New in PJ Media:
It seems as if the whole world is celebrating Ahmed al-Ahmed, who tackled one of the jihad mass murderers at Australia’s Bondi Beach last Sunday, but there are more than a few notable holdouts.
“Ahmed al Ahmed,” Bernie Sanders wrote on Monday, “a Muslim father of two, risked his life to disarm a murderer who was shooting down Jews celebrating Hanukkah in Sydney. Religion must not divide our common humanity. We must stand together and end antisemitism, Islamophobia and all hate — no exceptions.”
The superannuated socialist was not alone. Ahmed al-Ahmed has been hailed around the world, and deservedly so, as he prevented many more people from being killed. Ahmed al-Ahmed is, however, more valuable to some, like Bernie Sanders, for his appearing to prove that the problem of terrorism is not a problem of Islam. It is not accidental that Sanders went out of his way to identify al-Ahmed as “a Muslim father of two,” while referring to the jihadi al-Ahmed tackled simply as “a murderer,” without noting that the murderer in question was acting in accord with the teachings of Ahmed al-Ahmed’s religion, which contains core texts teaching venomous hostility to Jews and including such indelible exhortations as “Kill them wherever you find them” (Qur’an 2:191, 4:89, 4:91, cf. 9:5).
Some Muslims, however, being better informed about their religion than Bernie Sanders is, demonstrated that they were well aware that the Bondi Beach murderers were Muslims. They knew that Ahmed al-Ahmed was a Muslim as well, and weren’t happy about that at all.
The Daily Mail reported Thursday that “Ramallah News, one of the most popular news outlets in Palestine,” by which the politically correct rag likely means Judea and Samaria, also known as the West Bank, as well as Gaza, “shared a story about Mr al-Ahmed’s brave actions on Sunday.” Yet among Palestinian Arabs, al-Ahmed’s actions were not regarded as a cause for celebration: “Ramallah News’ post about Mr al-Ahmed was quickly spread around Arab communities, which overwhelmingly condemned him for saving Jewish lives.”
Nor was this a matter of one or two fanatics who were so blinded by hatred that they didn’t see all the peace and love that was breaking out everywhere: “According to analysis by a senior researcher for Palestinian Media Watch, Ahron Shapiro, of the 1,000 comments left under the article – 75 per cent were unsupportive of Mr al-Ahmed, 20 per cent were supportive and five per cent were neutral.”
This is striking. Ever since 9/11, the “experts” have repeatedly assured us that among Muslims worldwide, jihad terrorists and their sympathizers are a tiny minority of extremists, whom ordinary Muslims abhor as much as ordinary Christians find the Ku Klux Klan and Westboro Baptist Church abhorrent. Seventy-five percent, however, is not exactly a tiny minority.
There is more. Read the rest here.
ElderlyZionist says
I have a hunch someone will put a fatwa on Ahmed al Ahmed sooner than later.
Tony says
Muslims do not have to issue a fatwa on Al-Ahmed because Al-Ahmed’s actions give credibility that Islam ‘may be peaceful’ and allows Muslims to continue operating with impunity in the West. Remember, Islam is deceitful, and individual Muslims can exercise their own discretion, peaceful or violent, on what to do with Al-Ahmed whether Ahmed is a Muslim hypocrite or not.
England Invaded says
And if there were none? This incident wouldn’t have happened. A better outcome over all.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Precisely. Ahmad al-Ahmad wouldn’t be there, but neither would the Akrams
GE says
I read somewhere that he was actually a Lebanese Christian. Fake news, I guess.
CryHavoc says
This is par for the course in some respects. I am surprised thatso.e Muslims spoke up about this incident but even so, their nihi!ism is showing. A person’s cladei sn’t their fault.