It is said that a Muslim ruler bought a mirror, and when he looked at himself in that mirror, he felt intense anger and disgust upon seeing his own ugliness. Someone close by asked the reason for this grief and anger, so he replied: I saw myself in the mirror; I did not expect that I would be so ugly. Upon this, the favorite one said: You became angry after seeing yourself once in the mirror — now just imagine our condition, who see you every day?
Readers of the writings of “Faraz Pervaiz” (Courage of Inquiry) generally get angry because in these writings, they see the ugly face of Islam. Personally, I have no enmity towards Islam itself; my only plea is that this ugly form of it should be washed away. But what can be done about those Muslims who have been taught and indoctrinated since childhood that the religion in the sight of Allah is Islam (Al-Imran 19), and that if anyone follows any religion other than Islam, it will not be accepted from him (Al-Imran 85)? Therefore, they kill, enslave, abuse, issue fatwas of disbelief, stone people, and with an utterly peaceful conscience, blow up innocent people in explosions — because this is precisely Allah’s command.
One kind person wrote: After reading the writings of Faraz Pervaiz, I felt deeply ashamed of myself. Was my face really that horrific? Thank goodness I have thrown away this ugly mask.
I replied: Thank you. Certainly, there are good Muslims, too — yes, but if they were to implement Islam in its true sense, our misery would be something to behold.
The response came: No, sir, there is no such thing as a good or bad Muslim; there is only an educated and practicing Muslim in contrast to an ignorant and non-practicing one. The Muslim who appears to you as good and noble on the surface actually rejoices at the actions of suicide bombers (9/11) and terrorists (Hamas) because, in his view, they are enforcing Sharia.
So what is the problem?
The problem is that the majority of Muslims want a book to be implemented which they call the Book of Allah, and they want to follow a person whom they call the Messenger of Allah…
The Book of Allah?
The Messenger of Allah?
Just thinking about it makes one laugh… However, there is no harm in accepting that the Quran is the word of Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah — after all, human beings all in all worship around 300 million gods!
So where is the problem?
The problem is that the teachings of what is called the Book of Allah and what is presented as the Messenger of Allah do not align with humanity and human rights. You are incited to pass through a door on which is ostensibly written “The Book of Allah and the Messenger of Allah”… Then, gradually, you are stripped of your humanity, and you don’t even realize when you have turned into a Taliban Hamas-like Daesh criminal…!
If Europe does not want to commit civilizational suicide, it should firmly imprint this in its mind: the people it is welcoming with great delight place their religion and prophet above every civilizational, human, and legal consideration.
This danger is already evident. In the notorious cases of grooming gangs in the UK (such as Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford), Muslim men of Pakistani origin systematically sexually abused thousands of white British girls. According to Alexis Jay’s 2014 Rotherham Inquiry, between 1997 and 2013, around 1,400 girls were sexually abused in Rotherham alone, and most of the perpetrators were of Pakistani heritage. These men viewed non-Muslim girls as “inferior” or “easy meat” because of their religious/cultural beliefs. The authorities delayed action for years because they feared accusations of “racism” — which is exactly what I am saying, that if these aspects of Islamic teachings are not clearly rejected, Europe will be as devastated as the countries from which these people came. Baroness Casey’s 2025 National Audit also confirms the over-representation of Asian/Pakistani heritage men disproportionately involved in group-based child sexual exploitation.
Therefore, the people of Europe should warn them that there is no place in their countries for Islamic teachings. This warning should be in writing, and the Muslim asylum seeker should sign an agreement stating that he will abandon those Islamic teachings that are contrary to human rights and the prevailing laws of the host country.
In case of violation, he will have to immediately leave the soil of that country. Here, it is also necessary to point out the contradictions between the prevailing laws of the host country and Islamic teachings, so that everything is clear. Furthermore, these countries should ensure that the children of refugees are clearly taught that there is no place on their soil for those Islamic teachings that are against human rights.
It is better to incur this displeasure even at this time; otherwise, in the end, only destruction and ruin will be the outcome. It should not be forgotten that it is Islam that has destroyed the countries from which these refugees are coming… The same teachings will bring these countries to the brink of destruction as well — those that are granting refuge to these refugees purely on humanitarian grounds — if these countries do not take timely measures to prevent this.
Wellington says
For the record, I do harbor enmity towards Islam itself.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Precisely! Those who wish for some nicer aspect of islam to make it to the forefront are just delusional
Billy says
Every Potential Citizen of a Western Country must agree under oath to follow Western Country’s Federal, State, and Local Laws, and the Potential Citizen must reject any Foreign Laws including Islam and its Shariah, Islamic Law. Similarly, Islam and Islamic Law should be made illegal for public practice, and Islam should be denied ALL Federal, State, and Local Legal protections and Preferential Tax Treatments under the Tax Codes.
Unfortunately, Islamization, like Cultural Marxism, deceives and virtue-signals against Non-Muslims using Islamic Law, discrimination, segregation, violence, and terrorism through our Western Institutions via Muslim MONEY and Muslim LIVES as well as Public Money as taught in Islam’s Qur’an(Qur’an 3:54; 7:99; 9:5, 29, 111; 49:15, etc.).
somehistory says
I too, hate, abhor, have enmity for, the slime, the evil, called islam.
Two parts of the article stand out to me: One, “there is no harm in accepting that the Quran is the word of Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah ”
and
Two, “my only plea is that this ugly form of it should be washed away. ”
Those who “accept” the demon filth written in the book muzzies follow, are bound and determined that the rest of us should also “accpet” or be slaughtered on the altar of demon filth.
And the “ugly form”…is all of it, from beginning to end, from inside out. It’s not just “ugly,” it’s the worst of evils. Demanding that people suffer…torture, rape, extortion, death in horrible ways…at the hands of those who “accept” the evil is not just “ugly form.” It’s beyond anything any human should be forced to follow.
Dancing around the core issue doesn’t help anyone avoid what muzzies want and are demanding to have.
somehistory says
“‘Life of Brian’ star John Cleese prompts backlash for lamenting loss of Christianity, rise of Islam
British actor and comedian John Cleese drew scorn for a recent X post lamenting the decline of Christianity amid a surging Islam in the United Kingdom, with many on social media blaming him for mocking the Christian faith throughout his career.
“The UK has always been based at the deepest level on Christian values, regardless of dogma,” the 86-year-old Cleese said Monday in response to a video of British politician Susan Hall, who warned the historic Christian culture of the U.K. is quickly eroding.
“Despite the many mistakes made by churches, for centuries British people have been influenced by Christ’s teaching. If these values are replaced by Islamic ones, this will not be Britain any more,” Cleese added.
Some commenters on X suggested that Cleese, a veteran of the famous Monty Python comedy troupe, epitomized the post-war antipathy toward Christianity in his country and played a role in its cultural decline, with some singling out his role in “Monty Python’s Life of Brian,” a 1979 film mocking Jesus Christ and Christianity that drew widespread outrage when it was released.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/life-of-brian-star-john-cleese-prompts-backlash-for-lamenting-loss-of-christianity-rise-of-islam/ar-AA1YZqaL?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=69bc212c2b19405cb971683e90266149&ei=64
Alex Lund says
Long ago I found the Clint Eastwood classification of muslims:
http://www.theburningplatform.com/2016/03/23/why-islam-lops-off-heads-christianity-doesnt-and-trump-is-right/
Good Muslims follow the Koran and the example set forth by Mohammed. Good Muslims are the most likely to become terrorists.
The bad Muslim shares similar qualities to a bad Christian. They don’t read the Koran regularly, or at all. They rarely go to mosque. Their knowledge of Islam is quite weak. Because they don’t know what’s in the Koran, they usually don’t have ill feelings towards non-Muslims. Like most of us, they just want to be left alone to live their lives as they see fit unencumbered by religious gobbledygook. If a Muslim moves in next door, you really want them to be bad Muslim. When people say that they personally know 2.3 Muslims and that they are “just like me!”, they most likely are talking about a bad Muslim.
The ugly Muslim knows the truth about Islam … but lies about it. This is the worst Muslim of all. These people will always portray Islam in the best possible way. They will twist all the heinous verses in the Koran and make them sound reasonable or, they’ll just ignore them, pretending they don’t even exist. They are the ones who make the loudest claims about Islam being “hijacked”, even though know it’s not true. They’ll even agree with you that the good Muslims are bad. They will say that Sharia is a terrible idea. How can this be? How can one say they are a follower of Islam while at the same time not follow Mohammed’s explicitly clear commands? This is fishy, blatantly dishonest and hypocritical. You can’t trust these people. They can try to sugarcoat Islam all they want but, what they can never do is change its nature.
And we all know that once the bad muslims begin screaming their Allahu Snackbar the rest will follow as they dont want to be killed first.
And considering how muslims celebrated 9/11 and every time some infidels head is removed we all know that in reality they deceive us.
Islam is bad says
Ban Islam across the globe.
Make adherence to Islam a crime against humanity.
Arrest, fine, imprison, punish all those unwilling to renounce Islam.
Arrest, fine, imprison, punish all those naive, gullible, non-Muslims who enable Islam in some form.
Dare to dream of a world in which Islam is permanently eradicated.
Siddi Nasrani says
That would be near as Heaven on Earth,” No Islam- know Peace.
Know Islam- No Peace.”
jerry glenn says
Islam is Islam.
Controse says
Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t what is happening to Western Civilization unprecedented in human history? They are destroying their civilization via accommodation joyfully offered to those who express state they are there to serve Allah and thereby replace Western Civilization with Allah’s savagery.
gravenimage says
The last days of the Roman Empire saw a lot of suicidal behavior–but this seems to be even worse.
Garry Pollack says
B’cuz we refuse to judge… Situational ethics. If I told U some 50 yr old guy. In nj “married” his niece @ 6… & Consummated it when she was 9…. Everybody on the Left wud say “lock him up!” Until I told him it was Mohammed. Look… Hitler, Stalin, Mohammed… What’s not to see!!!
Garry Pollack says
B’cuz we refuse to judge… Situational ethics. If I told U some 50 yr old guy. In nj “married” his niece @ 6… & Consummated it when she was 9…. Everybody on the Left wud say “lock him up!” Until I told him it was Mohammed. Look… Hitler, Stalin, Mohammed… What’s not to see!!!
gravenimage says
Islam’s Ugly Face in the Mirror: Why Europe Is Heading Toward Civilizational Suicide
………………………………………………………
Grimly true–just insane.