Another day, another Islamic ‘War on Christmas’.
France just canceled its New Year’s Eve celebration. It’s on high alert citing a ‘very high’ risk of Muslim terrorist attacks on Christmas markets while citing past Islamic terror attacks on Christmas markets. Especially in Germany. Here’s another one.
What makes this one stand out is the seeming brazenness of it.
In Lower Bavaria, several men are suspected of planning a vehicle attack on a Christmas market. Arrest warrants have been issued for four of them. Authorities suspect an Islamist motive.
What was their first hint of an ‘Islamist’ motive?
According to information obtained by BILD, the Egyptian man was a prayer leader who allegedly called upon the three Moroccans in a mosque in the Dingolfing-Landau area to carry out the attack. Authorities stated that the goal was “to kill or injure as many people as possible.”
According to the Attorney General’s office, they are a 56-year-old Egyptian, a 37-year-old Syrian, and three Moroccans aged 22, 28, and 30. According to the current state of the investigation, the Egyptian man allegedly called for an attack in a mosque in the Dingolfing-Landau area “in order to kill or injure as many people as possible,” the public prosecutor’s office stated.
The three Moroccans were reportedly prepared to carry out the attack. The Syrian man is said to have reinforced their resolve.
What did German authorities think Islamic prayers consisted of? Pretty much this. If they’re going to ban calls for the death of infidels, well that’s pretty much banning Islam.
Walter Sieruk says
This jihad watch article should serve a a reminder that It’s a good idea not to take at face value the claim that the word Islam means “peace.” For example, the ENCARTA WORLD ENGLISH DICTIONARY copyright 1999 defines Islam as “submission” based on the word “aslama” meaning “he surrendered.” Given the definition it’s an odd phenomenon that after about fourteen hundred years starting on September 12, 2001 the meaning changed from “submission” to “peace.”
It’s very well known that if the police are questioning someone and he changes his story something is wrong. Nevertheless, when it comes to Islam no one gets suspicious of the change. The jihadists brag that they will win the war against the West by using the Western ignorance and naive gullible mindset on the subject of Islam against us. It seems that they do have some basis in that claim since so many Westerners are beguiled by the Muslim disinformation campaign.
For the terrible reality is that Islam is a religion of brutal blood vicious violence,
As the Quran instructs devout Muslims in Surah 2:191. 9 :5. 123, 47:4
somehistory says
And the very fact that an egyptian scum, three thugs from marocco and a syrian thug were involved in one plot, proves that muzzies the world over are all of the same mindset.
And that mindset is to murder as many of the people they hate as quickly and as horribly as they can, while blaming the Christians and Jews for their own deaths.
As Florida Rep Randy Fine says, ‘they are out to destroy us.’
ploome says
you write:
” Given the definition it’s an odd phenomenon that after about fourteen hundred years starting on September 12, 2001 the meaning changed from “submission” to “peace.””
It is important to remember that, while muslims have learned t use our language, to them, words have different meaning.
e.g. koran 9:29. describes what islam considered “peace”
Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day, nor comply with what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden, nor embrace the religion of truth from among those who were given the Scripture,1 until they pay the tax,2 willingly submitting, fully humbled.
dialogue to muslims means dawah and if muslims are forbidden dawah that is considered an aggression against islam
islamic statements and declarations may sound reasonable and comforting, but the meaning and islamic understanding is something else.
Who would understand that “peace” means total submission and humiliation-unless in the case of violent conflict/war?
Dar al Islam is at perpetual and constant war with “dar al harb:-
James Lincoln says
ploome says,
“It is important to remember that, while muslims have learned t use our language, to them, words have different meaning.”
Yes, and thanks for pointing that out.
Taffy says
The police shpuld raid the mosque, drag the Imam out and just make him disappear, never to be heard from again! This is of course after making absolutely sure that they have the correct imam.
I used to believe that the rule of law was absolute, and that EVERYONE was entitled to a lawyer, a fair trial, etc., (5th, 6th and 8th Amendment stuff). But, then in law school, I took a class in International Law.
After reading the writings of Hugo Grotius and the international law giants that followed, and after reviewing each US Supreme Court case pertaining to International law, I saw that there were crimes that were so horrendous, and guilt was so certain, that under the right set of circumstances due process could be short-circuited.
As a final exam, I was tasked with writing an essay defending Adolf Eichmann. As most will recall, Eichmann was grabbed off the streets of Argentina and smuggled out of Argentina to Israel where he stood trial for his war crimes. From an international law point of view, everything about it was wrong! They kidnapped a foreign national. Israel didn’t exist at the time the war crimes were committed, Germany, rather than Israel had jurisdiction to try Eichmann, he was not given a trial by impartial judges, etc.
In my submitted essay, I went through each of these defenses, explaining why the Israelis violated international law in this show trial.
But, I concluded with the premise that there is natural law that governs everything, and international law (and domestic law) cannot anticipate every atrocity or every situation, and situations may arise where the perpetrator of an atrocity could walk free under a technicality or be given a slap-on-the-wrist sentence such as were given to many Nazi war criminals that were tried n German courts.
Since Eichmann admitted his identity, and what he orchestrated was public record, he got his just deserts, and everything about his Israeli trial and execution was “kosher.”
On a smaller scale, an Imam that tells his congregation that congregants should perform jihad on a Christmas market, in the name of Allah, by killing the infidels that attend and outing fear into the hearts of the unbelievers, is setting himself up for a similar fate to Eichmann’s. So too did the Hamas infiltrators those that directed them.
Hugo Grotius said that pirates on the high seas were fair game for anyone who has the opportunity to take them out. The same ahould be true if the jihadis.
James Lincoln says
Thanks for your very informative post, Taffy.
Walter Sieruk says
One of the main reasons that government leader and agencies as well as other authorities in power are unable to handle the problem of Islamic terrorism is because they are operating of policy with the false premise which is that “Islam is benign and harmless religion.
They ignore the fact that “holy book” the Qur’ an ,as it instructs in Surah 47:4 , which instructs “Whenever you encounter the disbelievers strike of their heads until you made great slaughter among them…”
Since in Qu’ ran based Muslim worldview both Christians and Jews are “disbelievers” Therefore, in this month of December both the Europe Christmas market and that Australia Hanukkah festival Muslim terrorists attacks valid targets in the teachings of Islam.
There are also many other passages in the Qur ‘an that instructs devout Muslim to engage in violence and killing of “disbelievers” As in ,for example ,Surah 2:191, 4;89. 5:33 .9:5,123 47:4.