A Harris presidency would resume the Biden regime’s race toward authoritarianism.
Kamala Harris wants very much to be president of the United States, but she doesn’t have a great deal to show anyone who asks her the fateful question: “What shows that you would be a good president?”
Harris failed at the easiest, most content-free job in the world, the vice presidency of the United States. Her stint as Old Joe Biden’s “border czar” was so disastrous that the leftist propaganda organs known as the establishment media started denying, in the teeth of abundant evidence, that she had ever been “border czar” at all. And, of course, she managed to lose the 2024 election despite running against a man with zero favorable mainstream media coverage and multiple high-level efforts to smear and destroy him.
And so in her increasingly energetic quest to secure the Democrat Party’s 2028 presidential nomination, Harris has opted to embrace the most far-left principles available short of open Stalinism. Her “No Bad Idea Brainstorm,” which she unveiled Wednesday night, is a cluster of authoritarian measures dressed up in the garb of populism. If they are ever implemented, the U.S. will be a one-party leftist dictatorship, or, since the borders will once again be erased, the U.S. will be part of a larger socialist internationalist conglomerate state.
The New York Post reported Friday that Harris said on a podcast called “Win with Black Women,” which suggests that she is still pretending to be a black woman, “that Democrats need ‘an expanded playbook’ and need to consider radical positions ahead of the 2026 midterm elections — including abolishing the Electoral College and packing the Supreme Court.”
Oh, that will fix everything. With the border reopened and unvetted migrants streaming into the country once again, the Electoral College-less United States will have Los Angeles and New York City choosing its presidents. If you thought Zohran Mamdani was far left, just wait until you see who emerges then. And then, when the nation’s embattled patriots appeal to the Supreme Court for some relief for some protection against the steady erosion of their freedoms, the fifteen-member body will bat down their complaints in the name of “diversity.”
Harris must know that this would be the outcome of her proposals, and yet she presented them as the cure for what ails us: “Look, this is a moment where there are no bad ideas, a ‘No Bad Idea Brainstorm’ is what I’d like to call it. And in that No Bad Ideas Brainstorm, we talk about what we need to do and think about doing around the Electoral College. We talk about the idea of Supreme Court reform, which includes expanding the Supreme Court. We invite a conversation about multi-member districts.”
And if that isn’t enough to secure far-left hegemony over the U.S. for generations to come, she has more bad ideas: “Harris also suggested considering ‘statehood for Puerto Rico and DC,’ and for fighting back against Republican-led states’ redistricting efforts. ‘We’ve got to neutralize red states from cheating, including blue states expanding their maps. We got to fight fire with fire. They’re playing to win.”
Not likely. Republicans don’t generally do that. But it’s important to bear in mind that when Harris talks about stopping Republicans from “cheating” in their redistricting efforts, she is talking about measures such as the Virginia effort to strip state Republicans of virtually all representation. The whole idea here is to ensure that the far left has no significant opposition. The Democrats are not just playing to win; they’re playing to dominate and destroy their opponents and turn the U.S. into Venezuela.
And so New York City Councilwoman Vickie Paladino (R-Queens) quite correctly observed that “Democrats have declared the entire electoral process illegitimate because they sometimes lose elections. They are prepared to torch the entire country in order ‘neutralize red states’. This is the language of civil war.” Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch noted thatTop of FormBottom of Form “@KamalaHarris doesn’t think it is a ‘bad idea’ to destroy our constitutional republic.”
Indeed. That is exactly the case. And it’s not just Harris alone. The Democrats in general have now refined their hatred of America’s Founding Fathers to include a determination to destroy the system they built. They constructed a vehicle for limited and responsible government. But for Harris and the left, it’s all about raw power: getting it, and keeping it. Forever.
loek de vette says
Hi Robert, how powerful is Kamala? Or is she just a pawn in the demos circus? Who has really power in that political monster?
John Pepple says
This “No Bad Ideas” business reminds me of a joke I heard decades ago. A provocatively-dressed young woman goes to her professor and says, “I’ll do anything for an A.”
“Anything?” he asks.
“Yes, anything,” she says.
“Even study?” he asks.
The Democrats will do anything to win an election other than the obvious thing, namely wooing back all the people who left the party. That, of course, would require them to compromise, which they absolutely refuse to do. It’s much more enjoyable to call such people Nazis.
40 rounds says
I remember SNL doing a skit called “Bad Idea Jeans” in which several yuppies decide to play basketball against some very tall and athletic black men and, of course, are so confident they’ll win that they wager even more money. Is that Kamala? Possibly
Troybeam says
She is a patsy, someone the democrats use as a figure head much like Biden/Harris elected, someone else ran the show, they would do this again if allowed to cheat on a greater scale. If it should happen The United States of America would cease to exist and Islam and China would fight for control.
WPM says
It is wonder the democrats use such a blunt tool to try to spread their BS propaganda .They must think every American has a memory like a goldfish if they think she can sell any message well .The Harris /Walz ticket being so bad that it almost guarantee a win for Trump no matter has much the MSM cheer them on blowing smoke up everyone, s ass that it was what America wanted and needed.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I thought her political career is dead! We saw how stupid she was in 2024 when she got the nomination handed to her on a platter, and went on to completely blow it! Why would anyone think she’d do better against opponents within her party who are no longer inhibited about opposing her, since they know that she would lose if handed the nomination?
40 rounds says
Well, evidently, there are no bad ideas
࿗Infidel࿘ says
They could give it to AOC: at least she is better looking
somehistory says
Put her in a pot with aoc and hellary clinton and stir that witches’ brew. Throw in ilhan, ratshida, jayapal and the big crocket mouth in Texas. They are all the same….in looks and their evil insides.
They give women a bad name.
Wellington says
With Kamala Harris there’s no there there. She is about as empty as a person can be and made all the worse considering how high she has risen in the halls of power. If this nothing of a human being, a complete ding-bat, had become President instead of Trump this great nation would have been even further on its way to its transformation into a giant third-world country, courtesy of the Democratic Party, the most mortal enemy of America in our era.
OLD GUY says
She’s a loser, and might be used to make another Democrat candidate look good. .
skeptiker says
Feministen-Sprech: Frauen müssen keinen Nachweis für Wissen & Können erbringen, da sie per Geschlecht die besseren Menschen sind. Einfach Frau, sein, viel reden und wild gestikulierend mit den Armen herumfuchteln, die Opfer- und Benachteiligungskarte zücken, lächeln und laut gackern egal warum, mit dem Popo wackeln und wichtig tuen.
Mit dieser Bertugs- und Hochstaplermasche haben Frauen besonders in der Politik Erfolg.
Ich freue mich schon darauf, wenn die amerikanische Bärbock-Variante Harris zum Wahlkampf gegen Vance oder Rubio ins Rennen geschickt wird. Der ihr unkontrolliertes Gegacker und ihre sinnbefreiten Sätze werden für gute Unterhaltung sorgen.