The UN has endured a precipitous decline in legitimacy during the last two decades. It has been unwilling, or unable, to prevent or halt many of the world’s conflicts. It has done nothing to stop Russia’s aggression against Kiev. It hasn’t been able to halt China’s war against the Uighurs, nor its aggression in the South China Sea, where it has been intimidating ships from both Vietnam and the Philippines. The UN did nothing to stop North Korea from manufacturing nuclear weapons. It has done nothing to stop the jihadist terror group Boko Haram and other jihad groups from massacring tens of thousands of Christians in Nigeria, as well as smaller numbers of Christians in Cameroon and Niger. Jihadists have carried out attacks, kidnappings, and killings on Christian populations and villages in the Far North Region of Cameroon, the Lac Province of Chad, and the Diffa Region of Niger. There has not been a single UN Resolution passed against Muslim organizations or states until this year, when the Security Council passed Resolution 2817, which condemned Iran for its attacks on the Arab states of the Gulf and on Jordan. There will never be a UN resolution that will condemn a Muslim state or states for aggression against a non-Muslim state. There is no longer a Soviet bloc of states, nor a Western bloc of states, that could be counted on to vote in predictable ways; these blocs have gone the way of the Cold War. In truth, there is only one powerful bloc still subsisting at the UN, consisting of the 57 Muslim states, members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, who vote in lockstep, save during the rare occasions when the 56 Sunni Muslim states vote as one to condemn the single Shi’a state, Iran, for its aggression against its Sunni neighbors.
The most alarming development for the indigenous peoples of Europe is the invasion — that’s the mot juste — of their countries by tens of millions of Muslims, and in addressing that problem, the UN is of no help. These people now realize that they are in danger of having their own societies transformed as a result of demographic conquest, and have concluded that the UN can no longer help the West to survive. Instead, the UN, with its huge Muslim bloc, is now an obstacle to the West’s attempts to save itself.
Now Gilad Erdan, who as a former Israeli ambassador to the UN saw how nauseatingly anti-Israel that organization had become, and how protective of Islam, has proposed that a league of democracies replace the UN. No Russia, no China, no North Korea, and no Muslim states, either, for they would only be obstacles preventing the West from defending itself against a Muslim takeover.
More on Gilad Erdan’s proposal can be found here: “Gilad Erdan: ‘Defund the UN, replace it with a real league of democracies,’” Jerusalem Post, June 2, 2026:
Former Israeli ambassador to the UN Gilad Erdan called for the United Nations to be defunded and dismantled, saying at The Jerusalem Post Conference in New York that the organization has become structurally hostile to Israel and incapable of reform.
“Defund the UN. Replace it with a real league of democracies,” Erdan said during a panel with political analyst Danielle Roth Avneri. “After 80 years, it is time to get rid of the UN.”
Erdan, who now serves as global president of Magen David Adom, said the UN’s problem was not limited to Secretary-General António Guterres, whom he sharply criticized, but was rooted in the organization’s political makeup.
“When you have more than 50% of member states that are non-democracies, and almost one-third of UN member states are Muslim countries that vote together against Israel, of course there is no way to fix it from within,” he said.
He pointed to Iran’s election to the Human Rights Council and Saudi Arabia’s role chairing the Commission on the Status of Women as examples of what he described as the UN’s moral collapse….
“Any deal with the ayatollahs’ Iranian regime that keeps them in place is a bad deal for the future of Israel,” Erdan said, adding that he believed an agreement between Washington and Tehran would ultimately be signed.
The minimum terms, he said, must include removing all enriched uranium from Iran and dismantling all of its nuclear facilities.
“Otherwise, I’m sorry to say, it will be the same kind of agreement as the one that was signed during President Obama’s term,” he said….
Erdan also confirmed that he is working to establish a new right-wing party in Israel, saying that many Israelis feel “politically homeless.”
He said the party would be clearly right-wing, but committed to the principle that “everyone in Israel, including Arabs and including haredim, should share the burden.”burden.”
So much for that idiotic charge of “apartheid” so often flung at Israel. Erdan is ready to welcome not just the haredim, but also Arabs, to join his new party, and also wants them to serve in the IDF, for he thinks it right and proper for all parts of Israeli society to share the burden of defending the country.
In 1946 the League of Nations, having failed so spectacularly to prevent the rise of Fascism and Nazism, was put out of its misery, closed down, and the United Nations replaced it. Now the United Nations has also failed so spectacularly, this time unable to prevent tens of millions of Muslims from moving into Western Europe. Their presence has led to hundreds of billions of dollars being spent annually on every sort of benefit the generous welfare states provide those economic migrants posing as asylum seekers, a rise in the crime rates wherever Muslims have settled in large numbers, and a breakdown in social cohesion. This is the great challenge to the wellbeing of the indigenous non-Muslims, and one which the UN, subservient to the huge Muslim bloc formed by 57 of its 193 members, cannot deal with. Hence the need for a new organization to take the place of the corrupt and corrupting UN. This would not be a military alliance but, rather, an alliance of democratic countries within an organization dedicated to upholding the political and social values of the West.
The people who understand and are alarmed by the increasing Islamization of their countries need to discuss Erdan’s proposal. Already, in every Western country, political leaders have now come to the fore who would be willing to consider such an organization. These leaders include Jordan Bardella and Marine Le Pen of the National Rally in France, Alice Weidel of the Alternative für Deutschland in Germany, Rupert Lowe of the Restore Britain Party, and Giorgia Meloni of the Fratelli d’Italia in Italy. A new union consisting of the democracies to replace the hideously antisemitic United Nations is as necessary now as the United Nations once was, after the League of Nations proved itself to be of little worth in constraining Nazis and Fascists.
David Lakatos says
Democrats will ally with anyone that will keep them in power and control. Democrats are constantly compromising with evil.
David Lakatos says
Democrats will ally with anyone who will keep them in power and control. Democrats are constantly compromising with evil.
ploome says
China is doing the the muslim Uyghurs,
what the muslims did to forcibly convert them originally to islam
might be the only way to stop the shocking spread and worldwide jihad
live by the sword……you know the rest
Peter B says
In theory, a League of Democracies sounds peachy keen.
In practice, if you definition of democracy lets today’s Canada in it’s doomed from the start.
ploome says
exactly..
the so-called European democracies have really joined the OIC lately..
they also have a Jewish problem, masquerading as anti-zionism
࿗Infidel࿘ says
True, most of the world’s democracies are anti-Israel. Look at any UN vote: the number of countries that vote alongside Israel are in single figures. There is no reason to believe that in a different club, their votes will suddenly flip
Most of the West, excepting to an extent the US, has turned against Israel
commonsense says
Years ago, Hugh, you wrote about the Uyghurs’ murderous jihad against the Han in China’s Xinjiang province, which led to the Chinese government’s adopting strong, ruthless countermeasures to stop the Muslim Turkmeni Uyghers’ killing of ethnic, non-Muslim Chinese. The Chinese government’s actions, Draconian as they are, have likely saved the lives of many Han; less immoderate policies, given the ferocity and fervor of the call to jihad, would have been less effective, and more Han would have been killed. Moreover, Muslim countries economically in thrall to China, while obsessed with the alleged genocide being waged by Israel against Muslims in Gaza and “Palestine,” have had nothing to say regarding China’s persecution of the Uighurs. Let the Uyghurs and their fellow members of the Umma go to the devil.
ploome says
excellent
I totally agree
and also the Rohingya
commonsense says
Yes- they, too, are almost always depicted as victims, when nothing could be further from the truth. Hugh wrote about them here on JW some years ago.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Very true. The Rohingya refugees in India have been making life miserable for Hindus. Most Indians can clearly see why Burma kicked them out. Only Modi was stupid enough to take them in
Edmund Carey says
It is a pity that this will never be done. It is just too outlandish a suggestion. It is also a too rational suggestion, the two things coming together more and more these days. While it does maintain some useful service organizations, politically the U.N. is about as responsible as an off-track betting office. I would say that Canada would be a good location for a League of Democracies. We do have some representatives of the belief system that inspired the Paris massacres here, but, we’re not dominated by them, yet.
More than one threat says
A proposal for a United Nations of Democracies has been around for decades.
The solution is not a United Nations of Democracies to REPLACE the existing United Nations.
The solution is a United Nations of Democracies to exist IN PARALLEL to the existing United Nations.
The democracies should remain engaged in the impotent and irrelevant United Nations. However, any decisions coming out of the United Nations can be ignored by those democracies. The budget or peacekeeping contributions by the democracies can be kept to the bare minimum.
The USA, UK and France should retain the veto powers in the existing United Nations Security Council.
By remaining in the United Nations, the democracies can influence the organisation’s policies and actions.
But decisions on collective action can be taken in a parallel organisation – the United Nations of Democracies.
Entry criteria should be established in order to be or remain a member of the United Nations of Democracies.
Such criteria could include an acceptance of the principles contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).
Muslim democracies that signed the alternative 1991 Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI) would not be eligible to be a member of the United Nations of Democracies. The CDHRI is not compatible with the UDHR.
Obviously non-democracies, including autocratic states, or Communist nations, like the People’s Republic of China, or Islamic theocracies like Saudi Arabia or Iran, would not meet the eligibility criteria to be members of the the United Nations of Democracies.
If democracies, such as the UK, started arresting citizens for so-called Islamophobic tweets, they would be contravening Article 19 of the UDHR, thus prompting temporary suspension of the UK from the United Nations of Democracies.
The United Nations of Democracies could be established now as a parallel organisation. It doesn’t have to wait for the the United Nations to be dissolved.
tgusa says
I have always thought it is absurd to call a collection of nations with opposing views interests and cultures United.
jerry glenn says
This idea was very popular at Restoration Weekend ten or fifteen years ago. It is past time. US out of UN. UN out of US.