Pakistani Family Dissatisfied With Its Brand-New Housing in the UK

Now comes the story of yet more Muslim migrants who displaying their want of gratitude to those Western countries that have taken them in. A Pakistani family has complained that the brand new house — costing 250,000 pounds to build — that the British government has provided them is not to their liking. They want something better, and in a neighborhood they like, preferably less rural. More on their preposterous demand can be found here: “Migrant family handed £250k new-build say house is ‘no good for us’ as they demand to be moved,” by Dan McDonald, GB News, July 1, 2026:

A Pakistani asylum seeker family housed in a £250,000 new-build home say they are desperate to leave after claiming they have been left frightened to live in a Shropshire village.

And why they are they frightened? Did anyone threaten them, scrawl anti-Muslim graffiti, yell at the children as they walked to school? Nothing of the sort. Read on.

Muhammad Nadeem, 40, moved to Britain with his wife, Shamaila, and their four children two years ago.

Six Pakistanis, now in the UK, living in rent-free housing — a four-bedroom house. Free medical care for all six. Free education for their four children. A family allowance of 295 pounds a week. Not bad for people who contribute the absolute minimum to the economy (how much can an Uber driver contribute to the economy, after all, in goods and services?) and nothing to the wellbeing of the non-Muslims among whom they now live.

The family had been living in Stockport, where Mr Nadeem worked as an Uber driver after qualifying for a work visa.

After his visa expired, the family claimed asylum and were initially housed in a hotel before being moved into a four-bedroom property in Stoke Heath a fortnight ago.

“We are scared to stay in this house. We hate it here,” Shamaila said.

Have you considered going home?

Mr Nadeem claimed the problems began almost immediately after they arrived.

“My wife and our kids were outside the house when three people came towards us. We quickly went inside and I locked the door,” he said.

My god. This is paranoia. There was nothing that those “three people” said or did to have fed such fears. No words were uttered, no angry looks. Given the layout of he housing development, each house shares two outer walls with houses on both sides, save for the two houses at either end that share only one such wall. These three were likely doing nothing more threatening than walking to their own houses.

He alleged that hours later, two more people approached the property, one wearing a mask, and began filming him on a mobile phone after he answered the door.

“They walked away and they started shouting what sounded like abuse,” he added….

The filming of the father could constitute intimidation — that is, if it happened at all. It’s clear that Muhammad Nadeem and his wife Shamaila “hate it here,” as she said, and were determined to be moved to still better housing. What better way to achieve that than to claim that white neighbors harassed them?

But if the “intimidation” by neighbors claim isn’t enough to get them moved, they are quick to supply other reasons:

“This is no good for us this place. It’s too rural. I have diabetes and back pain,” he said.

Diabetes and back pain? Both are apparently the sudden result of living in a rural area? C’mon, Muhammad, you can do better than that.

The nearest supermarket requires a £20 return taxi journey, which he said consumes much of the £295 weekly allowance the Home Office provides for the family of six.

But Muhammad Nadeem is an Uber driver, and has the use of a car. Why wouldn’t he use that to get to and from a supermarket? And how many trips to the supermarket would he need to make weekly? Surely a big shopping once-a-week is what many people do.

“If my bread goes out of date, what do I do? Most of our money goes on taxis,” he said….

The claim that “most of our money goes on taxis” is false. Along with free housing, free medical care, and free housing, the family of Muhammad Nadeem receives almost 1200 pounds each month. Even if he did not have the use of the car he uses as an Uber driver to take one trip a week to the supermarket, that would hardly mean that “most” of the family’s money would “go on taxis.” One trip to the supermarket each week would cost 80 euros a month; 80 euros is not “most” of the 1200 pounds the family is receiving. This absurd exaggeration is being used to convince the authorities to move them to a still better house, in a less rural neighborhood, possibly to one that fellow Pakistanis inhabit.