them girls The deadly dangerous posed by Islam’s violent and murderous jihad hasn’t gone away in the UK. Therefore, it’s shameful that the King is “bending over backwards” to appease the Muslim mayor of London and the imams as well as the other Muslims in power in the government in the United Kingdom.
Walter Sieruk says
King Charles with his attraction and admiration towards Islam the might mean that he had been proselytized to Islam. If so or if not the King of England, his approval and respect for Islam is very revealing about his religious education he received in the Church of England, Which in the United Kingdom is also called “The Anglican Church.”
The King with is favorable spirit to Islam reveals that the Anglican church didn’t teach and ingrain the Bible doctrines about the Nature of Jesus into the his mind and heart when he was still a prince.
Likewise back then he was a prince his “higher education “ didn’t cover the many different aspects of how the religion of Islam rejects the many clear Bible teaching about the nature of Jesus.
For Islam denies the Bible doctrines about of and about the actual natural of Jesus which is blasphemous.
For Islam denies that Jesus is the Son of God. Meaning that Jesus of the only Son of God the Father. That is in blatant contradiction to the information revealed in the Bible.. As found, for example, Matthew 3:16, 17, First John 2:22, 23. Likewise, Jesus is God the Son, as seen in Hebrews 1:8. First John 5:20.
The Deity of the Son taught in the Bible .For in Colossians 2:9 It reads “For In Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form. ” [N.I.V.]
That Jesus is God is further revealed in the Bible in John 1-1-3. Colossians 1:15-17. Romans 9:5 Second Peter 1:1. Titus 2:13 First John 5:20.
So, in the Light of the Bible it’s then no surprise that in Islamic countries, the Muslim clerics attempt to discourage the people from reading the Bible, by their words and even owning a Bible, by their actions.
For those Islamic clerics would have no hold or control over the people if they discovered the truth of the sculpture, Bible, Second Timothy 3:16 and the Jesus is the way to heaven, John 14:6.
Furthermore the Bible in First Kings 8:89 teaches that “Only God Knows that thoughts of men” in the Gospel of Mark 2: 8 reveals that Jesus knows the thoughts of men.”
In conclusion, the Bible does reveal to that, Jesus is God and that exposes Islam is false teaching about Jesus and therefore Islam is a false religion of demonic darkness.
As Isaiah 8:20 reads” To the law and to the Testimony ! If they do not speak according to the word, it is because there is no light in them.”
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I would support William doing a palace coup and forcing him to abdicate/retire. As it is, the king is currently recovering from cancer, but at that age, his health isn’t going to get that much better. Just like there are regents if there are minor kings, William should at least take over as a Regent for his father until the time the latter passes and he can formally ascend the throne. Otherwise, his father should abdicate and let him run the joint
I do wonder, however, how much William shares the views of his countrymen. As it is, he is an Agnostic who’s not much interested in Church of England activities, and maybe it’s time to separate the Church of England from the throne of England. But the question is whether he shares the views of an increasing number of Englishmen who’d like to see Britain become England/Wales/Scotland/Northern Ireland again. If not, I don’t see Britain recovering
asperian says
Scumbag…