German Father on a ‘Palestinian’ Migrant’s Murder of His Daughter

The story is always the same: a Muslim migrant, a knife, a non-Muslim victim chosen at random. A rape. Or a murder. Or a rape followed by a murder. And then when the bereaved parents describe what they have endured, and focus on the religious and ethnic identity of the victimizer, they are immediately labeled as “far right.” What may be called the the German political establishment similarly calumniates the one party in Germany that has made halting Muslim migration a centerpiece of its platform, the Alternative für Deutschland, which has skyrocketed in the polls, as “far right” and even “neo-Nazi.” A German father whose teenage son was murdered by a “Palestinian” inveighs against those who call him, and other parents similarly situated, “right-wingers” for publicly describing the rapes and murders of their children. And he defends the AfD party itself, that is also called right-wing in the hope to keep the one anti-immigrant party from winning against the German establishment. His remarks can be found here: “German father whose daughter was murdered by Palestinian migrant asks if mourning victims of illegal immigration is now ‘right-wing extremist’ after AfD ruling,” Remix News, June 5, 2026:

The father of a German teenager murdered by a migrant on a regional train has questioned whether he and other bereaved parents could be treated as right-wing extremists after Saxony-Anhalt’s domestic intelligence agency cited an Alternative for Germany (AfD) politician’s remarks about “murdered children” in its classification of the party’s state branch as an extremist organization.

According to Apollo News, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution in Saxony-Anhalt justified its classification of the AfD state association as a confirmed right-wing extremist organization in part by pointing to the party’s migration rhetoric.

The other parties, the parties in Germany that did nothing to prevent, and much to promote, Muslim migration, are now in a panic. They know the Germans “can’t do this,” despite what Angela Merkel insisted, that is, they can’t integrate a large Muslim population into their society, but they are afraid to admit how dangerously wrong they have been. Instead, they are carrying on a disgraceful campaign against the AfD, which is the one party that forthrightly denounces Muslim migration into Germany, and highlights the baleful consequences, including a steep rise both in crime, and in welfare expenses, of that immigration.

The agency’s report accuses the AfD of being “essentially permeated by the racist ideology of ethnopluralism” and says the party promotes the vision of ethnically homogeneous states. It claims that such a vision amounts to “the expulsion of all ‘aliens’.”…

What “racist ideology” is that? No matter how many times defenders of Islam scream about “racism,” Islam is still not a race. Nor does the AfD insist the Germany again become an “ethnically homogeneous state.” It is perfectly willing to recognize that such a state is not only impossible to achieve, but would be a bad idea in any case. Germany benefits from useful migrants — doctors, scientists, technicians, entrepreneurs. Among them are significant numbers of Chinese and Hindus. But Muslim immigrants are the exception. They are everywhere not an asset, but a liability. And it is their deep belief that they are the “best of peoples” and non-Muslims are the “most vile of created beings” that makes it impossible for them to truly integrate into European societies. And worse still, Muslims know — Muhammad himself said it — that “Islam is to dominate and not to be dominated.”

The Saxony-Anhalt Interior Ministry replied to his post, saying, “Unfortunately, we are unable to comprehend why you assume that the Constitutional Protection Agency of Saxony-Anhalt would classify you as hostile to the constitution. We would be happy to discuss this in person. A phone number will follow via direct message.”

Kyrath responded by directly linking his own campaigning to the AfD passage cited by the intelligence agency.

“Is it not correct that someone from the Constitutional Protection Agency of Saxony-Anhalt was classified as a confirmed right-wing extremist because he thought of the murdered children by an illegal and uncontrolled immigration, and warned that it can strike anyone and anywhere?

The Saxony-Anhalt officials are trying to tar anyone who dares to raise the matter of violent crimes by Muslims as “far right,” and “racists.” This false and sinister description of the AfD is the only way the other political parties in Germany can possibly stop the party’s vertiginous rise. And now the parents of children who have been raped or murdered by Muslims, who are saying the exact same things as the AfD, have challenged the establishment politicians for attacking the AfD. In mourning their children they bring the public’s attention to the similarity of the attacks, the German victims and the Muslim victimizers. They endorse the AfD’s determination to curb the policy that has allowed their children’s killers into the country. Every attempt by leftist and centrist politicians to blacken the image of the AfD as full of racists and neo-Nazis, and every attempt to silence parents of victims from speaking out about Muslim violence, only makes the turn toward the AfD more pronounced.