The cover-up continues.
The radical Albanese regime in Australia solicited a 60-page report on Islamophobia from its ‘Special Envoy to Combat Islamophobia’ which conveniently never actually defined Islamophobia, but did call for removing religion as a motive in terrorist attack because that would discriminate against Muslims…
…and is now set to spend tens of millions on fighting this ‘Islamophobia’.
This comes not long after the Bondi Beach Muslim massacre of Jews at a Chanukah Party that was the single worst Muslim terrorist attack in Australian history.
Instead, the Albanese regime keeps referencing the killing of Muslims in a mosque in New Zealand back in 2019, rather than talking about the Bondi Beach Muslim terrorist attack in December 2025, because an attack in New Zealand from 7 years ago is somehow more relevant than an attack in Australia 7 months ago.
Albanese took the time to attack Pauline Hanson of One Nation, a patriotic party which has been polling well, and which had called for dealing with Islamic terrorism, falsely claiming that she is damaging ‘social cohesion’. No word about whether hospitals having to hide the Bondi Beach terror attack victims from Muslim nurses ‘damages social cohesion’.
A Muslim minister in the Albanese regime falsely claimed that “Islamophobia is dangerously close to being normalized”. No, but the denial of Islamic terrorism has been once again normalized.
Barney Shane says
Daniel are you aware of the senate bill in Massachusetts s2134 that appoints 11 Muslims to a committee and puts in Islamophobia laws?? It’s about to pass
See https://malegislature.gov/Bills/194/S2134
somehistory says
If there were no muzzlims in that nation, perhaps no one would pay much attention to their *fear* of islime and perhaps it would not get to the point of being irrational.
There is, as we all know, nothing about islime which would make one fear it *irrationally.* One can be aware of the evils it demands be carried out, know of what muzzlims are capable of doing, but still be rational in their thinking.
One might say, when his neighbors are muzzlims, there are muzzlims in his government, and muzzlims coming into his country every day while threatening to slice necks, “My fear is *rational.*”
By now, if the various people like the PM wanted to expose the dangers muzzlims present, they would admit that the ‘phobia’ does not exist and stop pretending that it does. But, they don’t wish to bring anger to themselves from those who are ready….always ready….to murder them, Murder for their false god and fake prophet.
Dave says
“Islamophobia: a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons.”—Christopher Hitchens
Phobia. An irrational fear.
Now, look at all the violence around the world, today and understand that Islam is causing a great deal of it. Your fear, at this point, is not irrational. The fear is very well-founded and identifiable with Islam as the root cause.
The moment I hear ‘Islamophobia’ being used in the context that certain Australians are using it, I know their country is being taken over by Islam.
I thought Australians were a little smarter than this.
More than one threat says
Left Wing Modis Operandi, whether in Australia, Germany, US, UK or elsewhere.
1. Import thousands, if not millions, of immigrants, including both legal and illegal immigrants, and actively work against assimilation of the new immigrants into the existing culture, which results in massive damage to ‘social cohesion’ as self-interested and corrupt ethnic or religious ghettos emerge, often engaged in criminal activities (e.g. fraud in Minnesota etc)
2. The moment there is backlash to the massive immigration influx, accuse the critics of the mass immigration of being racist and bigoted and of damaging the so-called ‘social cohesion’ of the nascent multicultural society that has been enforced upon the people by the Left without their consent. If possible (as evident in UK and Germany) either arrest the critics of the immigration influx or suppress the critics freedom of speech.
3. Use the newly imported immigrants to provide a Left Wing voter base and maintain Left Wing power in perpetuity.
Tim gallagher says
Sounds about right, more than one threat. Do you think that they know how evil islam is and that letting Muslims in is a disaster but they don’t give a damn. I am more certain of this than anything, future generations will curse the fools who destroyed Australia by letting Muslims. Dumbest move ever.
gravenimage says
After Worst Muslim Terrorist Attack, Australian Government Tackles ‘Islamophobia’
…………………………………………………..
Suicidal stupidity…
Wazza says
Oh how I would love to inject this mongrel Albo into a muslim prison in Israel
Pray Hard says
Apparently, they’re too stupid to do anything else.
jerry glenn says
Australia surges in the international Islamopandering derby.
Rod says
It’s claimed that the report “conveniently never actually defined Islamophobia,I”
If Mr Greenfield had cared to look, he might have noticed that the report in fact produces several definitions and discusses their merits.
Oh well, this is Jihad Watch after all.
Islam is bad says
Page 15/60 of the Australian report – A National Response to Islamophobia:
A Strategic Framework for
Inclusion, Safety and Prosperity
‘…Many may find it surprising to learn that there is
no universally accepted definition of Islamophobia…”
Runnymede Trust definition , “dread
or hatred of Islam” (Runnymede Trust, 1997, p. 1).6
The United States’ first ever National Strategy to
Counter Islamophobia and Anti-Arab Hate, defines
Islamophobia as “hatred, discrimination, or bias
directed at Muslims or those perceived to be Muslim”
(The White House, 2024, p. 3).
Canada’s Anti-Racism Strategy 2024–2028 defines it as
“racism, stereotypes, prejudice, fear or acts of
hostility directed towards individual Muslims or
followers of Islam in general” which “can lead to
viewing and treating Muslims as a greater security
threat on an institutional, systemic and societal
level” (Government of Canada, 2024, as cited in
Elghawaby, 2024).9
“…The term is contested, and debated…However, broadly speaking, it is a perceived “fear” (Gabsi, 2024, p. 17) of,
and “threat” (Awan & Zempi, 2020, p. 7) from, Islam and Muslims…encapsulates a range of anti-Muslim behaviours, such as anti-Muslim hatred, anti-Muslim sentiment, and anti-Muslim prejudice…The absence of a universal definition should
not deter us from acknowledging that Muslim
Australians are facing increasing instances of
prejudice, discrimination, assault, and attacks. …This report does not seek to define Islamophobia, but to convey its pervasiveness and impacts…”
So while the Australian report on Islamophobia refers to the definitions of Islamophobia developed by others, the reports does not “…actually define Islamophobia” and states that fact in the report.
Appears someone may owe Mr Greenfield and Jihad Watch an apology
Rod says
Thank you friend, for confirming the very obvious.
I read a report this morning about taxation.
Can you believe that nowhere in this report does it actually define “taxation”.
Islam is bad says
The normal convention is to apologise for being factually wrong, and just move on with your life.
Unless you’re Left Wing.
Left Wing supporters never, ever apologise for anything.
Rod says
My comment was that the report “in fact produces several definitions and discusses their merits”.
If this was “factually wrong” as alleged, the normal convention would be to say why or where or how it was factually wrong. What it has to do with Left Wing, I cannot imagine.
But as I pointed out, this is Jihad Watch, after all.
Islam is bad says
The Australian report – A National Response to Islamophobia:
A Strategic Framework for Inclusion, Safety and Prosperity states “This report does not seek to define Islamophobia, but to convey its pervasiveness and impacts”
That’s not a settled definition.
Your allegation was that Mr Greenfield’s comment that the Australian report “conveniently never actually defined Islamophobia”. It is essentially irrelevant that the Australian report references prior UK, US, and Canadian definitions of Islamophobia, because the Australian report does not accept any of those definitions as the Australian definition of Islamophobia.
The Australian report “never actually defines” an Australian definition of Islamophobia. Mr Greenfield’s statement was 100% accurate.
That is why and how you are factually wrong.
Rod says
Now you’re telling me that an allegation which you say that I made, but which you haven’t defined, is factually wrong.
You may be right.
Peter Williamson says
Albo and Wong, our Prime Minister and foreign Foreign Minister have blood on their hands. They allowed the antisemitic occupation of the bridge, reversed the Libs plan to move our embassy to Jerusalem, recognised the fictional “State of Palestine”, imported thousands of ‘palestinians’ from Gaza, prohibited Israeli politicians from visiting Australia and continually pander to the hard left antisemites in the Labor Party for political gain. They are beyond disgusting. A pox on them both.
If seven or eight of the people attending the Hanukkah celebration were carrying concealed, the slaughter would never have happened. These Islamic terrorists are cowards. They will only attack soft targets. The problem isn’t too many guns – the problem is not enough guns. Our politicians are bloody idiots. The Liberals disarmed us in 1996, and now Labor wants go even further. As the joke goes, when seconds count the police are only minutes away. But what is the first response of these morons? More punitive gun laws which affect the law abiding but are ignored by criminals and terrorists. We don’t need gun control- we need moslem control. And new politicians. To those who leap in with their gotcha point that the brave hero is a Moslem I say ‘so what. Does Schindler’s list, one good German, prove Nazi Germany wasn’t evil? Of course not – and one Moslem hero doesn’t negate the fact that Islam is an evil dangerous ideology which has no place in in a free society
Rod says
“Albo and Wong, our Prime Minister and foreign Foreign Minister have blood on their hands. They allowed the antisemitic occupation of the bridge, reversed the Libs plan to move our embassy to Jerusalem, recognised the fictional “State of Palestine”, imported thousands of ‘palestinians’ from Gaza, prohibited Israeli politicians from visiting Australia and continually pander to the hard left antisemites in the Labor Party for political gain.”
Despite the claim that these two folk “have blood on their hands”, isn’t it truly admirable that all the achievements listed above were accomplished without the spilling of a single drop of blood.
As for prohibiting visits from Israeli politicians, Israel’s President, no less, visited as the guest of Australia’s prime minister only a few months ago.
A few more guns carried concealed among the Australian population might well have produced a bit more spillage of blood. Would that be an improvement?
Islam is bad says
Someone was absent from school when the difference between the literal use of language (i.e. blood on hands meaning actual blood on someone’s actual hands) was compared with the figurative use of language (e.g. blood on someone’s hands being a common turn of phrase suggesting moral guilt or responsibility for wrongdoing, especially when the consequences of one’s actions lead to harm or death).
Israeli politician, Simcha Rothman, had his visa to Australia cancelled in August 2025 by the Left Wing Albanese Government just one day before he was scheduled to arrive in Australia for meetings with the Australian Jewish community.
Simcha Rothman, a member of Israel’s National Religious Party (aka Mafdal) which is part of Netanyahu’s ruling coalition, and who chairs the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committe, had his visa cancelled and is prevented by Australia’s Left Wing Australian Labor Party from visiting Australia for three years.
On the other hand, the Left Wing Australian Labor Party did allow the Left Wing Israel President, Isaac “Bougie” Herzog, to visit in February 2026 after the Bondi massacre.
Isaac Herzog had been a former member of Left Wing Israeli political parties, the Zionist Union then Israeli Labor.
So it makes sense that the Left Wing Australian Labor Party would allow Left Wing Israeli politicians to visit Australia, while cancelling the visa of Israeli politicians who weren’t Left Wing.
And if seven or eight armed police officers were overtly carrying long arm weapons at Bondi, given the predictable risk of Islamic attack on Jews in Australia, then the slaughter would never have happened.