Dan Bilzerian is a most unpleasant fellow. The son of convicted felon Paul Bilzerian, Dan Bilzerian made his fortune by his online presence, where he flaunted his hedonistic lifestyle, with lots of scantily-clad young girls promisingly pouting, and white sandy beaches, and attracted thereby millions of wannabe followers. Dan then decided to make the leap from his social media antics to running for a congressional seat as a Republican, challenging the incumbent, Randy Fine, in the 6th Congressional district in Florida. Bilzerian has become one of the best known antisemitic voices on social media.
Bilzerian has over the years made a series of antisemitic statements against Jews, Judaism, and Israel. He has accused Jews of “perpetrating” the Holodomor (a man-made famine that Stalin caused and exploited in Ukraine during the 1930s). He has said that Jews assassinated Kennedy in 1963, orchestrated the 9/11/2001 attack on the World Trade Center, inveigled the American government into attacking Iraq in 2003, and dabbled in other antisemitic conspiracy theories.
In a 2024 interview with Piers Morgan, Bilzerian claimed that Judaism “promotes supremacy and rape, and sanctions theft from non-Jews.” He said that “most of the problems today are caused by Jewish supremacy.” He claimed that all the Jews in Israel are “Eastern European Ashkenazi Jews” with no connection to the Jews of ancient Israel. He has further claimed that Jews “control the media.” He has pushed Holocaust denial, claiming that “I would bet my entire net worth that it was less than six million. He followed this with the claim that “Jews killed more Christians than six million” and that “they’ve basically invented genocide.”
He has apparently been enraged that Jews, in turn, have attacked him, and particularly annoying to him is Ben Shapiro, who runs The Daily Wire. So Bilzerian made inquiries from two of his fellow antisemites whether there might be a way to rid the world of Ben Shapiro. And they have just revealed to the world his sinister inquiry, for though they hate Jews, too, they didn’t want to be ensnared in discussions that could potentially lead to charges of participating in a plot to commit murder.
So they have now revealed Bilzerian’s inquiry to them, that might be enough for the government to charge him with the first stages of planning a murder. More on Dan Bilzerian’s inquiry to two other antisemites about assassinating Ben Shapiro, and their response, can be found here: “Dan Bilzerian Accused of Inquiring About Assassinating Ben Shapiro, Israeli Officials,” by David Michael Swindle, Algemeiner, May 15, 2026:
Two of the loudest online antisemitic voices have accused US congressional candidate Dan Bilzerian of telling them he wanted to assassinate Daily Wire co-founder Ben Shapiro and target Israeli officials.
“The first time I met Dan Bilzerian at his house, he had us put our phones in another room, then asked me how difficult it would be to assassinate Israeli government ministers,” Nick Fuentes posted on social media earlier this month. “Then he invited me to Dubai and Qatar, which I declined. On his way there he was ambushed by the FBI.”
Bilzerian, a social media personality, launched a bid last month to unseat incumbent Republican Rep. Randy Fine in Florida’s 6th Congressional District.
Days later, Israel’s Ministry of Diaspora Affairs and Combating Antisemitism named Bilzerian in a published report as the most influential antisemitic figure in the world.
“To be honest with you, the only real battle in the world today I see worth fighting is f**king exterminating Israel,” Bilzerian said in a recent interview with fellow antisemitic influencer Sneako. “I mean, I would sign up tomorrow and go f**king put boots on the ground and go f**king kill Israelis.”
Lucas Gage, another prominent antisemitic voice on X, replied to Fuentes’ original posting, claiming a comparable experience when visiting Bilzerian.
“HOLY F**K. Nick, I swear to God, he did the same thing to me,” Gage wrote. “He walked me and Jake up to that room with a batting cage. We put our phones on the couch and went up to that secluded room with the big TVs. He asked me about where Ben Shapiro lived and how he could be taken out.”…
Well, now Dan Bilzerian’s fellow antisemites have accused him of expressing his intention to assassinate Ben Shapiro. He asked them about where Shapiro lived, and whether he “could be taken out.”
I assume that given these revelations from Nick Fuentes and Lucas Gage, the FBI will now be interviewing Dan Bilzerian about his interest in, and inquiries about, assassinating Ben Shapiro. Is stating one’s intention to murder someone, and asking others for advice on how to find the intended victim, enough to lead to a felony charge? Yessir, that’s exactly what Dan Bilzerian is about to find out.
David Lakatos says
Islam is the religion of murdering terrorists.
somehistory says
In the usual scenario when some person tells LE they have been solicited to hit someone, the LE wires that person up and gets them to have the perp say the same things as they are recorded. Then, the LE moves in to arrest the perp before a murder happens.
The FBI should have had someone wear a wire and record the terrorist with the foul mouth, evil mind before he finds someone willing to murder Mr. Shapiro.
K says
He’s a disgusting inhuman thing
Wellington says
Hating Jews, and thus by extension Israel, is invariably a major indicator that the person doing so is an extremely deficient human being, only the reason or reasons why functioning as variables.
Meanwhile, Israel remains, easily so and no contest here, the single best hope that a perennially dysfunctional Middle East, replete with terror, torpor and stupidity galore, and thanks first and foremost to Islam, can finally become a region of the world which works. Even with Israel, this is a long shot. Without Israel, there is no possibility of this. A morally stupid man (damn ignorant too just on basic facts) like Dan Bilzerian will never grasp any of this unless he ceases to be the monumental idiot that he is, which unfortunately is not very likely.
BTW, as the non-Christian that I am, I don’t want to turn the other cheek or love my enemies. I generally support Christianity and wish every Muslim would wake up tomorrow a devout Christian, but I have no desire whatsoever to extend any good sentiments to a person like Dan Bilzerian and am of the opinion that an indefensible pacifism lurks in the Christian framework as evidenced by the many pacifist sects that have arisen within Christianity, such as the Quakers and the Amish. Just as Islam errs terribly on the side of violence, so does Christianity err in the other direction. I don’t like either direction but, of course, I am far more opposed to the Islamic direction than the Christian direction.
somehistory says
Christians who actually understand the Commands of Jesus Christ, are few. Many have listened to the wrong applications….which are many such interpretations of His Words…and act accordingly.
If a wrong direction is given, and the wrong direction taken, then the desired destination will not be reached.
Jesus even said, “Few are finding” the ‘right road.’….
Wellington says
Well, somehistory, have such Christians like the Quakers and the Amish gotten Jesus’ message wrong? Perhaps, just perhaps, Jesus should have been a little clearer. Look for instance at Mark 16:16 where Jesus Himself says that those who are not baptized and believe are condemned.
Well, what about all those who lived centuries before Jesus? How could they have been baptized and believe? What about some guy in 10th century AD Japan, living almost a thousand years after Jesus and who never heard of Him but was an overall good person, with parents, wife and children, etc.? Is he doomed to perdition?
You see, somehistory, while generally supportive of Christianity, I think legitimate objections can be raised against it, including against Jesus Himself who often times is mired in ambiguity and vagueness and if one is talking about eternal salvation, as Jesus regularly was, anything less than crystal clear clarity is arguably sloppy if not downright unethical.
somehistory says
I understand you, Wellington. I just hope someday, you can understand what I have tried to explain.
Jesus deliberately spoke in parables and speech sometimes difficult to understand because He wanted the people to seek Truth and understanding.
Just as a scientist or doctor understands things which they personally research better than others who are just told the facts, those who search out what Jesus really meant, understand it better than someone who just reads the words or hears them from a pulpit..
As for people who died before Jesus ever came to earth, they have a promise from Him….”there will be a resurrection of the righteous and the unrighteous.”
No one will be denied life because of when he happened to be born or where he happened to be born.
Over the years, trying to follow the command to “preach the good news,” I have spoken to a lot of people who feel the same way as you do, who had some of the same questions, and the same concerns and doubts.
But, so many ‘judge’ Christianity based on what some who claim to be Christian are doing….such as the pope, and leaders of other sects/churches…and can see how wrong those actions are.
If those who favor welcoming muzzies were to understand Jesus’ actions in the Temple when He overturned the tables of the moneychangers, either they would continue in their darkness or they would see the light and realize they are not following Him.
If they understood what He meant when He said, “love your enemy” and “to be like your Father in heaven,” they would not be bringing evil in and making excuses for doing so.
Anyway, not wanting to be ‘preachy’ or pushy, I’ll stop here. And I appreciate your response, even though it is upon things with which we disagree.
abu taleb says
Mark 16:16 Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.
You misunderstand the verse, it does not say “who are not baptized and believe are condemned”, only says “whoever does not believe will be condemned”.
Most Christians are emphasizing too much on baptism, while baptism is only a sign of belief and repentance. Jesus does not say who are not baptized are condemned.
mark c says
If someone tells you not to put your fingers in the fire; because you will get burned,& does so anyway, has “not believed”. True belief directs actions, thought, desires. Jesus had told them the way they were to follow. They in turn were to pass that to others. Those that refuse, do so by their own choice. No one can claim the mind of God. Regarding your 10c.man who lived a virtuous life; the opportunity for him is in God’s Hands, not ours
This admonition is for those who hear and reject the opportunity
Wellington says
Thanks for the replies by somehistory, abu taleb and mark c. I would add here that reason could lead one sincerely to not believe as required by Jesus. For choosing wrongly, then one is condemned and this isn’t how philosophy and science operate, only religion does this. Of course Islam compounds all this by sanctioning the use of force in this world in order to compel belief or submission and this is a major reason why Islam is such a menace unlike other major religions which do not have this in their theological blueprint.
I would close here by stating again that I wish every Muslim would wake up tomorrow a devout Christian (or Hindu or Buddhist, et al.). A world without Islam would be a far better world and while I have some reservations about religion in general I am also conscious that it provides purpose to many and more likely ensures sound ethical behavior in this world—with Islam being the major exception to all this.
mark c says
“Discernment is not knowing the difference between right and wrong
It is knowing the difference between right and almost right”
Charles Spurgeon
Wellington says
Thanks, mark c, for that quote. It’s a good one.
BTW, are you familiar with Albert Schweitzer’s assessment of Jesus in his monumental work, The Quest of the Historical Jesus, first published in 1906 in the original German and then in English in 1914?
I find Schweitzer’s thesis a very valid one, and this was coming from a man who admired Jesus enormously. Again, thanks for your replies to mine.
mark c says
Interpretations can be “almost right” and therefore dangerously persuasive precisely because they make sense to us
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Bilzerian is the most influential antisemite in the world, as per Israel? I thought that that distinction went to Tucker Carlson. Unless Jerusalem doesn’t consider him an antisemite
⮞ After all, until he became fully unhinged anti-Israel, Tucker did talk sense about a lot of things, from the degeneration of our cities to our endless war projects to the intrusive policies of Big Tech, including the censorship of American citizens to the DEI based racism against Whites & Asians to BLM/Antifa to Covid lockdowns and censorship of anybody disputing the Fauci narratives. That was a major reason why he became the most influential commentator on US politics, and was at one time, even considered a potential Trump running mate, as well as a major leader of MAGA
⮞ Result of that was a huge following, including many here before October 2023. Granted, that after he turned on Israel and refused to support American Jewish students being bullied by pro-Pali activists, a lot of people turned on him. But it’s by no means big, and he is a major reason that a majority of the youth even on the Right are still anti-Israel
So if Israel is concerned about antisemitic influencers, Tucker should be at the top of their list. Not Bilzerian, who most people outside his district have never heard of
Rufolino says
This guy would have been perfectly at home in Nazi Germany.
nyTRUMPlover says
Here’s a question. Would it be a crime for Ben Shapiro, knowing that this pieceofshiite Dan Bilzerian is inquiring about assassinating him – to hire an assassin to preemptively ‘take out’ the pieceofshiite? Seems like the best form of SELF-DEFENSE to me!
The muzzieSCUM shout GLOBALIZE THE INFITADA!! – And have their lowIQ inbred muzzieSCUM kill Christians and Jews all over the world.
Why can’t us INFIDELS shout GLOBALIZE THE ELIMINATION OF ISLAM – and start taking out muzzieSCUM leaders??
Or are us Jewish victims relegated to being victims waiting to be slaughtered by these goat-fucking pedophiles?
Just asking!!
Beans🫘 says
Sorry to say. But the right wing is losing it lately. Europe has really lost it. While they are being over run by Muslims and pillaged, they somehow turn their attention on Israel and Jews as the enemy.
I don’t even like Israel like that, but I just don’t get it at all. Look at European cities. Look at Berlin. And they choose to side with Muslims? Tucker praises Muslims and clams to be a protector of christians world wide?
What is going on? All these people talk about is Israel all day all night. At least blizsrisn has the balls, he’s an anti semite and doesn’t hide in corners like Tucker.
gravenimage says
There have even been some sick antisemites showing up here at Jihad Watch. Ugly stuff.
Beans🫘 says
Very uncommon, I don’t think I’ve seen one.
But this Palestine garbage is bleeding into. The Republican Party and I hate it. That isn’t our business.
Do these clowns even know what tuckers Hamas said? They said USA is their primary target not Israel. Yes that is a fact and it was said right after October 7…. Nobody wants to say it.
nyTRUMPlover says
And TheLibertyDaily – where I get much of my news now has all kinds of anti-Israel, anti-semitic links.
gravenimage says
Dan Bilzerian Asks Fellow Antisemites About Killing Ben Shapiro
………………………………………………….
This is not just appalling, but *illegal*. You cannot plot the murder of people yu disagree with. Hope he is prosecuted.