New in PJ Media:
Elon Musk has just dared to shine the light of truth and accuracy upon one of the left’s favorite weapons of propaganda and manipulation.
Whenever mainstream media “journalists” want to make people dislike someone and reject whatever their victim may stand for, they start calling the person they want to destroy “far right.” The idea is to associate the victim with Hitler and fascism without saying anything that could end up being legally actionable, and the leftists have not hesitated to use the label for anyone and anything they don’t like, no matter how far from anything genuinely “far right” their target may be.
One notorious example is the media’s use of “far right” to try to defame everyone who dares to oppose its favorite religion, Islam, and to speak out against jihad violence and Sharia oppression of women. And so the late Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn, who was a gay activist with leftist positions on everything except his refusal to accept the Islamization of the Netherlands and Europe, was “far right.” So is his political heir in the Netherlands, Geert Wilders, whose party’s program aligns with the left on almost everything except its opposition to mass Muslim migration into Europe, and so he, too, is “far right.”
I myself believe in free speech, free enterprise, and free society, and reject racism, fascism, and the like, but when I started writing books about how Islamic jihad is a historic and present-day threat, I, too, became “far right,” and was placed on the blacklists of the Southern Poverty Law Center and Anti-Defamation League, and defamed and deplatformed accordingly.
The whole thing has gotten so absurd that in a December 2024 article published in the aftermath of an Islamic jihad attack upon a Christmas market in Germany, the Daily Mail warned: “This Christmas market carnage will make a dangerous situation even uglier – and the Far Right will grow even stronger.” Yeah, that’s the biggest takeaway from a jihad attack that killed six people and injured over 300 others: the “far right” may take advantage.
The idea that anyone at all would have been worrying about the “far right” at that moment demonstrated how avid the establishment media is to divert attention away from Islamic jihad violence. If that required warning about a nonexistent threat and once again smearing people who were simply trying to stand against the prevailing madness, so be it.
Now, however, Elon Musk has had enough. The Hill reported Friday that in a recent interview, The Economist’s Editor-in-Chief Zanny Minton Beddoes claimed that Musk “supports not just the populist right, but the far right — in fact, very fringe parties in some countries.”
Musk took issue with this characterization, saying: “No, I support the normal people. What you call the far right, falsely. Literally, you could go back 10 or 15 years and these policies were completely normal.”
There is more. Read the rest here.
Luchtpint says
Left wing people have simply unleashed a smear campaign against normal people who want our societies to be civilized on the basis of equality before the law. We are talking about sensible people vs. crazed idiots who don’t actually believe in equality before the law.
Socialists will exempt everyone who barges into our countries from being held accountable for their criminal actions. Socialists have helped create this dystopian nightmare, by making foreign wrongdoers feel like they are entitled to do just about anything they set their criminal minds to.
If they hadn’t, then the sensible and rational people of Western Europe and Northern America would not have to plead on their knees for their politicians to make stricter policies on immigration and border security.
We (the people of Northern America and Western Europe) are NOT far right neo-nazi skinhead knuckleheads. That’s basically the contrived rhetoric from the left we have to deal with, time and time again.
AND WE ARE SICK AND TIRED OF IT !
ConcernedReader says
The problem is that there is a brainwashing operation going on.
Directed towards females.
Behavioural Science actually is able to shed light what is hapenning quite well.
That all you need in order to change the thinking of most women, is to deploy a vanguard, and repeat a few things to make it the new normal, to which most women themselves immideatly will conform to.
This is what is and was happening on quite a large scale.
If the media constantly victimizes the illegal immigrants, if it constantly rephrases border protection being a bad thing and so forth, most women will fall in line. Because they want to eradicate injustice, offer compassion to everyone and so on.
In order to understand many of the economic shifts happening around the world, and how the thought process of the masses (especialy women) has changed learning about behavioural science is a key aspect.
I myself noticed quite a few strange things but could not voice my concerns properly, but once i started to delve more and more into the behavioural science and the differences between male and female thought processes, socialization (growing up) and a few other things, a lot of things made more sense.
This also actually explains how the everyday political speech has switched so much towards the far left, and how quite often facts and evidence, so basicly logical explanation and reasoning, why do not work when trying to argue with females.
And why many and most female reporters try to ruin the reputation of people they interview who do not share their view and “indoctrinated” values.
Like for instance calling everyday average native local males as far right.
Because if you diminish someone’s reputation you do not need to engage or listen to them anymore. It is a female ostracizing and social exclusion tactic.
(Which again stems from the different thinking and “self-forming”/”self-building” between males and females.)
So i would suggest everyone in order to understand more what is actually going on, to learn behavioural science and evolutionary biology in regards to behavioural differences
somehistory says
You write: (among other things) “That all you need in order to change the thinking of most women, is to deploy a vanguard, and repeat a few things to make it the new normal, to which most women themselves immideatly will conform to.”
Baloney. Or if you prefer, bologna.
I challenge you to prove that you know “most women.”
ConcernedReader says
“Your obvious misogyny fits right in with the way muzzlims view women.”
You call em a mysognyst.
It is your right to do so.
But:
“And when you point these things out to them it is always an emotional reaction that you will receive. One where they either point out you are disrespectful, or where you are lying, or where they go on the offensive and misdirect the topic, or try to ruin your reputation.”
And this is left brain thinking, you are not denying or refuting anything i say.
You are trying to ruin my reputation, and my views fit right into the view of muzzies.
I did not advocate for their rights to be taken away, to make them into secondary citizens.
I stated though that many women’s irrational and inconsistent behaviour can be explained if we look at the finding of behavioural science.
I brought up a few example from European women. Because it is where i live, and it is what i see.
But you can go up to any form of social media and see similar things.
Your claim of me being mysognist is also not really a solid argument, when data reveals that it is actually misandrism that is getting normalized and spread widely on most media. And it took roots, as in the UK ~30% of the females under 25 are openly misandrist. Compared to ~7 % of young males being mysognistic.
The dropping of birth rates, the dropping of marriage rates can all be noticed around civilizations that accept the western culture.
And at almost every such place, females actually have now more rights than males. At most of these countries many of the “conform” high paying jobs are being taken over by females as well. Because of positive discrimination policies towards job hiring practices, or simply because females become the gatekeepers of HR. The mental health or therapy sector another noticeable sector where female participation is huge and where males are being pushed out. Yet for some reason we have more and more people with mental issues.
Men and women are biologically different. They also act different.
But females are getting positively discriminated in education(there is actually an innate grading bias towards females as well), in hiring practices. They are also held to different standards, they face different sentences(sentences are more lenient towards women). They seldom have to face if at all accountability and responsibility.
They are also less likely to understand effect->cause, because they are less forced to deal with consequences. They are less likely to innovate or to take risks. To step out of their comfort zones.
So if a workplace(corporate, institutional) gets feminized, it usually changes from merit based approaches, towards conforming and equity based one. So Silent Quitting happens. Almost exclusively among males.
So what happens if Western Civilization becomes overly feminized?
Where the female compassion is able to subdue the male logic or rationale.
Where female conformity, the need of equity is more important, than facts or evidence.
Where females are institutionalized of being allowed to get away with more lenient sentences?
Where it is not the law and the equality before it is the important thing, but the context of the perpetrator. The empathic approach.
Who are the most radical, far left thinking people mostly in the west?
Usually they are young females. In the USA most of the campuses became a breeding ground of far left propaganda? Who attend to these universities mostly? Females.
Who are more likely to fall in line and who are more likely willing to confront in a civilized manner?
Who are more willing to engage in an actual debate and who are more likely to damage your reputation instead?
Men and women are different. They act and behave different. They think different.
And if you deny this and call me instead mysognist when i point this out, then i accept your emotional based reply. But i cannot accept it as an argument.
There is talk of how the she-economy is on the rise.
My expectation is that with its rise the the marriage rates and birthrates will drop even further.
why? Because previously males were able to have jobs and be evaluated based on their performance on their contribution. But now they are not. And instead of hiring males, they hire females. Since there are incentives and laws that require them to do so. (Quotas for instance. Equal pay for equal position, even if the female is unable to keep up with the average male performance.)
These jobs previously allowed males to accumulate money throughout the years in order to build a family, or use to build a foundation of a household. Now these jobs are offered to females, to finance their consumeristic behaviour.
To spend on travels, bags, luxuries. But their expectation of the men to build the foundation of the household still remains with the men.
But they were the ones that drove out men, and are driving out men from such places.
(Because most workplaces do not evaluate their workers based on merit. On contribution, or performance.)
And all of this can be observed in real life. The social media is full of such expectations.
And on the other hand the message you see is how men are trash, men are garbage, disposable. You don’t need men.
(But somehow it is okay to import hostile cultured men? And we need more? And we can’t send them back?)
gravenimage says
ConcernedReader wrote, replying to Somehistory:
“You call em a mysognyst.
It is your right to do so.”
So ConcernedReader *doesn’t* consider female genital mutilation, child marriage, faorced marriage, polgamy, wife beating, Honor Killing and stoning women to death to be mysogynist? Just sickening.
Wellington says
Yes, there are many foolish and vile women but there are also many foolish and vile men.
There is also the phenomenon of beta males. What’s up with them?
ConcernedReader says
I know quite a lot of european women.
Well educated ones, singles, wives, mothers.
A right wing voter single mother, will be more concerned about the french arab kid that might lose his father due to deportation, than her own male relatives.
She finds her relative more useless that spends years helping her with her three children, than a random african/arab immigrant.
I talked to many females who have a degree in economics.
That if you invite into the country a lot of uneducated males, or males that have a different kind of education not really western style, than you are inviting masses of unemployed people. Who will tax your social systems. By placing a drain on it, and increasing waiting lists and such. And these resources instead of supporting you, your family, or fellow people of your country, or the advancement of the country, will be used to feed, cloth and otherwise satisfy people that are foreign, and often outright hostile to you.
And the reply is, yes it is true, but we have a moral obligation to help them.
So it does not matter that you economically and logically point out the issues.
It can be dismissed, because if she feels better being a good person(via virtue signaling), that is more important than evidence or factual reality.
The causality is also becoming an alien concept.
It is something similar with Israel.
“Israel is a genocidal state, and so forth . . .” will be used in every discussion.
Yet when you ask, whether they knew what one of the prophets first decree was, they are silent. You point out that one of his first decrees and aims was to ETHNICALLY CLEANSE the arab peninsula.
A religion that actually mystifies and sanctifies ethnical cleansing(so actual genocide), which can be seen being done currently in the name of islam in multiple african countries, is just simply unacceptable or unrealizable to these women.
Because the “consensus”, the smear campaign, the “good thing” to do is be anti-israel. Because jews are evil. And that is enough.
If you ask them whether they know what the original populace even was in many of the current arab states? Then it is silence.
They think in Egypt egyptians are the majority, and they speak egyptian.
And these people went to college, university, have high paying jobs. (The worst is with some of them i took the same courses where they EXPLAINED about egypt how it is an arab country. And our teacher even wrote arabic on the board, as he could speak arabic.)
And when you point these things out to them it is always an emotional reaction that you will receive. One where they either point out you are disrespectful, or where you are lying, or where they go on the offensive and misdirect the topic, or try to ruin your reputation.
You can see this almost everywhere. A women seldom is able to or is willing to accept she is wrong. Much less be able to acknowledge it.
But perhaps you are right and i am completely wrong about this.
(Although the Beta males following these females is quite easy to figure out why they do it.)
.
somehistory says
Your obvious misogyny fits right in with the way muzzlims view women.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Somehistory.
Desparate-in-Germany says
Being a product of the CA University system i can agree to that. The left had already taken hold there some decades ago. I was brain-washed myself until i did what any reasonable human would do, i moved to a communist country. Haha, that innoculated me rather quickly. And now decades later i see it clearer. That is why people like Hasan Puker disgust me so deeply. I wish he would get off his ass, get away from his air conditioned studio and computer desk and bloody move to a communist country with one a suitcase, no money, no name, no fame. But then again, he would end up doing well being the psychopath that he is.
gravenimage says
What rot. There are plenty of Anti-Jihad women here. The claim that women are all biological sheep is claptrap.
And there are plenty of male dhimmis–have you never noticed this?
And–this year, at least–I note that you have *never* said anything critical of Jihadists or Islam–just ranted about how you hate women. Ugly stuff. You know who else hates women…
ea says
I am a woman and l agree in many ways, but not all. There are many, many sensible bright women who hate the Left and all it stands for, Here is my take after watching alot of women vent their hatred for conservatives in videos that they produced. The culture promotes multiple abortions and l believe many of these lunatic women have had many abortions as some are proud to admit to. After abortion you either grieve or you don’t care. It’s the don’t care ones who flip out and who have the most abortions. It is often their only birth control. (The Pro-life community offers free loving post abortion counseling via Rachel Projects and other free weekends.)
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Speaking of Musk, I love how he busted Ilhan Omar’s bubble, when she demanded that POTUS get out of her country. He said “I had no idea that President Trump was on a visit to Somalia” 😂🤣
The perfect “thug-life” response! 😈
tgusa says
Have women changed that much? My brothers and I who today would be classified as far right used to watch this stuff on TV (on Saturday mornings when we were allowed to watch TV). Way better than cartoons.
https://youtu.be/yvslWb3Iowc?si=BWRUv3SJp0pCoEEp
They eventually lost popularity because the forgot who and what they were.
tgusa says
There are some things that are better left to men, or in this case, boys.
https://rumble.com/v7dcvye-heart-stopping-moment-teen-lifeguard-rescues-little-boy-from-violent-waves.html
somehistory says
Good for those young guys….young *men.*……thanks for sharing.
tgusa says
Sure thing. I have been there, alone, no lifeguard on duty. Damn scary.