The Muslim migrants who now enter Europe are mostly single males, who regard the indigenous Infidel women among whom they have been allowed to settle as “asking for it” with their supposedly “come-hither” mien and dress. Sexual assaults, including rape, by Muslim men have skyrocketed all over Europe. The grooming gangs in the U.K., who seduce young girls “from vulnerable backgrounds,” give them drugs and alcohol, and then scores of Muslim men gang-rape them and pass them around like confetti, are the most extreme example of the phenomenon. Those grooming gangs have ruined the lives of tens of thousands of non-Muslim English girls. But after all, the Muslims know, as the Qur’an instructs, that non-Muslims are “the most vile of created beings.”
Now, in the once-placid and pleasant Netherlands, women are speaking out against Muslim asylum seekers being lodged in neighborhoods near them, by a government apparently indifferent to its own citizens’ welfare. More on the women marching to protest the government’s plan to house those asylum seekers — single, male, and Muslim —near to their neighborhoods, can be found here: “‘We Don’t Feel Safe Anymore’: Dutch Women March Against Migrant Centre,” by Zolta Győri, European Conservative, May 12, 2026:
Women marched through the Dutch town of Apeldoorn this weekend to protest plans for a new asylum seeker centre (AZC), warning that mass immigration and the placement of large groups of male asylum seekers are making women feel increasingly unsafe while local residents are ignored.
Protesters said politicians and the media routinely dismiss concerns about crime, harassment, and women’s safety linked to mass immigration and the placement of asylum seekers near residential areas.
Several women at the march said they joined because they no longer feel safe in public spaces and believe local residents have little influence over decisions affecting their communities.
One participant said she attended the protest “for safety,” adding that local residents felt ignored….
She argued that earlier women’s safety campaigns often avoided discussing migration-linked crime, focusing instead on issues such as street lighting or public awareness campaigns.
“The trust in politics is gone,” she said, arguing that many residents no longer believe voting changes anything.
Several participants also criticism of migration policy is too often shut down through accusations of racism or extremism.
The same speaker said women raising concerns about immigration are frequently branded “right-wing” or “extreme,” while activists on the political Left are treated as legitimate voices despite, in her view, offering no real solutions.
“As a woman, you shouldn’t accept that,” she said. “Whether you’re left or right.”
Another demonstrator carried a banner accusing politicians and activists of “sacrificing women.” She claimed counter-protesters had downplayed cases of sexual violence committed by migrants and said her own experiences hosting a refugee had left her fearful and disillusioned.
This demonstrator, a naïve Good Samaritan, had apparently hosted one such “refugee,” but her experience with him “left her fearful and disillusioned.”
One can only guess how the Muslim “refugee” she initially welcomed must have behaved while living in her house, his lack of gratitude, his clear contempt for the woman as an Infidel of whom he took every possible advantage, his likely crimes of theft and vandalism, his possible attempts at sexual assault, his drug habit, the squalor of his room. One, or some, or all of these might have left her “fearful and disillusioned.”
These Dutch women are right to be furious with their government, that in placing the AZC for migrants in residential areas is making decisions that heighten their physical insecurity. The march against the placement of this AZC shows two things: first, that ordinary Dutch people are fed up with their government making decisions about the placement of migrants without consulting the people most affected, and second, that the government is making decisions as to how many migrants it will admit, and on what basis, and where it will place them, without consulting the people of the Netherlands.
The Dutch, initially so welcoming to Muslim migrants, have learned, to their no-longer-secret sorrow, that their welcome was misplaced, and it is time for the portcullis to be dropped, and an end to Muslim migration be instituted. There is still time — just — to halt the Muslim demographic conquest of Europe, with European leaders such as Geert Wilders in the Netherlands, Jordan Bardella in France, Giorgia Meloni in Italy, and Alice Weidel in Germany, who are ready to rise to the occasion, steadily gaining political support.
Troybeam says
Refugees come into a nation illegally, these people do not assimilate at all and yet governments allow them to stay disregarding their citizens safety along with ignoring the citizens cries to remove them from nation.
Instead of building places to put these refugees remove them from the nation, period. These people rape a nation of its own resources so the question is why let them stay?
Simply put the governments of the world tell the world they need labor workers and yet these refugees do not work. What the governments should have done is put their own citizens to work, stop supporting your own citizens with welfare, if they are able body they can work. Stop giving them more money for not working change that amount and they will have to work.