Britain has sacrificed public safety, and damaged its economy, by allowing in a steady invasion of unvetted illegal migrants from Africa and the Middle East. With rampant crime, sex attacks and a financial inability to sustain the invasion, the Labour Party has been creative in coming up with a range of ideas on how to make it appear to the public that its confronting the problem. From the failed Rwanda deportation scheme (for which UK taxpayers doled out $132 million USD to Rwanda) to paying France nearly a trillion USD to curb illegal migrant crossings of the Channel, the UK taxpayer has been hard hit in all directions. While law-abiding citizens are subject to the rule of law and, for example, stringent rules at airports, the same does not apply to unvetted illegals. In the same vein, illegals also completely bypassed Covid rules.
So in another attempt to fool the public into trusting the government, while exonerating itself from its own irresponsible lack of action, the ruling Labour Party has come up with a new outlandish idea: to hire members of the public as “immigration judges in bid to deport bogus asylum seekers.” “Migrant crisis: Great British public hired as immigration judges in bid to deport bogus asylum seekers – could YOU be one?,” by Peter Stevens, GB News, June 29, 2026:
Members of the public are set to be hired to judge immigration appeals to speed up the deportation of bogus asylum seekers.
Shabana Mahmood is set to announce plans to recruit hundreds of people to serve as adjudicators in magistrate-style reforms to the appeals process.
The Home Secretary will include the changes in the Immigration and Asylum Bill on Tuesday.
Illegal migrants will get only one chance to appeal against rejected claims under the new Independent Immigration Appeals Authority (IIAA), which will replace the two tiered-immigration tribunal, behind infamous decisions like that of the “chicken nugget migrant”.
The new authority will be used to identify cases which are in the public interest, including “high-harm” foreign offenders and asylum seekers who make human rights claims which are “clearly without merit”.
Ms Mahmood said the reforms would help to clear a record backlog of 87,400 asylum cases.
But the Conservatives, who ran the Home Office for 14 years, have argued the reforms to the immigration system have not gone far enough.
Chris Philp, Shadow Home Secretary, said: “If the Government was serious about deporting illegal immigrants and foreign criminals they would leave the ECHR, leave the modern slavery treaty, ban illegal immigrants from claiming asylum and prevent most judicial reviews. But they are too weak to do this.”…
The new plan shows that the UK government’s new strategy apparently involves hiding behind the public. As taxpayers foot the bill for this new idea of public adjudication, the government positions itself to evade backlash, no matter what the adjudicators decide.
The effectiveness of the process is dependent on who is choosing the untrained members of the public to act as members of the Independent Immigration Appeals Authority. Sans any details about how this unique process will be implemented, it sounds like a jury type of setup. Should woke leftists be chosen as the public adjudicators, we know what the results will be. And then the government can try to assert that the public made the decision, and thus evade accountability.
The same woke leftists who ally with Islamic supremacists and voted in the Labour Party may well be the public adjudicators. Yet should the adjudicators decide to rid the public of these lawbreaking menaces, patriotic Britons will celebrate, while the government will avoid backlash from its own leftist base and try to gain some points among the undecided or centrist public. On the other hand, it could then stand against the adjudicators and accuse them of “racism” and “Islamophobia.”
At the most basic level, the government is evading its own job to protect the public from illegals invading the country. Judging immigration appeals among “high-harm” foreign offenders and asylum seekers who make human rights claims which are “clearly without merit” is not the role or responsibility of a few paid but untrained members of the public. It is a bizarre plan that a defunct government has concocted.
J Allan says
‘On the other hand, it could then stand against the adjudicators and accuse them of “racism” and “Islamophobia.”‘
Islam ISN’T ANY kind of RACE!
And there’s no phobia involved … the UK simply doesn’t NEED, nor want, Muslim interference in its country, and the running of it!
40 rounds says
Hint: they’re all bogus claims
England Invaded says
The UK has surreptitiously just dropped the rule that anyone entering illegally can’t apply for citizenship.
Although it was useless, as most on the channel are technically brought in to circumvent and subvert those rules. They are not regarded as illegals technically.
A bunch of new houses in Shropshire worth £250,00 each, are now to be filled with invading third world filth.
When they were built under the deception they would be for local people.
This is as the traitors in charge empty the hotels of these invaders. We all knew it would mean them going into homes.
Does anyone at this point really think that any politician or any conversation or voting will reverse this?
The only thing which changes anything is let’s just say direct action or the threat of direct action.
It will have to be down to as many Brits as possible taking out as many as possible!!!
40 rounds says
I here you. My son helped build a house as part of a high school class and they gave it to filthy somalis. Not Americans, not poor white people, fucking somalis
England Invaded says
And the traitors making that decision will still be patting themselves on the back for all their good work. What happened to the West?
Ade Fegan says
Every single one on the payroll will be a bleeding heart liberal or a muslim
OLD GUY says
Open migration and borders is a recipe for destruction of your society and country.