German Activist Calls for White Germans to Stop Reproducing, and to Welcome All Immigrants

Apparently, white people have done such terrible things, and especially, contributed so much to global warming, that they should agree with Verena Brunschweiger, an anti-white white activist in Germany who says “my lineage ends with me,” and urges the entire white population of Germany to stop having children. And who will replace the white population that disappears in this act of racial suicide? Why, the blameless migrants from the Third World, whose countries are now unlivable because, she says, of the global warming that is, Ms. Brunschwieger assures us, the fault of the world’s whites. Germany, and the rest of the West, should invite in those migrants with no limit on their numbers. More on this hysterical madness can be found here: “‘My bloodline ends with me’ – German feminist activist calls for White people to stop having children and accept refugees,” Remix News, June 29, 2026:

Germany’s Verena Brunschweiger, a self-described “radical feminist,” is promoting the slogan: “My lineage ends with me.” She says she hopes to encourage people, especially White people, to stop having children.

She claims that Western pro-natalists only want to “control women, and keep refugees out.”

How does a pro-natalist policy, which would provide financial and other support to German women wanting to have more children, “control women”? And yes, pro-natalism for indigenous Germans is also designed to keep those she inaccurately calls “refugees” — but who are in truth economic migrants — out of the country, for they are a fantastic burden on taxpayers, costing Germany last year 36 billion euros in benefits provided to those migrants. The presence of migrants, mostly Muslims, has also led to a steep rise in crimes both of property and of violence.

The article on her views, from Australian broadcaster news.com.au, is entitled: “‘My bloodline ends with me’: Why feminist ‘childfree icon’ wants fewer ‘white babies’ and more refugees.”

The report quoted her as saying: “We have a proud slogan, ‘My bloodline ends with me.’ I think this is a responsible choice.”

It is, in fact, an act of civilizational despair, not hope, and a call for racial suicide.

Brunschweiger said that Europeans are to blame for the poor quality of life in Africa, and she would invite the entire world to Europe.

There are many things that contribute to the “poor quality of life in Africa.” Huge political corruption, the lack of strong civil institutions, absence of the rule of law, ethnic strife, including genocide, and an average I.Q. of between 65 and 80, far below that of people in Europe, where the average I.Q. is 100, or in East Asia, where the average I.Q. is 105. In fact, Europe and North America have together provided 1.5 trillion dollars in aid to Africa since the 1950s, but dysfunctional regimes that “strong men” who loot the countries they lead have wasted, and are still wasting, so much of it.

Brunschweiger ignores all of this: in her view, everything wrong with Africa is the fault of the whites. And as for wanting to invite the “whole world” into Europe, just what would Europe look like if 450 million Africans were admitted to take over the lands where whites had dutifully ceased to reproduce themselves? Or what if half the population of India, or of China — in both cases amounting to some seven hundred million people, were to get on ships and head for Europe, where Verena Braunschweiger would be there to welcome them?

This is the dystopian fantasy — or future reality — that Jean Raspail describes in his 1973 novel The Camp of the Saints. A journalist working for the far-left Southern Poverty Law Center has noted that “[t]he premise of The Camp of the Saints plays directly into that idea of white genocide. It is the idea that through immigration, if it’s left unchecked, the racial character and content of a culture can be undermined to the point of oblivion.” Political scientist Jean-Yves Camus argues that The Camp of the Saints, with its apocalyptic vision of a sudden and violent mass migration swarming in ships and boats of every kind towards Europe, is even more disturbing than Renaud Camus’ “Great Replacement,” which is supposed to take place over several decades. Verena Braunschweiger is ready to welcome to Europe an immediate and overwhelming swarm of hundreds of millions of third-world economic migrants looking to settle in and live on the benefits the generous welfare states of Europe now provide. But if the whites in Europe do not reproduce, then who will be left to pay for the benefits that the “refugees” arriving from Africa and elsewhere in the Third World are expecting?

“So I would take all immigrants and refugees in because we ruined the world, so to speak.”

“We produce the climate change which makes life in Africa, for instance, miserable and horrible. So of course, why not invite [them] if they want to come?”

Who is the “we” who “ruined the world”? Does that “we” include the two largest contributors to pollution of the air right now — the non-whites of India and China? No, “we” only means white people, who have made “life in Africa miserable and horrible.” So claims Verena Brunschweiger. Is she right? Didn’t white people bring civilization to Africa — mass literacy, schools and universities, the rule of law, science-based medicine with doctors replacing witch doctors, equality of the sexes, modern hygiene, electricity, the combustion engine, vehicles of all kinds, from motorbikes to cars and truck to trains and planes, and now computers, iPhones, and so much more? What would South Africa look like today if the Dutch and then the English had never colonized it? What would Algeria be like if the French — who built the first hospitals, the first colleges and universities, and introduced modern systems of agriculture —had never arrived?