Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

How real is Iran’s threat that any attack on Khamenei is declaration of war against ‘entire Islamic world’?

By

The Islamic Republic of Iran is in full crisis mode with nationwide protests and teetering economy, so now the regime has issued a unilateral declaration that the “entire Islamic world” will respond with “an issuance of a ‘jihad ruling’ in the event of an attack on its supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei”: “Iranian Lawmakers Warn Attack on Khamenei Would Mean War With ‘Entire Islamic World,” Al Arabiya, January 20, 2026:

Iranian lawmakers warned on Tuesday that any attack on Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei would amount to a declaration of war “against the entire Islamic world” and would lead to the issuance of a “jihad ruling.”

Tensions between Iran and the United States have escalated following Tehran’s deadly crackdown on anti-government protests, which US President Donald Trump has warned could prompt Washington to intervene to aid protesters.

For all the latest headlines follow our Google News channel online or via the app.

Iran’s semi-official ISNA news agency quoted the parliamentary National Security Committee as saying that “any attack on the supreme leader means declaring war against the entire Islamic world,” adding that those responsible should expect a “jihad ruling from Islamic scholars” and a response from what it called “the soldiers of Islam” worldwide.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian issued a similar warning on Sunday, saying that any attack on Khamenei would constitute a declaration of war.

“An attack on the great leader of our country is tantamount to a full-scale war with the Iranian nation,” Pezeshkian said in a post on X, in what appeared to be a response to Trump’s remarks calling for new leadership in Iran…

How seriously should the threats from the National Security Committee and Pezeshkian be taken? A point to remember: Pezeshkian signaled earlier in January “that the crisis maybe rapidly moving beyond officials’ control,” adding: “We should not expect the government to handle all of this alone… The government simply does not have that capacity.” It wasn’t clear at the time whom Pezeshkian might have had in mind about aiding Iran, and he was issuing what was obviously a desperate plea for help, but now it’s apparent that he is looking to the entire Islamic world to respond by issuing a jihad decree if Khamenei is attacked. How likely, however, is it that the “entire Islamic world” would respond to an attack on the Islamic Republic?

Robert Spencer observed: “Trump’s weakness and empty threats have emboldened the Islamic Republic, but they’re still wary, and figure he can be cowed into inaction with threats of their own. They’re probably right about that. Meanwhile, whether the Sunni world would really take up jihad for Shi’ite Iran is questionable, at best.”

Few things are more pathetic than being emboldened but also weak, which describes the current state of the Islamic Republic. And Iran is well aware that Trump’s threat still looms, even as protesters are expressing their deep sense of betrayal in light of Trump’s inaction. Trump recently seemed to keep the door open to action:

Also, Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi is ready to head a caretaker government in Iran once the Islamic Republic falls:

The Islamic Republic of Iran is not only desperate; it’s isolated. The Sunni world is unlikely to take up jihad for Iran. Although Saudi Arabia, one of the world’s leading Sunni countries, has told Tehran that “it will not be part of any military action taken against it, and that its territory and airspace will not be used for that purpose,” the Saudis have opted to take a “very strategic and safe approach” to Iran. Likewise, Turkey has not endorsed the protesters, but neither has it backed Tehran’s brutal crackdown. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has only warned ambiguously that “foreign intervention in Iran could spark wider turmoil in the region.”

And for the Shia world,  it has always been unsettled toward Ayatollah Khamenei, who is a Marja, the highest religious authority in Shia Islam, providing authoritative interpretations of religious law for Shi’ites; however, longtime controversies haunt Khamenei. His appointment as Marja only came after a long, drawn-out debate, and before that, he had already earned the mocking titles of the “Overnight Ayatollah” and “Ayatollah in a Prance.” Khamenei’s religious credentials were widely deemed inferior

The enduring controversies and disapproval of Khamenei — from the beginning of his career up to now — somewhat mitigate the threat from the regime about the “entire Islamic world” coming to the regime’s rescue. Although the ayatollah holds significant authority as the supreme leader of Iran, he lacks unified allegiance and respect across the Shia world. Shortly after Khomeini’s death in 1989, Iran’s Assembly of Experts approved of Khamenei’s succession. The head of the Assembly of Experts, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, sold acceptance of Khamenei as a matter of honoring the dying wish of Khomeini. By a vote of 60 to 14 Khamenei became supreme leader, while Rafsanjani became known as Khamenei’s “kingmaker.”

Khamenei’s rise to power “raised the ire of the country’s clerical elites in Qom.” It was the Islamic Republic’s political elites that rallied behind Khamenei. Eventually, even the Rafsanjani-Khamenei bond soured, as Khamenei grew increasingly hardline.

Khamenei has proven to be an utter failure. His hardline policies are a source of wide disagreement across the Shia world, along with Iran’s deplorable human rights record and the regime’s savage crackdown on internal protests; nonetheless, the regime clings to power at immense cost. Iran International now puts the death toll at over 16,000 murdered by the regime and at least 330,000 injured, according to reports compiled by doctors. This video gives insight into what is happening inside Iran:

A recent viral video featured an Iranian Shia cleric denouncing the brutal regime as “criminal” and “murderous,” and calling on the people of Iran to “rise up against the system founded by Khomeini”:

Over 90% of Iranians are Shia according to the US Department of State website as of 2022, and they are pleading for regime change. As one Iranian voice put it: “We are 90 million prisoners in Iran, and we need support.”

When Pezeshkian became president, I stated in a previous Jihad Watch post: “Many among wishful thinkers believe that the newly installed president of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian, is a ‘moderate’ or ‘reformist.’ Like all of his predecessors, Pezeshkian is nothing more than a puppet of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Ayatollah Khamenei. Pezeshkian has virtually admitted this as he explains how he selected his cabinet, as the selections weren’t really his choice. The president of Iran is merely a functionary of the Supreme Leader.” See more here: “‘Don’t be fooled’ by Iran’s ‘bogus election of a puppet president.’”

In Iran’s current crisis, as the regime is showing the world its true self, Iranians are responding to Pezeshkian as the puppet president he always was, contrary to Western references to him as “reformist.” His warning that any attack on Khamenei would amount to “full-scale war” “prompted sharp criticism from Iranians who say the statement ignores the killing of protesters during recent nationwide unrest.” He also continues to face vilification from his own people on social media. Iran Wire reported:

Ali Sharifi Zarchi, a professor at Tehran’s Sharif University of Technology, wrote in response, “Curse the bloodthirsty regime that massacred thousands of Iranians. Curse the executioner Khamenei, whose only rival in killing Iranians in contemporary history is Saddam Hussein. Curse you and all the perpetrators of this massacre against the people.” Musician Arash Sobhani also addressed Pezeshkian directly, writing: “You have orchestrated the largest slaughter of Iranians in contemporary history.”

The Western world should not forget that the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps follows a Twelver Shia doomsday vision of an apocalypse. The hidden Twelfth Imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi, plays a dominant role in the official religion of Iran, Twelver Shi’ism. There is a messianic belief that at the end of days, al-Mahdi will appear in the midst of a violent apocalyptic scenario played out on a battleground stained with infidels’ blood. This messianic figure is believed to be the one to establish a global Islamic caliphate. The regime views its hostile policies, and its approach to America and the annihilation of Israel, as key in contributing to the conditions for the Mahdi’s reappearance.

How does one reconcile the crisis in Iran with the Twelver Doomsday belief? For one thing, it keeps the hardline Islamic regime emboldened and motivated; even if it falls short of its goal of galvanizing support across the Islamic world to wage jihad in its defense, it will certainly succeed in alerting the Islamic world to shore up defenses against the infidels. In the event of the regime’s fall, the global jihad must not be stymied in its relentless zeal for “martyrdom” and the expansion of the hegemony of Sharia

The Palestinian “resistance” (from the River to the Sea) remains the central cause to the Muslim ummah, as does Islamic supremacism and dedication to restoration of a global caliphate.

In October, Iran and Turkey discussed military cooperation, and signaled their intent to build a stronger regional security partnership. Let’s also not forget that Iran, Turkey, Qatar and even Saudi Arabia have been supporters of Hamas. The global Islamic jihad is alive and well, and schisms in Islam are as old as Islam itself; Muslims are well known to have murdered other Muslims by the droves in the name of their religion.

With respect to the Islamic Republic of Iran, it will not go down without a fight, backed by its religious zeal; nor will it discard its the Twelver doomsday beliefs; however, whether the Khamenei regime will survive is another question. It is now as fragile as it has ever been since the 1979 Revolution. It has never stood before the world as weak and humiliated as it is now. Its chances of ultimate survival look as slim and the prospect of the entire Islamic world coming to its defense.

Comments

  1. Just bluster. There may be some sabre-rattling and unpleasant rhetoric…but Iran would be on their own with exception of noise from Hezbollah and the Houtis, I think the most disconcerthing issue might be the presence of Hezbollah in South America and those in sleeper cells already in the U.S.

  2. Over 90% of Iranians are Shia,….

    Christine

    That is really dated data. Go through the GAMAAN survey of 2020, and you’ll see that only 32% of Iranians are shi’a, and including them, only 40% are muslim of any sect. Note that that data is now 6 years old, and according to some Iranian podcasters, it’s probably only 20% of Iranians that are still shi’a. It’s unlikely that since 2020, the number of believing muslims has gone up, and of the remainder, the bulk of them are deists/None (22%), Atheist (9%), Spiritual (7%) and Agnostic (6%)

    For adherents of particular religions, you have Zoroastrians at 8%, Christians at 2% and Jews at 0.1%. Add them to the various categories of non believers above, and you have ~60% of Iranians who are explicitly non-muslim

    As for the larger analysis, I do think that while sunnis may hate shi’a, the last thing Iran’s Arab neighbors want is a non-muslim Iran. That’s why they have been urging Trump to not attack Iran, b’cos if the Khamenei regime falls and Pahlavi comes to power, this time Iran will be neither a muslim nor an islamic country, and it could (hopefully IMO) pull out of the OIC. Unlike Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi, who was still somewhat islam-friendly – he had alliances w/ Pakistan and even sponsored the building of shi’a mosques in completely non-muslim countries like Taiwan, Reza Pahlavi is careful to declare that while he is a practicing shi’a (my only beef against him), he does not believe that his personal faith is anybody else’s business. That’s the last thing that the Arabs or Turks around Iran want

    Also, from what I’ve seen from Mahyar Tousi, Goldie Ghamari and Armin Navabi, the regime has all but collapsed, and the only power they have remaining is shutting down the internet, and killing people en masse. There have been massive defections already, which is why Khamenei’s statements sound completely like hollow threats

  3. No Sunni nation will shed tears over the end of the Khamenei Regime. It frankly makes Islam look bad on a very large scale. It’s one thing that most singular crazy jihadists, in the news for mahem in the West, are named after Muhammad and another that a nation’s regime, claiming to be Islamic, rapes and murders its citizens – justifying that in the name of Islam.

    It’s only a minority who actually support the evil mafia government of Iran. A coerced supporting mob will always show up on demand to support Khamenei when it means preserving their family and life. His crooked ministers, mullahs, and IRGC thugs are all invested in the open prison that is Iran. They hold an entire nation in Stockholm Syndrome.

    Even Allah seems angry and withholds water from Iran. How about Khamenei showing he is the annointed representative of Allah by ending the drought and greening Tehran? If the man wants to be a Caliph, why not start by walking on his own water?

    • I disagree. All of Iran’s sunni neighbors have shown, w/ their appeal to Trump to not intervene in Iran, that they’d prefer a shi’a Iran to a secular Iran. Their reasons may vary: they may think that if Iran becomes secular, that it would be a more attractive destination for both foreign investment and tourism, than even the best of Emirates or Saudi Arabia. Not to mention that w/ Iranian oil once again being available in the international markets, w/o any sanctions, that’ll send their price of oil even more south

      • That’s not shedding tears.

        Do we really think Islam wouldn’t have power in a secular government? It would take generations for it to fade away because people cannot suddenly change the platform that provided their purpose for life from an early age.

        All that can socially happen with Iran changing to a Monarchy is better relations with its citizens and the world. Islam will remain, like India, a thorn.

      • Well, if we believe the survey of Iranians that I linked above, which would show that less than 40% of Iranians today are muslims of any sort, then islam wouldn’t have any power in a secular government. One of the slogans on the streets in Iran goes, “No true Iranian is muslim, and no true muslim is Iranian”. While I have no idea of what percentage of the opposition that is, the fact that they are demanding that would suggest that islam would have no role to play in a future Iran. In fact, that’s one of the salient points of the Pahlavi plan: to have a secular democracy

        I originally did think that the Saudis and others would want the Iranian regime to fall and would encourage the West to topple it, like they did w/ Libya in 2011. But instead, not only have Qatar and Oman opposed it, but much to my surprise, both Saudi Arabia and Egypt have as well. Only reason I can think of for their opposition is that they don’t want a secular, non-muslim Iran to emerge: it’ll look too attractive for foreign investment and tourism. Particularly the latter, for people who are wary of visiting muslim countries

  4. he islamic world has been at war with the free and civilized world for 1400 years

    • Spot on, ed. Because Islam is nothing but endless murderous hate for non Muslims, Muslims are always at war with us. And Muslims are also at war among themselves with Sunnis and Shiites hating one another with murderous hatred. What evil poison Islam is.

  5. How real is Iran’s threat that any attack on Khamenei is declaration of war against ‘entire Islamic world’?
    ……………………………………………

    Hard to know–probably a lot of majority Sunni Muslims would like to see the fall of the Mullahs, for internecine reasons.

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content