I’ve been saying all these things for years and have been branded an “Islamophobe” for doing so. This indicates that the fears of British authorities were well-founded. They knew they’d face professional ruin if they went after the Muslim rape gangs. So they chose the destruction of their own country’s future instead.
“250,000 girls in UK abused by rape gangs comprising 95% Pakistani Muslim men over decades, enabled by police and a system that was scared of being ‘Islamophobic’: Independent inquiry report,” by Shraddha Pandey, OpIndia, June 17, 2026:
Hundreds of thousands of minor non-Muslim girls were lured, picked up, raped, brutalised, sold, and even killed by Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs or rape gangs for a full forty years or more in the United Kingdom. The British authorities and media covered up the horrifying truth of rape jihad in pursuit of not coming across as ‘racist and Islamophobic’. An independent Rape Gang Inquiry Report has now revealed that the Muslim rape gangs comprised 87% to 95% Pakistani Muslim men, who raped, exploited and groomed over 250,000 non-Muslim, mostly White girls.
The 219-page Rape Gang Inquiry Report is an independent, survivor-led inquiry chaired by MP Rupert Lowe, with lead Sammy Woodhouse, who is a survivor and campaigner, and a panel including MPs Esther McVey, Nick Timothy, and Carla Lockhart…
“The perpetrators bear primary responsibility, yet the institutional failures that enabled them for decades must also be confronted. In court records and official inquiries, around 87% of those convicted in these group-based child sexual exploitation (‘CSE’) cases bore distinctively Muslim names. The vast majority of men involved in these gangs were not convicted. Dr Taj Hargey, an imam with the Oxford Islamic Congregation, believes the true proportion of gang members who are Muslims to be around 95%. This figure far exceeds the Muslim share of the overall United Kingdom population,” the Inquiry states.
As per the Inquiry, most of the rape gang members were of Muslim backgrounds – predominantly of Pakistani heritage, although smaller groups from Somali, Iranian, Syrian, Turkish, and other Muslim origins were also involved.
‘Islamic motivations of rape jihad, theological aspects of Islam’
In a major departure from the prevalent approach of downplaying the religious drivers of the child sexual exploitation by Pakistani and other Muslim rape gangs, the Rupert Lowe-chaired Rape Gang Inquiry explicitly details the Islamic motivations of rape jihad.“Perpetrators from Pakistani Muslim and other Muslim backgrounds operated under an honour and shame-based clan code that treated non-Muslim girls, especially white working-class girls, as property available for sexual use. This pattern was reinforced by eight theological and legal aspects of Islam,” the report states….
Further dissecting the Islamic drivers of rape jihad, the Rape Gang Inquiry Report says that Islamic doctrines of superiority over non-Muslims or kuffar, al-walā’ wa-l-barā’ (loyalty to Muslims and enmity to non-Muslims), Islamic-historical precedents of treating non-Muslim war captive females ‘Maal-e-Ghanimat’, and the belief that White girls, and by extension all non-Muslim girls, are ‘property’ or ‘easy meat’.
One of the survivors, Dr Ella Hill, told the Inquiry, “I was told that white girls are trash. They are all whores. They are lower than shit under your shoe. They don’t obey Allah, so they deserve to be punished.”
Several others described ‘rituals’ imposed by Pakistani Muslim rape jihadis to assert Islamic dominance. These included forcing victims to lick feet, branding ‘M’ for ownership on the bodies of Kafir girls, setting up ‘red rooms’, subjecting victims to extreme torture and even getting the White girls raped by animals. Some were also forced to witness murder….
somehistory says
The other % …not pakis…were from egypt, morocco, afthanistan or elsewhere. So one may as well say that they all are/were scuzzy muzzies. 100%
If the authorities….the non-muzzie ones…who didn’t actually participate in raping or driving the girls around or threatening them…had a *fear* of being called names. Boo hoo.
The young victims *were called names*** some really bad insulting names. And what about the *fears* these children felt while the ugly, filthy slugs, sons of demons, actually were raping, molesting, torturing, abusing and killing them?
What about their fears when the cops were driving them to the places they knew they would be raped, abused, called names and maybe murdered?
What about their fears?
All of the guilty will reap what they have so evilly sown.
David Lakatos says
Muslims are Satan’s perverts. Praising Allah while they rape you. Pedophilia perversion is spread throughout Islam. Allah, the moon god, is in hell fornicating with his 72 virgins.
James Lincoln says
Tommy Robinson was right all along.
Ostracized, mocked, imprisoned, etc., because he was “over the target”.
Ade Fegan says
and still is of course
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Only 95%? What were the other 5%?
carpediadem says
English police, presumably.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Non muslim ones?
Ade Fegan says
What’s with all the past tense language ?
gravenimage says
Good point, Ade–grimly, I don’t think that any of this has stopped.
England Invaded says
And the traitor authorities turned a blind eye due to the references to islam
More than one threat says
The unwillingness of the Left Wing media, politicians and activists to give the independent Rape Gang Inquiry Report due prominance and attention is a large part of the problem.
The actions of the Muslim grooming and rape gangs can’t be dealt with until the Left Wing media, politicians and activists who cover up for them, protect them and enable them, are first dealt with.
The Left are accomplices to these horrendous crimes.
OLD GUY says
Have you noticed the weakest amongst are always the ones HURT.
Huh?!? says
There was a WW 2 song by Vera Lynn: “There will always be an England, and England shall be free.” Not much longer. England still has some life left. The fact this report came out shows that. The true citizens of England must use this information to fight back. Fight, fight, fight. Other comments here are correct. The police officers that aided in this are just as guilty. This shows what Islam really is. The Islamist that took part in these rapes must be deported back to their home countries. In an urn.
Ralph says
I remember well Ms. Lynn singing that “live”. That was a very admirable, very courageous England. Gone with the wind. So sad.
gravenimage says
Huh?!? and Ralph, I wrote this a few years ago:
Just as the original song helped Britain make it through the Blitz, this should help with the transition to a Shari’ah state:
There’ll always be an Al-Britani
I give you a toast, ladies and gentlemen.
I give you a toast, ladies and gentlemen.
[this is Haram! There will be no alcohol in Islamized England, and no mixing of the sexes! The Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice هيئة الأمر بالمعروف و النهي عن المنكر will remove these blasphemous lyrics!]
May this fair dear Dunya we love so well
In dhimmitude and oppression dwell.
Though worlds may change and go awry
While there is still one voice allowed to cry
There’ll always be an Al-Britani
While there’s an ugly Mosque,
Wherever there’s a Madrassa
Beside a stoning ground
There’ll always be an Al-Britaini
While there’s a busy slave market,
Wherever there’s a violent Muslim mob,
A million marching feet.
The Shahada on a field of black; what does it mean to you?
Surely you’re proud, shout it aloud,
“Muslims, awake!”
The Ummah too, we can depend on you.
No Freedom remains. These are the chains
Nothing can break.
There’ll always be an Al-Britani,
And Al-Britani won’t be free
If England means as little to you
As England means to me.
(apologies to “There’ll Always Be an England).
tgusa says
The spotlight is turned on and pointed directly at this issue and more of the ugly truth is being brought in to the light. In my opinion, as time goes by, it is going to get uglier.
The UK covered this up for 70 years (The Rape Gang Inquiry Report)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4384755/posts
That kind of thing will destroy a country’s reputation for who knows how long. A decade, a century, forever?
tgusa says
Starmer was the unfortunate one who got caught in the crosshairs as this issue was exposed. Starmer is left holding the bag. He is just the last guy, the guy on the spot, the last man standing, in the history of this disgusting coverup. The lesson for leftists is, be very careful, lest you get left holding the bag.
gravenimage says
Starmer is no innocent victim, though–he has been one of the worst of the deniers and appeasers.
somehistory says
He didn’t allow the Truth to be told about the scum who murdered the little girls at the dance academy. He’s also scum, imo.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Somehistory.
tgusa says
“Starmer is no innocent victim”
That’s right, he isn’t. As I wrote, he is the last man standing in a long line of deniers and appeasers. He is the last man standing and he is going down while the others that came before him have escaped responsibility. They have escaped responsibility because many of them are dead. But even though they are dead and buried their reputations may not survive.
gravenimage says
tgusa, while I would not like to see Starmer take *all* the blame, I’d still love to see someone go down for these crimes against English girls, I’m not at all sure that *anyone* is going down for this–although more Britons do seem to be waking up, it is a glacially slow process–and I think children are still being abused.
tgusa says
“I’d still love to see someone go down for these crimes against English girls”
So would I. The truth is it is not just someone. It is perhaps ten of thousands of someones (maybe more) that are guilty in this decades long monstrosity. It is so huge the left will do anything they can to bury it.
More than one threat says
Starmer was the head of the UK Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), between 2008-2013.
As the head of the CPS Starmer oversaw charging decisions, prosecutorial policy, and the handling of serious crime cases.
The question is whether Starmer was effective and zealous in pursuing prosecutions against grooming gangs or individuals.
Critics of Starmer say he deserves criticism, or worse, for a failure to effectively achieve sufficient prosecutions.
Critics refer to the claim that as many as 13,000 warning letters or notices were issued, in lieu of prosecutions. Such critics also allege that the ethnicity of the perpetrator influenced the decision by the CPS on whether or not to prosecute.
Defenders of Starmer, and Starmer himself, refute the criticisms. They refer to the significant prosecutions that did occur, and reforms to the legal processes.
Is Starmer deserving of criticism or even culpability? Who knows.
But his role appears more prominent that just some unlucky innocent who was
left holding the bag as the last guy on the spot.
Starmer’s role and alleged potential culpability, and the broader role of the CPS, deserve serious scrutiny by an authorised and impartial inquiry process to get to the truth.
tgusa says
“But his role appears more prominent that just some unlucky innocent who was
left holding the bag as the last guy on the spot.”
No doubt about that. Dragging this multi-generational skeleton out of the closet, no wonder the establishment types are going crazy. That explains the shut up, dont talk about it, we will bar you from the Internet, we will arrest you if you do attitude.
It seems like really bad plan that will eventually go terribly wrong.
David M says
Starmer didn’t just ignore it, he enabled it.
gravenimage says
UK: 95% of rape gang members were Muslims, they justified their acts by references to Islam
………………………………………………..
How have so many–in Britain and elsewhere–missed this?
David M says
Because the elites are enabling it.
David Lakatos says
Muslims are Satan’s perverts. There Praising Allah while they rape you. Pedophilia perversion is spread throughout Islam. Allah the moon god is in hell fornicating with his 72 virgins.