“Most Islamic scholars would agree that such apostates should be killed”
Everyone loves fireworks on July 4th. Or well everyone who loves America, anyway. That may not include the man from Dearbonistan.
Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed once asked his YouTube viewers whether Americans could “PLEASE” find another way to celebrate the Fourth of July, in a video promising four reasons “why fireworks suck.”
In one episode that remains online, he questioned whether football could be “ethical” or “safe” and linked the sport’s “ethos” to narratives used to justify slavery and westward expansion.
In another he floated replacing the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms with a constitutional right to health care.
In another since-removed video from September 2022, El-Sayed dismissed the southern border as an issue Republicans “love to flog,” saying it “doesn’t even make the top five among issues that people in the United States actually care about that affect their lives.”
While Abdul Mohammed El-Sayed may hate fireworks on July 4th and football, he does love Islamic Sharia law.
Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed once declared his sacred “obligation” to follow Sharia law in every aspect of his life
Mohammed (he doesn’t like to use that name) just tries to hide this stuff.
A documentary about his 2018 gubernatorial bid shows him telling the filmmakers not to shoot a bookshelf in his home that contained the Quran and controversial works about Islam, including Cutting the Fuse, a 2010 book that argues that suicidal terrorism is driven by foreign military occupation, not Islamic extremism.
El-Sayed’s private bookshelf also contained a copy of A Thematic Commentary on the Qur’an written by Muslim Brotherhood member Sheikh Mohammed al-Ghazali, who said “the refusal of implemenation [sic] of sharia is apostasy” as he testified in defense of 13 Islamic terrorists who had gunned down an Egyptian professor who called for the separation of church and state in Egypt. Al-Ghazali testified during the 1993 trial that the slain professor was “without doubt” an infidel and said most Islamic scholars would agree that such apostates should be killed, but that he personally believes the professor should have received a life sentence instead, the Washington Post reported.
“You’re going to want to not get these things in the shot,” El-Sayed said in the documentary, How To Fix A Primary, as he pointed to his bookshelf which contained al-Ghazali’s writings. “We’re trying to keep the shot secular.”
The good news though, according to his spokesman, is that Abdul Mohammed El-Sayed believes in the “separation of church and state”.
No word on the separation of mosque and state.
The two threats says
Every Left Wing party contains large numbers of people who hate their own country.
The US Democratic Party hates the USA and traditional US culture.
The UK Labour Party hates the UK and traditional US culture.
The Liberal Party of Canada hates Canada and traditional Canadian culture.
The Australian Labor Party hates Australia and traditional Australian culture.
The Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party, and other Leftist allies, hates Spain and traditional Spanish culture.
Thus they are willing to flood their respective countries with enough immigrants to change the demographics and secure a Left Wing voter base.
Abdul El-Sayed is just the latest US Democrat to display his anti-USA credentials. The treacherous US Democrat voters will love him.
Raja says
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Beans🫘 says
I am totally shocked right now to have learned that Abdul Mamdani follows sharia law. It must be a mistake because there can not be sharia law in America.
Abdul only wants to make people rich by giving them money. Money comes from a camels ass, it’s infinite.
Tony says
Remember, Islam is the daily practice of Sharia, Islamic Law. Now, Muslims try to force you to follow Sharia, Islamic Law, as they grow in number and gain political power if you let them(Qur’an 1:5; 3:51,1 01, 118; 5:3, 48; 8:60, 45:18; etc.). This process never stops. Allah in Qur’an 8:39 commands, “And engage in war with them[Non-Muslims] until there will not be sedition and the religion will be completely to Allah…”
Cynthia says
Anti American and pretend leftist, he is an Islamist trying to take us down from within.
The Democratic Party is filled with treasonous officials and ideology. All the causes they espouse are aligned with anti American courses in our universities to divide us with a woke agenda. Also, foreign pressure from money donations (Qatar) to teach courses that are pro Islam and antiAmerican have created generations of useful idiots for Muslim Brotherhood candidates’ agenda.
somehistory says
Too bad he can’t be drop-kicked over the border and all the way to his daddy’s egypt.
I, for one, am totally sick …nauseated….by these muzzie terror supporters who want to change everything to suit their demonic islime.
He has no business making laws for infidels to be forced to follow.
Big Dude says
Every Jew is in mortal danger under sharia law. This guy is so dangerous. Next he will bring texts to justify murdering Jews where you find them
Tim gallagher says
The left wingers who support Islam are brain dead imbeciles. They must be too lazy to bother to look into Islam’s nature. Islam and this evil shit called sharia is all about forcing people to live the primitive, evil life that knuckle dragging 7th century Arabs lived. Islam deserve to receive total loathing and contempt from every human being with a functioning brain. As for this Muslim piece of shit here, he is a knuckle dragging scumbag dressed in a modern suit and with his beard trimmed. All Muslims belong in Muslim societies where they can live like 7th century Arabs.
Stacy says
Don’t insult knuckle draggers. They have a set of moral codes that Islam doesn’t. Even Barbarian’s have moral codes. I would put Savage’s above Muslims for being more moral.
Tim gallagher says
You’re right, Stacy. Muslims are far worse and more degenerate than knuckle draggers and barbarians. No doubt about that.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Abdul
If you hate July 4th so much, do both yourself & us all a favor:
1. Drop out of the race: let Haley Stevens be your party’s nominee
2. Take the next flight – one way – to Cairo. While they don’t quite have sharia, you’ll be surrounded only by muslims (Copts are an asterisk) and there will be no 🏈 either: just ⚽
Only issue for you: your government won’t be to keen to restart their wars w/ Israel, watching as they have Israel pulverize Hamas, Hizbullah, Syria, islamic republic and Houthis. But even in the US, despite the antisemitism on both sides, you still have an uphill struggle there
Or you could move to Gaza and be a real doc in one of Hamas’ hospitals
somehistory says
The slug won’t do any of that because he wants us to be made miserable due to his hatred…and his evil designs.
Westman says
“..El-Sayed dismissed the southern border as an issue Republicans “love to flog,” saying it “doesn’t even make the top five among issues that people in the United States actually care about that affect their lives.”
For “Democrat people” that may be true since there is less understanding of any cause and effect exceeding the duration of a month. More mature Republicans understand what destroys a nation’s stability and drains its resources BEFORE it affects their lives.
Wolfman Jack howled, Wussman Abdul whines. He needs the protection/power of the State to allow him to harness New Yorkers with his Walter Mitty fantasies – like bleeding successful people of the booty while they passively submit.
Dave says
Every Patriot in the city, if there are any, should celebrate the 4th and every Patriotic holiday with fireworks in his front yard!!
Troybeam says
This was written in 2007, as a warning, it was not heeded.
NATIONAL SECURITY…/And Shariah For All?
Diana West |Posted: Sep 15, 2007
The story of the week wasn’t Gen. David Petraeus’ testimony on Iraq, although it dominated the headlines. The story of the week wasn’t the sixth return of Sept. 11 since the jihad atrocity of 2001, although it inspired many public statements and ceremonies. The week’s biggest story garnered little press and few comments. But, in a significant way, this overlooked story — an outrageous display of police force in Brussels on Sept. 11, 2007 — symbolizes the missing link in our flawed comprehension of both Iraq and Sept. 11.
There, in the so-called capital of Europe, 200 people marked the day with a protest against the Islamization of Europe — a civilizational shift which, as Europe increasingly accommodates Shariah (Islamic law), is shockingly advanced. Indeed, Middle East expert Bernard Lewis has already predicted Europe will become Islamic by century’s end. Absent a reversal of Islamization (which remains possible) I’m guessing sooner than that.
The assembly, sponsored by Stop the Islamization of Europe (SIOE), was wholly peaceful — at least until Belgian police showed up. With a chopper above, water cannon nearby, they didn’t break heads, exactly — nothing so kind as that. In a photo that should be titled The New Face of Fascism (see it at http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2441), we see black-clad Belgian policemen brutalizing a man in a light-colored suit and tie. His hands are cuffed behind his back, his right elbow is clasped in what is known as an arm-bar hold, and he is also being subjected to a genital hold — a vicious grip that, a retired cop friend of mine tells me, would get any American policeman thrown off the force.
The man under arrest was Frank Vanhecke, president of the Flemish secessionist party Vlaams Belang and a member of European Parliament. Also arrested and beaten was Filip Dewinter, who, as the leading politician of Vlaams Belang, Belgium’s largest opposition party, has personally garnered 25 percent of the electorate. (You can find a picture of Belgian police forcing Dewinter to the ground online at kleinverzet.blogspot.com.)
These men are invariably described as “far-right” politicians, as though “far-right”-ness alone (whatever that means when totalitarian police tactics are considered tolerant left) is rationale enough for harsh treatment. I’ve met both men and know them as free-market, small-government conservatives who deeply believe Western civilization is worth defending against the Islamization that occurs with the entrenchment of Shariah. Indeed, they are bravely trying to prevent Europe’s Islamization, practically by themselves. I say “bravely” because in Europe these days, as we know from the Islam-motivated murders of Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh, such beliefs can get you killed.
Maybe so, a reader might say. But what does protesting Shariah in Europe have to do with either American policy in Iraq or Sept. 11?
The answer is everything. What were the attacks of Sept. 11 all about? Al Qaeda’s terrorist plot was designed not only to strike at the United States, but also to advance the cause of establishing an Islamic caliphate — a world government ruled according to Shariah, which, among other things, forbids criticism of Islam. Polls indicate that sizable numbers of Muslims (solid majorities in key countries), regardless of their opinion of Al Qaeda, share this same goal of a Shariat-based, Islamic caliphate. This is a highly significant overlap between the goals of Islamic terrorism and what we think of as mainstream Islam.
Meanwhile, though, in our childish, PC wisdom (accepted across the political spectrum), we have let Islam off the hook when it comes to terrorism, sticking to the story that our whole problem is with a Tiny Band of Extremists That Hijacked Islam, not the jihadist teachings of Islam itself. To make the story stick, we also seem to ignore the impetus behind Islamic terrorism — the imposition of Shariah, what with its ultimate institutional denigrations of non-Muslims and women, and its denial of freedom of conscience and expression.
This blinkered view of Islam explains how even in our commemorations of Sept. 11 we ignore the ongoing threat to liberty posed by the spread of Shariah across the West, which the SIOE was trying to protest. It even helps explain our confusion over Iraq, where, ignoring the formative influence of Shariah on the native culture, we are stumped by our failures to remake Iraq in our own Western image.
There is another consequence of our blindness: a terrible indifference to cultural allies in Europe who are fighting its Islamization — a cataclysm for the liberty-based West.
We ignore them at our peril.
https://townhall.com/columnists/dianawest/2007/09/15/and-shariah-for-all-n1035809
John1 says
The fact that he is a Democratic candidate for the US Senate shows the failure of US immigration law allowing pieces of shit from Muslim countries come to the USA LEGALLY in the first place. Meanwhile, the hard-working people of Central and South America are being kicked out.
gravenimage says
Abdul El-Sayed Hates 4th of July Fireworks and Football, Loves Sharia
………………………………………
Bet he’s not fond of dogs and unveiled women, either. And how is football linked to slavery? American football did not even exist during slavery nd westward exanpsion. And nevermind that some of the greatest football players have themselves been Black.
Of course, though, El-Sayed loves Islam–which *really does* sacralize enslaving people.