Where did Tajul Islam get the idea that a ten-year-old girl would be a suitable sexual partner? Might it have been from his prophet?
There is abundant justification for child marriage in Islamic law, as it is in accord with Muhammad’s example, so these clerics can’t possibly find anything wrong with the practice. Those who wave away the threat of Sharia as “bigotry” and “racism” never seem to care about its victims, such as the untold numbers of young girls who have been victimized by having to become brides.
Islamic tradition records that Muhammad consummated his marriage with (i.e., raped) Aisha when she was nine, and the resultant fact that child marriage and the sexualization of children are taken for granted in wide swaths of the Islamic world.
“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).
Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:
The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).
Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old. Nowadays in the West there are elaborate efforts to deny all this. An Islamic scholar/apologist named Joshua Little has constructed an elaborate argument from close study of the chains of transmitters (isnads) of various traditions about Aisha, claiming that those traditions, despite appearing in Sahih Bukhari, the hadith collection Muslims consider most reliable, are actually inauthentic. Little’s argument, however, is absurd and self-contradictory. He acknowledges that the hadiths are late and unreliable from a historical standpoint, and even admits that the chains of transmitters, like the stories themselves, were freely forged. Then he bases his whole argument for the traditions being inauthentic even on Islamic grounds on the basis of the isnads that he just admitted could be forged. He claims to be able to determine the age of various traditions by how they were forged, but here is argument is so conjectural and subjective as to be essentially worthless.
Little is also a standard-issue lemming academic. He denounces people he calls “Islamophobes” for making much of Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha. He ignores the primary reason why anyone cares about this: not because, as he claims, “Islamophobes” contend that Muhammad’s example forces Muslims to condone child marriage, but because all too many Islamic authorities do condone child marriage. In April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.
Turkey’s directorate of religious affairs (Diyanet) said in January 2018 that under Islamic law, girls as young as nine can marry.
“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria
“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law
There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council
“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology
“Religious leader accused of groping 10-year-old girl in Queens mosque: DA,” by Mira Wassef, PIX11, April 30, 2026:
QUEENS, N.Y. (PIX11) — A religious leader is accused of repeatedly groping a 10-year-old girl in a Queens mosque, and police suspect there may be more victims, authorities said Thursday.
Tajul Islam, 55, was arrested for allegedly sexually abusing the girl multiple times inside the Masjid Bilal mosque at 121-03 Sutphin Blvd. in Jamaica from April 21 to April 27, according to the criminal complaint.
Islam is accused of touching the girl’s chest and inner thighs on four separate occasions, prosecutors said.
The Queens Child Abuse Squad apprehended the suspect on Monday after the victim reported the incident, according to the NYPD.
Islam was charged with sexual abuse, forcible touching, and endangering the welfare of a child, police said. He had no prior arrests….
Police believe there may be more victims and are asking the public for help with the investigation.
Ugly 312 says
Ahh, the peaceful religion of rape, murder and pedophiles. Absolutely disgusting.
F Islam!
Kepha says
I am well aware that I.slam permits the marriage of prebuscent girls. But sexual assaults on minors or other vulnerable persons are not limited to Muslims. The scandals of Roman Catholic and Protestant clergy have been shouted from the housetops for some time. A rabbi of a prestigious synagogue in Washington was caught photographing women using the mikveh. There are stories of Buddhist clergy being far less that ascetic all over Asia.
But, lest the “secular humanists” (how Uncle Kepha hates that hijacking of the term humanists gloat and feel superior, there are numerous instances in public schools, in the scouts, and other secualr venues where abuse happens.
Yes, if Tajul Islam is indeed guilty, throw the book at him–and, hopefully, if he is not a citizen, throw him out of the country. But let’s not think this is strictly an Islamic issues.
Ugly 312 says
Kepha, all you stated is true and even more in terms of instances, but this is Jihadwatch. The name gives the forum it’s lense. Everything you read on here will be focused on this group of idiots and it’s plan to rule the west and eventually live amongst a global caliphate. Look at the hundred year plan and all it’s good things for the kefirs.
I am a believer, but not of this.
Be well. Richard
bill says
The clergy of any religion are supposed to live to an elevated standard of mral behaviour. They are just men after all. At least most of them are chaste but quite a few especially in the RC church are banned from marriage and I assume relations with women too. This places an additional burden upon them..
OLD GUY says
If he is here on a visa or a migrant he should be deported after serving a few years in prison.
abu taleb says
Muslims can get angry that may lead to a riot if you enter a mosque without removing your shoes, they accuse you disrespecting Islam and doing a blasphemy. But they will never accuse the same thing to their fellow muslims who rape or sexually abuse women inside a mosque.
So, either they just make excuse to attack non muslims or they consider a mosque is a suitable place for sexually abuse women, or abusing women is an Islamic thing. Or all of them.