Leftist leaders of the EU will use wars and instability to promote their suicidal open-door migration agenda. Muslim refugees should be fleeing to surrounding Muslim countries, not to the EU, UK, Canada and the US.
With past migrant surges, antisemitism has risen, and national security threats have increased. Jihad by immigration (or hijrah) is a well-established stratagem throughout history.
The Combating Terrorism Center at West Point published Stories of Foreign Fighter Migration to Syria. The report discussed the Islamic idea that the “Qur’an and the sword [should work] together.”
This is a famous slogan used by jihadists in general, and ISIL in particular, stating that da`wa (religious propagation) does not serve Islam by itself. Both peaceful means (da`wa) and violent ones (jihad) should work hand-in-hand to achieve the mujahidin’s ultimate goal of conquering Islamic land and implementing Shari`a on it.
Another note referenced “a number of tweets” entitled “How Did I Migrate to the [Land] of Jihad.”
Leftists in Europe and throughout the West will continue to enable the entry of jihadists through their refugee streams, unvetted. In the game of numbers, it is game over for the West, unless something significant changes.
The UN Migration Pact (mentioned below) has long served as an underhanded strategy attempting to strong-arm the countries of the Visegrad group, particularly Hungary, that oppose open-door mass migration policies. It also exonerates Muslim countries of any responsibility for helping their own, while enabling the hijrah in the West.
It is worthwhile to note that Angela Merkel, who is highlighted below for swinging open the gates of Germany (and all of Europe) to mass migration from Africa and the Middle East, eventually admitted: “We now have another phenomenon, as we have refugees or people of Arab origin who bring another form of anti-Semitism into the country.”
“Concerns in Europe over Another Migrant Crisis Amid Conflict in Iran,” by Kurt Zindulka, Breitbart, March 16, 2026:
Still grappling with the civilizational transformations of the migrant crisis sparked over a decade ago by conflict in the Middle East, the European Union is facing the prospect of another large wave, with little more in the way of protection for its external borders.
In 2015, more than a million migrants poured into Europe as German Chancellor Angela Merkel unilaterally opened the gates of the bloc to mass migration from Africa and the Middle East, most notably from the Syrian Civil War, which in part was exacerbated by U.S. involvement, with the Obama administration funding rebel groups against the now-defunct regime of Bashar al-Assad.
The influx of the largest number of alleged asylum seekers since the Second World War upended European society and politics radically, sparking crime waves in once peaceful nations like Sweden, ingraining Islamist terrorist movements across the continent, straining national budgets, and entrenching sectarian politics.
Characteristic of the bureaucracy-obsessed European Union, it took a decade for the bloc to reach a form of migration agreement, dubbed the Migration and Asylum Pact, which is still only set to come into force by June. Even this agreement was struck over the objection of conservative nations such as Hungary and Poland, given that its primary aim is to share the burden of migration equally throughout the EU, meaning that countries which fail to police their borders can send illegals to countries that do, upon threat of financial penalties from Brussels.
It is unclear if the Migration Pact will be able to function regardless of outside pressure…..
More than one threat says
Leftists in the West need to replace Right-of-Centre voters with Muslims and Third Worlders who will vote Left.
That’s why the Leftists like to import future voters.
OLD GUY says
Absolutely True.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Once things in Iran settle, assuming that the Iranians make good on their word and roll back islam to where it has no say in anything outside the lives of practicing muslims – shi’a or sunni – then I expect migration to go the other way. I expect a whole bunch of Iranian expats to over time (not overnight) return to Iran, and help them recover to the point that they are at par w/ the rest of the world in terms of prosperity
The only people who would flee Iran are either regime figures, or islamic fanatics unable to accept the new Iranian credo of “live & let live”. The shi’a among them can flee to Iraq, and build new lives in Kufa, Najaf, Karbala and Basra. The sunnis among them can flee to Pakistan or Afghanistan or Turkey, and build up new lives there. Usually, the rule of refuge is that one flees to the nearest safe country. For these islamic fanatics, there are plenty of them right next door to Iran: they don’t even have to skip them and go to countries like Qatar or Syria
As a result, there is absolutely no reason for Europe or Canada to allow them in. However, being as stupid and self-destructive as they are, one can bet they will! That is not the fault of either Israel nor the US nor the Iranian people: that would purely be the fault of the Eurocrats who let them in
40 rounds says
Exactly, Europe could always say no
࿗Infidel࿘ says
40 rounds
You are right. Yet there is more news of IRGC regime families fleeing, not to Iraq or Pakistan or their other neighbors, but to Western countries. I was watching Tousi TV, and they showed an IRGC wife in a chador arriving at Sydney Airport and being confronted by Iranian expats, who are appalled at them not only being allowed into the country, but also getting security details from the Australian government. The same is probably true for Canada, Britain and France
Iranians can’t be blamed if Western governments don’t do what the US did at the start of the demonstrations in January, making it clear that islamic regime figures were not welcome in the US
Troybeam says
The Iranian people need to remain in Iran: it is that simple.
They need to remain to rebuild the nation from a theocracy to a free and independent nation, yes the in fighting between ideas will be great however nothing is that easy.
Change will be hard but the results will be worth it, America needs to send all of its Muslim refugee over to Iran to teach them the American way of life as they have spooned off enough monies and have lived under freedom long enough to teach others.
It’s a win win for all. America needs to remain out of Iran in all ways once the goal has been reached.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Fully agree. A secular Iran can be an ally in the same way that Israel is, where we have no troops there, but they are supportive of our interests
James Lincoln says
Another possibility is that Iran could return to pre-1979 Iranian revolution westernized status.
A well-run secular government could actually attract people.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
That seems to be the driving factor behind the popularity of Reza Pahlavi. Although as discussed on Breitbart, part of that narrative is through rose-colored glasses, since Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi did have some pro-islamic policies, such as allying w/ Pakistan, and turning a blind eye towards islamic activity
Main difference today is that most Iranians, if GAMAAN is to be believed, have left islam. Also, Reza Pahlavi has said that if Iran becomes a monarchy, he will be more of a ceremonial, rather than an executive head, and that there would be a prime minister and his cabinet. I’m not sure I completely agree w/ that: Iran may not be Iraq, Afghanistan or Pakistan, but it’s not Britain or the Netherlands or Sweden either
So maybe Pahlavi wouldn’t have the powers that his father had, or as MbS has across the Gulf, but he should have some powers that ensure stability, like Iran’s foreign affairs (have good relationship w/ Israel and have the embassy in Jerusalem) and defense & security, so that Iran always has a stable government, irrespective of who they elect
James Lincoln says
Infidel,
Thanks for your reply.
Good points made.
Alkflaeda says
When I read of Muslim countries where Christians are persecuted, it seems a great pity that we can’t swap our migrants for Christians, especially as the migrants don’t seem happy in Western countries. It would be win/win – somewhere like Pakistan would get strapping young men of their preferred faith, and our refugee provision would go to those who are genuinely persecuted.
Walter Sieruk says
The native people of Europe are showing wisdom about concern regarding the vast influx of Muslim migrants into their countries. For it should be remembered that it only takes a few of many to create much harm. In the cause of Muslim terrorists in Europe, it would be much murderous and destructive harm.
For example, statistics show that 91% of terrorist attacks that occurs in Europeans countries are Islamic.
The sad and tragic reality of jihad-minded Muslims migrants who live in France and the other nations of continental Europe who engage in Islamic suicide/homicide bombings attacks is for a large part, the outcome the extreme brainwashing that is performed in Islamic mind programming centers, which are mosques and madrasas.
In those jihad mind control places students are thoroughly indoctrinated into the jihadist mindset of committing murderous bombing attacks in the jihad for the advancement of Islam. As Islam’s “holy book,” the Quran instructs in 9:111. , for example, “The believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain they kill and are killed.” Therefore, those who come out of those Quran based mind programming centers .mosque and madrasas, are so terribly harmed and damaged that they are literally, as it has be rightfully called, “dangerous to self and others.” This results in jihad suicide /homicide attack in which those jihadists who commit such murderous actions are so very deluded that they think of that jihad mass murders as “martyrdom operations.” This is Islamic delusion of the most heinous and malicious kind.
This may be, somewhat, explained by the narrative from the fable of Aesop which is entitled THE SCORPION AND THE FROG So “Once upon a time there was a scorpion who really wanted to get to the other side of the river, but he could not swim. Therefore, the scorpion begged a frog to carry him on his back across the river. The kind but foolish frog agreed and then half-way across the river the scorpion stung the frog. In shock and horror the dying frog asks the scorpion “Why did you sting me since this means that we both are going to die” The scorpion replied “The reason that I stung you even though we both will now die is because that just what a scorpion, by nature, does.”
In conclusion, just as that scorpion in the fable had proven himself by the dangerous and deadly, to self and others, because of his nature. The violent and murderous jihadists of Islam are as that scorpion, dangerous so self and other because they is their nature because they have been thought programmed in the ways of the violent and murdering jihad of Islam. As always stated above ,this is the sad and tragic reality of Islamic terrorism in today’s world.
Walter Sieruk says
The native people of Europe are showing wisdom about concern regarding the vast influx of Muslim “refuge” migrants into their countries. For it should be remembered that it only takes a few of many to create much harm. In the cause of Muslim terrorists in Europe, it would be much murderous and destructive harm.
For example, statistics show that 91% of terrorist attacks that occurs in Europeans countries are Islamic.
The sad and tragic reality of jihad-minded Muslims migrants who live in France and the other nations of continental Europe who engage in Islamic suicide/homicide bombings attacks is for a large part, the outcome the extreme brainwashing that is performed in Islamic mind programming centers, which are mosques and madrasas.
In those jihad mind control places students are thoroughly indoctrinated into the jihadist mindset of committing murderous bombing attacks in the jihad for the advancement of Islam. As Islam’s “holy book,” the Quran instructs in 9:111. , for example, “The believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain they kill and are killed.” Therefore, those who come out of those Quran based mind programming centers .mosque and madrasas, are so terribly harmed and damaged that they are literally, as it has be rightfully called, “dangerous to self and others.” This results in jihad suicide /homicide attack in which those jihadists who commit such murderous actions are so very deluded that they think of that jihad mass murders as “martyrdom operations.” This is Islamic delusion of the most heinous and malicious kind.
This may be, somewhat, explained by the narrative from the fable of Aesop which is entitled THE SCORPION AND THE FROG So “Once upon a time there was a scorpion who really wanted to get to the other side of the river, but he could not swim. Therefore, the scorpion begged a frog to carry him on his back across the river. The kind but foolish frog agreed and then half-way across the river the scorpion stung the frog. In shock and horror the dying frog asks the scorpion “Why did you sting me since this means that we both are going to die” The scorpion replied “The reason that I stung you even though we both will now die is because that just what a scorpion, by nature, does.”
In conclusion, just as that scorpion in the fable had proven himself by the dangerous and deadly, to self and others, because of his nature. The violent and murderous jihadists of Islam are as that scorpion, dangerous so self and other because they is their nature because they have been thought programmed in the ways of the violent and murdering jihad of Islam. As always stated above ,this is the sad and tragic reality of Islamic terrorism in today’s world.
Walter Sieruk says
About the concern that many Europeans have about so many unvetted Muslim migrant ‘refuges” entering their countries. This concern is, indeed, very warranted
This may be illustrated by one of the fables of Aesop may yet better explain this vile horrendous Muslim violence, which is, entitled THE FARMER AND THE VIPER. So here it is “Once in ancient Greece there was a farmer outside on a very cold winter day walking in if field to make sure that everything is in order and as it should be. The farmer came upon a half-froze viper about to die from the bitter cold. The kind yet foolish farmer took pity on the viper and in an action of kindness put it his is vest jacket to warms and up and thus save its life. The viper warned up revived and then bit farmer through the vest jacket. So the kind but foolish farmer died a slow painful death in awful agony because he felt sorry of the viper and saved it life. The point to this fable is the no amount of kindness will change and vicious and evil nature.
So it is with those Muslim migrants who were allowed to enter the Western countries to live . Those violent migrants who are Muslims will not be impress and change because kindness of Westerners. This is because those violent Muslims have that ungrateful dangerous viper nature because of their venomous and violent religion which is Islam.
David M says
Just because third worlders want to come in doesn’t mean you have to let them. Stopping them is the job the politicians are supposed to do.