🚨 The Leicestershire Council of Mosques has sent a formal complaint regarding the “Islamophobic poster” displayed at Leicester Secular Hall for No Hijab Day.
Yet promoting World Hijab Day, forcing children in schools to try the hijab, or offering it to passers-by at railway… https://t.co/UHDTECSDRX pic.twitter.com/Ak8iz7KxRZ
— Subversive Force (@sirwg202110) January 30, 2026
Women have been brutalized and even killed for not wearing hijab in the Islamic Republic of Iran and elsewhere, but the Leicestershire Council of Mosques has never filed a complaint about that. This is a clear indication of how Muslims and leftists use charges of “Islamophobia” to silence criticism of Islam, even when that criticism stems from a concern for the rights of women or some other legitimate reason to be skeptical about whether or not Islam is really as wholly wonderful as we are all compelled to believe.
somehistory says
And if in afghanistan, off with their heads for even suggesting that a scarf worn tightly about the face might be something women and tiny girl children would wish to avoid. Perhaps that is coming soon to the British Isles.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
The “put your hijab on a man” is laughable. There have been a lot of incidents where muslim men have worn hijabs to hide themselves and escape by pretending to be women. The most famous of those being the siege of the Lal Masjid in Islamabad, Pakistan, when at the end of it, one of the leaders of that insurrection was captured after removing the hijab which he was using to hide himself. In muslim countries, removing a hijab can be dangerous, if it turns out that it’s indeed a woman who’s wearing it. But if it turns out to be a man, then whoever pulls off the hijab is justified
There have also been cases of muslims – both men & women – wearing hijabs, entering stores and then stealing items. I guess CCTV and cameras make it more risky, but in the absence of evidence, if a muslimah’s hijab is pulled off and nothing is found, the person who pulls it off would be in trouble w/ the local ummah
I think anybody wearing a hijab voluntarily should first be shot, and then the hijab pulled off to see who it was
Hoi Polloi says
Thanks for the info about the hijabed jihadi. As Canadian comedian Ben Bankas said, “If islam is such a great religion, then how come the capital of Pakistan is called Islamabad?”
somehistory says
I have often thought at that paki fact. And Ben Bankas has had his show canceled in MN for making a joke about the deceased lawbreaker who tried to run over an ICE agent. Can’t help but laugh at what he said, and the business is going to have to pay him for the six shows they canceled.
I recall some years ago, a burka went into a building, the male wearing it stabbed someone and walked out….all of it being filmed.
The scarves, the burkas, the full-face, body bags are all weapons; first against the girls and women forced to wear them, then then against those of us who see the problem.
E T says
People in England need to demand an Emmeline Pankhurst Day.
somehistory says
They would likely be arrested for that these days.
Hoi Polloi says
Yes, it is most definitely a two-edged sword.
James Lincoln says
Hoi Polloi,
Yes, Ben Bankas is pretty funny:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl8VOb6bHUI
Hoi Polloi says
I enjoy his willingness to challenge islam.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
You and Bankas joke, but some years ago, there was an online petition started by someone from Bangladesh to change the name of Pakistan’s capital
https://www.opindia.com/2021/02/pakistan-online-petition-change-name-islamabad-islamagood-goes-viral
“Abad” actually means “city of” in Urdu and Farsi. “Islamabad” actually means “city of islam”, just like “Hyderabad” means “city of Hyder” and so on. It doesn’t come from English, contrary to that some muslim expats in the above story may have thought
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Hoi
Forgot to add – this story was discussed on Jihadwatch as well
https://jihadwatch.org/2021/02/online-petition-calls-for-changing-name-of-pakistans-capital-from-islamabad-to-islamagood
Hoi Polloi says
Thank you; missed that one.
Walter Sieruk says
First, Islam’s Sharia supports forcing females to wear the hijab which is a symbol of the misogyny of Islam with its Sharia.
Second ,regarding Sharia, it should be made known that the actual origin of Sharia. It had been revealed in a Time –Life book with the title MESOPOTAMIA: THE MIGHTY KINGS copyright 1995 ” For that future history book about the ancient pagan world of Mesopotamia informs the reader that “many Islamic laws resemble the Babylon and Assyrian forebears.” .page 150.
Therefore Sharia is of pagan origin and therefore has no value or worth.
Walter Sieruk says
Regarding the hijab and also the burqa this is connected with that Islamic regime’s horrendous abuse of young women leads to murderous violence. For example, that heinously cruel and murderous Islamic tyranny of Iran is very brutal and vicious to the Iranian people. Especially regarding females. Both girls and women.
The murder of Mahsa Amini is very sad and tragic and that horrendous evil of her being murdered is because of the oppressive vicious brutal cruel and deadly misogynistic Islamic regime of Iran.
That action of male Muslim who are officials murdering defenseless, helpless women in cold blood is a heinous and hideous has occurred before and if that murderous Islamic regime isn’t overthrown such wicked killing will continue.
Another example of such callous despicable heartless anti-female evil is when a teenage girl in Iran was talking to her boyfriend on the phone and then the Islamic state “police” walked over to her and shot her dead. They did that wicked and malicious thing to her because she was talking to her boyfriend and they also didn’t like her clothing. [1]
That was a clear cut case of murder and vicious Islamic madness by Iran’s Islamic state “ police”, who call themselves the “Revolutionary Guards”, they got away with their hideous and malice –filled evil because the mullahs as well as other villains in power in that tyrannical Islamic regime.
[1] A TIME TO BETRAY by Reza Kahlili page 240
Walter Sieruk says
About the hijab and that brutal cruel vicious Islamic “morality police” of Iran even go so far as to raise a terrible horrendous brutal fuss over a little bit of hair showing on a woman’s head not only proves true the old saying that “Evil is always looking for an excuse.” But this also further exposes the malicious and oppressive misogyny of Islam and of that Islamic tyranny of Iran.
That horrific vicious and cruel “mullah regime” of Iran is brutal and cruel violator of human rights. Especially regarding the human rights of girls and woman.
For example, to imprison women for not wearing the hijab is but one part of the anti-female tyranny of this tyrannical “mullah regime” of Iran.
That ruthless cruel brutal heinous Islamic regime of Iran that is so unfittingly has the word “Republic” in its title ,for its called “ The Islamic Republic of Iran” [ I R I].
That brutal cruel Islamic tyrannical regime of Iran is full of ruthless malicious misogyny.
On the topic of this Islamic tyranny of Iran a former Muslim revealed that “The IRI system recognizes women as dependent upon men and incomplete human beings who need to be supervised and controlled by men and the State. This author further exposed that “Women are created for the purposes of giving pleasure to men and child bearing – functions that confine them to the home” This is a male Chauvinistic as can possibly be.
In addition this writer further makes it known that “The IRI legal system still retains traditional patriarchal bias that can be described as nothing but systemic subordination of women , which is undoubtedly a human rights violation .”
This author further reveals that “Iran is of what Islamic fundamentalists desire, an Islamic State, and the consequence of achieving it “State Terror. Instead of utopia, Iran is an Islamic totalitarian nightmare…” and “the Islamic Republic of Iran exists and operates as what every Islamic fundamentalist dreams of, an Islamic state ruled by Sharia …What followed its establishment was the inevitable consequence and inexorable logic of its Islamic premises; state terrorism, a merciless tyranny.” [1]
All this is wicked, unjust and misogynistic to the extreme. Islam had not regard for human life, regardless of what the apologists for this religion will claim.
[1] THE ISLAM IN ISLAMIC TERRORISM BY Ibn Warraq. pages 345-347.
Walter Sieruk says
On the topic of the hijab and the cruel Anti- female essence of Islam is that Islamic kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a kingdom of callous brutal misogyny of the most heinously heartless kind there is. Be it the vicious, malicious and murderous Islamic practice of what is so very inappropriately called in the Islamic world “honor killing” and also the brutal cruel , savage Islamic tradition so unfittingly called “female circumcision “ which is reality of female genital mutilation. And other Islamic evils.
For example, on March 11, 2002 in Saudi Arabia a girls dorm caught on fire, the girls naturally rushed out of that dorm that was on fire. In their hast to escape the flames they forgot to take and put on their face veils. Those Islamic state police of Saudi Arabia with this totally unreasonable and heartless Islamic mindset forced all the girls back into the dorm that was on fire. Only because they didn’t have their face veils. So all those girls did a horrible painful death .This is worse than tragic and sad, this is the murderous misogyny of the Islamic kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Furthermore that tragedy of the terrible burning to death of those young girls because of the cruel oppression of Islam’s “values” is a brutal reminder of the harsh reality is a reflection of the information revealed in the book by Brigitte Gabriel entitled THEY MUST BE STOPPED.
Which informs the reader on page 171 “Control of behavior and disregard for human life are key elements in Islamic ideology.” Furthermore, on the very next page of this book ,it reveals “women in Islam are considered unclean , deemed inferior even to dirt.”
Walter Sieruk says
A girl or a young woman if she goes outside with her hijab , according to Islam’s Sharia , might possibly become a victim of an ‘honor killing.”
Therefore , “Islamic culture” is not really a genuine culture. As observed in that so very savage cruel, brutal vicious and murderous that it’s not really an actual, genuine, culture but a result of a primitive deadly religion , because of its wicked Islamic practice of “honor killing.”
The terrible term “honor killing” is alone a dishonest term. For there is no honor, at all, it’s a malice -filled murder of a young female. Just giving an evil action a better sounding title doesn’t change the wicked nature of it. It’s like scrapping off the label of that jar of cyanide which reads “Danger Poison” and replacing on that jar another label that reads “ Apple Juice.” That doesn’t change the deadly content in that jar. As it has been wisely said that “Evil is always looking for an excuse.”
Second, the horrible reality is that Islam is able to in a sinister way, warp the cognation of the human mind that a man might even feel and think that a cold-blooded murder of a helpless young girl or woman is something that is “good” That’s outright demonic. So much so that it’s a reflection of the words found in the Bible in Isaiah 5:20. Which read “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil; who put darkness for light and light for darkness…” [N.K.J.V.]
Third. , the Muslim father who so vicious ,because of his religion that his wants to murder his own daughter in a so called ‘honor killing” and feels no remorse or guilt about the horrendously evil actions that they committed are so very heartless because ,as the Bible reveals they have had “their own conscience seared with a hot iron” First Timothy 4:2.
In that situation, that “hot iron” is Islam.
Forth , but not less important than the other three points is to have the knowledge that this brutal, callous cruel, malice-filled and murderous Islamic tradition that so very inappropriately called “honor killing” by many Muslims in one of the many malicious and vicious deadly fruits of Islam.
Jesus taught, “By their fruits you will know them” Matthew 7:20.
rick says
Council of Mosques? Council of Fascists is more like it. Want to make women wear slave outfits? Then leave a civilized nation with a civilized ( more or less) people and return to your 7th century country.
E T says
NOW
PRCS USN (ret) says
The letter states that some Muslim women choose to wear the veil and some don’t, but it does not, of course, note that some Muslim nations mandate it.
A list:
https://uisjournal.com/in-which-islamic-countries-are-women-required-by-law-to-wear-the-veil/
OLD GUY says
Everyday should be a NO Hijab day.
ANDRES ARANGO says
The hijab worn by Muslim women should offend Muslim men.
Women wear this garment to avoid being touched or physically harassed. That is the reality and any religious justifications they claim are just euphemisms to hide the truth. And they should feel offended or insulted by the assumption that they cannot control their desires and physical attraction to a woman who is not covered. Like an animal in heat, it cannot control itself.