New in PJ Media:
Leftists all over the country have been making it clear for quite some time: they love violence, and want to see violence done to patriots. There was all the leftist cheering after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, as well as numerous more or less veiled calls from leftist politicians to go after those whom they fear and hate with weapons a good bit more lethal than compelling debate points. Now a Texas state representative, Jolanda Jones (D-Of Course), has added her name to the list of these politicians with a throat-slashing gesture that she made — so afraid is she of Trump’s alleged fascist stormtroopers — not in the privacy of her lavish dwelling, but on CNN.
On the other hand, so few people watch CNN these days outside of airports and dentist’s offices that making the gesture on that leftist propaganda outfit is pretty much like making it in private, but nevertheless, Jones’ gesture is a matter for concern. Fox News reported Thursday that Jones “rejected former first lady Michelle Obama’s famous mantra, ‘when they go low, we go high,’ during a CNN interview Wednesday,” which is fine, because Michelle Obama herself never followed her own dictum, anyway.
Jones fulminated: “If you hit me in my face, I’m not going to punch you back in your face. I’m going to go across your neck,” accompanying her bellicose words by “making a slashing motion across her neck.” Jones added: “We can go back-and-forth, fighting each other’s faces. You’ve got to hit hard enough where they won’t come back.”
This is not the first time that Jones, who is running for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, where she will fit right in with AOC, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley and the rest of the gang, has engaged in such talk: “she told Axios this week that when Republicans go low, ‘I’m going to the gutter.’”
Now, however, Jones wants everyone to calm down. Her office issued a statement downplaying the whole thing: “The interviewer asked about the phrase, ‘When they go low, we go high.’ Representative Jones responded with a simple fighting metaphor — nothing more, nothing less. Anyone attempting to read more into it is mistaken.”
Sure. Yet there are so very many Democrats who have been trafficking in “simple fighting metaphors” these days, ones that can all too easily be mistaken for open calls for violence. In the overheated atmosphere following the murder of Charlie Kirk, it might be wise for leftists to reconsider their use of “simple fighting metaphors” — if, that is, they really don’t want to see violence done against patriots.
There is more. Read the rest here.
Eva says
Looking at her, I’d say the gutter is where she’s from, so there’s no problem for her there.
It’s just a pity these ‘people’ can’t evolve beyond their natural inclinations.
Nienie says
Yes, looking at that photo:
bare shoulders, arms,& cleavage, No head covering hair and face.
I am certain that she would be given a “make-over” in the
East Plano (TX) i slam (ICK !) Center city.
40 rounds says
Listen to black women we are told all the time. Supposedly they have special insights that no one else have and wisdom gained from years spent at waffle house or from dealing with security personnel at Walmart. Could the fake lashes be any longer?
Mike says
You can listen, but it’s unlikely you’ll understand a single word. Wear a mask to avoid getting spittle on your skin.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I think people on the Right now – the firearm owning ones – should now either conceal carry where legal, or open carry where legal. And whenever they encounter Leftists making those sweet remarks about bullets through necks (like a broad made to a TPUSA official in Arizona a few days ago), just show them that and ask whether they’re interested in a duel. You’ll be amazed at how quickly they chicken out
I know there were polls done weeks ago that found out that 1/3 of Dems are okay w/ violence. You know what – w/ them, I’m okay w/ violence too: never believed in the Marquis of Queensbury rules. Obviously, peaceful Dems/Libs, have decent, respectful debate like Charlie used to have, but absolutely do not go the Gandhian route. When you encounter thugs, give them a taste of their own meds (obviously w/o killing them): they’ll think 50 times before advocating violence in future, knowing that they’d lose such face-offs
OLD GUY says
I respect all races and religions based on the individual. If you show me respect I’ll show you respect. If you attempt to attack me I’am prepared and will respond appropriately. I’m I looking for trouble? NO,
I’ll wave say hello, help and be courteous to everyone until they prove they don’t deserve it.
RESPECT, is the key to getting along and success.
somehistory says
This idiot, tough-talker, will reject any idea that she has a part in causing any of the public to take that kind of action.
According to a report on the news feed today, an elderly White guy slashed the throat of a little girl (parents and lawyers are muzzie) in MI about a year ago.
The perp was evaluated to see if he was a mental case, and the doctors decided he could stand trial. He has not been proven guilty as yet, but the muzzie lawyers have filed a $50 million lawsuit and they only “allege” that the child held her throat as she ran home. They have decided the guy is guilty before a trial.
The “complaint” is a doozy.
So, someone is taking action….slicing throats…of the people with whom they disagree. Just not likely the throats which this idiot politician would slice.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/michigan-7-year-old-s-heartbreaking-words-after-stranger-slashed-her-throat-at-park/ar-AA1PaYgY?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=68fcedfeb45e49f388df63bf9ae58ef7&ei=6
gravenimage says
They Just Can’t Help It: Now a Dem Makes a Throat-Slashing Gesture
……………………………………………………..
Bloody thug.