In any list of antisemites now poisoning the geopolitical atmosphere, pride of place must go to the Italian harridan Francesca Albanese, who is the UN Special Rapporteur For the Situation of Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. She now faces a defamation lawsuit that two leading Christian organizations, Christian Friends of Israeli Communities and Christians for Israel USA, have brought. Before issuing her latest UN Report on the “situation of the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories” Albanese had sent threatening letters to the two groups, and to other pro-Israel organizations, claiming that they could be prosecuted for “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity.” She accused the charities of “knowingly spreading malicious lies” about the situation in Gaza, in denying the charges of “genocide” and “war crimes.” Now a court has ruled that both charities do have standing to sue Albanese in an American court. She will soon be in the coils of American justice, and if she loses the defamation suit being brought against her, she’ll likely be on the hook for a huge sum.
More on Albanese and the defamation suit against her that can now go forward can be found here: “Federal court rules antisemitic UN envoy Albanese can be served,” Israel National News, May 19, 2026:
In a significant legal blow to one of the international community’s most vehement anti-Israel voices, a US federal court has ruled that Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur for Palestinian Arabs, cannot evade a defamation lawsuit filed against her by two prominent Christian organizations, JNS reported.
The ruling was issued on May 15 by the US District Court for the District of Colorado. The court ruled that Albanese can be legally served via electronic mail and social media channels….
The litigation was initiated in September by Colorado-based Christian Friends of Israeli Communities (CFOIC) and Christians for Israel USA. The charities took legal action after being targeted by Albanese in what they describe as an orchestrated intimidation campaign….
Specifically, Albanese accused the charities of “knowingly spreading malicious lies” and falsely linked them to allegations of genocide and war crimes in Gaza.
The plaintiffs argue that Albanese’s malicious claims caused severe reputational harm, directly hindered their ability to conduct vital charitable work, and were distributed with the specific intent to inflict damage. The charities are seeking a federal court mandate requiring Albanese to formally retract her statements, barring her from repeating the defamatory claims, and awarding monetary damages.
Oh, Albanese will stop making those claims, and will, with her fingers crossed behind her back, even retract her defamatory statements. None of that bothers her. But those “monetary damages” are another matter. What if she’s hit with bill that will bankrupt her? It could happen.
Albanese has repeatedly come under fire over her anti-Israel bias. She was recently condemned by several European Union foreign ministers for comments made at an Al Jazeera conference, in which Albanese had said: “The fact that instead of stopping Israel, most of the world has armed, given Israel political excuses, political sheltering, economic and financial support … We who do not control large amounts of financial capitals, algorithms and weapons, we now see that we as a humanity have a common enemy.”
Albanese is quite clear: Israel is the “common enemy of humanity.” And what must be done with such a “common enemy” of all humanity? Why, all of humanity must join as one, to defeat and destroy such a malevolent and all-powerful enemy, with its “financial capitals [sic], algorithms, and weapons.” This is Protocols of Zion stuff, brought up to date with mention of those algorithms.
Albanese later claimed in an interview that she “never, ever, ever said ‘Israel is the common enemy of humanity,'” calling the accusations “completely false accusations.”
How dumb does she think we are? When she referred to the “common enemy of humanity” which she linked to “those who control large amounts of financial capitals [sic], algorithms and weapons,” she had only one people, and one country, in mind — the Jewish people, and the Jewish state of Israel.
How furious she must be. So far, much of the world has accepted her hysterical anti-Israel animus. The UN’s António Guterres refused to fire her, even though several countries, including the United States, had asked him to do so. The anti-Israel prime minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez, has just awarded her the “Commander’s Cross of the Order of Civil Merit,” one of Spain’s highest civilian honors. Her admirers have nominated her for a Nobel Peace Prize, and why not? After all, Kurt Waldheim, who served as Secretary-General of the UN, was also repeatedly nominated for that prize, and he turned out to have been a Nazi war criminal.
I’m looking forward to this lawsuit against Albanese. The reputational damage she did to these two Christian groups in linking them to the IDF’s supposed “genocide” and “war crimes” in Gaza was considerable. Get ready, Francesca, to see your bank account drained, and to turn out your pockets.
H says
The right wing president of Croatia, he does not want anything to do with Israel’s ambassador and is refusing him, a first for Croatia for any country. Including Iran Russia North Korea etc have not had such treatment.
Croatia is catholic, so it does make some sense. The president is firmly pro Palestine openly, and hostile to Israel even though he’s a conservative. There’s a strong reason Croatia is so pro Palestine, they are very close to the Roman Catholic Church and its previous two popes.
I think any way you look at this, this is out of line and not reasonable. There are much worse countries than Israel. But the church people are pressing the leadership to isolate Israel. The pope himself is hostile to Israel and uses entire nations to do his bidding. Croatia being one, brainwashing the congregations one by one against Israel. Now? Israelis are harassed by Catholics just by going vacation. It’s shameful. Palestine flags in Catholic Churches. Shameful shameful.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
In the Second World War, aside from the Bosniaks, the Croats too welcomes the invasion of Yugoslavia by Hitler, and collaborated w/ him, since it meant Serb-hunting. Somehow, the fact that Tito was a Croat is allowed to obscure those factoids
Israel’s best allies in the Balkans would be countries like Greece & Serbia. Countries that hate them, like Croatia for Serbia, are unlikely to be their friends or allies. Same goes for Melania Trump’s native Slovenia
H says
Why don’t you give half your India to Pakistan? Why should Croatia have Serbs then. Put up or shut up.
H says
Your people, India and Hindus do nothing but appease Muslims. So obviously you will never understand.
But your enemy. They are only waiting for the correct time and you will lose half your country. No independent claims to Croatia will be accepted. You go and appease your Muslims and wait 300 years, they will eventually get lucky again like 1947.
gravenimage says
Your claim that staunch Anti-Jihadist Infidel is appeasing Islam is *quite* mistaken.
H says
Left wingers.
ploome says
Bulgaria
https://www.rferl.org/a/holocaust-bulgaria-jews-salvation-world-war-ii/33290179.html
ploome says
NAZIs, Croatia and the Catholic Church have a long history-
Many NAZIs and Croatian Ustase were helped by Catholic clergy, later fleeing to Argentina.[117]
The Ustaše enacted race laws patterned after those of the Third Reich, which persecuted Jews, Romani and Serbs, who were collectively declared to be enemies of the Croatian people.[47] Serbs, Jews, Roma and Croatian and Bosniak dissidents, including Communists, were interned in concentration camps, the largest of which was Jasenovac. By the end of the war the Ustaše, under Pavelić’s leadership, had killed an estimated 30,000 Jews and 26,000–29,000 Roma,[123] while estimates of Serb victims range from 200,000 to 500,000,[124] with historians generally listing between 300,000 and 350,000 deaths.
and the Catholic Church knows no shame
David Lakatos says
The atrocities Islam has committed in the last 1400 years would fill a library.
Siddhi Nasranni says
So true, I would like to see this library that the whole world could visit, via the
internet.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
There was a project by Ali Sina years ago called “WikiIslam”, which was meant to be a library of that, plus the real teachings of islam, just like Robert has done in his 30+ books. Not sure whether it still exists, or what its state is
Siddhi Nasranni says
Thanks’ Infidel, just looked ” WikiIslam,” up, it is still online.
Thanks’ once again, To a greater understanding.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Siddhi
Good to know
gravenimage says
Yes–this fine site still exists:
https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Main_Page?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=12400230405&gbraid=0AAAAADkntAxFm8bjiTuyT1JsoQag51mB8&gclid=Cj0KCQjwoMXQBhDcARIsAH-eEtvSRp7XjvenKFy3ua6yxr9Q0NJD417assfP5ksVzBXdIiihduoeb_8aAk7IEALw_wcB
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Just like Turkey did a teleseries about the founder of the Ottomans, maybe they can, on behalf of the OIC, do one about all the jihad conquests from Muhammad’s time to that of the Ottoman & Mughal empires
crown says
“ Get ready, Francesca, to see your bank account drained, and to turn out your pockets.”
Oh, I think she’ll be just fine. Tucker will make a couple of phone calls to Qatar, and there will be an endless flow of cash to Albanese, just like Tuck now enjoys.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I think the Qataris may have to be a tad more frugal. One of the benefits of this war has been IRGC rogue elements bombing Qatar and destroying 30% of its LNG output. As a result, Doha may find it more challenging even to bankroll the muslim brotherhood or keep al Jazeera running, much less dole out money to antisemites worldwide
I do wonder whether Tucker still is in the good books of his pals in the al Thani clan, given his support to Iran, when contrasted w/ their attacks on Qatar? I doubt he’ll be in much of a position to influence them, and I also wonder whether that mansion in Doha that he was sold is still there for him?
abu taleb says
Non muslims should fight back the Islamists by using non violent tools such as lawsuit etc like using the term Christianophobia or whatever. Do you realize that muslims are so afraid of Christianity so that they may say the cross symbol carried by a Christian can weaken the muslims’ spirit which will lead to apostasy?
It is almost the same as how the lefties in the US behave when they see someone wearing a MAGA hat.
tgusa says
For decades we have been told about the strong female. We see the portrayal of them in the movies and TV. Either there are no strong females or weak females have been elevated in to positions of power throughout the West .
Now who would have an interest in doing that? Who would sponsor it? Who would benefit from doing that?
Why are so many Western women at odds with Western civilization? What do they want instead? Would they prefer an islamic male dominated place to live over a Western male dominated place to live?
For any Western woman there is only one choice and the choice is pretty obvious to even the slowest of the slow.
tgusa says
It seems it It doesn’t take much for these foreigners to bullshit many modern Western females. That is a disappointment indeed.
gravenimage says
It is not just females who are snowed by Islam. Lots of dhimmi fools to go around.
tgusa says
Yes you are right. But you very well know that Western females that fall for their BS are a special kind of stupid. Myself, as a not alphabet, not female guy, could easily fit in to their cult if I wanted to. Being male I would be on top. On top in the cult hierarchy that is.
tgusa says
Me, being a sane capable and affable white male American…I would not just be on top they would probably showcase me. I would be all the rage, man of the year. Too bad for them I find their ideology abhorrent.
gravenimage says
tgusa, I don’t think that *any* civilized person can fit in with Islam. I hope not.
John Pepple says
The prime moral imperative of our era is that we must accept the Other. (The Other need not accept us or our values.) Anyone who doesn’t accept the Other is basically just a Nazi. And so a lot of otherwise sensible women, who want patriarchy to be smashed but who also accept this moral imperative, are supporting this invasion of very patriarchal men. As far as I can tell, they live in a bubble and are never asked how they can smash patriarchy under these circumstances. It is similar to the Queers for Palestine, who seemed completely surprised when people told them that the Palestinians were homophobic.
Getting these people out of their bubble is imperative, but I don’t know how to do it.
tgusa says
“Getting these people out of their bubble is imperative, but I don’t know how to do it.”
I’m right there with ya.
gravenimage says
Well, there was Golda Meir–and Margaret Thatcher. And there is Marine le Pen. And while she is not perfect, Italy’s Georgia Meloni looks pretty good.
I am good with any Western leader–male or famale–who opposes Islam.
skeptiker says
Die Alte (Albanese) hat nicht nur einen Dachschaden (Israel ist der Feind der ganzen Welt) sondern verkörpert wie keine andere “Die häßliche Fratze des Islam”.
Hoffentlich legt man dieser bösartigen Furie bald das Handwerk, sanktioniert sie und ihre Sippschaft mit lebenslangem Einreiseverbot für die USA.