Berlin-Neukölln is a heavily Muslim populated area. Sonnenallee is a busy neighborhood which is sometimes referred to “as the Gaza Strip.”
The renewed debate about “the role of Sharia law and fears of parallel justice” is decades overdue, but now that mass migration and tangible changes in German society are evident everywhere, populations are starting to wake up and ask questions, but not quickly enough. People tend to believe what they want to believe, and it’s more convenient to believe that Islam is a religion of peace and that every religion wants the same thing. The inconvenient truth, however, is that the Sharia is divine law in Islam, antagonism against the infidel is historically universal throughout the history of Islam, and “martyrdom” is the greatest calling in Islam.
The article below spells it out and sounds the alarm. If Islam is so peaceful, then religious freedom should be the norm in Islamic countries, gay pride parades would not have violent consequences, and women would be free to dress according to their own choice.
“Islamist Influence in Germany: Neukölln Broadcast Raises Alarm,” European Conservative, April 30, 2026:
A German television report and an Austrian court ruling have sparked renewed debate in Europe over the role of Sharia law and fears of “parallel justice” systems operating alongside national legal frameworks.
In Germany, a report broadcast by ARD in its programme “KLAR” examined attitudes among young men in Berlin-Neukölln regarding Sharia and German law. In street interviews, some respondents said they would prioritise Sharia over state law, with one stating “Sharia, of course” when asked which should apply.
From here, the broadcast becomes even more extreme. The interviewer asks what should happen if a friend’s sister is living with her boyfriend without being married. One of the men first responds, “That’s wrong.” When asked what punishment would apply, another says:
Adulterers are stoned to death. Unmarried people are whipped.
Another man initially mentions “900 whippings,” then corrects himself to “99”—while another adds: “But I’ll do another one on it.” The most serious moment follows shortly afterwards. When asked what should happen to the woman, one respondent says: “Her brother would have to kill her.” The interviewer then asks: “Why should he kill her? We are in Germany.”
The answer is:
She would dishonour the whole Ummah (Islamic community). This is haram (prohibited). I’ll kill them.
The broadcast further explored concerns about social pressure in schools, religious influence in some communities, and the spread of Islamist ideology online. Educators and experts featured in the programme warned that radicalisation can begin with non-violent expressions of intolerance and may develop over time. The report also highlighted cases where students reportedly pressured others during religious practices, such as Ramadan fasting….
jerry glenn says
Why do civilized countries let them in?
ploome says
because some ” civilized countries’ need to believe all cultures are equal and all people want the same things, and have the same values
࿗Infidel࿘ says
B;cos in this century, doing anything else would be raaaysissst!!!
OLD GUY says
It will only be a parallel justice system for a short time and than it will be an Islamic Sharia justice system. The Migration Invasion marches on.