UK Home Office covers up number of local authorities wanting to put illegal migrants in new council houses

Keir Starmer is the most unpopular British prime minister ever, and that record-breaking title is well deserved. From persecuting patriots to Muslim rape gang coverups and failing to keep out illegals (mostly from Africa and the Middle East), he has gained the contempt and resentment of his countrymen. And now, another cover-up has come to the surface. This time it’s the cover-up of the number of local authorities who want to put illegals in newly revamped council house houses, at the expense of taxpayers and at great risk to them.

Why the secrecy? Because the Labour Party knows how corrupt it is, and how much it is putting national security at risk and depleting Britain’s economy, but it just doesn’t care.

The Labour Party is trying to hide truth as a desperate means to hold on to power.

“Migrant crisis: Home Office ‘covers up’ number of local authorities wanting to put asylum seekers in new council houses,” by Jack Walters, GB News, March 24, 2026:

The Home Office has been accused of “covering up” the number of local authorities wanting to put asylum seekers in newly revamped council houses.

Shabana Mahmood’s department rejected a Freedom of Information request from GB News that was looking for confirmation on the local authorities which had expressed an interest in the £500million Home Office Asylum Fund.

The People’s Channel also requested information on local authorities that had been shortlisted, invited to participate, or confirmed as part of the controversial programme.

GB News can now reveal that the Home Office holds the requested information.

The department cited Section 43(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to exempt its disclosure on the grounds it “would or would be likely to prejudice the commercial interests of any persons”.

Responding to GB News’s request, the Home Office said: “If we were to disclose the information to you, this would be likely to prejudice the commercial interests of both the Home Office and those companies with whom the Home Office enters contracts.”

As part of its considerations, the department admitted there would be public interest in the “immediate disclosure” of the information due to concerns about “value for money in terms of its contracts”.

However, the Home Office added: “We have therefore concluded that the balance of public interests identified lies in favour of maintaining the exemption….