Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

No Politician Should Support Sharia in America

By

But is it a red line for all conservatives?

There are red lines in the conservative movement and over the past few weeks we’ve been having a vigorous debate about what some of those red lines should be. Here’s one red line that’s gone unmentioned. Sharia Islamic law.

Sharia mandates the inferiority of Christians, Jews and other non-Muslims to members of the Muslim master race, it mandates the inferiority of women and eliminates any notion of human freedom.

So is it a red line for all conservatives?

Paul Dans, currently being promoted for the Georgia Senate in a primary race against Sen. Lindsey Graham by Tucker Carlson, previously went on Al Jazeera (of all places) where he was interviewed by Marc Lamont Hill. A former CNN contributor, Hill had been ousted as being too extreme for CNN after he justified the kidnapping and murder of three Israel teens. (That was a while back and today that would be a point in his favor at CNN.)

Dans had been the director of Project 2025, the ill-fated Heritage proposal disavowed by Trump, (which also led to Heritage being sidelined within the Trump administration after Kevin Roberts bragged about it publicly). Project 2025 had good and bad parts to it, but talking about it was a sure way to undermine the Trump administration.

Going on Al Jazeera to talk about it seemed like an even worse idea. Al Jazeera is the state media of Qatar, an Islamic terrorist state accused of developing ties to some on the ‘woke right’, which also sponsors the Muslim Brotherhood. It loves the idea of implementing Sharia law in America.

And so Hill asked Dans about that. Dans was woefully unprepared when Hill asked him if a Muslim candidate wins an election, would he be able to implement Sharia law.

 

Dans could have answered that question by saying that America is based on Judeo-Christian values or (since he doesn’t like Jews, on Christian values) rather than Muslim ones, instead he seemed happy to play into the idea that America could be ‘Islamized’ if it was done ‘democratically’.

Sharia law should be a red line. And yet some of the people who talk about making America more Christian again seem open to the idea of Islamization.

You can’t claim to be making America more Christian, if you’re willing to allow Islam to take over.

This is all the more relevant now since Tucker Carlson, who sat out tough races in New York, New Jersey and Virginia, doing nothing to help conservatives, decided to get involved in the Georgia race to boost Dans. I’m no fan of Sen. Lindsey Graham, who has his own troubling record on Islam, but Tucker’s record is even worse.

And includes defending Sharia law.

Comments

  1. And so it begins: soon enough we will see in the U.S. scum politicians like George Galloway in Britain, who never met a murderous Islamic terrorist he couldn’t admire and bootlick.

  2. There are laws against abuse of children….including mutilation; laws against sexual abuse and rape of children; laws against murder; laws against abuse of a corpse; laws against lying to Congress….and so many more on the Federal books and State books across the country.

    The so-called “law” of islime ( I won’t dignify it with the words muzzies use, nor call it an actual law), has the demands and permissions to make anyone who practices life using those demands and permissions, **lawbreakers**.
    muzzies believe…due to the no-law law…that they can take little babies and young girls and legally rape them, calling it *marriage.*
    muzzies in places where their pretend law is practiced, also make the rape of young boys by adult males, permissible. We know this from reports by U.S. military based in Afghanistan where they heard the screams of the children being raped and were told to mind their own business.

    muzzies find no problem raping the corpses of women, and consider all females who refuse to completely cover up, fair game for rape.
    muzzies consider it permissible to murder family members if they are thought to be in a state of ‘dishonoring’ them.
    Where the so-called islimic ‘law’ is practiced, people are not permitted to criticize the evil book of demonic demands, nor the mass-murdering, child-raping, sex-slave trading, thief and liar, the false ‘prophet’ of islime.
    And no one should forget the muzzie ‘nolaw’ of murdering one who decides he no longer wishes to be a muzzie.
    There are other things, but these are enough to say, that the lawless demands of islime have no place here….or anywhere.

    Anyone with morals, integrity or who puts a value on Life and Freedom of Religion and Speech will realize that islime offers only evil.

  3. I wonder what Bush 43 knows about Sharia to this very day. I suspect not much or, even worse, he does and yet sent many American military personnel into war with the enemy not identified and with no plan for total victory.

    I used to admire Bush 43 and voted for him twice for President. I no longer admire him and regret those votes.

    • I take your points, Wellington–but would Al Gore and John Kerry have been better? With the greatest respect, I think they would have been even worse.

      • I take your points too, graveniamge. But I would argue one could regret voting for someone without it meaning that they had no choice but to vote for “the other guy.”

        • True enough, Wellington. But sometimes this is what we are reduced to, and the “lesser of two evils” is still the better–if only by default. Grim to be in such a position.

  4. Small exception. The penalty phase after conviction for Muslims. After a trial according to US Law and found guilty, the Muslim should have the ability to ask for sharia punishment. SO if found guilty of murder, he can ask for beheading. After theft, he could ask for the cutting off of his hand. After rape he could ask for the cutting off of his…..

    How many Muslims would choose sharia over Western punishment? I think not one. Proving even they hate it.

    • Rick, you are mistaken. A Muslim would not be beheaded for murdering Infidels.

    • Some misunderstanding here, as when a muzzie steals, he can get *forgiveness* from those he victimized if they choose and demand money from him. The same goes for other crimes….muzzies *forgive* in order to benefit.

  5. I’d like to see Sen Lindsay Graham primaried, but a candidate that’s not fully opposed to sharia is not an acceptable replacement

  8. ” America could be ‘Islamized’ if it was done ‘democratically’. ”

    If democracy leads to islamization, then I prefer a smart and patriatic dictaitership political system, like the ruling regime in China, to the stupid, failed and disastrous western democracies.

    • Won’t be necessary. Within this system, if we limit muslim immigration, which we have been doing by limiting all immigration, and deport muslims here illegally, which again we have been doing by targeting all illegals, and deport muslims like those in Columbia bullying Jews, then that alone ensures that a muslim takeover can’t happen here

      We do have to reverse trends like EPIC City, TX, that Houston real estate purchase of a few hundred acres and other such islamic real estate acquisitions all over this country. We should treat it exactly like we treat Chicoms owning agricultural land near military bases

      • If the democrats win the next presidential election, they will surely lift restrictions on legal and illegal immigration. So the immigration policy of the current administration is temporarily, not permanent.

    • The idea that dictatorships never practice dhimmitude is mistaken. China exempted Muslims from the On Child policy, and Russia is building Muslims mega-Mosques and claiming that Islam is a bulwark against the West.

      • Currently, China subjects all muslims – not just Uyghurs, but Hui as well – to genocidal policies. It’s in fact one of two countries that gets it right about how to treat muslims – the other country being Burma. Only fault of Beijing – instead of allowing those muslims to flee to muslim countries (such as, say, Uyghurs to Kazakhstan), they insist on keeping them in China as slave labor, and have extradition treaties w/ most muslim countries on this policy

        On a separate note, I read on Breitbart the other day this story about Russian citizens being uneasy w/ muslims praying just about anywhere, anytime. Sooner or later, Putin will have to handle this

        https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2025/11/11/reports-russians-increasingly-frustrated-muslim-migrants-praying-public

  9. Paul Dans, currently being promoted for the Georgia Senate in a primary race against Sen. Lindsey Graham by Tucker Carlson

    Daniel

    Are we talking Georgia or South Carolina? Sen Lindsay Graham reps SC, so would not be a roadblock to Dans in GA.

  10. No Politician Should Support Sharia in America
    ………………………………………

    Spot on, Mr. Greenfield, This should be a red line for *every* American politician.

  11. No political should support sharia law, why is that even a question. The same is true no politican should support the sale of property and business to foreign countries or investors.

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Skip to content