New in PJ Media:
After all these years, it turns out that your beloved pooch may be “unhealthy,” so much so that his breed has to be banned. This dire news comes from the far-left government of the United Kingdom, where beagles, dachshunds, mastiffs, great danes, boxers, and saint bernards may soon be a thing of the past. All in all, the government is considering banning no fewer than sixty-seven dog breeds, with the stated reason being animal health. This is so implausible, however, that it cries out for another explanation, and there is an obvious one that doesn’t bode well for Britain’s future as a free society.
The UK’s Daily Mail reported Thursday that this initiative comes from the top: “Sixty-seven dog breeds could be banned in Britain if new breeding guidelines set by parliament become mandatory, campaigners have warned.” This is because “the all-party parliamentary group (APPG) for animal welfare has launched a new tool to determine if a dog is healthy.”
Why was a new tool to determine if a dog is healthy needed now, to the extent that the British parliament has a group devoted to studying this question? Is Britain suffering a plague of unhealthy dogs? Are these legions of unhealthy dogs infecting their owners with diseases of some kind?
None of that seems to be the case; on the contrary, this sudden parliamentary fascination with canine health seems to be entirely a bolt from the blue, and the parliamentary group’s criteria for what constitutes sufficient dog health look just as arbitrary: “The cross-party committee has developed a 10-point checklist of extreme physical characteristics which can make for a poorly pooch. They include mottled colouration, excessive skin folds, bulging outward-turning eyes, drooping eyelids, under or overbite and a muzzle that interrupts breathing.”
The upshot of this is that numerous breeds of dog that are perfectly healthy but which have a coloration or skin folds or eyes to which parliament objects may end up being banned. And parliament means business: “The assessment – which is currently voluntary but expected to become law within five years – aims to drive out breeds with these sorts of exaggerated attributes.”
The claim is that this is all about caring for the poor dears, just as Canada’s euthanasia program is supposed to be all about alleviating pain and suffering. Britain’s anti-dog push “comes after studies have shown animals of these varieties can sometimes suffer pain, discomfort and frustration from birth.” However, “critics have cautioned the new criteria will see some 67 of the most popular types of dog in the UK automatically dubbed unhealthy.” These include “widely adored breeds like dachshunds, shih tzus and Scottish terriers – and even the late Queen’s beloved Welsh corgis.”
There is more. Read the rest here.
J Allan says
‘The upshot of this is that numerous breeds of dog that are perfectly healthy but which have a coloration or skin folds or eyes to which parliament objects may end up being banned. And parliament means business:’
Parliament can mean whatever business it WISHES!
But, when PUSH comes to SHOVE … it’s PARLIAMENT’S ULTIMATE BOSS that will DECIDE!
And THAT boss is the British ELECTORATE!
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Before the next elections – whenever that is, will “PARLIAMENT’S ULTIMATE BOSS” get to prevent them from banning these dogs, and then either euthanizing them or deporting them to another country willing to take them?
Stacy says
Do you believe they have honest elections or that government listens to the people?
Nera says
Yup they’re nothing like us and letting them in was simply an open act of aggression by domestic traitors. That’s why punishments for betrayal have traditionally been severe, because consequences of betrayal are massive destruction. Severing people from their animals and children is a massive obsession in both communists and muslims.
Tony says
BASICALLY, ISLAM IS DAILY PRACTICE OF ISLAMIC LAW, A MURDEROUS WAY OF LIFE AND A REIGN OF TERROR BY 50+ ISLAMIC COUNTRIES(Qur’an 1:5; 3:51,101; 5:48, etc.). From within a society, Islam and its Muslims use a Muslim Death-Cult Caliphate Army of Jihadist Believers to engage in a spiritual and fanatical war to Islamize, impose Islam and Islamic Law, to ultimately conquer Non-Muslims. Moreover, ISLAM IS ANTICHRIST, AHISTORICAL, DECEITFUL, MILITARISTIC, AND POLITICAL continuously against the USA Constitution and Western Laws to conquer and to subjugate Non-Muslims using MUSLIM-TERRORIST-CRIMINAL-GANG ENTERPRISES with ISLAMIC LAW(SHARIA) and with CONTINUOUS, TERROR PROPAGANDA from Islam’s Qur’an as evidenced by the continuous Muslim attacks to make Islam supreme(Qur’an 2:191; 3:28, 54; 4:89-91; 7:99; 8:30, 60; 9:5, 29,111; 16:106; 45:18; 47:4, etc.). Islam, a subversive enemy of Non-Muslims, teaches, incites, and promotes murder, lies, deceit, accusations, and slander against Non-Muslims as taught in Islam’s Qur’an.
Deceitful Allah affirms Non-Muslims as enemies of Allah while Muslims continuously undermine a society from within using their man-made Qur’an with lies, obfuscation, and deceit(Qur’an 2:225; 3:54; 7:99; 8:30; 60:4, etc.). Allah in Qur’an 4:101 says, “…Surely the infidels[Non-Muslims] were your clear enemies.” Allah expects all Muslim believers to war against all non-Muslims until the Unbelievers convert to Islam or face Muslim violence. Corrupt Allah in Qur’an 8:39 says, “And engage in war with them[Non-Muslims] until there will not be sedition and the religion will be completely to Allah…” As a result, Non-Muslims are marked for death by Islam and its Muslims.
Worthless Islam is a civilization-destroying, delusional, indoctrinating, cancerous fraud because there is NO MECCA, NO MUHAMMAD, and NO Qur’an in the 7th century AD in Saudi Arabia despite the Muslim Standard Islamic Narrative claims; the Deceitful House of Islam is founded on propaganda, lies, intimidation, and deceit where Islam’s 1400-year traditions are based on fallacy and myth including a more than 300-year gap with no documented history. Hence, NEVER give money to Islamic Countries, Islamic Organizations, Mosques, Islamic Schools, etc. because your are funding your ultimate destruction. Islam must be banned as illegal, and we have the legal right to defend ourselves from Muslim violence.
Islam’s Muslims are to be Seditionist Terrorists for Allah with their MONEY and their LIVES. Allah in Qur’an 49:15 teaches, “Surely the believers[Muslims] are only those who believed in Allah and his messenger. They do not doubt, and they performed jihad with their MONEY and their LIVES for the sake of Allah. Those are the truthful.” Again, Islam is a FACTITIOUS IDEOLOGY and CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION despicably fabricated over time into the 21sth century, and there is NO PEACE only genocidal obliteration with Islam and its deceitful Muslims(Qur’an 4:89; 7:18; 8:39: 9:5, 29, 111; 11:119; 32:13; 47:4, etc.).
Demonic ALLAH claims MUSLIMS are a greater TERROR than serpentine Allah in Islam’s Qur’an. Allah in Qur’an 59:13 says, “You[Muslims] are a greater terror in their chests than Allah. This is because they[Jews & Christians] are people who do not understand.” Allah in Qur’an 9:29 commands, “Engage in war with those who do not believe in Allah nor in the last day. Nor forbid what Allah and his messenger forbid, nor believe in the religion of the truth among those who have given the book until they pay the jizyah(extortion payment) out of hand and they are subdued.”
Totalitarian Islam, its Mosques, its Schools, its Sharia Courts, its Organizations, etc. are Terrorist-Criminal Enterprises of hatred and enmity against all Non-Muslims as totalitarian Islam, the House of Satan, islamizes the society with impunity(Qur’an 2:225; 5:14, 64; 60:4; 9:5, 29, 111, etc.). As taught from Islam’s Qur’an, Islam should be banned for its incitement, funding, and promotion of hybrid warfare, violence, terrorism, criminality, hatred, human trafficking, and discrimination against women, children, and Non-Muslims.
Hateful Allah describes Muslim women in Jenna, Allah’s Paradise, as whores of Allah in Qur’an 56:37. Also, Allah stirs hatred, cursing, and punishment against Christians until the resurrection day as Qur’an 5:14 instructs, “And some of those who say, ‘Surely we are Nasara (Christians),’ we took their covenant. So they have forgotten a part of what they were reminded of, so we have stirred up ENMITY and HATRED among them until the resurrection day. And Allah will inform them of what they were doing.” See also Qur’an 2:225; 60:4; 8:55.
jerry glenn says
Dhimmi Britain surges in the European Islamopandering derby.
Taffy says
The only logical explanation of why dogs are banned under Islam is that Mohammed was a homosexual who was visited often by “the Angel Gabriel,” who was his homosexual lover.
As the English nursery rhyme says: “ Hark, hark! the dogs do bark, Beggars are coming to town. Some in rags, some in jags, And some in velvet gowns.
Well guess what? Dogs bark when a stranger comes and their barks invite investigation. And Muhammad’s homosexual lover’s reception was no different. The dogs announced his presence and probably barked constantly while he was there. So the only thing for Muhammad to do was to ban dogs, with an exception for herding and guard dogs. I believe Aisha commented on this in a Hadith of a puppy under the bed saying that Angel Gabriel said that angels do not enter a house with a dog.
Greyhound Fancier says
Dogs also bark when Mohammedans approach the caravan that the dogs guard. That makes Mohammed’s livelihood of caravan robbing much harder. Barking dogs give the infidels a fighting chance against Islamic criminals.
KK says
It’s simple, the muhammadists are behind this as everyone knows they hate dogs. First the dogs, then the pigs, then ???
Troybeam says
Never hear of Islam claiming cats are dirty, why is that?
Greyhound Fancier says
Their anti-Christ originator Mohammed liked cats. Keeping cats is a way for the Muslims to pattern their life after the “perfect man”.
gravenimage says
Actually, the claim that Muhammed liked cats dates to a squib in the Cat Catalogue from 1977, which says that he cut off the sleeve of his tunic because his cat was sleeping on it when the call to prayer sounded and he did not want to disturb the cat.
But this is unsourced and I have not seen any earlier reference. I think the author just wanted an Islamic reference to spice things up–but it was probably written by an Infidel cat lover.
James Lincoln says
So, the UK has a choice of either banning most dogs – or most muslims.
What they finally decide to do will tell us everything that we need to know.
gravenimage says
+1
biii says
I have doubts about the veracity of this ‘report’ as i have seen no mention of it in the UK media, which I check every day. Were it true and given the attachment British people have for their 4 legged ‘chidren’ I would expect the public to be in uproar. Although I respect Mr Spencer for his books of which I have bought a few, he has a bee in his bonnet about anything he can find pejorative about UK simply because he was denied entry many years ago. It was not the UK piublic who blocked him but one politician. I wish he would get off his hobby horse and stick to that on which he is an expert.
Rotten says
Another Muslim apologist
Hoi Polloi says
I’ve often noticed that you use this form of objection to Mr. Spencer and his work. Ad hominem easier than Google?
“The 67 Dog Breeds That Could Be Banned in Britain – And What a Ban Would Mean” https://www.peta.org.uk/blog/dog-breeds-banned-britain/
gravenimage says
*Thank you*, Hoi Polloi.
OLD GUY says
One other reason is dogs will run off the goats, who are than too tired for accommodating the men.
Sister Alberti says
It behooves all British citizens who are not Muslims to get a dog right now and take them with you wherever possible. I’ve long advocated for this to deter Muslims.