No conspiracy to see here.
Outgoing British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had formerly headed the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) which had offered a pass to the Muslim sex grooming gangs who had trafficked and raped as many as 250,000 women and girls in the UK.
Starmer had initially refused to launch a national inquiry into the grooming gangs, claiming that they were merely a local matter, before finally giving in to political pressure.
“In a number of cases presented to us, particularly in cases involving groups, there’s clearly an issue of ethnicity that has to be understood and addressed,” Starmer awkwardly admitted.
“The CPS, under his leadership, had dropped a case against a rape gang despite overwhelming evidence of their guilt. Following the CPS’s decision to abandon the case, Greater Manchester Police (GMP) dropped its wider investigation into Asian grooming gangs in the area, and the abuse continued,” The Telegraph revealed.
“It’s absolutely vile. How can he stand there and say he did a good job? They had DNA, concrete evidence, and still didn’t get charged with rape,” one of the victims blasted Starmer.
When Starmer finally agreed to a national inquiry into Muslim sex grooming gangs, multiple victims threatened to resign with one of the women warning about a “push to widen the remit of the National Inquiry in ways that downplay the racial and religious motivations behind our abuse”.
When PM Starmer was ousted because the Labour government’s radical policies and the mass invasion by Muslim migrants had made him historically unpopular, he was coincidentally replaced by yet another Labour political figure with connections to the Muslim sex grooming cases.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham had formerly served as the mayor of Greater Manchester, a city with a large Pakistani Muslim population that was at the epicenter of the grooming gangs. After the grooming gang scandal went national, Burnham tried to argue that he had led the way, but in reality had resisted any serious inquiry until the BBC aired the ‘Three Girls’ documentary.
The inquiry that Starmer tried to block had been centered on the Muslim sex grooming gangs in Oldham, in Manchester, where there are now over 1,000 cases being investigated. In Rochdale, also in Greater Manchester, young girls were raped, passed around and trafficked by Muslim men with one victim saying that she had been raped over 100 times since she was 12 years old.
Even though the events dated back to the oughts and there had been trials in 2012, Burnham claimed to have known nothing about it until he watched the 2017 documentary.
“We’d seen the BBC programme The Three Girls, and I acted immediately on it, particularly after I’d heard an interview with Maggie Oliver about a police investigation in Manchester, Operation Augusta, which had been closed down,” Burnham claimed.
But Operation Augusta was a 2004 investigation, and Burnham had served as the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Home Affairs right after Operation Augusta, at a time when victims and their parents were writing to the Home Office clamoring for justice.
Burnham claimed that he only found out about the outrage after the 2017 BBC documentary and an interview with Maggie Oliver, a key police whistleblower, and immediately launched an inquiry that got results. In reality, the inquiry failed to hold anyone in authority accountable and avoided exploring any links to Labour politicians including Rotherham Councilman Jahangir Akhtar, accused by some reports of raping one of the victims, who had achieved political power through Labour’s Baron Nazir Ahmed: who was later convicted of the attempted rape of a girl and of a serious sexual assault upon a boy under 13. His two brothers, both named Mohammed, were charged but not convicted of alleged sexual assaults against a boy under the age of 11 and a boy under the age of 8.
But Burnham had been campaigning based on that inquiry and used it to pave his path to replacing Starmer, claiming that he had gotten results where other politicians had failed to act.
But how did that inquiry really go?
A Burnham promotional timeline boasts that he had “commissioned an independent review into historic child sexual exploitation (CSE) cases in Greater Manchester to be led by nationally recognised independent experts, Malcolm Newsam and Gary Ridgway.” What it does not mention is that the six year inequity by Newsam and Ridgway was stonewalled by the police and local authorities and denied access to documents that might have made the difference.
Burnham had failed to intervene, provide support or stay on the case.
Maggie Oliver, the police whistleblower, recently charged that, “Andy Burnham was very open about talking about the failures of the past which everybody already knew by that time. The fourth part of those inquiries was meant to be an assurance review. That was published last year. That was meant to look at what had happened between 2019 up until 2025. What happened in that, in my experience, was actually a cover-up. It was a paper exercise. What it led to was the resignation of the two independent reviewers who had spent six years scrutinising Greater Manchester Police. Instead HMIC came and they did not speak to a single victim or a single survivor who had been caught in the last seven years of working with Greater Manchester Police.”
“When it comes to leadership and courage and gripping what is going on now, unfortunately he turned away. We missed a huge opportunity to bring changes that are needed,” she said of Burnham.
Burnham complained about what he called the “distasteful politicisation” of the trafficking of young girls and bragged about backing a national inquiry, but his proposed inquiry was only a “limited” one, and in a mayoral question and answer session, he declared, “I 100 per cent will stand by what I’ve done.”
“Greater Manchester did not look in the other direction. We looked directly at this issue, we held a complete mirror up to ourselves,” Burnham falsely claimed. “I see the stuff online and it’s actually designed to create hate, and they’re trying to pull everyone apart.”
When put to the test, Burnham defaulted back to claiming racism and continuing the cover-up. Much as PM Keir Starmer had before him.
What are the odds that the last two prime ministers of the UK were both in a position of power to cover up the Muslim sex grooming gangs? But some might say that’s why they were chosen.
The seemingly improbable coincidence of PM Keir Starmer and PM Andy Burnham both being in positions that allowed them to have knowledge of the depredations of the Muslim sex grooming gangs, to do nothing about them, to play ‘reformers,’ and to fail to tackle the institutional corruption, testifies to how embedded the gangs were in the circles of political power, especially in Labour which is heavily dependent on Pakistani Muslim bloc votes.
Did covering up the crimes of the Muslim sex grooming gangs put Starmer and Burnham on a path to power? There is no way to know for sure, but the coincidence is too much to ignore.
somehistory says
The two slugs probably participated ….maybe still are participating…in raping he young children.
Hang ’em high.
Rob Porter says
What Britain has here is one piece of thorough dung, Starmer , replaced by another. These men have NO morals. If they did they’d be outraged by vile Pakistani Muslims raping of British girls, and begin not only punishing, but deporting people whose ‘religion’ tells them they have a right to rape ‘infidel’ girls and women.
Horatio says
It is apparently believed by many leading politicians today that MuzzLemmings are a large religious group that should be seen as holding an “underdog” status in society. It would be immoral and discriminatory to hold them responsible for their actions such as rape. Therefore society must avoid judging them and punishing them for such behavior. This is justified in the interest of fairness and equalitarianism.
somehistory says
Especially when those who are hired to ‘judge” and “punish” engage in the crimes with the muzzkies.
Tony Porcaro says
“No way to know for sure”!? Are you kidding!? Read the Rape Gang Inquiry Report to realize how much widespread complicity and cover-up were going on for decades involving government , the police, care officials, the health system among others; this a major reason why the UK is now a FAILED NATION STATE and has long ago abandoned any pretense to possessing even a remnant of traditional values or sovereignty; a country which fails to stand up for its own children in time of greatest need, no longer deserves to be called a country!
Taffy says
Spot on! And since when is a rape gang national network (per the Inquiry Report) only a local problem? Scotland Yard should’ve had all the participating Muzzies rounded up years ago. Those poor women and girls that were victims will never be the same. The British government surely let them down.
Rob Porter says
Tony Porcaro, well said. A thorough collapse of morals facilitates cover-up of the rape of British girls, but why are British men, particularly military men and ex-military men not creating vigilantes, hunting down the rapists and disposing of them – in dumpsters.
Wellington says
When the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom is no longer a true man, then you know just how utterly pathetic the UK has become. The first duty of a man is to provide for and protect women and children. Starmer and Burnham have failed here miserably. .
There is no higher duty for any man, notwithstanding the rubbish about toxic masculinity and other Leftist destructive nonsense along these lines. And real men also admire women and treat them as equals but all the while recognizing that the differences between the sexes are biologically based realities and that pretending otherwise is the route to complete foolhardiness or even worse.
A lot of pretending going on today in the West, examples being men capable of giving birth, women being able to do anything a man can do (N.B. a woman will never play linebacker for the Eagles, pitch for the Phillies or play point guard for the Sixers), and Islam being a religion of peace and tolerance. Oh yeah, a lot of stupid and destructive ideas still going on out there in Western nations (N.B., but nowhere else and this is key to grasp) as the Descent of the West continues unabated.
Walter Sieruk says
In the UK, those despicable vile and heinous horrendously evil vile and heinous Muslim migrants gangs sex groom and also rape girls and young women in that country are a horrendous monstrous outrage.
This type of situation is reflected in the Bible. Which reads “When the wicked comes, contempt comes also; with dishonor comes reproach.” Proverbs 18:3. [N.K.J.V.]
Such an evil Islamic way of thinking is explained in the Bible, which the reader is informed that even “The thoughts of the wicked are an abomination to the Lord…” Proverbs 15:26.
Walter Sieruk says
The problems caused by all those horrifically dangerous vile and heinous Muslim gangs who sex groomers and rapists in the United kingdom are most despicable, Those criminal Muslim gangs of street hoodlums are a plague on civilized society, They have no respect for human life, of private property, so much less do those thugs care about the law. The law enforcement officers and officials should come down on those gangsters with much force. For this is the only language that they street ruffians will understand, they will not respond to the language of reason.
Furthermore the officials and officers of the law do have every right to come down hard with force against those hooligans. This statement is true because it’s upheld by the Bible which instructs that government law enforcement people are ordained by God to capture and punish evil doers. As seen in Romans 13:1-4.
In addition, such heinous street gangs are even described in the Bible in Proverbs 4:16,17. Which reads “For they do not sleep unless they have done evil; and their sleep is taken away unless they make someone fall. For they eat the bread of wickedness, and drink the wine of violence.” [N.K.J.V.] Moreover, it’s only a matter of time before those violent street criminals get what’s coming to them. Sooner or later all their heinous evil will come back on them. For as the saying “What goes around comes around.” The reason that saying is the truth is because it’s based on the Bible. Which teaches “For whatever a man sows, that he will also reap.” Galatians 6:7.
Tim gallagher says
A disgraceful cover up by Starmer and Burnham. Both seem like cynical politicians who would do anything for the Muslim voting bloc. I wonder if their wives are appalled at the cover up of all those girls being raped. Also Starmer has a daughter and Burnham two daughters so their behaviour is atrocious. For some politicians, politics is all that matters. Human decency means nothing.
OLD GUY says
As always with those protecting muslim/islamic migrants their families are well protected and away from the average person or families.
Tim gallagher says
There’s no doubt about that, old guy. All well removed from the Muslim scum and they don’t seem to give a damn about the average english citizens.
tgusa says
Either one of them could play a pedophile on an episode of Law and Order and they would be believable, authentic, in the part.
Huh?!? says
The God of Moses help the UK. This once great nation has become a joke. Upon their day of judgement, the men and women complicit in this, the millstones around their necks, invisible now, will appear and the weight will be felt.
Andrew Blackadder says
The UK is such a messed up country that today mentioning the actual muslim rape gangs appears to be a bigger crime than the actual muslim rape gangs.
An upside down world indeed.
However The Left keeps screaming about everybody being treated equally..
Go figure.