In the long-suffering U.K., another Muslim migrant has just been found responsible for child sex offenses, involving upskirting, indecent photographs, and voyeurism. These offenses are not nearly as grave, of course, as the offense of a 54-year-old man having sexual intercourse with a 9-year-old girl. Abusali Rahman, the sad sack, really wanted to look under girls’ dresses to catch sight of knickers, or ideally, of pudenda sans knickers, and managed to photograph a number of them; which photos he presumably would take home and masturbate to. He has also pleaded guilty to one count of making and sharing with others “obscene photographs” (presumably, in addition to the upskirting photos), of four counts of publishing an obscene article, of three counts of making indecent photographs of children, and of voyeurism. A ghastly fellow, but, of course, not as ghastly, I hasten to repeat, as a 54-year-old man having sexual congress with a 9-year-old girl.
More on Rahman can be found here: “Sick ex-supply teacher admits 21 child sex offences at schools across North West,” by Dan McDonald, GB News, May 29, 2026:
A sick former supply teacher has admitted to 21 child sex offences at schools across the North West of England.
Abusali Rahman, 36, who lives in Salford, pleaded guilty to the charges at Bolton Crown Court on Thursday.
The extensive list of offences took place between December 2023 and June 2025, with 13 schoolgirls targeted in a number of different schools.
Rahman – a British national of Bangladeshi ethnicity – pleaded guilty to 12 counts of taking indecent photographs of children by upskirting, four counts of publishing an obscene article and three counts of making indecent photographs of children.
He also admitted to single counts of voyeurism and distributing an indecent photograph of a child.
Emma Kehoe, defending, told the court that Rahman was aware he will receive a prison sentence, adding: “He was going through a mental health crisis at the time.”
How does she know this? No psychiatric examination has yet been carried out on him. She knows it because, like so many Muslims whose guilt cannot be denied, he claims to have been going through a “mental health crisis.” She’s a defense lawyer and clings to this claim in order to make the verdict less harsh.
Could Abusali Rahman be both perpetrator and at the same time a victim? He’s so far from the nurturing environment of his native Bangladesh. In that world, young girls are fair game, and not just for what the Infidels call “indecent photographs.” Rahman has been so lonely, living among people consumed with Islamophobia and racism. Is the pathos of his life so hard to understand? Has he really done any harm by taking a handful of photographs? He needs companionship, even if only of the two-dimensional kind. Was it really so terrible for him to take a few photographs of which its subjects were unaware? Give Rahman a second chance. He promises on a cross-my-heart and hope-to-die basis, never to do it again.
Just kidding. M’lud, please throw the book at him.
somehistory says
With life the way it is, with all of the current problems, health, money, crime, etc. there are probably very few people not having serious stresses in the entire population of earth.
However, the majority are not looking up the skirts of little girls and taking photos, hoping to see what the little girl has a right to keep hidden.
It’s not mental illness; it’s an immorality of the soul enhanced by the evil demands of a book of demon filth.
This scum’s attorney should picture herself in those photos.
Rick Gordon says
This jerk was just copying Muhammad’s behavior during his time.
Hugh Fitzgerald says
He didn’t have sexual intercourse with iittle girls. Muhammad did.
mark c says
Lusting in your heart’s the same
gravenimage says
Not for the victims…
Patton says
We are diverse: Protestants. Catholics. Jews. Mormons. Buddhists. Sikhs. Hindus.
See- Case closed. No need or want of moose slimes. Don’t need ‘em. Don’t want ‘em.
Case closed Problem solved.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
💯
࿗Infidel࿘ says
One of the few wise things that Tucker Carlson used to say before he became deranged was, “How does a country become stronger by having people who have fewer things in common w/ each other?” That very cliche is debunked all the time, worldwide!
somehistory says
There was a saying some years ago, “The family that prays together, stays together.”
If a family, a neighborhood, a community is made up of like-minded people, it is stronger. That’s common sense. Like an orchestra where all members are playing the same tune.
Those who oppose it, and claim there is ‘strength’ in wide-ranging differences, are liars.
gravenimage says
Abusali Rahman, One More Proof That ‘Diversity’ Is Not ‘Our Strength’
……………………………………………..
Probably not the best idea when “abus” is part of your name…